Re: 64bits df
El Mar 18 Nov 2003 01:58, Peter Eisentraut escribió: Ben Collins writes: I would suggest something close to ditching calling ld directly, so that the CC env can make things work smoothly. We need ld to do partial linking: ld -r -o SUBSYS.o foo1.o foo2.o ... We get the right ld to use with gcc -print-prog-name=ld but that does not pick up the right flags. I'm open for better ideas. I got it to compile and link using what Tom Callaway suggested: export LDEMULATION=elf64_sparc with the aditional export CC=gcc -m64 Now I have trouble running initdb. Don't know if it has something to do with my semvmax configuration (using the kernel from the distro), or with the 64 bit linkage. -- 08:41:01 up 27 days, 16:03, 2 users, load average: 0.61, 0.56, 0.44 - Martín Marqués| select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' Centro de Telematica | DBA, Programador, Administrador Universidad Nacional del Litoral -
Re: Want to have sparc-mini.iso working on my Sun Ultra 10
Hi, On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 01:16:24PM -, Dan Beach wrote: new revised build from http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/sparc-mini.iso (2.4.21 + gcc 3.3.2?) still comes up with Illegal instruction on Sun Blade 100 (haven't had chance to try Ultra 5 yet) but quite a bit later during install boot after you've hit enter from splash screen (doesn't get as far as loading drivers tho?) There wasn't a new build at this time. You have to wait, or make your own build. This is the issue of this thread. If you want to have a working sparc-mini.iso image, you need to do by yourself at this time. Mine personnal ISO image was done by using vmlinux instead of arch/sparc64/boot/image, and by stripping down the kernel configuration. (see previous posts). Good day. Olivier -- Olivier Bornet | français : http://puck.ch/f Swiss Ice Hockey Results | english : http://puck.ch/e http://puck.ch/| deutsch : http://puck.ch/g [EMAIL PROTECTED] | italiano : http://puck.ch/i Get my PGP-key at http://puck.ch/pgp or at http://wwwkeys.pgp.net pgpdfmVresUT3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm sure you know from the subject what this is about.
Yes, everything that can be a module is a module, and only things I need are
compiled in. Still I get the above message.
I've tried booting:
vmlinux
gzip vmlinux
gzip -9 vmlinux
arch/sparc/image
gzip arch/sparc/image
gzip -9 arch/sparc/image
strip -R .comment -R .note vmlinux -o vmlinux.stripped
How am I supposed to boot the kernel? Should I torture silo?
- -
typedef struct me_s {
char name[] = { Thomas Habets };
char email[] = { [EMAIL PROTECTED] };
char kernel[]= { Linux 2.4 };
char *pgpKey[] = { http://www.habets.pp.se/pubkey.txt; };
char pgp[] = { A8A3 D1DD 4AE0 8467 7FDE 0945 286A E90A AD48 E854 };
char coolcmd[] = { echo '. ./_. ./_'_;. ./_ };
} me_t;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ukbkKGrpCq1I6FQRAir3AKCFIttxGhFRAVmy9b88Lke102pO0QCg167s
K/cQzlR9J+Vp+ZKdd/5Nso8=
=f5Hm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9
Thomas,
Silo has gzip built in. You can just gzip the kernel image, and then
just point silo at the .gz file, and it'll do all the rest for you.
--Adam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm sure you know from the subject what this is about.
Yes, everything that can be a module is a module, and only things I need
are
compiled in. Still I get the above message.
I've tried booting:
vmlinux
gzip vmlinux
gzip -9 vmlinux
arch/sparc/image
gzip arch/sparc/image
gzip -9 arch/sparc/image
strip -R .comment -R .note vmlinux -o vmlinux.stripped
How am I supposed to boot the kernel? Should I torture silo?
- -
typedef struct me_s {
char name[] = { Thomas Habets };
char email[] = { [EMAIL PROTECTED] };
char kernel[]= { Linux 2.4 };
char *pgpKey[] = { http://www.habets.pp.se/pubkey.txt; };
char pgp[] = { A8A3 D1DD 4AE0 8467 7FDE 0945 286A E90A AD48 E854 };
char coolcmd[] = { echo '. ./_. ./_'_;. ./_ };
} me_t;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ukbkKGrpCq1I6FQRAir3AKCFIttxGhFRAVmy9b88Lke102pO0QCg167s
K/cQzlR9J+Vp+ZKdd/5Nso8=
=f5Hm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 17:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Silo has gzip built in. You can just gzip the kernel image, and then
just point silo at the .gz file, and it'll do all the rest for you.
That's what I meant I tried with the gzip-lines below. Sorry for being
unclear.
I've tried booting:
vmlinux
gzip vmlinux
gzip -9 vmlinux
arch/sparc/image
gzip arch/sparc/image
gzip -9 arch/sparc/image
strip -R .comment -R .note vmlinux -o vmlinux.stripped
... and the last one gzipped
- -
typedef struct me_s {
char name[] = { Thomas Habets };
char email[] = { [EMAIL PROTECTED] };
char kernel[]= { Linux 2.4 };
char *pgpKey[] = { http://www.habets.pp.se/pubkey.txt; };
char pgp[] = { A8A3 D1DD 4AE0 8467 7FDE 0945 286A E90A AD48 E854 };
char coolcmd[] = { echo '. ./_. ./_'_;. ./_ };
} me_t;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/uk8DKGrpCq1I6FQRAgS0AJsEQEXO7crZI0xluXGQ9y9rDwvYPwCg5xTm
Amod0rhCC4t1rf6ybv2TVn0=
=ZfVt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:55:31PM +0100, Thomas Habets wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 17:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Silo has gzip built in. You can just gzip the kernel image, and then just point silo at the .gz file, and it'll do all the rest for you. That's what I meant I tried with the gzip-lines below. Sorry for being unclear. you must 'make image' first then use arch/sparc64/boot/image for silo. -solca
Re: Want to have sparc-mini.iso working on my Sun Ultra 10
So let me understand this correctly. You have an image that works as vmlinux, but doesn't work when you strip it. Is that correct? -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 18:10, Otto Solares wrote:
you must 'make image' first then use arch/sparc64/boot/image for silo.
You mean sparc, not sparc64? It's a sparcstation 4, not an ultrasparc.
Like I said, I tried arch/sparc/boot/image. I tried it raw and I tried it
gzipped, I've also tried it strippedgzipped, which got it down to 3.0M,
1.3M gzipped (gzip -9)
So:
cp arch/sparc/boot/image .
strip -R .comment -R .note image -o image.stripped # i've tried w/o this
gzip -9 image.stripped # I've tried w/o this
cp image.stripped.gz /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.0-test9
I used make all, which accoring to make help includes make image
- -
typedef struct me_s {
char name[] = { Thomas Habets };
char email[] = { [EMAIL PROTECTED] };
char kernel[]= { Linux 2.4 };
char *pgpKey[] = { http://www.habets.pp.se/pubkey.txt; };
char pgp[] = { A8A3 D1DD 4AE0 8467 7FDE 0945 286A E90A AD48 E854 };
char coolcmd[] = { echo '. ./_. ./_'_;. ./_ };
} me_t;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/umuXKGrpCq1I6FQRApJOAJ0c3CI3yQNRudjqxgHvFaIIoWxSgQCaApc0
yIZeuctnVcfilsWyxLHHQZc=
=eHF4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
SMP hypersparc ss20 kernel recommendations
I had to upgrade from my working 2.2.25 SMP kernel on my dual hypersparc ss20 to a 2.4.x kernel because of the recent debian unstable changes. I am now running 2.4.22 custom compiled single processor kernel. I sorely miss that extra CPU on this box. Note in all cases I'm compiling with 2.95 gcc instead of latest-greatest 3.x because of the sparc glitches in the code that get triggered by gcc 3.x. Before, when I spent several days trying to get a 2.4 SMP kernel running on this box it always hung on the way up. Is it possible that other aspects of the system (libs?/programs?) were breaking instead of the kernel? Should I sit tight for some patchset to come down the pike in a future 2.4 or 2.6 kernel? Also, and this is very strange, 'top' stopped working in 2.4.22, though worked great in 2.2.25. I'd appreciate any clues re getting it to work again. Thanks, Heitzso
Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:57:27PM +0100, Thomas Habets wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 18:10, Otto Solares wrote: you must 'make image' first then use arch/sparc64/boot/image for silo. You mean sparc, not sparc64? It's a sparcstation 4, not an ultrasparc. Good, i have a ss4 too. Like I said, I tried arch/sparc/boot/image. I tried it raw and I tried it gzipped, I've also tried it strippedgzipped, which got it down to 3.0M, 1.3M gzipped (gzip -9) So: cp arch/sparc/boot/image . strip -R .comment -R .note image -o image.stripped # i've tried w/o this gzip -9 image.stripped # I've tried w/o this cp image.stripped.gz /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.0-test9 I used make all, which accoring to make help includes make image these are the steps i do to compile a 2.6 kernel on my ss4: cp arch/sparc/defconfig .config make oldconfig make make image make modules make modules_install cp arch/sparc/boot/image /boot/vmlinuz silo -U -f # not needed but anyway... :) The only problem i have with my ss4 and kernel 2.6 is the lack of keyboard and mouse, i have looked deeply in the sunzilog code and can't find a solution. -solca
x server no running on a ultra 60
hello guys i have a debian 3.0.1 runing on a sparc ultra 60 whit a SUN elite 3D i have some problems to start the x server due to errors reporting when loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libshadow.a FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO:invalid argument Fatal server error: AddScreen/ScreenInit Failed for driver 0 Xfree configurator does not correct the mistake some help to start the x server without black magic ??? tanks a lot Roberto William Aranda Roman coordinador de redes WAN Corporativo Corvi S.A. 56285100 ext 2006 reload!... Enter The MATRIX!!.. ___ Contrata el SuperInternet Terra Premium http://www.terra.com.mx/acceso/conectate/ Encuentra los mejores productos y precios increibles!! Aprovecha nuestra promoción a 12 pagos sin intereses con Banamex y Bancomer http://www.decompras.com/
Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 20:40, Otto Solares wrote:
these are the steps i do to compile a 2.6 kernel on my ss4:
...
cp arch/sparc/boot/image /boot/vmlinuz
That doesn't work for me. Maybe I'm using too many features. But since I
removed all but the needed ones, and put as much as possible in modules, if
it won't run with this config then it's useless to me. And I really want a
nice working IPsec :-(
silo -U -f # not needed but anyway... :)
I'm assuming here that this won't have a chance of fixing it? (it's a drag to
reboot the box just to try this, since it's in use, and has some screens that
need manual starting (no, not IRC :P)).
The only problem i have with my ss4 and kernel 2.6 is the lack of keyboard
and mouse,
Oh, good to know. Not that I need it right now, but still good to know.
- -
typedef struct me_s {
char name[] = { Thomas Habets };
char email[] = { [EMAIL PROTECTED] };
char kernel[]= { Linux 2.4 };
char *pgpKey[] = { http://www.habets.pp.se/pubkey.txt; };
char pgp[] = { A8A3 D1DD 4AE0 8467 7FDE 0945 286A E90A AD48 E854 };
char coolcmd[] = { echo '. ./_. ./_'_;. ./_ };
} me_t;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/uoRuKGrpCq1I6FQRAifDAKD9dzTKeSH20F2rLEM4488aBVPxDQCgsL3w
XSsUTd0kRA8/06h/sKm4vRs=
=DFhY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: x server no running on a ultra 60
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:47:19PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello guys i have a debian 3.0.1 runing on a sparc ultra 60 whit a SUN elite 3D i have some problems to start the x server due to errors reporting when loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libshadow.a FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO:invalid argument Fatal server error: AddScreen/ScreenInit Failed for driver 0 Xfree configurator does not correct the mistake some help to start the x server without black magic ??? try without 'fbdev' driver nor 'Option FBDev True' in your X config. -solca
Re: SMP hypersparc ss20 kernel recommendations
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:19:31PM -0500, Heitzso wrote: I had to upgrade from my working 2.2.25 SMP kernel on my dual hypersparc ss20 to a 2.4.x kernel because of the recent debian unstable changes. I am now running 2.4.22 custom compiled single processor kernel. I sorely miss that extra CPU on this box. What changes required you to upgrade? Note, 2.4.x is still unstable on SMP sparc32. Not much you can do about that other than pitching in with coding skills. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Re: Image too large to fit into destination with 2.6.0-test9
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:57:27PM +0100, Thomas Habets wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 November 2003 18:10, Otto Solares wrote: you must 'make image' first then use arch/sparc64/boot/image for silo. You mean sparc, not sparc64? It's a sparcstation 4, not an ultrasparc. Like I said, I tried arch/sparc/boot/image. I tried it raw and I tried it gzipped, I've also tried it strippedgzipped, which got it down to 3.0M, 1.3M gzipped (gzip -9) Sounds to me like you just need to make some things modules. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Re: x server no running on a ultra 60
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:47:19PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello guys i have a debian 3.0.1 runing on a sparc ultra 60 whit a SUN elite 3D i have some problems to start the x server due to errors reporting when loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libshadow.a FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO:invalid argument Use the sunffb driver. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Dual boot between Linux and Solaris yielded spurious interrupt msg
In setting up dual boot on my Sparc Classic between Linux and Solaris, I encountered this message: Boot options: [1] Linux Kernel 2.4.21 [2] Solaris 9.0 SunOS Release 5.9 Version Generic_112233-08 32-bit Copyright 1983-2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. spurious interrupt at processor level 10 What is this spurious interrupt? This is my silo.conf: $ cat /etc/silo.conf partition=2 timeout=80 message=/boot/message.txt root=/dev/sdc2 default=linux read-only image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.21 alias=1 single-key label=linux other=/iommu/sbus/espdma/esp/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0;1 alias=2 single-key label=solaris I tried silo version 0.9.8 and 1.2.5. Both version yielded the same message on the console output. Does anyone have any idea what this is? How can I move forward? I already searched the bug report but this has not been recorded. Thanks for any assistance. Alex
Re: Want to have sparc-mini.iso working on my Sun Ultra 10
Hi, So let me understand this correctly. You have an image that works as vmlinux, but doesn't work when you strip it. Is that correct? Correct. When booting the stripped image, this cause the Illegal instruction problem. Thanks for your help. Olivier -- Olivier Bornet | français : http://puck.ch/f Swiss Ice Hockey Results | english : http://puck.ch/e http://puck.ch/| deutsch : http://puck.ch/g [EMAIL PROTECTED] | italiano : http://puck.ch/i Get my PGP-key at http://puck.ch/pgp or at http://wwwkeys.pgp.net pgpdIp0i9V0ui.pgp Description: PGP signature
