Re: serial ports on Sparc 2.

2003-07-11 Thread Paul Hedderly
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 07:07:35PM -0700, Peter Easthope wrote:

You can normally get 38400 on non-ultra Sun serial ports. No more.
--
Paul

 
 Can anyone tell me the top speed of the serial ports on 
 a Sparc 2?  The manual specifies the functions of the pins
 and how to set jumpers for RS-232 or RS-4?? operation
 but does not mention speeds.  None of the lists of specs. 
 on the Web that I have found mention the speed either.
 
 Thanks, Peter E.
 
 http://carnot.pathology.ubc.ca/peter.html
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



SS5 170 crashed with 2 S-Bus Happy Meal

2003-07-11 Thread Alex Yung
The SS5 170 is my Masquerade machine.  It was running solid with Woody
before I replaced the second Lance card with the 2 Happy Meals.  I was
testing to see how much throughput I gain with the Happy Meal.

I ran ftp behind the SS5 using an Ultra 2 with Solaris 9.  Upload or
download would lock up the SS5.  I did not get any error from the console
since it is running headless nor anything in /var/log.  It will not even
accept a [Break] key to escape to the OBP.  Both Happy Meals are good.  I
tested them individually in the Ultra 2 and got 9.5MB/s with crossover cable
to Windows 2k.

Has anyone seem this?  Any suggestion what else I should try?  Thanks.



GCC Status?

2003-07-11 Thread Shawn Boyette
I just installed on a Netra X1 (which went fine once I realized the
netinst cd just was not going to work due to needing ethernet to get
the kernel and drivers but needing the drivers to have ethernet). I
did a *bare* minimum install and then immediately turned around and
dist-upgraded to testing before installing any extra software.

So now I can't compile a kernel that works. egcs64 no longer exists
(not even through the package lookup page on debian.org). I found a
message in the list archives from last month where Ben said he was
removing it and uploading a 64-bit capable gcc3.2, but this doesn't
seem to be the case.

Attempting to compile with gcc linked as gcc-3.2 and gccbug linked as
gccbug-3.2, compilation fails thus:

FLOOD
deneb:/usr/src/linux-2.4.21# make dep
make -C arch/sparc64/kernel check_asm
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.21/arch/sparc64/kernel'
gcc -E -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.21/include -P tmp.c -o tmp.i
/bin/sh ./check_asm.sh -data task tmp.i check_asm_data.c
/bin/sh ./check_asm.sh -data mm tmp.i check_asm_data.c
/bin/sh ./check_asm.sh -data thread tmp.i check_asm_data.c
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.21/include -mmedlow -ffixed-g4 -S -o 
check_asm_data.s check_asm_data.c
cc1: invalid option `medlow'
make[1]: *** [check_asm] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.21/arch/sparc64/kernel'
make: *** [check_asm] Error 2
FLOOD

Using gcc-3.3 instead successfully compiles, but the kernel halts on
boot with DATA ACCESS EXCEPTION.

This isn't a big deal, it just got me wondering what the status of gcc
and kernel compilation on sparc64 was.

-- 
Shawn Boyette  | He had reached the stage in a young man's life when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | the grimness of the general human situation becomes
   | evident; and the realization of this causes the
   | ambition to halt a little
   |  -- Thomas Hardy, Return of the Native



Re: GCC Status?

2003-07-11 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 02:19:49PM -0400, Shawn Boyette wrote:
 I just installed on a Netra X1 (which went fine once I realized the
 netinst cd just was not going to work due to needing ethernet to get
 the kernel and drivers but needing the drivers to have ethernet). I
 did a *bare* minimum install and then immediately turned around and
 dist-upgraded to testing before installing any extra software.

You need gcc/gcc-3.2 from unstable, not testing.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo   - http://www.deqo.com/



SunPc card??

2003-07-11 Thread W
I have in my possession a SunPc card. What is it good for?

-- 
Thanks
W

Click on the link below to make a $5 Paypal donation to my College Fund.
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=woodland%40a1above.netitem_name=Walt%27s+College+Fundamount=5.00no_note=1tax=0currency_code=USD





RE: SunPc card??

2003-07-11 Thread Solarisexpert Submissions
If it's an S-BUS (series I) card you have a nice 486 CPU with no support
for it.

There is a 586 PCI version (series II) that I think it's still
supported. It will work under Solaris, no support under Linux (???).
More details below:

#375-3051
SunPCi II 733-MHz Coprocessor Card SunPCi II 733-MHz Coprocessor Card 


#375-0131
SunPCi II 600-MHz Coprocessor Card SunPCi II 600-MHz Coprocessor Card 


#375-0095
SunPCi 400-MHz Coprocessor Card SunPCi 400-MHz Coprocessor Card 


#375-0075
SunPCi 300-MHz Coprocessor Card SunPCi 300-MHz Coprocessor Card


Raoul Volpe
Phone (877) 44 SOL EX (Toll Free)
Phone +1 914 729-6305 (outside US)
Fax   +1 586 816-7086
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.solarisexpert.com
 

-Original Message-
From: W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:20 PM
To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: SunPc card??

I have in my possession a SunPc card. What is it good for?

-- 
Thanks
W

Click on the link below to make a $5 Paypal donation to my College Fund.
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=woodland%40a1above.netitem_name=
Walt%27s+College+Fundamount=5.00no_note=1tax=0currency_code=USD




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]