Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 23:18 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:

> DSA would like to decomission lebrun and schroeder (old sparc build
> daemons). Please if you think this is a bad idea for some reason, let
> me know, otherwise those will be decomissioned in the following 
> weeks.

If there are people wanting to work on the sparc64 port perhaps we
could ship them to those people or turn them into sparc64 porterboxen?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-02 Thread Frans van Berckel
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 12:56 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 23:18 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> 
> > DSA would like to decomission lebrun and schroeder (old sparc build
> > daemons). Please if you think this is a bad idea for some reason,
> > let
> > me know, otherwise those will be decomissioned in the following 
> > weeks.
> 
> If there are people wanting to work on the sparc64 port perhaps we
> could ship them to those people or turn them into sparc64
> porterboxen?

For what i have seen at the debian-sparc mailing list, Rod Schnell
(CCing) just did that for the raverin porterbox ...

Frans van Berckel



Do 8042/kb_ps2 keyboard devices work under wheezy kernels?

2015-10-02 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
Hi all,

I'm currently working on a patchset to fix up the various OpenBIOS
properties to enable detection of the PS/2 keyboard in QEMU. After a
couple of days work I have a prototype patch which fixes us the various
device tree properties to match those close to real hardware - which
works fine on all of my non-Linux images but fails when trying to boot a
Debian wheezy kernel.

Here is the panic I get when I try and boot the kernel:

[   17.184211] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
[   17.184776] tsk->{mm,active_mm}->context = 
[   17.185438] tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pgd = f89f6550
[   17.185964]   \|/  \|/
[   17.185979]   "@'/ .. \`@"
[   17.185990]   /_| \__/ |_\
[   17.186001]  \__U_/
[   17.187411] swapper(1): Oops [#1]
[   17.188086] TSTATE: 004480001605 TPC: 00812788 TNPC:
0081278c Y: Not tainted
[   17.189643] TPC: 
[   17.190247] g0:  g1: 009563e8 g2:
 g3: 00992cf8
[   17.191080] g4: f8000703b6e0 g5:  g6:
f8000704 g7: 
[   17.191911] o0: 008fd5c0 o1: f8000722e800 o2:
8000 o3: 0002
[   17.192738] o4: f800070436b0 o5:  sp:
f80007042ee1 ret_pc: 00812764
[   17.193693] RPC: 
[   17.194223] l0: 008e8800 l1: 008fd400 l2:
f800 l3: 00a83bf0
[   17.195069] l4: f8000726b748 l5:  l6:
0097cfa0 l7: 0008
[   17.195889] i0: f8000722e800 i1: 008e9000 i2:
008fd400 i3: 008e9000
[   17.196714] i4: f80007296980 i5:  i6:
f80007042f91 i7: 006a3d8c
[   17.197645] I7: 
[   17.198208] Call Trace:
[   17.198643]  [006a3d8c] platform_drv_probe+0xc/0x20
[   17.199200]  [006a2890] really_probe+0x50/0x180
[   17.199682]  [006a0ff4] bus_for_each_drv+0x54/0xa0
[   17.200178]  [006a2a40] device_attach+0x80/0xc0
[   17.200654]  [006a1f98] bus_probe_device+0x78/0xc0
[   17.201233]  [0069fcf8] device_add+0x498/0x600
[   17.201715]  [006a4440] platform_device_add.part.4+0x100/0x240
[   17.202297]  [006a498c] platform_create_bundle+0xcc/0x160
[   17.202938]  [009cd5f4] i8042_init+0x174/0x1d8
[   17.203420]  [00426ba8] do_one_initcall+0xe8/0x160
[   17.203923]  [009b08f0] kernel_init+0xd8/0x168
[   17.204396]  [0042b270] kernel_thread+0x30/0x60
[   17.204965]  [00801f20] rest_init+0x10/0x70
[   17.205590] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
[   17.206269] Caller[006a3d8c]: platform_drv_probe+0xc/0x20
[   17.206875] Caller[006a2890]: really_probe+0x50/0x180
[   17.207394] Caller[006a0ff4]: bus_for_each_drv+0x54/0xa0
[   17.207929] Caller[006a2a40]: device_attach+0x80/0xc0
[   17.208443] Caller[006a1f98]: bus_probe_device+0x78/0xc0
[   17.208977] Caller[0069fcf8]: device_add+0x498/0x600
[   17.209568] Caller[006a4440]:
platform_device_add.part.4+0x100/0x240
[   17.210185] Caller[006a498c]: platform_create_bundle+0xcc/0x160
[   17.210763] Caller[009cd5f4]: i8042_init+0x174/0x1d8
[   17.211270] Caller[00426ba8]: do_one_initcall+0xe8/0x160
[   17.211804] Caller[009b08f0]: kernel_init+0xd8/0x168
[   17.212312] Caller[0042b270]: kernel_thread+0x30/0x60
[   17.212826] Caller[00801f20]: rest_init+0x10/0x70
[   17.213420] Instruction DUMP: 350023f5  901221c0  370023a4 
9210001d  a21461f0  a01420d0  4467  b2166078
[   17.215328] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
[   17.215923] Call Trace:
[   17.216219]  [0046711c] do_exit+0x79c/0x7c0
[   17.216675]  [00427c3c] die_if_kernel+0x17c/0x300
[   17.217265]  [00818ac8] unhandled_fault+0x84/0x9c
[   17.217766]  [00819290] do_sparc64_fault+0x7b0/0x8e0
[   17.218273]  [00407880] sparc64_realfault_common+0x10/0x20
[   17.218881]  [00812788] sparc_i8042_probe+0x34/0x134
[   17.219393]  [006a3d8c] platform_drv_probe+0xc/0x20
[   17.219893]  [006a2890] really_probe+0x50/0x180
[   17.220368]  [006a0ff4] bus_for_each_drv+0x54/0xa0
[   17.220856]  [006a2a40] device_attach+0x80/0xc0
[   17.221428]  [006a1f98] bus_probe_device+0x78/0xc0
[   17.221934]  [0069fcf8] device_add+0x498/0x600
[   17.222402]  [006a4440] platform_device_add.part.4+0x100/0x240
[   17.222968]  [006a498c] platform_create_bundle+0xcc/0x160
[   17.223539]  [009cd5f4] i8042_init+0x174/0x1d8
[   17.224088]  [00426ba8] do_one_initcall+0xe8/0x160
[   17.225484] Press Stop-A (L1-A) to return to the boot prom


The problem seems to be related to the platform-specific parts of the
8042 

Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-02 Thread rod
I wouldn't be opposed to putting them back into service.  I have space
for them (in Missouri if that matters).

Rod

On 10/2/2015 6:11 AM, Frans van Berckel wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 12:56 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 23:18 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>>
>>> DSA would like to decomission lebrun and schroeder (old sparc build
>>> daemons). Please if you think this is a bad idea for some reason,
>>> let
>>> me know, otherwise those will be decomissioned in the following 
>>> weeks.
>>
>> If there are people wanting to work on the sparc64 port perhaps we
>> could ship them to those people or turn them into sparc64
>> porterboxen?
> 
> For what i have seen at the debian-sparc mailing list, Rod Schnell
> (CCing) just did that for the raverin porterbox ...
> 
> Frans van Berckel
>