Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
* on the Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:03:37AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote: Hello I know this probably doesn't really belong here, but this is the only Sparc-ML I'm reading, and it may be of interest to you. ping6 on an IPv6-enabled Sparc32 or Sparc64 on Kernel 2.4.20 bombs really nasty. Machine halts instantly. No matter what patches. Right now, I'm not quite sure whether I used USAGI on both systems. The Sparc10 had USAGI, and I thought I had compiled the kernel for the Ultra1 without USAGI. So this might actually be an USAGI-problem. I constantly try to recompile kernels (with and whithout this and that), but see below. Could you try 2.4.21-rc2? I'll try whatever I can. ;) Right now, all my self-built kernels cannot boot with a Data Access Exception, I suspect its a compiler-problem. Which one should I use? It's a Sid. I tried 3.2.3-2 3.3-0pre8 (I'll try pre9 today) and 2.95 which wouldn't even compile. Right now my /usr/bin looks like this: /usr/bin/gcc - gcc-2.95 /usr/bin/gcc-2.95 /usr/bin/gcc-3.2 /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 /usr/bin/gccbug - gccbug-3.2 /usr/bin/gccbug-3.2 /usr/bin/gccbug-3.3 /usr/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc - gcc-2.95 I'm not quite sure whether /usr/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc - gcc-2.95 makes sense. Should I install egcs64? egcs64 seemed to produce bootable kernels, but had problems compiling 2.5.6x (which I ultimatively want). Regards Peter -- Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
Re: How to install on a Ultra 1
Thanks For the help I finally got it !!! Thanks Again Richard Collins - Original Message - From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Richard Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: John Hedge [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-sparc@lists.debian.org Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2003 6:29 PM Subject: Re: How to install on a Ultra 1 On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 09:00:09PM -0500, Richard Collins wrote: I can't do a net install this is on a home network.. I have searched the archives and I still don't know the correct boot command. I am sorry but this is my first Ultra Sparc. http://lists.debian.org/google.html Search for sparc64 initrd -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
Re: Failed build process (segmentation fault)
Ben Collins wrote: I don't know what happen because I repeat this process in a x86 box and it works fine. Are there any problems with build process in a SPARC-LINUX systems ? Are there any requeriments ?. Perhaps bad memory in your IPX? I ran into the same problem with a SS1. I repeat the compilation process under with kernel 2.2.20 (before was 2.4.20) and it worked. Are there any problems with gcc and 2.4.20 ?. Thanks in advanced. Juan Antonio
Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
On Sun, 11 May 2003, Peter Keel wrote: Could you try 2.4.21-rc2? I'll try whatever I can. ;) Right now, all my self-built kernels cannot boot with a Data Access Exception, I suspect its a compiler-problem. Which one should I use? It's a Sid. I tried 3.2.3-2 3.3-0pre8 (I'll try pre9 today) and 2.95 which wouldn't even compile. Right now my /usr/bin looks like this: /usr/bin/gcc - gcc-2.95 /usr/bin/gcc-2.95 /usr/bin/gcc-3.2 /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 /usr/bin/gccbug - gccbug-3.2 /usr/bin/gccbug-3.2 /usr/bin/gccbug-3.3 /usr/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc - gcc-2.95 I'm not quite sure whether /usr/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc - gcc-2.95 makes sense. Should I install egcs64? egcs64 seemed to produce bootable kernels, but had problems compiling 2.5.6x (which I ultimatively want). You have to use egcs64 for 2.4 kernels. check this thread for 2.5 kernels http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2003/debian-sparc-200304/msg00169.html Fabio -- Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol We are on a mission from God - Elwood Blues http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp4.html
Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
Hi, On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 10:08:56AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote: * on the Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:03:37AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote: Hello [ ... ] Could you try 2.4.21-rc2? I'll try whatever I can. ;) Right now, all my self-built kernels cannot boot with a Data Access Exception, I suspect its a compiler-problem. Which one should I use? It's a Sid. I tried 3.2.3-2 3.3-0pre8 (I'll try pre9 today) and 2.95 which wouldn't even compile. Right now my /usr/bin looks like this: I have recently compiled an 2.5.68 with gcc-3.0 and it boots. So you can try to get an gcc-3.0 and compile your kernel with this compiler. HTH, tim -- When confronted by a difficult problem, you can solve it more easily by reducing it to the question, How would the Lone Ranger handle this? Tim Weippert [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG Key http://www.topf-sicret.org/kontakt.html
Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
* on the Sun, May 11, 2003 at 11:45:53AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: You have to use egcs64 for 2.4 kernels. Yes, seems so. It boots. I verified also the whole patch-situation, and it seems I was wrong: This was with the USAGI-patch. The stock kernel (even with grsecurity and ipfilter-patch) has no problems with ICMP. check this thread for 2.5 kernels http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2003/debian-sparc-200304/msg00169.html Thank you. Only it doesn't really help, how do I compile my 2.5.69 now? ;) Peter -- Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
Re: Failed build process (segmentation fault)
On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 11:41:31AM +0200, Javera - IDFO wrote: Ben Collins wrote: I don't know what happen because I repeat this process in a x86 box and it works fine. Are there any problems with build process in a SPARC-LINUX systems ? Are there any requeriments ?. Perhaps bad memory in your IPX? I ran into the same problem with a SS1. I repeat the compilation process under with kernel 2.2.20 (before was 2.4.20) and it worked. Are there any problems with gcc and 2.4.20 ?. No, but there are definitely stability issues with 2.4.x on sparc32. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
