Linux 2.2.17 on SPARC & AX25/BPQ

2000-10-20 Thread iain
Hello Everyone,

Ive cross posted this message to debian-hams, and debian-sparc,
, as it involves both, so my apologies if this is off topic for 
you.

(In replies, please only send to the list that you are subscribed
to, or me directly, in an attempt to reduce the amount of cross
pollution)

Anyway, I have potato installed, currently running, and was 
about to recompile my kernel (2.2.17) with AX25 and BGP support.

However, I note that there is no BPQ option in make xconfig, and
after a little digging, I find that it is in the i386 architecture
source tree, but not the SPARC.

My question is simple (and I know strictly speaking this is 
could be considered slightly off-topic for both lists, sorry), 
but:

Does BPQ (AX-25 over ethernet) work on Debian-SPARC ? Is it
just someone has done a merge of two trees, and the config 
stuff got lost ? Or does BPQ rely on something on the i386
architecture ? Or am I missing something totally obvious ?

I have tried both the stock kernel, and added Mattias's (DG2FEF)
patch [from DG1KJD's home page], and found BPQ missing in the
kernel config stuff both times.

Personally, I see no reason why BPQ shouldn't work, after all
ethernet frames are ethernet frames, but maybe the BPQ driver
doesnt talk to the Sun Lance driver ?

(After all, under intel architecture, how can it know what
particular Net Card it is talking to ?)

Anyway, any help, or advice will be gratefully received and
apologies to anyone on both lists who finds this off topic


Best Regards

Iain(G7III)


PS: Althought I am (supposidly) on both lists, please CC
[EMAIL PROTECTED], in order to ensure I actually
receive your reply [Don't ask, else Ill start the ISP/MTA
/Whatever broke this time rant...]



Re: multiple copies of mpicc

2000-10-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 07:30:06AM -0700, Shandar Ahmad wrote:
> I installed mpich using the debian package on my new
> debian SPARC cluster. It makes three copies of mpicc

This sort of thing isn't really Sparc-specific - you'd probably get a
better response by asking a list like debian-beowulf or the package
maintainer (if things are breaking you should probably file a bug
report).

> /usr/bin/mpicc
> /etc/alternatives/mpicc
> /lib/mpich/build/LINUX/ch_4/bin/mpicc
> and /lib/mpich/bin/mpicc

> (This is also true for other mpi directives e.g.
> mpirun).

> Can one tell me what are these four copies meant for
> and how to make a better install.

That looks roughly like what it did when I used to maintain MPICH
(assuming the /lib directories are really under /usr/lib) but this may
not be the case.  Anyway:

If you look you'll probably find that all those copies are the same
thing symbolically linked.  The files in /usr/lib/mpich are there
because that's where the MPICH upstream source wants to put them (both 
copies).  /usr/bin/mpicc is there because that's where users expect to
find their executables.  Since there are multiple MPI implementations 
in Debian, each of which can provide things like mpirun, mpicc and mpif77
these things in /usr/bin are managed using the alternatives system,
which symlinks from /usr/bin into /etc/alternatives which symlinks to
the real binary.

-- 
Mark Brown  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFShttp://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/filmsoc/


pgpD9m7krNown.pgp
Description: PGP signature


multiple copies of mpicc

2000-10-20 Thread Shandar Ahmad
I installed mpich using the debian package on my new
debian SPARC cluster. It makes three copies of mpicc
and similar files. This causes lot of problem in
installing certain parallel program and hangs some of
them. The copies are 

/usr/bin/mpicc
/etc/alternatives/mpicc
/lib/mpich/build/LINUX/ch_4/bin/mpicc
and /lib/mpich/bin/mpicc

(This is also true for other mpi directives e.g.
mpirun).

Can one tell me what are these four copies meant for
and how to make a better install.

Shandar

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf!  It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/



Re: sparc vs apollo

2000-10-20 Thread Tibor Simko
Hello

> Does anyone here know how a HP Apollo Model 715 compares with a
> Sparc.  For instance is a Apollo 715 similar in terms of cpu
> horsepower to a sparc lx, sparc 4, sparc 5, etc?

SPEC http://www.spec.org/> is your friend, e.g:

  model  SPECint95   SPECfp95
  -- -   
  HP 9000 Series 700 Model 715/100 2.89 3.47
  Sun SPARCstation 5 model 170 3.53 3.00 
  Sun Ultra 5 model 2709.1710.6
  ...

cheers
-- 
TS