Re: Wheezy: iceweasel crashes
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:18:03PM +0200, Hartwig Atrops wrote: > Hi. > > Today I run a quite basic Wheezy test install on my Sun Ultra 60. > > Tasksel selection: only standard system + ssh server > > + apt-get install: > xorg > xfce4 > xfce4-terminal > iceweasel > (+apt-file) > > xfce is working so far (xfce4-terminal ok, xterm nok: black window) > > iceweasel starts, but has problems with several sites: > > crashing on: > www.spiegel.de > www.linux-magazin.de > www.arte.tv > (and some more) Are you getting any error messages? I would expect "bus error" or something. You might see evidence of it in dmesg as well. If you get "bus error", then it's most likely yet another case of unaligned memory accesses in the code somewhere. The simplest way to get some useful stack trace out of it is to follow these steps: 1. Install iceweasel debugging symbols (iceweasel-dbg package). 2. Enable core dumping with 'ulimit -c unlimited'. 3. Start iceweasel, navigate to one of the crashing pages, it should dump a core file. 4. Use gdb to obtain an annotated backtrace, something like gdb /usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin core (gdb) bt Once this is done, file a bug against iceweasel, including the entire stack trace. Best regards, -- Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120517214416.ga6...@wooyd.org
Wheezy: iceweasel crashes
Hi. Today I run a quite basic Wheezy test install on my Sun Ultra 60. Tasksel selection: only standard system + ssh server + apt-get install: xorg xfce4 xfce4-terminal iceweasel (+apt-file) xfce is working so far (xfce4-terminal ok, xterm nok: black window) iceweasel starts, but has problems with several sites: crashing on: www.spiegel.de www.linux-magazin.de www.arte.tv (and some more) sites without problem: www.debian.org www.heise.de What's going wrong? Any ideas? Regards, Hartwig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205172218.03711.hartwig.atr...@arcor.de
Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:50:04PM +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of > >> http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated, > >> as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us > >> determine sparc's status for the release. > > > > I see the number of registered sparc porters has dropped since the last time > > around and we're now in the red, but I don't think that's because of an > > actual change, rather we must have done different accounting. > > > > upstream and downstream, the situation seems unchanged - stuff is generally > > working fine, I don't see a particular reason to avoid releasing sparc > > wheezy compared to sparc squeeze. > > And if debian-sparc would include the virtio drivers, it might even > get more porters, > as they would be able to develop stuff and do some initial testing > without having > an access to sun4u hardware. [1] ;-) > > 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2012/05/msg00014.html File a wishlist bug against linux-2.6 package asking to enable virtio-modules udeb for sparc. We have them for other architectures, if there any particular reason why they are not available for sparc, kernel team will explain it to us. Best regards, -- Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120517183024.ga3...@wooyd.org
Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of >> http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated, >> as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us >> determine sparc's status for the release. > > I see the number of registered sparc porters has dropped since the last time > around and we're now in the red, but I don't think that's because of an > actual change, rather we must have done different accounting. > > upstream and downstream, the situation seems unchanged - stuff is generally > working fine, I don't see a particular reason to avoid releasing sparc > wheezy compared to sparc squeeze. And if debian-sparc would include the virtio drivers, it might even get more porters, as they would be able to develop stuff and do some initial testing without having an access to sun4u hardware. [1] ;-) 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2012/05/msg00014.html > We should probably note that upstream sparc32 is actually fairly revived > with LEON these days, so that one bit of real regression we had a few years > earlier might actually get fixed :) > > -- > 2. That which causes joy or happiness. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120517101018.ga16...@entuzijast.net > -- Regards, Artyom Tarasenko Solaris/sparc and Linux/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacxas8arfhn-2aquc+dqkydir5bv0bkv0n1zhvjj2nkiz9o...@mail.gmail.com
SunFire V245 Crash
Hi, We have a Sun Fire V245 that craches at random times after an upgrade to a new kernel, it sends an error message: 35403.390136] ERROR(0): Cheetah error trap taken afsr[1202] afar[000144fbb100] TL1(0) [35403.390158] ERROR(1): Cheetah error trap taken afsr[00108000] afar[000144fbb100] TL1(0) [35403.390170] ERROR(1): TPC[5ce7c8] TNPC[5ce7cc] O7[4d2578] TSTATE[11001604] [35403.390174] ERROR(1): TPC [35403.390191] ERROR(1): M_SYND(0), E_SYND(0), Privileged [35403.390198] ERROR(1): Highest priority error (8000) "Correctable ECC error from remote cache/memory" [35403.390205] ERROR(1): D-cache idx[0] tag[] utag[] stag[] [35403.390211] ERROR(1): D-cache data0[] data1[] data2[] data3[] [35403.390219] ERROR(1): I-cache idx[0] tag[] utag[] stag[] u[] l[] [35403.390226] ERROR(1): I-cache INSN0[] INSN1[] INSN2[] INSN3[] [35403.390233] ERROR(1): I-cache INSN4[] INSN5[] INSN6[] INSN7[] [35403.390239] ERROR(1): E-cache idx[44fbb100] tag[1e048241] [35403.390245] ERROR(1): E-cache data0[] data1[] data2[f80163f51ab0] data3[0001] [35404.959955] ERROR(0): TPC[5bb66c] TNPC[5bb670] O7[43888c] TSTATE[9911001602] [35405.052756] ERROR(0): TPC [35405.116922] ERROR(0): M_SYND(0), E_SYND(2) [35405.171923] ERROR(0): Highest priority error (1000) "Foreign read to DRAM incurring correctable ECC error" [35405.312865] ERROR(0): D-cache idx[0] tag[] utag[] stag[] [35405.437757] ERROR(0): D-cache data0[] data1[] data2[] data3[] [35405.586715] ERROR(0): I-cache idx[0] tag[] utag[] stag[] u[] l[] [35405.757440] ERROR(0): I-cache INSN0[] INSN1[] INSN2[] INSN3[] [35405.906395] ERROR(0): I-cache INSN4[] INSN5[] INSN6[] INSN7[] [35406.055350] ERROR(0): E-cache idx[44fbb100] tag[1e005302] [35406.135551] ERROR(0): E-cache data0[] data1[] data2[] data3[] I verified the server Hardware status, it seems OK Here, some information commands outputs: · /etc/debian_version : 6.0.4 · /var/log/installer/lsb-release : DISTRIB_RELEASE="5.0 (lenny) - installer build 20090123lenny7" · uname –a : Linux X 2.6.32-5-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Thu Mar 22 18:46:12 UTC 2012 sparc64 GNU/Linux thanks
Re: sparc qualification for Wheezy
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated, > as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us > determine sparc's status for the release. I see the number of registered sparc porters has dropped since the last time around and we're now in the red, but I don't think that's because of an actual change, rather we must have done different accounting. upstream and downstream, the situation seems unchanged - stuff is generally working fine, I don't see a particular reason to avoid releasing sparc wheezy compared to sparc squeeze. We should probably note that upstream sparc32 is actually fairly revived with LEON these days, so that one bit of real regression we had a few years earlier might actually get fixed :) -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120517101018.ga16...@entuzijast.net
