RE: Which X server
OK, being a brave (or is that stupid?) soul, I tried to compile it, but it has me totally stumped. After doing 'make World' I get this... ** cd ./config/imake && make -f Makefile.proto all make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/xfree/xc/config/imake' gcc -O -ansi -pedantic -I../../include -I../../exports/include/X11 -I../.. -I../../exports/include -Dlinux LinuxMachineDefines -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500L -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DCPP_PROGRAM="\"/lib/cpp\"" -c -o imake.o imake.c gcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations ** I cannot figure out what is wrong here. Not sure if it is the compiler, the makefiles or something else. If there is a simple fix to this, please let me know and I will try again, otherwise I will just wait. Cheers Michael Anthon > -Original Message- > From: Ben Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 9 May 2000 6:55 PM > To: Michael Anthon > Cc: 'debian-sparc@lists.debian.org' > Subject: Re: Which X server > > > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:20:25PM +1000, Michael Anthon wrote: > > That is definitely the one (get a little piccie with an > eagle looking thing > > at bootup). > > > > Thanks for the info, will dload the latest 3.3 and see if I > can compile it > > Branden is working on a new upload of X server packages for SPARC that > incorporates Jakub's latest patches. If you can't get it compiled > yourself, hang tight till the new packages are installed. > > Ben > > -- > > ---===-=-==-=---=- > ---=-=-- > / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- > Debian GNU/Linux \ > ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' > > `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==--- > =--=---' >
Re: SPARC Cpu?
Marc O. Gloor schrieb: > Next I install slink but I'm confusing about the CPU inside > my SPARC, it's no TurboSparc 170Mhz - just a microSPARC II. > Is there a big difference between these processors? Can't > find more informations about this CPU type from the SUN website. Maybe www.sunhelp.org has the information you are looking for. -- Hendrik Seffler * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://home.pages.de/~seffler/
Re: SPARC Cpu?
Sorry- try this- #cat /proc/cpuinfo Tad "Marc O. Gloor" wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 07:22:30PM -0400, Tad Bilby wrote: > > With Solaris running- > > #prtconf -vp > > Thanks but since an hour, there is Linux (slink) installed on > my SPARC. *This* port is absolutely cool! > > -- > Marc O. Gloor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kuoni Travel Ltd., Neue Hard 7, 8010 Zuerich > Headoffice Information Technology Division > Unix System Engineer (Enterprise Management) > Private Website: http://www.unilec.org/mgloor > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tad Bilby Rave Computer Assoc. 800-966-7283
Re: SPARC Cpu?
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 10:43:15PM +0200, Marc O. Gloor wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 07:22:30PM -0400, Tad Bilby wrote: > > With Solaris running- > > #prtconf -vp > > Thanks but since an hour, there is Linux (slink) installed on > my SPARC. *This* port is absolutely cool! Linux has prtconf too BTW :) Glad the install went well for you. First time you get a chance, you will want to upgrade to potato (soon to be released) since it is much more stable. You can do this via network, or wait till CD's are available. Ben -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
Re: SPARC Cpu?
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 07:22:30PM -0400, Tad Bilby wrote: > With Solaris running- > #prtconf -vp Thanks but since an hour, there is Linux (slink) installed on my SPARC. *This* port is absolutely cool! -- Marc O. Gloor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kuoni Travel Ltd., Neue Hard 7, 8010 Zuerich Headoffice Information Technology Division Unix System Engineer (Enterprise Management) Private Website: http://www.unilec.org/mgloor
Re: SPARC Cpu?
With Solaris running- #prtconf -vp Tad "Marc O. Gloor" wrote: > Hi all > > I'm happy to meet you all. I subscribed to this list because I > have now my first Sun SPARC at home (what a feeling!). :) > > At work I use AIX and a lot of RS/6000 (I'm a SUN newbie). > Next I install slink but I'm confusing about the CPU inside > my SPARC, it's no TurboSparc 170Mhz - just a microSPARC II. > Is there a big difference between these processors? Can't > find more informations about this CPU type from the SUN website. > > Thanks > Marc > > -- > Marc O. Gloor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Kuoni Travel Ltd., Neue Hard 7, 8010 Zuerich > Headoffice Information Technology Division > Unix System Engineer (Enterprise Management) > Private Website: http://www.unilec.org/mgloor > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tad Bilby Rave Computer Assoc. 800-966-7283
Re: New bootdisks available
> Here's a snapshot of the latest 2.2.13 bootdisks, complete with fixes for: > > - tftp images being really broken > - drivers.tgz missing > - ethtool is now included in the root disk > - mkswap fixes > - updated 2.2.15 kernels with fixes from Dave Miller > > Let me know how this goes. Hi Ben, I just tried to install Potato on both an IPX and a Sparc10 using the latest bootdisks, with mixed results. For the most part, everything went fine on the IPX. The only problems I saw were that a few of the kernel modules in the misc section have unresolved dependencies, which generates a half-screenful of annoying messages when depmod runs at start-up. Here's a copy of the output: Calculating module dependencies... depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/module s/2.2.15/misc/b1dma.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.15/misc/b1pci.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.15/misc/c4.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.15/misc/eicon.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.15/misc/hisax.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.15/misc/icn.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.15/misc/sc.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.15/misc/t1isa.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.15/misc/t1pci.o done. Other than that, the IPX is now a fully functioning Debian system. Yeah! I wasn't as lucky with the Sparc10, though. It looks like I'm running into the same problems that Jonas Oberg pointed out on the list, late last month, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. While booting the kernel, no matter if I'm using a rescue disk or the TFTP image, it doesn't seem to be able to find a /proc file system. Here's a captured screen session, while booting from a serial cable using the TFTP image: SPARCstation 10 (1 X 390Z50), No Keyboard ROM Rev. 2.9, 48 MB memory installed, Serial #6318266. Ethernet address 8:0:20:12:47:2d, Host ID: 726068ba. Testing Memory Type help for more information ok ok boot net Initializing Memory Timeout waiting for ARP/RARP packet TILO PROMLIB: obio_ranges 5 Booting Linux... PROMLIB: Sun Boot Prom Version 3 Revision 2 Linux version 2.2.15 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.2 2313 (Debian GNU/Linux)) #1 Wed May 3 17:49:21 EDT 2000 ARCH: SUN4M TYPE: Sun4m SparcStation10/20 Ethernet address: 8:0:20:12:47:2d Boot time fixup v1.6. 4/Mar/98 Jakub Jelinek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Patching kernel for srmmu[TI Viking]/iommu [0]: v[f000,f100](100) p[] [1]: v[f400,f500](100) p[0400] [2]: v[f800,f8f5d000](f5d000) p[0800] SRMMU: Compact physical memory. Using strightforward VA<->PA translations. Found CPU 0 Found 1 CPU prom device tree node(s). Power off control detected. Calibrating delay loop... 35.94 BogoMIPS Memory: 43400k available (1260k kernel code, 3680k data, 160k init) [f000,f900] Dentry hash table entries: 8192 (order 4, 64k) Buffer cache hash table entries: 262144 (order 8, 1024k) Page cache hash table entries: 65536 (order 6, 256k) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX IOMMU: impl 0 vers 1 page table at f058 of size 262144 bytes sbus0: Clock 18.0 MHz dma0: Revision 2 dma1: Revision 2 Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0. NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP TCP: Hash tables configured (ehash 65536 bhash 65536) Linux IP multicast router 0.06 plus PIM-SM Starting kswapd v 1.5 Sparc Zilog8530 serial driver version 1.41.2.6 tty00 at 0xffede004 (irq = 44) is a Zilog8530 tty01 at 0xffede000 (irq = 44) is a Zilog8530 tty02 at 0xffedb004 (irq = 44) is a Zilog8530 tty03 at 0xffedb000 (irq = 44) is a Zilog8530 keyboard: not present Console: ttyS0 (Zilog8530) pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured Sun Mouse-Systems mouse driver version 1.00 RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size loop: registered device at major 7 Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077 md driver 0.36.6 MAX_MD_DEV=4, MAX_REAL=8 esp0: IRQ 36 SCSI ID 7 Clk 40MHz CCF=8 TOut 167 NCR53C9XF(espfast) ESP: Total of 1 ESP hosts found, 1 actually in use. scsi0 : Sparc ESP100A-FAST scsi : 1 host. Vendor: SEAGATE Model: ST11200N Rev: 9300 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Detected scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 3, lun 0 scsi : detected 1 SCSI disk total. esp0: target 3 [period 100ns offset 15 10.00MHz FAST SCSI-II] SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 2059140 [1005 MB] [1.0 GB] sunlance.c:v1.12 11/Mar/99 Miguel de Icaza ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: kernel-image 2.2.15 sun4cdm and devpts support?
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 08:20:43AM -0500, Mike Renfro wrote: > Some time ago, I successfully dist-upgraded a Sparc Classic to potato > using the 2.2.14 kernel image. Upon attempting another dist-upgrade > today, my SS1 refuses to let me log in remotely, apparently due to a > pts issue. > > $ ssh garibaldi -l root "ls k*.deb" > [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: > kernel-image-2.2.15-sun4cdm_2.2.15-0.19.4.deb > $ ssh garibaldi -l root > [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: > Warning: Remote host failed or refused to allocate a pseudo tty. > > So what's the fix? Thanks. ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/init.d/devpts.sh This should execute that script and create the correct setup for devpts. -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
kernel-image 2.2.15 sun4cdm and devpts support?
Some time ago, I successfully dist-upgraded a Sparc Classic to potato using the 2.2.14 kernel image. Upon attempting another dist-upgrade today, my SS1 refuses to let me log in remotely, apparently due to a pts issue. $ ssh garibaldi -l root "ls k*.deb" [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: kernel-image-2.2.15-sun4cdm_2.2.15-0.19.4.deb $ ssh garibaldi -l root [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: Warning: Remote host failed or refused to allocate a pseudo tty. So what's the fix? Thanks. -- Mike Renfro / Instructor, Basic Engineering Program 931 372-3601 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPARC Cpu?
Hi all I'm happy to meet you all. I subscribed to this list because I have now my first Sun SPARC at home (what a feeling!). :) At work I use AIX and a lot of RS/6000 (I'm a SUN newbie). Next I install slink but I'm confusing about the CPU inside my SPARC, it's no TurboSparc 170Mhz - just a microSPARC II. Is there a big difference between these processors? Can't find more informations about this CPU type from the SUN website. Thanks Marc -- Marc O. Gloor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kuoni Travel Ltd., Neue Hard 7, 8010 Zuerich Headoffice Information Technology Division Unix System Engineer (Enterprise Management) Private Website: http://www.unilec.org/mgloor
esp0: Gross error sreg=51
I keep noticing this error on boot up. esp0: Gross error sreg=51 I suspect it is not a good thing, but I don't know what it means. The system seems to be working anyhow. Is this something I can/should fix. Does it have to do with the kernel? hardware? whatever?? -- Josh Kuperman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Probably more info than anyone wants to look at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log$ more dmesg PROMLIB: Sun Boot Prom Version 3 Revision 2 Linux version 2.2.15 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.2 2313 (Debian GNU/Linux )) #1 SMP Sun Apr 30 00:05:15 EDT 2000 ARCH: SUN4M TYPE: Sun4m SparcStation10/20 Ethernet address: 8:0:20:12:7c:70 Boot time fixup v1.6. 4/Mar/98 Jakub Jelinek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Patching kerne l for srmmu[TI Viking/MXCC]/iommu [0]: v[f000,fd00](d00) p[] [1]: v[dd00,eff4f000](12f4f000) p[0d00] Found CPU 0 Found CPU 1 Found 2 CPU prom device tree node(s). Power off control detected. Console: colour dummy device 80x25 Calibrating delay loop... 49.87 BogoMIPS Memory: 514568k available (1332k kernel code, 7516k data, 164k init) [dd00,f d00] Dentry hash table entries: 65536 (order 7, 512k) Buffer cache hash table entries: 262144 (order 8, 1024k) Page cache hash table entries: 65536 (order 6, 256k) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Entering SMP Mode... Starting CPU 1 at f0193d44 Calibrating delay loop... 49.97 BogoMIPS Total of 2 Processors activated (99.84 BogoMIPS). IOMMU: impl 0 vers 3 page table at fcf0 of size 1048576 bytes sbus0: Clock 20.0 MHz dma0: Revision 2 dma1: Revision 2 Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0. NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP TCP: Hash tables configured (ehash 524288 bhash 65536) Linux IP multicast router 0.06 plus PIM-SM Starting kswapd v 1.5 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x54 fb0: cgsix at e.2000 TEC Rev 3 CPU 68020 Rev 8 [GX] Sparc Zilog8530 serial driver version 1.41.2.5 tty00 at 0xffede004 (irq = 44) is a Zilog8530 tty01 at 0xffede000 (irq = 44) is a Zilog8530 tty02 at 0xffedb004 (irq = 44) is a Zilog8530 tty03 at 0xffedb000 (irq = 44) is a Zilog8530 Sun TYPE 5 keyboard detected without keyclick pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured Sun Mouse-Systems mouse driver version 1.00 RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size loop: registered device at major 7 Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077 md driver 0.36.6 MAX_MD_DEV=4, MAX_REAL=8 esp0: IRQ 36 SCSI ID 7 Clk 40MHz CCF=8 TOut 167 NCR53C9XF(espfast) ESP: Total of 1 ESP hosts found, 1 actually in use. scsi0 : Sparc ESP100A-FAST scsi : 1 host. Vendor: SEAGATE Model: ST39216N Rev: 0004 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03 Detected scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 scsi : detected 1 SCSI disk total. esp0: target 0 [period 100ns offset 15 10.00MHz FAST SCSI-II] SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 17942584 [8761 MB] [8.8 GB] sunlance.c:v1.12 11/Mar/99 Miguel de Icaza ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) eth0: LANCE 08:00:20:12:7c:70 eth0: using auto-carrier-detection. eth0: Carrier Lost, trying TPE IP-Config: Incomplete network configuration information. Partition check: Partition check: sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 sda5 sda6 sda7 VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. esp0: Gross error sreg=51 esp0: Gross error sreg=51 esp0: Gross error sreg=51 Adding Swap: 1023816k swap-space (priority -1) esp0: Gross error sreg=51 esp0: Gross error sreg=51 esp0: Gross error sreg=53 esp0: Gross error sreg=53 esp0: Gross error sreg=53 esp0: Gross error sreg=51 etc filling the rest of the dmesg file.
Re: Any experience with Compaq cxx?
On Tue, 9 May 2000, David van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi, > > I've tried to install compaq's cxx compiler (6.3.6.10) as an > alternative for g++, because i need speed in runtime. > > I used cxx-6.3.6.10-12.alpha.rpm from Compaq's website, `alien'd it, > and `dpkg --install'd it. Fine. Hand-edited comp.config. > > Problem is that Compaq's loader wants `--style compaq' option, but > Debian's binutils 2.9.5.0.31 does not support that. > > Compaq delivers their own patch to binutils, they versioned it > 2.9.1.0.23 (for redhat 6.1), but i don't want to spoil > Debian's structure (compete with their binutils). > > Any ideas/experience in this field? Please update your binutils to the latest in frozen (2.9.5.0.37-1). It fixes this condition (demangler is table-driven). Thanks :-) C (who happens to be the binutils maintainer)
Any experience with Compaq cxx?
Hi, I've tried to install compaq's cxx compiler (6.3.6.10) as an alternative for g++, because i need speed in runtime. I used cxx-6.3.6.10-12.alpha.rpm from Compaq's website, `alien'd it, and `dpkg --install'd it. Fine. Hand-edited comp.config. Problem is that Compaq's loader wants `--style compaq' option, but Debian's binutils 2.9.5.0.31 does not support that. Compaq delivers their own patch to binutils, they versioned it 2.9.1.0.23 (for redhat 6.1), but i don't want to spoil Debian's structure (compete with their binutils). Any ideas/experience in this field? ---david
Re: Which X server
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:20:25PM +1000, Michael Anthon wrote: > That is definitely the one (get a little piccie with an eagle looking thing > at bootup). > > Thanks for the info, will dload the latest 3.3 and see if I can compile it Branden is working on a new upload of X server packages for SPARC that incorporates Jakub's latest patches. If you can't get it compiled yourself, hang tight till the new packages are installed. Ben -- ---===-=-==-=---==-=-- / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
RE: Which X server
That is definitely the one (get a little piccie with an eagle looking thing at bootup). Thanks for the info, will dload the latest 3.3 and see if I can compile it Cheers Michael Anthon > > That's Raptor 3DLabs card. I wrote support for it sometime > around November > last year, the patches are in the Red Hat XFree86 3.3.[56] > rpms, I have no > idea whether Debian picked that up or not. > The X server you need is XF86_3DLabs (unless you go XF4.0, > which is not finished > for SPARC yet though and works only on a few (read 2 at the > moment) cards).
Re: Which X server
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 03:54:19PM +1000, Michael Anthon wrote: > I am suspecting that the answer to this may be "You a SOL dude", but can > anyone tell me the correct xserver package to be using with this display > device? Came standard on this E250 and I just can't seem to get anything to > work with it That's Raptor 3DLabs card. I wrote support for it sometime around November last year, the patches are in the Red Hat XFree86 3.3.[56] rpms, I have no idea whether Debian picked that up or not. The X server you need is XF86_3DLabs (unless you go XF4.0, which is not finished for SPARC yet though and works only on a few (read 2 at the moment) cards). > > Bus 0, device 5, function 0: > Display controller: 3Dlabs Unknown device (rev 1). > Vendor id=3d3d. Device id=9. > Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. IRQ 6567552. Master > Capable. Latency=64. Min Gnt=192.Max Lat=192. > Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf9ff8002 > [0xf9ff8002]. > Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf9ff8080 > [0xf9ff8080]. > Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf9ff8100 > [0xf9ff8100]. Jakub
Which X server
I am suspecting that the answer to this may be "You a SOL dude", but can anyone tell me the correct xserver package to be using with this display device? Came standard on this E250 and I just can't seem to get anything to work with it Bus 0, device 5, function 0: Display controller: 3Dlabs Unknown device (rev 1). Vendor id=3d3d. Device id=9. Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. IRQ 6567552. Master Capable. Latency=64. Min Gnt=192.Max Lat=192. Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf9ff8002 [0xf9ff8002]. Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf9ff8080 [0xf9ff8080]. Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf9ff8100 [0xf9ff8100]. Cheers Michael Anthon
