Re: NCPFS, anyone?
From: "IvanK." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:12:10 -0400 I've compiled many times 2.4.19 with 3.1 cross-compiled for sparc64-linux and so far had had no problem (except not being able to compile framebuffer support). Should I continue using it (if it ain't broke, don't fix it) or should I compile egcs64? If it doesn't break for you, that's great. Keep using it :-)
Re: searching access to a sparc sid box ...
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:18:58PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > Yes, i did see it in the database today. Thanks. > > > > > > > > BTW, are you the buildd maintainer ? if yes, you could sign the ocaml > > > > sparc built from september 24, so it get uploaded without me having to > > > > rebuild the packages ? > > > > > > Nope, that would be James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or Ryan > > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). > > > > Ok, no problem, i am building the package by hand right now, and will > > upload it. > > Err, please don't. All your doing is fighting the buildd for vore's > CPU and IO. The machine's only been back 24 hours or so and is still > catching up on the backlog, please just be patient and give it a > chance. Ok, no problem. i just stopped the build. I was not aware that vore hosted the sparc buildd, but it makes sense, i should have thought of it. Sorry about the inconvenience, i just wanted to create too much problems, i suppose i did it wrong. Friendly, Sven Luther
Re: searching access to a sparc sid box ...
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > Yes, i did see it in the database today. Thanks. > > > > > > BTW, are you the buildd maintainer ? if yes, you could sign the ocaml > > > sparc built from september 24, so it get uploaded without me having to > > > rebuild the packages ? > > > > Nope, that would be James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or Ryan > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). > > Ok, no problem, i am building the package by hand right now, and will > upload it. Err, please don't. All your doing is fighting the buildd for vore's CPU and IO. The machine's only been back 24 hours or so and is still catching up on the backlog, please just be patient and give it a chance. -- James
Re: searching access to a sparc sid box ...
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > Yes, i did see it in the database today. Thanks. > > > > BTW, are you the buildd maintainer ? if yes, you could sign the ocaml > > sparc built from september 24, so it get uploaded without me having to > > rebuild the packages ? > > Nope, that would be James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or Ryan > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Ok, no problem, i am building the package by hand right now, and will upload it. Friendly, Sven Luther
Re: searching access to a sparc sid box ...
> Yes, i did see it in the database today. Thanks. > > BTW, are you the buildd maintainer ? if yes, you could sign the ocaml > sparc built from september 24, so it get uploaded without me having to > rebuild the packages ? Nope, that would be James ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or Ryan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
Re: searching access to a sparc sid box ...
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:12:43AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:19:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:35:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > Hello, ... > > > > > > > > I wanted to build the ocaml package for sparc, since it is the only > > > > thing stopping ocaml 3.06 (and a load of other packages depending on it) > > > > from entering testing. > > > > > > > > The package was built by the sparc buildd on september 24, but not > > > > uploaded, so i guess (from a response from debian-ia64, which had the > > > > same problem) that the buildd maintainer did not have time to sign it. > > > > > > > > So i said, ok, i will upload them myself, i did this for ia64 on > > > > merullo, but there was no sparc box running sid available to developpers > > > > (well, the pages i found listing debian machines from the developper > > > > corner lists 3 sparc boxes, but 2 being broken and the lats one having > > > > only woody auric). > > > > > > Login to vore.debian.org and read the motd. > > > > Ok, thanks, i will. > > > > (But then vore was listed as having a dead powersupply on > > http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi yesterday). > > Oh, didn't know that. It's alive as of yesterday. Yes, i did see it in the database today. Thanks. BTW, are you the buildd maintainer ? if yes, you could sign the ocaml sparc built from september 24, so it get uploaded without me having to rebuild the packages ? Friendly, Sven Luther
Re: searching access to a sparc sid box ...
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:19:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:35:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > Hello, ... > > > > > > I wanted to build the ocaml package for sparc, since it is the only > > > thing stopping ocaml 3.06 (and a load of other packages depending on it) > > > from entering testing. > > > > > > The package was built by the sparc buildd on september 24, but not > > > uploaded, so i guess (from a response from debian-ia64, which had the > > > same problem) that the buildd maintainer did not have time to sign it. > > > > > > So i said, ok, i will upload them myself, i did this for ia64 on > > > merullo, but there was no sparc box running sid available to developpers > > > (well, the pages i found listing debian machines from the developper > > > corner lists 3 sparc boxes, but 2 being broken and the lats one having > > > only woody auric). > > > > Login to vore.debian.org and read the motd. > > Ok, thanks, i will. > > (But then vore was listed as having a dead powersupply on > http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi yesterday). Oh, didn't know that. It's alive as of yesterday. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
Re: searching access to a sparc sid box ...
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:03:20AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:35:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > Hello, ... > > > > I wanted to build the ocaml package for sparc, since it is the only > > thing stopping ocaml 3.06 (and a load of other packages depending on it) > > from entering testing. > > > > The package was built by the sparc buildd on september 24, but not > > uploaded, so i guess (from a response from debian-ia64, which had the > > same problem) that the buildd maintainer did not have time to sign it. > > > > So i said, ok, i will upload them myself, i did this for ia64 on > > merullo, but there was no sparc box running sid available to developpers > > (well, the pages i found listing debian machines from the developper > > corner lists 3 sparc boxes, but 2 being broken and the lats one having > > only woody auric). > > Login to vore.debian.org and read the motd. Ok, thanks, i will. (But then vore was listed as having a dead powersupply on http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi yesterday). Friendly, Sven Luther
Re: searching access to a sparc sid box ...
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 08:35:10AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > Hello, ... > > I wanted to build the ocaml package for sparc, since it is the only > thing stopping ocaml 3.06 (and a load of other packages depending on it) > from entering testing. > > The package was built by the sparc buildd on september 24, but not > uploaded, so i guess (from a response from debian-ia64, which had the > same problem) that the buildd maintainer did not have time to sign it. > > So i said, ok, i will upload them myself, i did this for ia64 on > merullo, but there was no sparc box running sid available to developpers > (well, the pages i found listing debian machines from the developper > corner lists 3 sparc boxes, but 2 being broken and the lats one having > only woody auric). Login to vore.debian.org and read the motd. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
Re : searching access to a sparc sid box ...
Is there a sid box available, or alternatively could a sid chroot be made available somewhere, so that people can look at their packages on sparc ? Would it have to be sparc64, or would a simple sparc32 suffice? If I can get my E3000 to work, you can have access to that one - if not, I have a SS20 which currently has woody installed, but I can upgrade to Sid without much problem I guess.. Wbr Andreas Loong
Re: libc6-sparc64 2.2.5-11.2 problem
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Ben Collins mentioned: > > It seems to be a package bug - same thing happened me, and now I can't > > update...I assume the solution is to remove gcc, and wait for a fixed gcc > > package ? > apt-get remove libc6-sparc64 Of course, that gcc depends on it. I removed gcc,libtool etc. then removed libc6-sparc64 and reinstalled it. Everything was fine. thanks! John
searching access to a sparc sid box ...
Hello, ... I wanted to build the ocaml package for sparc, since it is the only thing stopping ocaml 3.06 (and a load of other packages depending on it) from entering testing. The package was built by the sparc buildd on september 24, but not uploaded, so i guess (from a response from debian-ia64, which had the same problem) that the buildd maintainer did not have time to sign it. So i said, ok, i will upload them myself, i did this for ia64 on merullo, but there was no sparc box running sid available to developpers (well, the pages i found listing debian machines from the developper corner lists 3 sparc boxes, but 2 being broken and the lats one having only woody auric). Is there a sid box available, or alternatively could a sid chroot be made available somewhere, so that people can look at their packages on sparc ? Alternatively, if someone could tell me who the buildd maintainer is and if he will be around shortly to sign the packages, this will make me happy also. Friendly, Sven Luther
