Re: Sparc release requalification
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:40:47PM -0800, David Miller wrote: OK. Yours has gcc 4.2.4, and our ones have gcc 4.3.2 (that we shipped as stable :) I also just tried a newer packaged image, and it has the same issue. I just tossed lenny onto my main build system and I will try to reproduce this and track it down. FYI: lenny uses gcc 4.1.3 for their normal build at least on amd64 and sparc systems: Linux version 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp (Debian 2.6.26-19lenny2) (da...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 03:34:29 UTC 2009 -- Netzwerkadministration/Zentrale Dienste, Interdiziplinaeres Zentrum fuer wissenschaftliches Rechnen der Universitaet Heidelberg IWR; INF 368; 69120 Heidelberg; Tel: (06221)54-8236 Fax: -5224 Email: hermann.la...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Sparc release requalification
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Hermann Lauer wrote: OK. Yours has gcc 4.2.4, and our ones have gcc 4.3.2 (that we shipped as stable :) I also just tried a newer packaged image, and it has the same issue. I just tossed lenny onto my main build system and I will try to reproduce this and track it down. FYI: lenny uses gcc 4.1.3 for their normal build at least on amd64 and sparc systems: 2.6.26 didn't have the NMI watchdog code anyway. Besides, 4.4 is on the way already, so old version talk is moot. Let's just let Dave do his magic :) -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Sparc release requalification
From: Hermann Lauer hermann.la...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:36:33 +0100 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:40:47PM -0800, David Miller wrote: OK. Yours has gcc 4.2.4, and our ones have gcc 4.3.2 (that we shipped as stable :) I also just tried a newer packaged image, and it has the same issue. I just tossed lenny onto my main build system and I will try to reproduce this and track it down. FYI: lenny uses gcc 4.1.3 for their normal build at least on amd64 and sparc systems: Linux version 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp (Debian 2.6.26-19lenny2) (da...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 03:34:29 UTC 2009 I'm confused now :-) So does gcc-4.1.3 produce the bad kernels or does gcc-4.3.2? I built Linus's current tree under Lenny and that booted up perfectly on my Niagara2 box. Also, please increase CONFIG_NR_CPUS to 256 in your SMP builds on sparc64 in Debian. I'm missing most of my cpus with the Debian built kernels :-) Probably I've mentioned this before :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Sparc release requalification
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:09:13PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Hermann Lauer hermann.la...@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:36:33 +0100 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:40:47PM -0800, David Miller wrote: OK. Yours has gcc 4.2.4, and our ones have gcc 4.3.2 (that we shipped as stable :) I also just tried a newer packaged image, and it has the same issue. I just tossed lenny onto my main build system and I will try to reproduce this and track it down. FYI: lenny uses gcc 4.1.3 for their normal build at least on amd64 and sparc systems: Linux version 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp (Debian 2.6.26-19lenny2) (da...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 03:34:29 UTC 2009 I'm confused now :-) So does gcc-4.1.3 produce the bad kernels or does gcc-4.3.2? No, Hermann's mail was not relevant, the new NMI code did not exist in 2.6.26. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Sparc release requalification
From: Josip Rodin j...@entuzijast.net Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:36:24 +0100 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:09:13PM -0800, David Miller wrote: I'm confused now :-) So does gcc-4.1.3 produce the bad kernels or does gcc-4.3.2? No, Hermann's mail was not relevant, the new NMI code did not exist in 2.6.26. I asked a question which was a choice between two non-booleans, and you resonded with a boolean. Please answer my question :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
