Re: Sun documentation resources
Ludovic Courtès napsal(a): Hi, Time passed... Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: While attending Debconf8, I've met with Barton George, Sun's group manager for free and open source software. He pointed out the new documentation resource Sun have set up to assist open source developers in supporting Sun hardware: http://wikis.sun.com/display/FOSSdocs/Home If you would like to see some document not mentioned there, please let me know, and I can pass the information on to him. That's good news! It even mentions SunPCi cards, although only the specs of the latest version are available (FWIW I have a SunPCi "Penguin" here). Thanks! Ludo'. May be documentation about envctrl on E250 and E450 will be interested too. Thanks Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netboot E250 -- tftp problem
Hero_xbd!.RRR napsal(a): Hi, everybody! I am trying to install a debian-sparc system on an old Enterprise 250(E250) in our lab. The CD-ROM on E250 is broken, so I need to do netboot and installation. The problem is when netboot, there are problem with tftp downloading. What I have done: 1. Setup a netboot server(Debian Sid i386), with rarpd and tftpd-hpa. 1.1. Edit /etc/ether and start rarpd. 1.2. Start tftpd-hpa(standalone, without inetd) with "-l -s /tftpboot -r blksize" option(edited in /etc/default/tftpd-hpa). 1.3. Getting a file from tftp server at another workstation works. 2. Turn on E250(in the same LAN as netboot server), Press Stop-A to get the OPENBOOT prompt, issue"boot net", it reads that: Boot device:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],4000/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1 File and Args: Time out waiting for ARP/RARP packet 4200 Data Access Error and throw me to the "ok" prompt again. 3.1 To solve the problem, I did "net-watch-all" in E250's OPENBOOT prompt, it returned no error. 3.2 I used Wireshark(aka. ethereal) to sniffer network packets, It shows that E250 has issued a RARP query, and netboot server has respond one then E250 has got an IP address(But when I ping from netboot server to E250, it gives no response). Then E250 has queried an image file named according to its newly received IP address(hexadecimal, I can also see in tftp's log this request), but when netboot server respond with the tftp packet, wireshark shows the udp packet encapsuring tftp data has "udp checksum error" 4. The hardware of netboot server is: CPU: Intel Cereron 1.7 Ghz Chipset: Intel i845G NIC: Realtek 8139 I don't know what to do now, I have tried everything I know and everything I can find on the net, but still stack with this problem. Please give me some suggestions. Thanks in advance! I don't know if my advice help you, but I use netboot on E250 and E450 and Ultra 20 and Ultra 5 many times without problem.But first thing that I do is upgrading OPB to latest version and switch to DHCP :-) I download OPB firmware from sunsolve put it on tftp server and boot it to upgrade OPB it works great and I use it. Dan -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Messy screen with ATI Mach64 on UltraIIi
Hernest napsal(a): Hi, I am trying to upgrade an UltraIIi from an old Aurora Linux (kernel 2.4.20) to Debian Etch (2.6.18), but I cannot get a workable framebuffer using the PCI video card on the system (an ATI Mach64 GT, see logs below). I am booting with the Debian netinst CD, but at all resolutions I tried, I always get a black verical stripe in the middle of the screen and sometimes the right half of the screen remains black. The thing is barely usable as I cannot see most of the comman line. With 2.4.20 everything is OK. If I disable the framebuffer (with video=atyfb:off fb boot option) the screen does not get messy, but the Debian menu is unusable, so I have to find a way to make the fb to work. I have not overwritten anything so far, so I could compare the video timings under 2.4.20 (when the screen is OK) and under 2.6.18 (when I get the mess). Incredibly they are exactly the same. Any idea to have a decent fb like it used to be in 2.4.20? Thanks Hernest == lspci 80:03.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC 215IIC [Mach64 GT IIC] (rev 3a) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) == fbset -i (on both distributions!!) mode "1024x768-59" # D: 64.201 MHz, H: 47.769 kHz, V: 59.414 Hz geometry 1024 768 1024 4064 8 timings 15576 128 56 27 3 136 6 hsync high vsync high csync high accel true rgba 8/0,8/0,8/0,0/0 endmode Frame buffer device information: Name: ATY Mach64 Address : 0x180 Size: 4186112 Type: PACKED PIXELS Visual : PSEUDOCOLOR XPanStep: 8 YPanStep: 1 YWrapStep : 0 LineLength : 1024 MMIO Address: 0x17ff800 MMIO Size : 2048 Accelerator : ATI Mach64GT == Relevant kernel log (2.4.20) PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 3.10.8 1999/03/17 12:34 Linux version 2.4.20-2.3sparc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc driver version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) executing gcc version egcs- 2.92.11) #1 Wed Jan 15 18:27:52 EST 2003 ARCH: SUN4U [ ... ] Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda2 ro Console: colour dummy device 80x25 Calibrating delay loop... 665.19 BogoMIPS Memory: 124176k available (1880k kernel code, 536k data, 152k init) [f800,07ec] [ ... ] atyfb: 3D RAGE IIC (PCI) [0x4756 rev 0x3a] 4M EDO, 14.31818 MHz XTAL, 230 MHz PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48 fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI pty: 1024 Unix98 ptys configured [ ... ] == Relevant kernel log (2.6.18) PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 'OBP 3.10.8 1999/03/17 12:34' PROMLIB: Root node compatible: sun4u Linux version 2.6.18-5-sparc64 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #1 Mon May 21 21:52:13 UTC 2007 ARCH: SUN4U [ ... ] Kernel command line: debconf/priority=low PID hash table entries: 512 (order: 9, 4096 bytes) Console: colour dummy device 80x25 [ ... ] atyfb: 3D RAGE IIC (Mach64 GV, PCI) [0x4756 rev 0x3a] atyfb: 4M EDO, 14.31818 MHz XTAL, 230 MHz PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK, 83 MHz XCLK Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x48 atyfb: fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI Hi, may be I have the same problem on E250. Problem is now solved in > 2.6.20. Dan -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: build sparc32 kernel deb on sparc64
Robert Reif napsal(a): Daniel Smolik wrote: Robert Reif napsal(a): Is it possible to build a sparc32 kernel deb on sparc64? I can compile a 32 bit kernel using ARCH=sparc ok. Running make-kpkg --arch sparc tries to compile a 64 bit kernel. Setting an ARCH=sparc environment variable doesn't help. Any one have any pointers on cross compiling a sparc32 kernel deb on a sparc64 system? I normaly compile kernel for 32 sparc as: sparc32 bash make Dan This doesn't work for me: netra:/usr/src/linux-2.6# sparc32 bash -bash: sparc32: command not found What package do I need to do this? I just installed the standard (minimum) packages. dpkg -S /usr/bin/sparc32 sparc-utils: /usr/bin/sparc32 Dan -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: build sparc32 kernel deb on sparc64
Robert Reif napsal(a): Is it possible to build a sparc32 kernel deb on sparc64? I can compile a 32 bit kernel using ARCH=sparc ok. Running make-kpkg --arch sparc tries to compile a 64 bit kernel. Setting an ARCH=sparc environment variable doesn't help. Any one have any pointers on cross compiling a sparc32 kernel deb on a sparc64 system? I normaly compile kernel for 32 sparc as: sparc32 bash make Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Major bug in mysql build (all versions since 4.1)
BERTRAND Joël napsal(a):
Daniel Smolik a écrit :
BERTRAND Joël napsal(a):
Frans Pop a écrit :
tags 334339 - wontfix
thanks
On Sunday 25 March 2007 20:02, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
See bug #334339 (wontfix).
IMO the "wontfix" tag is not correct. There should at least be an
explanation by the maintainer _why_ he considers this an issue that
is does not need to be fixed.
Removing the tag as it was added without any justification. AFAICT
this is a real issue that should be solved.
I aggree.
Bug was reported to mysql dev without success because dev have
said that is a gcc-4.0 bug, not a mysql bug.
Yes, but the gcc maintainers have said that the bug there has been
fixed
"long ago". Unfortunately they don't say in which version.
"has been fixed" ? I have tried to build mysql with _all_ gcc
release between 3.3 and 4.1 without any success. Where have you seen
that this bug was fixed ?
Maybe, but I think it is not very difficult to fix the configure.in
script to avoid this bug.
I have no idea about that and no idea how that would affect other
architectures. Anyway, It is now probably too late to fix this for
Etch.
I have no idea too. In a first time, I suspected a 32 bits wide
userland and a 64 bits kernel... Maybe a trouble with gcc include on
sparc architectures.
Regards,
JKB
Hi,
could you tell me if this bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413471
reported by me is the same as bug you reported ?
Yes, I think. But to be sure, you have to apply my workaround.
Regards,
JKB
Hi,
I am 100% sure that my colleague found fundamentals of this bug.
On SPARC linux is used thread safe version of gethostbyname
genthostbyname_r. This function have third argument char buffer. But if
this buffer is not correctly aligned (on SPARC / 4 ) program crashed
with BUSS ERROR. I attach demonstrate program to test this issue. If you
change size of buffer from 1002 to 1000 program start working.
I mean that simple workaround on SPARC is not use gethostbyname_r.
I try report this bug to glibc. Because I mean that this is glibc bug
or compatibility problem.
Regards
Dan
--
Mydatex s r.o.
http://www.mydatex.cz
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mob: 604200362
tel: 226210085
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
extern int h_errno;
int main(void)
{
int ret;
const char *name="karotka";
char buf[1002];
int tmp_errno,buflen;
struct hostent tmp_hostent,*hp;
//struct hostent_data hd;
int size;
buflen=1000;
//size=sizeof(struct hostent_data);
//printf("size=%d\n",size);
printf("Align buff result=%p,buffer=%p,buflen=%d\n",&tmp_hostent,buf,buflen);
ret=gethostbyname_r(name,&tmp_hostent, buf,buflen,&hp,&tmp_errno);
printf("ret:=%d\n",ret);
if(ret==0)
{
if(hp)
{
printf("Lenght:=%d\n",hp->h_length);
printf("Addr:=%X\n",hp->h_addr);
printf("Name:=%s\n",hp->h_name);
}
}
return(ret);
}
Re: 'Illegal instruction' during boot
Josip Rodin napsal(a): On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 12:22:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: Rebooting the machine from Solaris and choosing to boot Linux doesn't work I now tried to boot from cdrom after a full poweroff and it worked. Yay! Should we add a small note about this into the release notes? (Frans?) If we can identify which systems are affected and someone provides a text, sure. Suggest you file a BR against release-notes with the proposed text. We have three reports so far, about Enterprise 450, Blade 2000 and Fire V240. That should be a sample large enough for a mild hint to all users. I must add E250 too. Dan -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'Illegal instruction' during boot
Josip Rodin napsal(a): On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:12:33PM +0200, Daniel Smolik wrote: I see the same problem on my E450 when I boot Solaris first. After reboot I choose linux and after this kernel crash with illegal instruction. A must power off machine to get linux boot. You mean, power off as in run 'poweroff' and return to PROM, or do you mean power off as in physically remove the power cable, return it, and then boot from cdrom (to get Linux)? I phycisally remove the power via the switch. Dan -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'Illegal instruction' during boot
Josip Rodin napsal(a): On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: I reproduced the 'Illegal instruction' just now on a Sun Fire V240... BTW, it's a machine without a video card, so I tried using 'install video=atyfb:off', to no avail. ctrace output with such an attempt is exactly the same. FWIW, the OpenBoot version on the machine seems to be 4.11.4. I see the same problem on my E450 when I boot Solaris first. After reboot I choose linux and after this kernel crash with illegal instruction. A must power off machine to get linux boot. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Major bug in mysql build (all versions since 4.1)
JKB I must confirm that your workaround solve problem on all !!! version of mysql on SPARC I test it on latest mysql (5.0) from experimental branch. Mysqlclient crashes everytime when you try access mysql on remote host. I haver remote DB on i386,SPARC and crashes everytime. Dan Hi, my colleague have theory for function this bug. If you say, that don't have reentrant version of GETHOSTBYNAME (#undef HAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R) compiler use non reentrant version and this version is not afected by bug. May be write some test program to explain probem with glibc or gcc on SPARC platform. Dan -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Major bug in mysql build (all versions since 4.1)
BERTRAND Joël napsal(a): Daniel Smolik a écrit : BERTRAND Joël napsal(a): Frans Pop a écrit : tags 334339 - wontfix thanks On Sunday 25 March 2007 20:02, BERTRAND Joël wrote: See bug #334339 (wontfix). IMO the "wontfix" tag is not correct. There should at least be an explanation by the maintainer _why_ he considers this an issue that is does not need to be fixed. Removing the tag as it was added without any justification. AFAICT this is a real issue that should be solved. I aggree. Bug was reported to mysql dev without success because dev have said that is a gcc-4.0 bug, not a mysql bug. Yes, but the gcc maintainers have said that the bug there has been fixed "long ago". Unfortunately they don't say in which version. "has been fixed" ? I have tried to build mysql with _all_ gcc release between 3.3 and 4.1 without any success. Where have you seen that this bug was fixed ? Maybe, but I think it is not very difficult to fix the configure.in script to avoid this bug. I have no idea about that and no idea how that would affect other architectures. Anyway, It is now probably too late to fix this for Etch. I have no idea too. In a first time, I suspected a 32 bits wide userland and a 64 bits kernel... Maybe a trouble with gcc include on sparc architectures. Regards, JKB Hi, could you tell me if this bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413471 reported by me is the same as bug you reported ? Yes, I think. But to be sure, you have to apply my workaround. Regards, JKB I must confirm that your workaround solve problem on all !!! version of mysql on SPARC I test it on latest mysql (5.0) from experimental branch. Mysqlclient crashes everytime when you try access mysql on remote host. I haver remote DB on i386,SPARC and crashes everytime. Dan -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085
Re: Major bug in mysql build (all versions since 4.1)
BERTRAND Joël napsal(a): Frans Pop a écrit : tags 334339 - wontfix thanks On Sunday 25 March 2007 20:02, BERTRAND Joël wrote: See bug #334339 (wontfix). IMO the "wontfix" tag is not correct. There should at least be an explanation by the maintainer _why_ he considers this an issue that is does not need to be fixed. Removing the tag as it was added without any justification. AFAICT this is a real issue that should be solved. I aggree. Bug was reported to mysql dev without success because dev have said that is a gcc-4.0 bug, not a mysql bug. Yes, but the gcc maintainers have said that the bug there has been fixed "long ago". Unfortunately they don't say in which version. "has been fixed" ? I have tried to build mysql with _all_ gcc release between 3.3 and 4.1 without any success. Where have you seen that this bug was fixed ? Maybe, but I think it is not very difficult to fix the configure.in script to avoid this bug. I have no idea about that and no idea how that would affect other architectures. Anyway, It is now probably too late to fix this for Etch. I have no idea too. In a first time, I suspected a 32 bits wide userland and a 64 bits kernel... Maybe a trouble with gcc include on sparc architectures. Regards, JKB Hi, could you tell me if this bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413471 reported by me is the same as bug you reported ? Thanks Dan
Re: dmsg error explain ?
Roman Shakin napsal(a):
Hey guys my sun ultra 5 just started giving me these errors...
CPU[0]: Correctable ECC Error AFSR[10] AFAR[20d44dd0] UDBL[1b9]
UDBH[0]
CPU[0]: UDBL Syndrome[1a] Memory Module "DIMM1"
I mean thats dying memory module. Try remove and insert it sometimes helps.
Dan
along with
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=32794816,
sector=80289
6
end_request: I/O error, dev 03:07 (hda), sector 802896
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=32794816,
sector=80290
4
end_request: I/O error, dev 03:07 (hda), sector 802904
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=32794816,
sector=80291
2
end_request: I/O error, dev 03:07 (hda), sector 802912
^'
This one i know is a dying harddrive, but what about the other one ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pending sparc patches
Jurij Smakov napsal(a):
Hi,
Below is a list of patches I'm planning to commit to svn, and the
patches themselves are attached. It is unlikely that they will make
it into etch's initial release, most probably they will be included
into the first point release. I'd appreciate if people with affected
hardware would build the kernels with these patches included and
report any problems or regressions. Let me know if some other
essential bugfix is missing.
Hi,
please add this patch if possible
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-sparc&m=117252788931806&w=3
without this e450 on kernel > 2.6.18 boot aprox. 6 minutes or doesn't
detect SCSI disks.
Regards
Dan
Author : Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:23:28 +0100
Message-ID : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : included upstream
Description : fixes unaligned access in ether1394_reset_priv()
Author : Doug Nazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:52:15 -0500
Message-ID : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : pushed to netdev maintainer for inclusion
Description : fixes frequent unaligned accesses in ip_rcv() and
ip_fast_csum()
Author : Joerg Friedrich
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:08:55 +0100
Message-ID : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : acked by David Miller, pushed upstream
Description : fixes kenvctrld so it does not consume 100% CPU
Author : David Miller
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : pushed upstream
Description : fixes atyfb-related hang on Sunblade 100/150/1000
Best regards,
Author : Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:23:28 +0100
Message-ID : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : included upstream
Description : fixes unaligned access in ether1394_reset_priv()
diff -aur a/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c b/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c
--- a/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c2006-09-20 06:42:06.0 +0300
+++ b/drivers/ieee1394/eth1394.c2007-03-08 08:01:43.0 +0200
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
#include
#include "csr1212.h"
@@ -491,7 +492,7 @@
int i;
struct eth1394_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct hpsb_host *host = priv->host;
- u64 guid = *((u64*)&(host->csr.rom->bus_info_data[3]));
+ u64 guid = get_unaligned(&(host->csr.rom->bus_info_data[3]));
u16 maxpayload = 1 << (host->csr.max_rec + 1);
int max_speed = IEEE1394_SPEED_MAX;
Author : Doug Nazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:52:15 -0500
Message-ID : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : pushed to netdev maintainer for inclusion
Description : fixes frequent unaligned accesses in ip_rcv() and
ip_fast_csum()
diff --git a/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c b/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c
index 5a35354..e3774a5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ const char * const medianame[32] = {
/* Set the copy breakpoint for the copy-only-tiny-buffer Rx structure. */
#if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__hppa__) \
- || defined(__sparc_) || defined(__ia64__) \
+ || defined(__sparc__) || defined(__ia64__) \
|| defined(__sh__) || defined(__mips__)
static int rx_copybreak = 1518;
#else
Author : Joerg Friedrich
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:08:55 +0100
Message-ID : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : acked by David Miller, pushed upstream
Description : fixes kenvctrld so it does not consume 100% CPU
diff -aur a/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.c b/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.c
--- a/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.c 2006-09-20 06:42:06.0 +0300
+++ b/drivers/sbus/char/bbc_i2c.c 2007-03-08 08:14:46.0 +0200
@@ -187,19 +187,18 @@
bp->waiting = 1;
add_wait_queue(&bp->wq, &wait);
while (limit-- > 0) {
- u8 val;
+ long val;
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
- *status = val = readb(bp->i2c_control_regs + 0);
- if ((val & I2C_PCF_PIN) == 0) {
+ val = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(bp->wq,
+ (((*status = readb(bp->i2c_control_regs + 0)) &
I2C_PCF_PIN) == 0),
+ msecs_to_jiffies(250));
+ if ((val != -ERESTARTSYS) && (val > 0)) {
ret = 0;
break;
}
- msleep_interruptible(250);
}
remove_wait_queue(&bp->wq, &wai
Re: List of supported machines and flaws with it?
Michelle Konzack napsal(a): Hello, I have seen on several mailinglists peoples asking about Debian support for sun machines, namely older ones... Since the CPU of my Sparc Ultra 20 is exploded (!!!) I have the need to reinstall my SS10/512 (Dual-PU) and since I use older hardware many peoples (specialy IT/Scientific students) have asked me about... So not THE auestions: 1) Is there a list od Sun Computers (SS5, SS10, SS20, SU5, SU10, SU20) with which Release(s) they are working? Ultra5 - 2.6.20 work all, I don't test X SS5 -2.6.20 work all, Eth,SCSI,eject floppy (reading from floppy doesn't work may be HW problem) E250 - work 2.6.20 SCSI,ETH,Envctrl (external patch),RSC,console frame buffer, X doesn't work need multidomain PCI patch may be Xorg 7.2 start working E450(SMP) - work 2.6.20 (with patch IRQ routing problem), SCSI, Envctrl,Eth, external disk array D1000 (SAF-TE preliminary supported). Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Firebird on SPARC
Frans Pop napsal(a): On Saturday 03 March 2007 16:00, Daniel Smolik wrote: have anybody experience why is not Firebird in repository for SPARC ? Look for icedove. Same thing. Sorry I mean Firebird database :-) Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Firebird on SPARC
Hi, have anybody experience why is not Firebird in repository for SPARC ? Thanks Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
netinstall via apt-cacher or apt-proxy
Hi, I start testing daily build of netboot install and want economize usage of my Internet line but installation doesn't work. I mean that problem is in installation script that use wget and not apt ( because apt is not still installed). My result is that apt-cacher or apt-proxy is not usable for installation and I must use some mirror tool. Am I right ? Thanks Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 2.6.18 not broken now
Hi, in Sparc64 mailing list today David Miller publisted patch that solve problem with booting kernel > 2.6.18 on E450. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: poweroff jumps to OBP instead of powering off
Daniel J. Priem napsal(a): Hi, if i type poweroff on the console, the systems shutdown and then jumps into the OPB instead of powering off. It's Netra t1 105. this happens with recent kernels in etch. I think its related to [1] if (auxio_power_register && !serial_console) in arch/sparc/kernel/process.c if (!serial_console) in arch/sparc64/kernel/power.c. Any hints? Is there already a sysctl option from kernel.org implemented? Or should we patch the kernel in debian? Any comments? Regards Daniel [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/03/msg00134.html I have oposite problem my E450 poweroff but not jumps to OBP as I want. I edit /etc/defaults/halt and now it woks as I want. Dan -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sparc32 etch status
Robert Reif napsal(a): I'm trying to install etch on all my sun4m machines. My first attempt using a netinst CD didn't work because of the esp CD problem. Installing stable and then upgrading didn't work because I couldn't configure apt because of gpg errors. I set up an LX running woody to netboot from and was able to get an ss20 working without problems. However I was unable to get a ss670mp and an ss5 working. The ss670mp wasn't able to download from the internet. I tried the onboard le, an sbus le and an sbus hme with the same results. It just couldn't connect to a server. The ss5 would connect to the server but would hang when probing the esp. I could try installing the driver manually like on stable but that wasn't necessary on the ss20. I'm trying to install on an LX and it connects to the server and probes the drive successfully but requires a low memory install. I also have an ss10 and a Classic X to try. I'm willing to test software or give more details if it would help. I have SS5 and install stable over netboot without problem with esp. I have only small problem with partitioning disk because auto mode does'nt work and with net install I cannot spawn shell to correct problem. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sun]install
Eric Rapilly napsal(a): hello, all of you. I got through the net an image to install the debian by the net. I'm new on debian and new on sun systems , but I'm rather old. Thus, I need help to either , go into the bios and tell to the machine to boot on the CD where is this image, or mount the cdrom and execute the shell. Thanks !! You can boot machine over net this is way that I prefer. To OK prompt type boot net prepare RARP and tftp server and download image from ftp://ftp.debian.cz/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-sparc/current/images/sparc64/netboot/2.6/boot.img If you have Sparc64. Regards Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: new user
Frans Pop napsal(a): On Monday 19 February 2007 22:01, Daniel Smolik wrote: I have requested 2x E450, 1xE250, 1x SS5 and 1x Ultra5 all machines have for playing. On all I run Debian Sid. I would like help with testing. That's excellent. Testing installations with Debian Installer periodically is very useful. So is testing kernels before or just after they are uploaded and maybe checking that X.Org runs correctly. Yes testig kernel is my hobby. Now I compile on all machines latest kernels to see if works OK. Now > 2.6.18 don't work on e450 :-( Note that testing becomes an awful lot more useful if you can also invest some time in tracing any issues that you might discover. At the moment testing the daily builds [1] of the installer would be very useful. Please file an installation report [1] for each type of machine. Yes I can do this but I prefer install over net. Because this image is small and thi machines are conected to the net over 512Kb line. Cheers Dan Cheers, FJP [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ [2] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch05s03.html#submit-bug -- Mydatex s r.o. http://www.mydatex.cz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mob: 604200362 tel: 226210085 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
new user
Hi all, I have requested 2x E450, 1xE250, 1x SS5 and 1x Ultra5 all machines have for playing. On all I run Debian Sid. I would like help with testing. Regards Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
