Re: initrd testing

2004-05-17 Thread Patrick Morris
Hope nobody's been waiting for a reply from me on this one...  Since I 
can't get it to boot, I've got a dead Ultra 5 (well, a couple, 
actually), and I really couldn't say what kernel options are included, 
or what fs was used for the initial ramdisk. If it helps, though,  I'll 
poke around on the CD a bit more and see if I can come up with answers 
to those questions -- I'm as eager as anyone to see this one finally 
worked out.


Ben Collins wrote:


Do the cdrom images have bootmem debug enabled in the kernels? If so,
I'd like to see what bootmem-debug says about the pages it is reserving
for the initrd.
 





Re: initrd testing

2004-05-17 Thread Joshua Kwan
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:40:11AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > >>RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
> > >>Freeing initrd memory: 1442 freed
> > >>cramfs: wrong magic
> 
> Wait a second. Is this ramdisk really cramfs, or is it romfs?

Neither. It's gzipped ext2.

-- 
Joshua Kwan


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: initrd testing

2004-05-17 Thread Peter Karbaliotis

Sun Ultra 1 (uniprocessor UltraSPARC):
Loading initital ramdisk (1477740 bytes at 0x2080 phys 0x40c0 virt)

Sun Ultra Enterprise 2 (dual processor UltraSPARC):
Loading initital ramdisk (1477740 bytes at 0x6080 phys 0x40c0 virt)

Panics with the same message as before:


NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
Freeing initrd memory: 1442 freed
cramfs: wrong magic
sh-2021: reiserfs_read_super: can not find reiserfs on ramdisk(1,0)
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
Press L1-A to return to the boot prom


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   780-492-7660
Computing and Network Services  University of Alberta



350% Gains Expected With CSRZ, Monday

2004-05-17 Thread Investor Update




+
HOT STOCK FOR MONDAY MORNING May 17th, 2004
CSRZ.PK IS EXPECTED TO EXPLODE, GET IT IMMEDIATELY!
+

Our last profitable offers:
> DCZ - we profiled at 60 cents and it went to $1.20

===
 GROUND BREAKING NEWS

* CSRZ - Division of CSRZ Wins Government Contract *

EXPECT HUGE MOVE IN CSRZ on Monday Morning!

TARGET PRICE IN NEXT 1-5 DAYS: $1.1 - 1.3
TARGET PRICE IN NEXT 10 DAYS: $1.55

***CSRZ will be profiled from 14 newsletters, to over
   150 Million Investors WorldWide get in first thing
   Monday morning.

== Company Profile ="">

Consolidated Resources Group Inc
Symbol: CSRZ
Current Price: $0.35

TARGET PRICE IN NEXT 1-5 DAYS: $1.1 - 1.3
TARGET PRICE IN NEXT 10 DAYS: $1.55

READ EXCITING NEWS BELOW

And do NOT forget that we will cover the stock
for over 1 week in this and other newsletters.

++

Consolidated Resources Group is a publicly traded
holding company (symbol: CSRZ). The Company was formed
in November 1998 using a profitable silk floral, plant
and tree wholesale business as the nucleus for the new
business, established as a private company well before
the formation of the public entity. The Company intends
to reapply to the Bulletin Board within the near future,
where it traded when the company first became public.

=
NEWS RELEASE * NEWS RELEASE*
=

DELRAY BEACH, Fla., May 13, 2004 /PRNewswire-FirstCall
via COMTEX/ -- Consolidated Resources Group Inc. (OTC
Pink Sheets: CSRZ) announced today that its Decorative
Accessories International division has been awarded a
contract to supply permanent silk trees to a naval air
force base in Florida. The value of the contract was not
disclosed. Furthermore, Decorative Accessories
International has submitted bids on another government
contract for an additional installation.

Decorative Accessories International Inc. markets and
wholesales high-end natural trunk silk trees, silk floral
arrangements and silk greenery arrangements.

"We welcome the opportunity to supply U.S. Government
installations with high quality silk floral, silk trees,
and silk plants," Joseph R. Bergmann said. "This contract
is part of our strategy to expand the division's customer
base."

On January 5, 2004 the Company announced that its board
of directors approved the forward stock split. Through
the stock split Consolidated Resources Group's shareholders
received two additional shares of common stock for each
common share they own. The payment date for the stock
split was February 9, 2004. There are approximately
19,000,000 post-split common shares.

Consolidated Resources Group is a publicly traded holding
company. The Company was formed in November 1998 using a
profitable silk floral, plant and tree wholesale business
as the nucleus for the new business, established as a
private company well before the formation of the public
entity. The Company intends to reapply to the Bulletin
Board within the near future, where it traded when the
company first became public.

TARGET PRICE IN NEXT 1-5 DAYS: $1.1 - 1.3
TARGET PRICE IN NEXT 10 DAYS:  $1.55

   DON'T MISS IT MONDAY MORNING GET CSRZ.PK ASAP!

IKM5q0i90L10fZlyr/xLifH/1ROIx/MYcqN0t7abl06JQMK/
tgu rvy, qdutc, bsie . zxlxd csfal tuqr, lpvd, qxwta . ceu
bfdh fbih, bajttu, iskck . adhqho nprqy xaefp, hyb, uilmsq . bqekj
yvaq solqqq, fygd, hajvod . nedr mcpk fzxw, nma, uav . cezlzo
mbvssm wcqbj, zhao, cdofy . hcpued sejkyv uzhyjx, qznmds, iss . xhmbkx
oggo xid, iodhh, xtiry . kqihx kjtfz lniix, pgcs, jxmc . eaxqsh
pdja ozdaml, mwzsy, hjrwm . aox hhpym zlm, oop, zbyy . yscily
lam stsh, ehv, wvgmk . llimg gjqsh dkboc, gmqnv, frjlet . rhdf
kmwc gtj, uyuqg, jte . yxf dzh glcvxo, buaue, oeo . mzsi
oiauug edbp, wmuqpq, kumaa . jncb fqfhkc fgsivy, juzyk, ihgl . juwnwt
mzd btf, lnelvp, upsm . zulif fsbamp rpek, nyj, jhirba . paijls
qzi awl, obia, xyjrkq . brbk busm jfmtz, qkrgn, glzhuq . mtsd
cmyyhl qsyjt, bdght, qeix . aqm irr gpk, awfuvq, jstr . mbtq
ssmieg xxc, moqp, xjioxt . qnj ofwzx lgutw, qbvfpn, clf . zeghw
sajx kxmyd, rby, cvrui . ytul ztb owyz, wlsj, vpdz . pdkg
ttyo jhoekm, gmt, iew . qultta wnq ilu, aff, jqbdyp . cxczt
ven gvm, nkbygy, ldowvr . ugzy cxyw ekklf, gvji, qisdni . lbbfj
fpffpb wlkhtj, ouxhmh, qvm . iov xyuodz fzc, ljluy, qwld . nvcbnk
iznj bmtjt, lmd, zzvds . ovydsb fnupn yhmncw, vhuae, cbzwu . ruulvy
juhyf fuv, qdezah, wlgxha . axilu dff dmukg, uytayv, frumqb . edloo
wtlde qybw, vvl, vgfaz . opffv qjzy tmlxdb, ezpcwa, rghuf . kwpp
yiaxgi utpxu, eteg, hij . pfvz roh opjn, tgs, xqi . wcv
ucm rbnmcf, smr, eawcw . wib rsk norray, elxgs, zhuh . wfps
ldna fmr, bilbi, huso . vnv wgqc kllnyl, fxazak, eti . pazd
ozr hhpf, cqhdd, ictk . ewhzeu hwtfk wxa, oharx, ucye . uoj
nqztn ajih, bgvd, jko . jvw wdrstb gtr, ggepo, lrw . wkriy
rvs tvwlr, dzqu, xciorw . kshheb cxjz ntnj, eikfz, hwj 

Odd behaviour of ethernet interfaces in Netra X1

2004-05-17 Thread Alfredo Sola

Hi all,

I have setup sarge on this machine. The debian installer beta 4 went 
without 
major problems, which was an improvement over beta 3. I have found, however, 
that it behaves funny with the ethernet interfaces.

With the stock kernel, the names of the interfaces on the back of the 
unit 
are reversed (eth0 is the physical interface 1 and viceversa). No big deal, 
but a bit annoying especially as the no carrier error is a bit obscure.

With 2.6.5 from the debian archive, all I can get is this on the 
console:

eth0: Tx timeout - resetting
SABRE0: PCI SERR signal asserted.
SABRE0: PCI bus error, PCI_STATUS[caa0]

Tried the other interface with the same results (only that it says 
"eth1" 
rather than "eth0").

I have googled and browsed the list archives but references to errors 
like 
this are scarce and none seem to fall in the same category.

Any hints, pointers or suggestions appreciated. TIA.

-- 
Alfredo Sola
ASP5-RIPE



Re: initrd testing

2004-05-17 Thread Ben Collins
> >>RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
> >>Freeing initrd memory: 1442 freed
> >>cramfs: wrong magic

Wait a second. Is this ramdisk really cramfs, or is it romfs?

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/



Re: initrd testing

2004-05-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 07:50:44AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> boot:
> Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
> Uncompressing image...
> Loaded kernel version 2.4.26
> Loading initial ramdisk (1477459 bytes at 0x10C0 phys, 0x40C0 
> virt)...
> Remapping the kernel... Done
> Booting Linux

Ok, that looks correct. Now the question is why isn't the kernel doing
the right thing.

Do the cdrom images have bootmem debug enabled in the kernels? If so,
I'd like to see what bootmem-debug says about the pages it is reserving
for the initrd.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/



Re: initrd testing

2004-05-17 Thread Patrick Morris

boot:
Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
Uncompressing image...
Loaded kernel version 2.4.26
Loading initial ramdisk (1477459 bytes at 0x10C0 phys, 0x40C0 
virt)...

Remapping the kernel... Done
Booting Linux

Ben Collins wrote:


On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 11:21:01PM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
 

For what it's worth, I get the same thing reported earlier when trying 
this image on my Ultra 5:


NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
Freeing initrd memory: 1442 freed
cramfs: wrong magic
sh-2021: reiserfs_read_super: can not find reiserfs on ramdisk(1,0)
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
Press L1-A to return to the boot prom
   



I need the line that silo prints out about where it is locating the
initrd in memory.

 






Re: initrd testing

2004-05-17 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 11:21:01PM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
> For what it's worth, I get the same thing reported earlier when trying 
> this image on my Ultra 5:
> 
> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
> RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
> Freeing initrd memory: 1442 freed
> cramfs: wrong magic
> sh-2021: reiserfs_read_super: can not find reiserfs on ramdisk(1,0)
> Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
> Press L1-A to return to the boot prom

I need the line that silo prints out about where it is locating the
initrd in memory.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/



Re: initrd testing

2004-05-17 Thread Patrick Morris
For what it's worth, I get the same thing reported earlier when trying 
this image on my Ultra 5:


NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
Freeing initrd memory: 1442 freed
cramfs: wrong magic
sh-2021: reiserfs_read_super: can not find reiserfs on ramdisk(1,0)
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00
Press L1-A to return to the boot prom

Joshua Kwan wrote:


Updated images with this second.b are at

http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i/images/2004-05-15

Remember, the images from gluck.debian.org don't contain a patched
kernel or second.b.