Re: lablgtk deps problem
The [...] part would be helpful -- it should say why those three packages aren't being installed. Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote: Hello, I would like to install lablgtk on my Ultra-5. I make a # apt-get install liblablgtk2-ocaml [...] The following packages have unmet dependencies: liblablgtk2-ocaml: Depends: libbonoboui2-0 (= 2.5.4) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgnomeui-0 (= 2.8.0) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libpanel-applet2-0 (= 2.8.2) but it is not going to be installed So... what should I do? - Report something to package maintainers? - Build them myself ? What would be the easy way? (I want to build the debian way...) I have an Ultra-5 box (275Mhz), slow enough to compile big things -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: lablgtk deps problem
I'm very dumb, I forgot to tell what debian i'm using... I'm using testing on sparc U-5 -- Get a fully managed dedicated server for ¤200/month ($257/month) No time limit for taking care of your server. You keep the root acces if you want. Billing periods are 3 months. See the conditions at http://aspo.rktmb.org/activities/managed_servers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:25:18PM -0800, David S. Miller said: On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:01:17 -0500 Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any case, I can't recall coming across this issue before, and most of the systems I run have far less memory than this beast. :) Is there a way to fix this? Try to find out what is asking for such a large allocation. You can do that by applying a patch similar to this one so that the debug message prints out more information: If it helps, the problem almost certainly seemed to be related to spamassassin (in particular, spamd). The issue became apparent when qmail-smtpd quit responding (but caused the kernel to log those errors when something connected to port 25). A restart of qmail fixed it for a minute or two, after which, the issue reappeared. It looked like there were a few too many spamc processes, which seemed to indicate an SA problem. Restarting SA fixed the issue - it hasn't cropped up again so far. I can try the patch if you still feel it'll help - but it does look like SA was at fault in this particular case. = mm/page_alloc.c 1.72 vs edited = --- 1.72/mm/page_alloc.c 2004-08-08 01:58:48 -07:00 +++ edited/mm/page_alloc.c2005-03-30 16:21:23 -08:00 @@ -476,6 +476,8 @@ out: printk(KERN_NOTICE __alloc_pages: %u-order allocation failed (gfp=0x%x/%i)\n, order, gfp_mask, !!(current-flags PF_MEMALLOC)); + printk(KERN_NOTICE __alloc_pages: task(%s) pid(%d) caller(%p)\n, +current-comm, current-pid, __builtin_return_address(0)); if (unlikely(vm_gfp_debug)) dump_stack(); return NULL; -- Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Administrator Psychology Department, Rutgers University, Newark campus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
keyboard errore
salve, ho appena installato debian3.0 su una Sun UltraSparc10 dopo aver aggiornato i pacchetti, al successivo riavvio , la tastiera viene completamente distorta...il tasti non corrispondono piu'.. cosa posso fare? grazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with /tmp d-i BUG?
Joey Hess schrieb: Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote: After my succesfull install of sarge on a Balde 100 I doscoverd that the permissions for /tmp are wrong. It should be drwxrwxrwx but it is drwxr-xr-x also the partition recipe of d-i created a seperated tmp partition /dev/hda7 there was no ext3 filesystem created on it The only automatic partitioning recipe that creates a /tmp partition is the multi-user one, which is not the default. Did you choose that one? Sorry that I've forgotten to provide that bit of info, yes that's what I used I know of nothing in the installer that would cause that partition not to be formatted. Well shor after I discovered that problem the disk died. Got a new one and currently reinstalling it. I'll try out som LVM things and /dev/shm tmpfs was mounte on the /tmp moint point anyway. Sorry, but I don't understand this sentence; /dev/shm is a mount point that has a tmpfs filesystem mounted on it. I don't know how a mount point could be mounted on /tmp. Sorry again /tmp wasn't mounted and I kinda blamed it on tmpfs but now I think the dieing disk was to blame for that. looks like that tmpfs behavier is triggered by the existence of the /etc/default/tmpfs file putet there by the initscripts package. Nothing in initscripts mounts a tmpfs on /tmp. /etc/init.d/mountvirtfs mounts a tmpfs on /dev/shm, it always does this no matter what the content of /etc/default/tmpfs is. Yes just figured that out myself after I got some sleep. My brain wasn't working very well last night. I think you need to do more investigation or give a clearer explantation of your problem. And on other thing mkfs -t fstype gives only a not found. What fstype? ext2 and ext3 haven't tried anything else but that was most likely the disk as well. I'll know for sure in the next hour and write a follow up to this mail. greets Uwe -- Jetzt will man das Internet nicht einfach ein paar Leuten wie der IETF überlassen, die wissen, was sie tun. Es ist zu wichtig geworden. - Scott Bradner http://www.highspeed-firewall.de/adamantix/ http://www.x-tec.de
