Re: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Jim Watson


On 17/12/2006, at 5:55 AM, Thomas Köllmann wrote:


On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:38:58 -0800
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Please try booting it with the boot parameter video=atyfb:off, i.e.
instead of just pressing enter at the silo boot prompt type

Linux video=atyfb:off


Yes, that works.

Does this have any drawbacks regarding the use of xorg? (I haven't  
yet installed that...)


I can confirm this problem exists on Sunblade100 with the 2.6.18-3  
(Mon 4 Dec) and the same fix works.


I have been using xorg and also using video=atyfb:off to avoid the  
"red dots" issue, no problems I can see, only the alternative  
consoles have some unusable frame outside, about 20% of the screen area.


Jim



Re: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Thomas Köllmann
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:38:58 -0800
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:32:29PM +0100, Thomas Köllmann wrote:
> 
> > atyfb: 3D RAGE XL (Mach64 GR, PCI-33) [0x4752 rev 0x27]
> > atyfb: 8M SDRAM (1:1), 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 235 MHz PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK, 63
> > MHz XCLK Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 144x56
> > atyfb: fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI
> 
> Please try booting it with the boot parameter video=atyfb:off, i.e. 
> instead of just pressing enter at the silo boot prompt type 
> 
> Linux video=atyfb:off

Yes, that works.

Does this have any drawbacks regarding the use of xorg? (I haven't yet 
installed that...)

Thanks,
 - Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:55:13PM +0100, Thomas Köllmann wrote:

> > Please try booting it with the boot parameter video=atyfb:off, i.e. 
> > instead of just pressing enter at the silo boot prompt type 
> > 
> > Linux video=atyfb:off
> 
> Yes, that works.
> 
> Does this have any drawbacks regarding the use of xorg? (I haven't 
> yet installed that...)

I don't remember anyone reporting problems with xorg on these 
machines, it would be very valuable information if you could try it 
and report back.

Thanks,
-- 
Jurij Smakov   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/  KeyID: C99E03CC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 16 December 2006 17:58, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Since you are the only person who reported such a problem so far, I
> feel that severity is a bit too high, so I'm dropping it to
> 'important' for now. I'm also CC'ing this message to the debian-sparc
> mailing list to ask whether anybody else is seeing similar problems.

There's something similar for a SunBlade 100 in installation report 
#402282 [1].

Cheers,
FJP

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/402282


pgpzpvj7TjgeH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Thomas Köllmann
Hi, Jurij!

On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:58:55 -0800
Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Since you are the only person who reported such a problem so far, I 
> feel that severity is a bit too high, so I'm dropping it to 
> 'important' for now. 

Sure, whatever you feel is in order.

> Do you have more than one videocard in this machine? 

No, only the onboard ATI card:

atyfb: 3D RAGE XL (Mach64 GR, PCI-33) [0x4752 rev 0x27]
atyfb: 8M SDRAM (1:1), 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 235 MHz PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK, 63 MHz XCLK
Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 144x56
atyfb: fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI

(This is from dmesg when running 2.6.16-17.)

Thanks,
 - Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 07:32:29PM +0100, Thomas Köllmann wrote:

> No, only the onboard ATI card:
> 
> atyfb: 3D RAGE XL (Mach64 GR, PCI-33) [0x4752 rev 0x27]
> atyfb: 8M SDRAM (1:1), 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 235 MHz PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK, 63 MHz 
> XCLK
> Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 144x56
> atyfb: fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI

Please try booting it with the boot parameter video=atyfb:off, i.e. 
instead of just pressing enter at the silo boot prompt type 

Linux video=atyfb:off

there.

Thanks,
-- 
Jurij Smakov   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/  KeyID: C99E03CC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Jurij Smakov
severity 403364 important
thanks

Hi Thomas,

On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 06:05:52PM +0100, Thomas Koellmann wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64
> Version: 2.6.18-7
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system

Since you are the only person who reported such a problem so far, I 
feel that severity is a bit too high, so I'm dropping it to 
'important' for now. I'm also CC'ing this message to the debian-sparc 
mailing list to ask whether anybody else is seeing similar problems.
 
> This kernel, which seems currently to be the latest in testing/etch,
> hangs on my Sun Blade 150 after displaying "Booting Linux" (at that
> stage where linux-image-2.6.16-2-sparc64 switches video resolution).
> 
> This is a fresh install using d-i beta-3 (d-i etch rc-1 also hangs
> early in the boot process).

Do you have more than one videocard in this machine? If that's the 
case, it might be that the machine is still booting, but the output 
goes to a different videocard.

Best regards,
-- 
Jurij Smakov   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/  KeyID: C99E03CC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]