Re: no keyboard after recompiling debian sid 2.6.4 kernel
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 01:28, James Morrison wrote: > > This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied > > and used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in (blah blah) > You are sending to a public list. This email is not confidential. A small note on this issue: Please, pretty please, remove that junky disclaimers at the end of your e-mails. They have no legal interest or clue at all and their sole purpose is to trash hard drive space. Especially true if you send e-mails to a public mailing list like this. If you're not the administrator of your network and the junklaimer is appended by default, get a free e-mail account on the Web and use it for public mailing lists. Bye, Antonello Iunco.
Re: no keyboard after recompiling debian sid 2.6.4 kernel
Richard Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Collins wrote > > I think for Ultra10, you need to enable the AT keyboard aswell. > > > # CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD is not set > > I have tried with this too and have the same problem. I have started to look > to see if the serial 8250 is the cause of the problem, but when I try to > complie in that module, make-kpkg fails comaplining about unused variable > 'size'. Any other ideas? > > thanks > > Rich Have you set the keymap to NONE? Remove any keymap files in /etc/console or use dpkg-reconfigure console-tools . > > This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied > and used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, > please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 > (0)20 7934 9000. Please then delete the e-mail and do not disclose its > contents to any person. We believe, but do not warrant that this e-mail and > any attachments, are virus free. You should take full responsibility for > virus checking. SBG Companies reserve the right to monitor all email > communications through their internal and external networks. You are sending to a public list. This email is not confidential. Jim
Re: Help needed with failed build (#220928)
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:22:24PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the package john, currently maintained by Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
> and myself, is failing to build on sparc. This was reported as bug
> #220928. Paul Slootman then suggested that the benchmark programs fails
> "when setting the SIGALRM signal handler at line 100 of bench.c" He
> suggested running some malloc debugger, like electric fence. But neither
> does Javier, nor do I have enough time for this task. So I'ld like to
> ask you to help debugging this problem and fixing the build, so that it
> works again. Otherwise we would have to drop sparc from the list of
> supported architectures. So if anybody wants to help, please contact me
> in private or send me a copy, as I'm not subscribed to debian-sparc.
>
> Christian
> --
>Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org)
> 1024D/B7CEC7E8 44BD 1F9E A997 3BE2 A44F 96A4 1C98 EEF3 B7CE C7E8
alrighty :-) The problem seems to be in des itself, I haven't figurd
out where yet, but I did find this:
diff -r -u john-1.6.orig/src/MD5_std.c john-1.6/src/MD5_std.c
--- john-1.6.orig/src/MD5_std.c 2000-04-01 05:21:43.0 -0500
+++ john-1.6/src/MD5_std.c 2004-04-06 18:01:19.0 -0400
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@
{
int length;
- for (length = 0; salt[length] && length < 8; length++);
+ for (length = 0; length < 8 && salt[length] ; length++);
memcpy(patterns.s, salt, patterns.l.s = length);
}
--
-Justin
Re: Help needed with failed build (#220928)
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:22:24PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > Hi, > > the package john, currently maintained by Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a > and myself, is failing to build on sparc. This was reported as bug > #220928. Paul Slootman then suggested that the benchmark programs fails > "when setting the SIGALRM signal handler at line 100 of bench.c" He > suggested running some malloc debugger, like electric fence. But neither > does Javier, nor do I have enough time for this task. So I'ld like to > ask you to help debugging this problem and fixing the build, so that it > works again. Otherwise we would have to drop sparc from the list of > supported architectures. So if anybody wants to help, please contact me > in private or send me a copy, as I'm not subscribed to debian-sparc. > > Christian > -- >Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org) > 1024D/B7CEC7E8 44BD 1F9E A997 3BE2 A44F 96A4 1C98 EEF3 B7CE C7E8 I'm looking at it now, just got the backtrace: (gdb) r 1 Starting program: /tmp/john-1.6/src/bench 1 Benchmarking: Standard DES [24/32 128K]... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x70048f98 in __errno_location () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x70048f98 in __errno_location () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x7005ed4c in __libc_sigaction () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x7005ef80 in sigaction () from /lib/libc.so.6 #3 0x7005ec6c in ssignal () from /lib/libc.so.6 #4 0x00026744 in benchmark_format (format=0x3a038, salts=256, results=0xeca0) at bench.c:100 #5 0x00026ec0 in main (argc=2, argv=0xed84) at best.c:53 #6 0x70048dac in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) efence Enabled Electric Fence (gdb) r 1 The program being debugged has been started already. Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y Starting program: /tmp/john-1.6/src/bench 1 Electric Fence 2.1 Copyright (C) 1987-1998 Bruce Perens. [New Thread 16384 (LWP 9948)] Benchmarking: Standard DES [24/32 128K]... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 9948)] 0x70115398 in write () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x70115398 in write () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x7002e3cc in Page_Size () from /usr/lib/libefence.so.0.0 #2 0x7002e5f0 in EF_Print () from /usr/lib/libefence.so.0.0 #3 0x7002d588 in _init () from /usr/lib/libefence.so.0.0 #4 0x7002e08c in malloc () from /usr/lib/libefence.so.0.0 #5 0x00028300 in mem_alloc (size=4) at memory.c:23 #6 0x000265cc in benchmark_format (format=0x3a038, salts=256, results=0xec70) at bench.c:76 #7 0x00026ec0 in main (argc=2, argv=0xed54) at best.c:53 #8 0x7005cdac in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 underfence is the same -- -Justin
Re: debian-installer latest netinst image failed to boot up on Ultra10
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:14:39AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to install sarge with debian-installer beta 3 netinst.iso and >> 2004-04-02 daily unstable snapshot netinst.iso, but kernel was failed >> to boot up with the failure of root filesystem mount. > >[snip] > >> ...kernel boot message... >> Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00 >> Press L1-A to return to the boot prom >> sunmouse: Successfully adjusted to 1200 baud. > >[snip] > >And Alex Bartok has the same problem on a Ultra 60 [1] and I have the >same problem with my Sparcstation LX. Could you file a bug against >debian-installer [2] so we can be sure that the team working on the >installer is aware of this? > > >- Werner I also had this problem on my ultra 30 (both local and serial console), but not my ultra 2 or sparcstation LX, using the same beta-3 d-i cdrom. I filed install reports on all of them. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature.
Help needed with failed build (#220928)
Hi, the package john, currently maintained by Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña and myself, is failing to build on sparc. This was reported as bug #220928. Paul Slootman then suggested that the benchmark programs fails "when setting the SIGALRM signal handler at line 100 of bench.c" He suggested running some malloc debugger, like electric fence. But neither does Javier, nor do I have enough time for this task. So I'ld like to ask you to help debugging this problem and fixing the build, so that it works again. Otherwise we would have to drop sparc from the list of supported architectures. So if anybody wants to help, please contact me in private or send me a copy, as I'm not subscribed to debian-sparc. Christian -- Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org) 1024D/B7CEC7E8 44BD 1F9E A997 3BE2 A44F 96A4 1C98 EEF3 B7CE C7E8 pgpAA1aKHRHPq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: libgimp2.0 fails to install
Euan Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi there, > > I'm running Debian unstable on my Ultra 2 (2x300Mhz 768MB). > > I ran apt-get -u dist-upgrade this morning and got a failure on the > libgimp2.0 package. > > Bar uninstalling gimp, is there anyway to resolve this problem?? > > Thanks, > > Euan. > > sparc:~# apt-get -f install > Reading Package Lists... Done > Building Dependency Tree... Done > Correcting dependencies... Done > The following extra packages will be installed: > libgimp2.0 > The following NEW packages will be installed: > libgimp2.0 > 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 50 not upgraded. > 37 not fully installed or removed. > Need to get 941kB of archives. > After unpacking 2425kB of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y > Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main libgimp2.0 2.0.0-4 [941kB] > Fetched 941kB in 20s (45.8kB/s) > debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Kde > debconf: (Can't locate Qt.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl > /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5 > /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 > /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at > /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Kde/Wizard.pm line 7, <> line 1.) > debconf: falling back to frontend: Dialog > (Reading database ... 107343 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking libgimp2.0 (from .../libgimp2.0_2.0.0-4_sparc.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/libgimp2.0_2.0.0-4_sparc.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite > `/usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/gimp20-libgimp.mo', which is also in > package gimp-data > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libgimp2.0_2.0.0-4_sparc.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > -- dpkg -i --force-overwrite /var/cache/apt/archives/libgimp2.0... if you don't care what files libgimp2.0 overwrites. In this case it's a lot of translations. You may want to use apt-listbugs so you can see this stuff comming. Jim
RE: no keyboard after recompiling debian sid 2.6.4 kernel
> Ben Collins wrote >Find where -Werror is set in arch/sparc64/Makefile and delete it. That >should get the compile going again. Hello Ben, No sign of -Werror in arch/sparc64/Makefile or in the 'mother' Makefile either. What should I do? Thanks Rich This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 (0)20 7934 9000. Please then delete the e-mail and do not disclose its contents to any person. We believe, but do not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments, are virus free. You should take full responsibility for virus checking. SBG Companies reserve the right to monitor all email communications through their internal and external networks.
RE: no keyboard after recompiling debian sid 2.6.4 kernel
> Ben Collins wrote >Do you see a kernel message about it detecting the kbd? I haven't seen any kernel message about kbd (in dmesg), but I also don't see one when I boot the 2.4.19 kernel where the keyboard does work. If dmesg isn't the place to look, where is correct? I'll try your other suggestion (-Werror) and see how that goes. thanks Rich This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 (0)20 7934 9000. Please then delete the e-mail and do not disclose its contents to any person. We believe, but do not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments, are virus free. You should take full responsibility for virus checking. SBG Companies reserve the right to monitor all email communications through their internal and external networks.
Re: quanta / kde bug?
> what does > $ apt-get install xlibmesa-gl-dev > > show ? Fantastic!!! Thanks Christian, that seems to have fixed Quanta ;-) I still have two packages that are held back but there doesn't seem to be any adverse affects. Thanks again for the quick response. Euan.
Re: quanta / kde bug?
On 06.04.2004 15:54 Euan Maxwell wrote: Hi there, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post this, if not then I apologise and if someone can advise me of the correct place, I'll post there. I use Quanta regularly for some php work that I do and it was recently upgraded by apt-get. I fired it up today for the first time in a while and as soon as I typed in the editor screen, the application just crashes. The KCrash application didn't yield any decent output so I did an strace on the application; the output of which is at the end of this email. The only other thing worth noting is that I have a few packages that have been "held back" by apt-get, I'm not sure why they're held back or whether they might effect the operation of quanta: sparc:~# apt-get -u dist-upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Calculating Upgrade... Done The following packages have been kept back: kdeaddons x-window-system-core xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu-dev xlibmesa3 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded. what does $ apt-get install xlibmesa-gl-dev show ? - Christian
quanta / kde bug?
Hi there,
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post this, if not then I
apologise and if someone can advise me of the correct place, I'll post
there.
I use Quanta regularly for some php work that I do and it was recently
upgraded by apt-get.
I fired it up today for the first time in a while and as soon as I typed
in the editor screen, the application just crashes.
The KCrash application didn't yield any decent output so I did an strace
on the application; the output of which is at the end of this email.
The only other thing worth noting is that I have a few packages that
have been "held back" by apt-get, I'm not sure why they're held back or
whether they might effect the operation of quanta:
sparc:~# apt-get -u dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
kdeaddons x-window-system-core xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu-dev
xlibmesa3
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 5 not upgraded.
Thanks again,
Euan.
strace output:
write(3, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"...,
1024) = 1024
ioctl(5, 0x4004667f, 0xefffe9c4)= 0
write(6, "\0", 1) = 1
ioctl(5, 0x4004667f, 0xefffe934)= 0
ioctl(5, 0x4004667f, 0xefffe8ac)= 0
ioctl(5, 0x4004667f, 0xefffe8ac)= 0
ioctl(5, 0x4004667f, 0xefffe9bc)= 0
gettimeofday({1081259074, 741315}, NULL) = 0
ioctl(5, 0x4004667f, 0xefffe63c)= 0
write(3, "=\0\0\4\1\340\0005\0\0\0\0\3\315\0\0318\0\0\4\1\340\000"...,
1996) = 1996
ioctl(3, 0x4004667f, 0xefffe18c)= 0
read(3, "\34\0^\274\1\340\0\7\0\0\0(\25\267\205R\0\0\0\0\25\267"..., 32)
= 32
ioctl(3, 0x4004667f, 0xefffe18c)= 0
ioctl(3, 0x4004667f, 0xefffe18c)= 0
gettimeofday({1081259074, 754300}, NULL) = 0
select(15, [3 4 5 7 9 10 13 14], [], [], {0, 0}) = 1 (in [5], left {0,
0})
read(5, "\0", 1)= 1
gettimeofday({1081259074, 759179}, NULL) = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
rt_sigaction(SIGALRM, {SIG_DFL}, {SIG_DFL}, 0x71c16f24, 8) = 0
alarm(3)= 0
close(9)= 0
getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, {rlim_cur=1024, rlim_max=1024}) = 0
close(3)= 0
close(4)= 0
close(5)= 0
close(6)= 0
close(7)= 0
close(8)= 0
close(9)= -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(10) = 0
close(11) = 0
close(12) = 0
close(13) = 0
close(14) = 0
close(15) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(16) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(17) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(18) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(19) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(20) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(21) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(22) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
[snip]
...
...
...
close(1018) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(1019) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(1020) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(1021) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(1022) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
close(1023) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
write(2, "KCrash: Application \'quanta\' cra"..., 41KCrash: Application
'quanta' crashing...
) = 41
fork() = 12173
alarm(0)= 2
waitpid(12173, NULL, 0) = 12173
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
write(8, "\0", 1) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
sigreturn() = ? (mask now [ABRT EMT KILL BUS
ALRM URG STOP CHLD TTIN TTOU IO XCPU LOST USR1 USR2])
sysconf(0xfd
--
Re: no keyboard after recompiling debian sid 2.6.4 kernel
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:36:29AM +0100, Richard Marshall wrote: > > Ben Collins wrote > > I think for Ultra10, you need to enable the AT keyboard aswell. > > > # CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD is not set > > I have tried with this too and have the same problem. I have started to look > to see if the serial 8250 is the cause of the problem, but when I try to > complie in that module, make-kpkg fails comaplining about unused variable > 'size'. Any other ideas? Do you see a kernel message about it detecting the kbd? -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Re: no keyboard after recompiling debian sid 2.6.4 kernel
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:36:29AM +0100, Richard Marshall wrote: > > Ben Collins wrote > > I think for Ultra10, you need to enable the AT keyboard aswell. > > > # CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD is not set > > I have tried with this too and have the same problem. I have started to look > to see if the serial 8250 is the cause of the problem, but when I try to > complie in that module, make-kpkg fails comaplining about unused variable > 'size'. Any other ideas? Find where -Werror is set in arch/sparc64/Makefile and delete it. That should get the compile going again. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Re: Can't install Debian on Sunblade2000
В сообщении от 6 Апрель 2004 11:29 Alexey Nezhdanov написал(a): > В сообщении от 5 Апрель 2004 14:06 Alexey Nezhdanov написал(a): > > I tryed three images this time: woody tftp image (still same effect - > > junk spreading all over the screen with "memory address not aligned error > > finally"), sarge d-i tftp image and tftp image from > > http://www.phunnypharm.org/. > > The last two images worked slightly differently: > > phunnypharm image prints out "Warning: can't find initial console" and > > then hangs. > > d-i beta 3 waits a moment and then panics after two "unknown sparc > > instructions" and "attempt to kill init". > > > > I can not connect through serial cable since this box have no RS-232 port > > and I have no first woody CD image (some additional googling points that > > it may be working). > > > > So - can you give me your invaluable tip once more? :-) > > Some more questions: since I still can not pass any parameters to kernel I > slightly offtopic question: > My box is Blade 2000 and it have no floppy drive. > > Can I just plug the floppy drive out of intel box and plug it into blade > 2000? I have checked out connectors - and yes it have connector on-board > that is very similar to usual one. > > BTW I'll try to make a null-modem cable and install linux through it in the > meantime. I have successfully connected to this box via serial cable. The only advantage I gain though that I can now log kernel messages. And the problem is still here: = Resetting ... TTYA not found. TTYA not found. SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000 (UltraSPARC-III+) , Keyboard Present Copyright 1998-2002 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. OpenBoot 4.5, 1024 MB memory installed, Serial #53064360. Ethernet address 0:3:ba:29:b2:a8, Host ID: 8329b2a8. Initializing Memory - Rebooting with command: boot net:dhcp serial console=ttyS0 -p Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1:dhcp File and args: serial console=ttyS0 -p PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 4.5.21 2003/02/24 17:23 <4>Linux version 2.4.21 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2 (Debian)) #1 Sat Nov 29 15:40:07 EST 2003 <4>ARCH: SUN4U Linux version 2.4.21 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2 (Debian)) #1 Sat Nov 29 15:40:07 EST 2003 <4>ARCH: SUN4U ARCH: SUN4U Ethernet address: 00:03:ba:29:b2:a8 Remapping the kernel... done. On node 0 totalpages: 130251 zone(0): 130929 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Booting Linux... Found CPU 0 (node=f006bd10,mid=0) Found 1 CPU prom device tree node(s). Kernel command line: serial console=ttyS0 -p Console: colour dummy device 80x25 Calibrating delay loop... 599.65 BogoMIPS Memory: 1029680k available (2504k kernel code, 576k data, 184k init) [f800,3fee2000] Dentry cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 2097152 bytes) Inode cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 7, 1048576 bytes) Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 8192 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 524288 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 7, 1048576 bytes) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX PCI: Probing for controllers. SCHIZO0 PBMB: ver[5:0], portid 8, cregs[4000440] pregs[4000470] SCHIZO0 PBMB: PCI CFG[7ffee00] IO[7ffef00] MEM[7fe] SCHIZO0 PBMA: ver[5:0], portid 8, cregs[4000440] pregs[4000460] SCHIZO0 PBMA: PCI CFG[7ffec00] IO[7ffed00] MEM[7fd] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 1] map[0] to INO[0c] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 2] map[0] to INO[10] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 5] map[0] to INO[1d] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 5] map[0] to INO[1e] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 5] map[0] to INO[1f] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 6] map[0] to INO[18] PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 6] map[0] to INO[19] PCI0(PBMB): Bus running at 33MHz PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 1] slot[ 4] map[0] to INO[04] PCI0(PBMA): Bus running at 66MHz ebus0: [flashprom] [bbc] [ppm] [i2c -> (dimm-fru) (dimm-fru) (dimm-fru) (dimm-fru) (nvram) (idprom)] [i2c -> (cpu-fru) (temperature) (fan-control) (card-reader) (motherboard-fru) (i2c-bridge)] [beep] [audio] [rtc] [gpio] [pmc] [floppy] [parallel] [serial] SAB82532 serial driver version 1.65 ttyS00 at 0x7fe7e40 (irq = 12,222) is a SAB82532 V3.2 ttyS01 at 0x7fe7e400040 (irq = 12,222) is a SAB82532 V3.2 Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Initializing RT netlink socket chmc0: US3 memory controller at 0440 [ACTIVE] Starting kswapd Journalled Block Device driver loaded devfs: v1.12c (20020818) Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) devfs: boot_options: 0x0 atyfb: 3D RAGE (XL) [0x4752 rev 0x27] 8M SGRAM, 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 230 MHz PLL, 100 Mhz MCLK Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 80x30 fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI kbd_init: Assuming USB keyboard. 8042(speaker): iobase[07fe7e32] pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured Real Time Clock Driver v1.10e RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 40
RE: no keyboard after recompiling debian sid 2.6.4 kernel
Ben Collins wrote I think for Ultra10, you need to enable the AT keyboard aswell. > # CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD is not set I have tried with this too and have the same problem. I have started to look to see if the serial 8250 is the cause of the problem, but when I try to complie in that module, make-kpkg fails comaplining about unused variable 'size'. Any other ideas? thanks Rich This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail or by telephoning +44 (0)20 7934 9000. Please then delete the e-mail and do not disclose its contents to any person. We believe, but do not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments, are virus free. You should take full responsibility for virus checking. SBG Companies reserve the right to monitor all email communications through their internal and external networks.
Re: libgimp2.0 fails to install
Thanks guys, I ended up removing gimp for the time being as it seemed to be the only way I could continue with the updates. I tried installing gimp-data but that didn't solve it. As Mustafa pointed out, there seems to be a bug with this package. Thanks for the quick responses though, Euan. On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 08:30, Mustafa Hussein wrote: > > Euan Maxwell > > I'm running Debian unstable on my Ultra 2 (2x300Mhz 768MB). > > > > I ran apt-get -u dist-upgrade this morning and got a failure on the > > libgimp2.0 package. > > > > Bar uninstalling gimp, is there anyway to resolve this problem?? > > There is a bug report filed against libgimp2.0 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241587 --
Re: libgimp2.0 fails to install
> Euan Maxwell > I'm running Debian unstable on my Ultra 2 (2x300Mhz 768MB). > > I ran apt-get -u dist-upgrade this morning and got a failure on the > libgimp2.0 package. > > Bar uninstalling gimp, is there anyway to resolve this problem?? There is a bug report filed against libgimp2.0 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241587
Re: Can't install Debian on Sunblade2000
В сообщении от 5 Апрель 2004 14:06 Alexey Nezhdanov написал(a): > I tryed three images this time: woody tftp image (still same effect - junk > spreading all over the screen with "memory address not aligned error > finally"), sarge d-i tftp image and tftp image from > http://www.phunnypharm.org/. > The last two images worked slightly differently: > phunnypharm image prints out "Warning: can't find initial console" and then > hangs. > d-i beta 3 waits a moment and then panics after two "unknown sparc > instructions" and "attempt to kill init". > > I can not connect through serial cable since this box have no RS-232 port > and I have no first woody CD image (some additional googling points that it > may be working). > > So - can you give me your invaluable tip once more? :-) Some more questions: since I still can not pass any parameters to kernel I slightly offtopic question: My box is Blade 2000 and it have no floppy drive. Can I just plug the floppy drive out of intel box and plug it into blade 2000? I have checked out connectors - and yes it have connector on-board that is very similar to usual one. BTW I'll try to make a null-modem cable and install linux through it in the meantime. -- Respectfully Alexey Nezhdanov
Re: libgimp2.0 fails to install
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:07:54AM +0100, Euan Maxwell wrote: > debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Kde > debconf: (Can't locate Qt.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl > /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5 > /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 > /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at > /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Kde/Wizard.pm line 7, <> line 1.) > debconf: falling back to frontend: Dialog you probably want to dpkg-reconfigure debconf > (Reading database ... 107343 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking libgimp2.0 (from .../libgimp2.0_2.0.0-4_sparc.deb) ... > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/libgimp2.0_2.0.0-4_sparc.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite > `/usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/gimp20-libgimp.mo', which is also in > package gimp-data > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libgimp2.0_2.0.0-4_sparc.deb > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) apt-get install gimp-data should fix that. -- -Justin
libgimp2.0 fails to install
Hi there, I'm running Debian unstable on my Ultra 2 (2x300Mhz 768MB). I ran apt-get -u dist-upgrade this morning and got a failure on the libgimp2.0 package. Bar uninstalling gimp, is there anyway to resolve this problem?? Thanks, Euan. sparc:~# apt-get -f install Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libgimp2.0 The following NEW packages will be installed: libgimp2.0 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 50 not upgraded. 37 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 941kB of archives. After unpacking 2425kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main libgimp2.0 2.0.0-4 [941kB] Fetched 941kB in 20s (45.8kB/s) debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Kde debconf: (Can't locate Qt.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Kde/Wizard.pm line 7, <> line 1.) debconf: falling back to frontend: Dialog (Reading database ... 107343 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libgimp2.0 (from .../libgimp2.0_2.0.0-4_sparc.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgimp2.0_2.0.0-4_sparc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/gimp20-libgimp.mo', which is also in package gimp-data dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libgimp2.0_2.0.0-4_sparc.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) --
Re: Bug#242343: debian-installer beta 3 sparc netinst image failed to boot up on Ultra10
[CC:ing debian-sparc to notify the other interested parties.] On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:48:57 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Version: beta3 > Severity: grave Aha. That's a known broken version, sorry. debian-cd was using a bad silo.conf. See below for more details... > boot: linux root=/dev/hdc mount=devfs,dall rw ... > Please fix it or teach me how to fix it if you know something about > it. Try linux root=/dev/rd/0 devfs=mount rw and see if that works. Or just try a daily CD image. I think manty fixed everything related to this issue, please notify us if you find otherwise. -- Joshua Kwan
Re: debian-installer latest netinst image failed to boot up on Ultra10
At Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:15:05 +0200, Morten Werner Olsen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 01:14:39AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > ...kernel boot message... > > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00 > > Press L1-A to return to the boot prom > > sunmouse: Successfully adjusted to 1200 baud. > > [snip] > > And Alex Bartok has the same problem on a Ultra 60 [1] and I have the > same problem with my Sparcstation LX. Could you file a bug against > debian-installer [2] so we can be sure that the team working on the > installer is aware of this? OK, I've put bug report to BTS: #242343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=242343 Regards, -- gotom
