problems with U2

2006-08-21 Thread Antonio M.
 all. In the first days of august I wrote a mail, but probably people was
enjoing holydays so I try to post again my problem in hoping to have
some hints.
My tentative to discover SUN ultra2 bipro goes on.
I have compiled two kernel that differ only on the setting of smp: the
first is setted on, the second off. I noted that:

the mono system shutdown regularly and the U2 switch off without problems,
but the command top doesn't work (it can't access to /proc);
the bipro system doesn't shutdown but top works

I use debian sarge regularly updated, with kernel 2.4.33 without modules
(securiry reasons), without X. The U2 works as net, internal DNS, firewall
server.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l|grep gcc
ii  gcc-3.33.3.5-13 
ii  gcc-3.3-base   3.3.5-13
ii  lib64gcc1  3.4.3-13 
ii  libgcc13.4.3-13 

kernel comes from kernel.org

I hope someone can help me.
Cheers
Antonio

-- 
#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#
Antonio Madesani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#+--+#


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Silo, Lilo, Grub and a new kernel

2006-08-21 Thread Vincent Pelletier
Le mercredi 16 août 2006 10:27, Daniel Liikamaa a écrit :
> You can't run lilo on a sparc, silo is the sparc alternative, so to
> speak.
> And as for your question; you just relink vmlinuz to your new kernel and
> reboot. Silo works a little bit like grub, you don't have to reinstall
> the boot sector every time you upgrade your kernel.

Just to mention it, I've started a sparc64-ieee1275 grub 2 port. It's not 
usable yet, sadly, and I haven't worked on it for some time.
For now I can just boot grub using netboot (it lacks a disk install 
system), "use" grub 2 (module loading, command line, ...) and cannot boot any 
OS (err... bootloader ? Ah, nevermind :) ).

If anyone want to contribute, you're welcome on #grub irc channel on freenode 
(I'm sometimes there...).

-- 
Vincent Pelletier


pgpBwzxAgWBxA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: problem with resolution on ultra 5

2006-08-21 Thread Steve Pacenka
On Saturday 19 August 2006 10:55, Steve Pacenka wrote:
> On Friday 18 August 2006 15:59, zagi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I installed Debian Sarge on my ultra 5. It has  ATI Technologies, Inc. 3D
> > Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] graphic card. Max resolution that I can set
> > in XF86Config-4 800x600. If I set any higher resolution Xserver will not
> > start.
>
> It's possible that you have the earlier U5/10 motherboard that has 2M VRAM;
> later ones have 4M.  2M VRAM is not enough to support more than 800x600 at
> 24 bits.  Cut back to 15 or 16 bits depth and you can get to at least
> 1024x768, and possibly to 1280x1024.

My reply was not completely right.  Of course 1280x1024 will only work at 8 
bits depth within 2M VRAM ...

The ATI Rage chipset supports other resolutions; perhaps 1152x900 or 1280x800 
will work at 15/16 bits.  See the Sparc Framebuffer FAQ.

-- SP


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]