XF86_3DLabs and/or XF86_FBDev (3.3.6) on AXi w/PGX32

2000-11-15 Thread David Butts
Hello, all-

I am not subscribed to debian-user, so please cc me on any responses
you send to that list (I know I should be, but I've been less than
entirely diligent about keeping up with debian-sparc, debian-alpha
and the like).

The broadest question I have is where documentation for XFree on
Sparc can be found.  AFAICT, it's a fairly recent development
(although I would assume that FBDev has been working for some
time).  If there's an FM to be read, please point me at it, and
I'll keep myself occupied for a while.

I have installed Potato on a Concorde UMax/10 (Basically an Ultra/10
but with SCSI instead of IDE), which is running a PGX32 (Permedia2).
There is no video card on the motherboard, so the PGX32 is the only
framebuffer in the system.

# cat /proc/openprom/banner-name

'SPARCengine(tm)Ultra(tm) AXi (UltraSPARC-IIi 440MHz)'

I've installed xserver-3dlabs and xserver-fbdev, but can't seem to
get either of them to behave.

XF86_3DLabs claims not to find any GLINT/PERMEDIA cards on startup,
and the closest I was able to find poking through list archives was
a thread about problems with XF4 probing multiple PCI busses to
find video cards on Alphas.  FWIW, the video card, in its current
location, is on PCI bus 1.  I tried moving it to another slot, and
it ended up on bus 128.  Rather than flailing around with that for
too long, I figured I'd solicit an expert opinion or two first.

I then tried to get XF86_FBDev (which has come to my rescue on a
great many occasions... slow, but dependable) to work, but was
unable to come up with an appropriate set of modelines.  Sadly,
xf86config has worked so well for me in the past that I have not
really learned how to make my own XF86Config file from scratch.
I tried using the output from fbset -x to create a usable modeline
for the framebuffer (which is running 1280x1024x60 ATM.  In a
perfect world I'd get that up to 1280x1024x76, but am less picky
for now), but XF86_FBDev continues to claim not to have found any
valid modelines.  Also, for whatever reason, multiple -verbose
on the command line don't seem to be getting me any more detail.

Is the most reasonable thing to do to try an upgrade to XF4?  It
seems like there's a great deal more traffic re: XF4 on sparc
that there is about 3.3.6.

Having written that all out, I get the sneaking suspicion that I
should be sending this to a newbie list of some type, but I'm
still too proud...

I've included some details below.  If any others would be useful
(kernel config, XF86Config snippets, etc) please let me know.

Thanks,
David Butts
Unix Systems Administrator
Storability, Inc.

# cat /proc/fb
0 Permedia2

# fbset -x

Mode 1280x1024
# D: 107.991 MHz, H: 63.976 kHz, V: 60.015 Hz
DotClock 107.992
HTimings 1280 1328 1440 1688
VTimings 1024 1025 1028 1066
Flags+HSync +VSync
EndMode

# cat /proc/pci
PCI devices found:
  Bus  0, device   0, function  0:
Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Ultra IIi PCI (rev 0).
  Medium devsel.  Fast back-to-back capable.  Master Capable.  Latency=40.  
  Bus  0, device   1, function  0:
PCI bridge: Sun Microsystems Advanced PCI Bridge (rev 19).
  Medium devsel.  Fast back-to-back capable.  Master Capable.  Latency=40.  
Min Gnt=2.
  Bus  0, device   1, function  1:
PCI bridge: Sun Microsystems Advanced PCI Bridge (rev 19).
  Medium devsel.  Fast back-to-back capable.  Master Capable.  Latency=40.  
Min Gnt=2.
  Bus 128, device   1, function  0:
SCSI storage controller: NCR 53c875 (rev 20).
  Medium devsel.  IRQ 6312128.  Master Capable.  Latency=80.  Min 
Gnt=17.Max Lat=64.
  I/O at 0xf9fe02000400 [0xf9fe02000401].
  Non-prefetchable 20 bit memory at 0xf9ff2000 [0xf9ff2002].
  Non-prefetchable 20 bit memory at 0xf9ff4000 [0xf9ff4002].
  Bus 128, device   1, function  1:
SCSI storage controller: NCR 53c875 (rev 20).
  Medium devsel.  IRQ 6312128.  Master Capable.  Latency=80.  Min 
Gnt=17.Max Lat=64.
  I/O at 0xf9fe02000800 [0xf9fe02000801].
  Non-prefetchable 20 bit memory at 0xf9ff6000 [0xf9ff6002].
  Non-prefetchable 20 bit memory at 0xf9ff8000 [0xf9ff8002].
  Bus  1, device   1, function  0:
Bridge: Sun Microsystems PCI-EBus Bridge (rev 1).
  Medium devsel.  Fast back-to-back capable.  Master Capable.  Latency=64.  
Min Gnt=10.Max Lat=25.
  Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf9fff000 [0xf9fff000].
  Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf9fff100 [0xf9fff100].
  Bus  1, device   1, function  1:
Ethernet controller: Sun Microsystems Happy Meal Ethernet (rev 1).
  Medium devsel.  Fast back-to-back capable.  IRQ 6312160.  Master Capable. 
 Latency=64.  Min Gnt=10.Max Lat=5.
  Non-prefetchable 20 bit memory at 0xf9ff40008000 [0xf9ff40008002].
  Bus  1, device   2, function  0:
Display controller: Texas Instruments TVP4020 Permedia 2 (rev 17).
  Medium 

Re: dependency problem

2000-11-15 Thread Steffan Baron
 
 after updating the list of available packages I have encountered
 the following dependency problem:
 
 dpkg pre-depends on libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
 libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 does not appear to be available
 
 and in fact I didn't find that package.
 
 I'm running potato with the following source list:
 
 deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib
 deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib
 deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free
 deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates

It's being fixed now. 1.6.15.1 will be installed today.

Now I am running into another prob .

After updating I have an unmet dependency regarding modutils
which depends ob libc6 = 2.1.94. But there is no such version
of libc6 ?!?!

cheers,
Steffan


---
I am the ILOVEGNU signature virus. Just copy me to your signature.
This email was infected under the terms of the GNU General Public License.



Re: dependency problem

2000-11-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:21:21PM +0100, Steffan Baron wrote:
  
  after updating the list of available packages I have encountered
  the following dependency problem:
  
  dpkg pre-depends on libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 does not appear to be available
  
  and in fact I didn't find that package.
  
  I'm running potato with the following source list:
  
  deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib
  deb-src ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ potato main non-free contrib
  deb http://security.debian.org/ potato/updates main contrib non-free
  deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian dists/proposed-updates
 
 It's being fixed now. 1.6.15.1 will be installed today.
 
 Now I am running into another prob .
 
 After updating I have an unmet dependency regarding modutils
 which depends ob libc6 = 2.1.94. But there is no such version
 of libc6 ?!?!

Wait for 1.6.15.2

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: dependency problem

2000-11-15 Thread Steffan Baron
 
 Now I am running into another prob .
 
 After updating I have an unmet dependency regarding modutils
 which depends ob libc6 = 2.1.94. But there is no such version
 of libc6 ?!?!

Wait for 1.6.15.2

Mmh, I'm running 1.6.15.2 .

Steffan


---
I am the ILOVEGNU signature virus. Just copy me to your signature.
This email was infected under the terms of the GNU General Public License.



Re: dependency problem

2000-11-15 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 03:02:07PM +0100, Steffan Baron wrote:
  
  Now I am running into another prob .
  
  After updating I have an unmet dependency regarding modutils
  which depends ob libc6 = 2.1.94. But there is no such version
  of libc6 ?!?!
 
 Wait for 1.6.15.2
 
 Mmh, I'm running 1.6.15.2 .

DOH, you mean modutils! :) Let me see if I can fix that.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Is 'i' or 'I' a bug on cdrom's?

2000-11-15 Thread Jeremy Rashbrooke
 Howdi,

 Quick question on the cd distro -- after doing a 'boot cdrom',
 you get the menu saying [ S - SCSI ] [ I - IDE ] etc.  I must have
 been having a bad day the other week, cos after fiddling with
 capital-I and other boot: variations, I eventually stumbled on
 lower-case i.  I was kinda happy when another non-Debian-Sparc
 unix dude here went thru the same confusion.   (It's also the only
 time I've seen the boot: prompt in a 'raw' configuration, too.)

 Is it a bug?  If so, which package name should I file it against?

 Jedd.