[hardware-donations] Sun Enterprise 450, Italy
Hi, one of my customers has just freed a couple of 450s with 1GB RAM, 2x400 UltraSparc-II and 7x18GB SCSI disks. These are available for Debian-related work. I can set them up and connect to the "Roma 3" University network (hosting provided by the local LUGRoma3, 155Mb), or prepare them for shipping if anybody is interested. Regards, L -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blade 100 and 2.6.{22,23}
ot syncing: Attempted to kill init! Press Stop-A (L1-A) to return to the boot prom lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Ultra IIe 00:03.0 Non-VGA unclassified device: ALi Corporation M7101 Power Management Controller [PMU] 00:05.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21152 (rev 03) 00:07.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation M1533/M1535 PCI to ISA Bridge [Aladdin IV/V/V+] 00:08.0 Multimedia audio controller: ALi Corporation M5451 PCI AC-Link Controller Audio Device (rev 01) 00:0c.0 Bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. RIO EBUS (rev 01) 00:0c.1 Ethernet controller: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. RIO GEM (rev 01) 00:0c.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. RIO 1394 (rev 01) 00:0c.3 USB Controller: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. RIO USB (rev 01) 00:0d.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c3) 00:13.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27) 01:02.0 Ethernet controller: U.S. Robotics USR997902 10/100/1000 Mbps PCI Network Card (rev 10) -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fixed kernels for SunBlade 100/150 - please test ASAP
Il giorno 20/ott/06, alle ore 17:37, Jurij Smakov ha scritto: On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:13:43PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote: Hi Jurij, I tested the new kernel on my SB100 and while the clock error has disappeared the kernel still doesn't boot. No error is printed. Starting on console framebuffer is activated for less than a second and then machine hangs back on the SILO screen. Thanks for testing. I have built another kernel overnight, (available at http://www.wooyd.org/debian/kernels/), including new DaveM's patch, and dropping the old atyfb patch for SunBlade which we have been applying for a while in Debian, but which was not accepted upstream [0]. There have been quite a few changes upstream, so my hope is that this patch is no longer required and things will work once it's removed (and I will start to get desperate if they will not :-). Ok, this kernel works on SB100, but only if atyfb is disabled. I attached the dmesg output, which shows some issues while scanning the of tree. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 2.6.18_dmesg.txt.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Re: Fixed kernels for SunBlade 100/150 - please test ASAP
Hi Jurij, I tested the new kernel on my SB100 and while the clock error has disappeared the kernel still doesn't boot. No error is printed. Starting on console framebuffer is activated for less than a second and then machine hangs back on the SILO screen. Regards, L Il giorno 19/ott/06, alle ore 18:43, Jurij Smakov ha scritto: Hi, Recently David Miller has posted a patch for clock problems with SunBlade 100/150 and kernel 2.6.18. We already have one positive report from Jim Watson, but it would be great if other people would test it too, to make sure that there are no regressions. The kernel packages are available from http://www.wooyd.org/debian/kernels -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cannot boot 2.6.18-1 on sunblade 100
Please find it attached. Il giorno 13/ott/06, alle ore 05:45, Jurij Smakov ha scritto: Can you please send the output of the 'prtconf -p -v' command to the bug 392078? -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 prtconf.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il giorno 08/ott/06, alle ore 22:42, Riccardo Tortorici ha scritto: The latest kernel version in unstable is 2.6.18. You do know that the kernel packages got renamed from kernel-image to linux-image at some point, right? :-). Yeah, I was convinced i did a dist-upgrade but not :) Now I've upgraded from 2.6.8 to 2.6.18 but I get this error if I boot with the new image: NVRAM: Low battery voltage! CLOCK: Clock was stopped. Kick start Boot with 2.6.8 is ok. As far as I can see, this message is in time.c from kernel sources... What if I'll comment those lines? Is it a dirty procedure or it's safe? I can confirm this on my SunBlade 100 too. It appeared in 2.6.17. Last known-to-work version is 2.6.16 even if I can't make the aty framebuffer work again when compiling with gcc-4.1 (which, BTW, is default for sid as of now). Regards, - -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFKoW98ZumGJJMDCYRAmvfAJ9A5OfOMJU2PbhuxQZYPgHI5e/8CACdEOfb pyBj1hT6u7dbCIS+gnaTNkI= =4JS8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: udev renaming interfaces fails on SunBlade100 with qfe
You can find it attached. Thanks, L Il giorno 19/set/06, alle ore 08:33, Eric Brower ha scritto: I'm not sure if I can be of further help, but can you send 'prtconf -pv' output? On 9/18/06, Luigi Gangitano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Eric, Il giorno 15/set/06, alle ore 20:40, Eric Brower ha scritto: >> I've tried to switch the single MAC address option in OpenFirmware >> but had no luck. And udev doesn't help with other ways of identifying >> the interface than MAC address. >> >> Can somebody help, please? > > Does your OBP have the "local-mac-address?" property? If so, set > it to true: > > ok> setenv local-mac-address? true Yes, my OBP has local-mac-address and is actually set to true. I already tried switching it to false but it doesn't make any difference either way. -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 prtconf.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Re: udev renaming interfaces fails on SunBlade100 with qfe
Hi Eric, Il giorno 15/set/06, alle ore 20:40, Eric Brower ha scritto: I've tried to switch the single MAC address option in OpenFirmware but had no luck. And udev doesn't help with other ways of identifying the interface than MAC address. Can somebody help, please? Does your OBP have the "local-mac-address?" property? If so, set it to true: ok> setenv local-mac-address? true Yes, my OBP has local-mac-address and is actually set to true. I already tried switching it to false but it doesn't make any difference either way. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
udev renaming interfaces fails on SunBlade100 with qfe
Hi, I'm experiencing some issues with udev at boot time. Correctly udev tries to rename interfaces to achieve name persistance across reboots. Sadly, I've installed a QuadriFastEthernet card on this workstation and every single interface appears to have the same MAC address. udev then fails badly leaving a lot of ethn_rename interfaces which are not automatically brought up. Since I've installed another ethernet interface that is not supported by OpenFirmware and thus keeps it original MAC address I can configure at least an interface to communicate with the world but this interface does change it's name at every reboot since udev fails to rename it along with the others interfaces. I've tried to switch the single MAC address option in OpenFirmware but had no luck. And udev doesn't help with other ways of identifying the interface than MAC address. Can somebody help, please? Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux 2.6.14 & blade 100 framebuffer
Il giorno 30/dic/05, alle ore 10:54, Admar Schoonen ha scritto: Luigi, could you put your kernel (2.6.14-6) and/or config/sources online so I could try it? Sure. You can find it at http://people.debian.org/~luigi/sparc64 Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux 2.6.14 & blade 100 framebuffer
Il giorno 29/dic/05, alle ore 19:38, Jurij Smakov ha scritto: There is a possible fix for the red dots problem: please have a look at the last message in 317756 (the patch was probably garbled during transmission, but is simple enough to be applied by hand). Please post the results of your tests to the bug trail. If everything will work out, I'll push this patch into the Debian kernels. I just checked my SB100 and I'm using a custom kernel built from 2.6.14-6 and the patch reported in 317756. With this kernel the fb is right and there are no red dots or other issues in Xorg. Everything is fine. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sparc buildd issues [Re: Release candidate architecture requalification results; amd64 is RC]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il giorno 28/dic/05, alle ore 15:29, Admar Schoonen ha scritto: Are you running the Debian 2.6.14 kernel, or another (self compiled?) version? A self compiled version based on the latest debian sources (2.6.14-6). And what about Xorg? Do you have red dots in Xorg? I don't use that machine as a desktop, so I run Xorg rarely. If I recall correctly, last time I run it there were some glitches in X. I will check as soon as I have phisical access to the machine. The Xorg setup that works flawlessly on my blade 100 with (custom) 2.6.9 at 1280 x 960 at 85 Hz suddenly only works at 60 Hz and shows red dots with debian 2.6.14. I haven't investigated much in this issue, but perhaps you know a solution / workaround? I run it at 1024x768, and had many problems with the framebuffer that have been solved in the latest 2.6.14 sources. Maybe you should try the latest kernel image. Regards, - -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDsqXV8ZumGJJMDCYRAhlnAJ90QVb4ZhN+UtzvQJuip7EdIhEITwCeManj hvwt0llLCnm3RYZ5Lo+Mqo0= =RpQD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sparc buildd issues [Re: Release candidate architecture requalification results; amd64 is RC]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il giorno 27/dic/05, alle ore 19:04, William Herrin ha scritto: On a Sparc netra X1, the system partially freezes (some stuff continues running but at least one of the operations necessary to log in gets stuck). The logs show that as of the moment of the freeze, the clock has jumped forward exactly 3 days, 6 hours, 11 minutes and 15 seconds. The change is not gradual; it jumps between syslog marks set a minute apart. I had the same problem on a SunBlade 100 (basically the same machine in a desktop case). Apparently the block subsystem is freezed (no activity of the disk) and login can complete. Now I'm running 2.6.14 and the bug has not occurred in the last 25 days, which is way longer than it was with 2.6.9 to 2.6.12 kernels. It seems to me that it has been fixed. Regards, - -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDsppW8ZumGJJMDCYRAiD+AJ4zZP9RNY2vjdhszLtunulroWdF8gCdHqXm nPQYxaR22a/0D/CQAYTjBoM= =OqPy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: booting a sunblade 100
Il giorno 10/nov/05, alle ore 04:33, Jurij Smakov ha scritto: On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Luigi Gangitano wrote: This is a known bug. You can find the attached patch that fixed it for me. Unfortunately this patch didn't find its way to the upstream kernel nor to the debian kernel sources. Well, it didn't find it's way because I've never seen it before :-). Just to confirm, this is the patch which fixes problems described in 321200, right? Exactly. This patch was discussed on linux-fbdev-devel on March, and I thought they would push it upstream. :-) I'll make test images including it today or tomorrow, so that people have a chance to test it out and make sure it does not break other systems. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: booting a sunblade 100
Il giorno 09/nov/05, alle ore 17:58, Dave Love ha scritto: Riccardo Tortorici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Just for information.. did you get frame buffer problems (i.e. first char missed)? For what it's worth, the frame buffer problem I reported involves garbled characters (maybe in addition to the first one being missing -- I can't remember) and also clobbered X if I remember correctly. Anyway, I second the question as I can't try it at present. This is a known bug. You can find the attached patch that fixed it for me. Unfortunately this patch didn't find its way to the upstream kernel nor to the debian kernel sources. I just verified that it is needed even with latest linux- source-2.6.14 from sid. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 atyfb_xl_gr_try.diff Description: Binary data PGP.sig Description: Questa è un messaggio firmato elettronicamente
Re: Netra X1 strange lock up Debian 3.1, kernel 2.6.12.3
Il giorno 05/set/05, alle ore 22:25, William Herrin ha scritto: I'm getting a wierd partial-lockup under Debian 3.1 (sarge) on a Netra X1 with a 2.6.11.3 kernel compiled fresh from the sources. I had the same problem on my Sun Blade 100. Never got to catch lock- up while still logged in, so I could not debug this issue. This happened with kernels from 2.6.9 to 2.6.11. It appears to have been fixed in 2.6.12, no lockup in the last 20 days (before it was 6 days between each freeze). Regards, Luigi Gangitano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian on a sun blade 100
Il giorno dom, 12/06/2005 alle 19.19 +0200, Admar Schoonen ha scritto: > Enter 'PROM blade 100' in the front page of http://www.sun.com. The first hit > is > a link to an obsoleted patch to openboot firmware, but it does give you a > patch > number (119235-01) of the patch that obsoleted that patch. Enter the patch > number in the search field and click on the first link (or click directly on > http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-119235-01-1&searchclause=119235-01 > ) > > I haven't gotten around to patch the firmware on my blade 100 yet. If you > update > your openboot, please let me know your experiences. Just upgraded my Sun Blade 100 from OBP 4.0.45 to OBP 4.17.1. The "MMU miss" error is still there and in addition 'stopping' the openboot firmware while is checking the ram leave the system in an unbootable state (boot command disabled), so no more 'Stop-A' and boot disk2... On the other end, Solaris loading is noticeable faster. :-( Don't know if this is related, but rebooting 'sid' with my custom 2.6.11, now snd-ali5451 loads without errors, but the system stops at /etc/init.d/alsa after 'Setting up ALSA...'. I did a dist-upgrade just before rebooting, so this may be the latest alsa's fault. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: keyboard errore
Ciao, questa mailing list è in inglese, per favore scrivi in inglese la prossima volta. For the list: this guy is asking why after installing debian 3.0 an an US10, having updated packages and rebooted the keyboard is messed up. I told him to use english, next time. Can you please tell us details of installation, kernel in use and packages installed? Regards, L Il giorno gio, 31-03-2005 alle 22:34 +0200, root ha scritto: > salve, >ho appena installato debian3.0 su una Sun UltraSparc10 > dopo aver aggiornato i pacchetti, al successivo riavvio , la tastiera > viene completamente distorta...il tasti non corrispondono piu'.. > cosa posso fare? -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 signature.asc Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
Re: AtyFB in 2.6.10, still not perfect
Il giorno lun, 14-03-2005 alle 15:04 -0800, David S. Miller ha scritto: > The mach64 chip on the SB100 has some very odd PLL clock inputs compared > the what is shipped on PCI and AGP cards sold for PCs. > > Reporting these details here isn't really going to help much, as the > folks active with the kernel ATI driver don't read this mailing list. > Could you please, therefore, report your stuff to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > who seems to be the most active person working on this driver lately? Thanks for the direction, David. I just didn't know who to contact, I'm forwarding the mail to hi now. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 signature.asc Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
AtyFB in 2.6.10, still not perfect
Hi all, I've just upgraded to the latest kernel-source-2.6.10 and recompiled it. AtyFB on my SB100 works now (sort of), but the console misses the first column on the left and some random pixels are corrupted. Under XFree86 I've got the same corruption of randome areas of the screen (I'll try to get some screenshot if this is of help). This is the relevant output of kernel (really I still don't know how to interpret it... :-)): atyfb: 3D RAGE XL (Mach64 GR, PCI-33MHz) [0x4752 rev 0x27] atyfb: 8M SDRAM (1:1), 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 230 MHz PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK, 63 MHz XCLK atyfb: setting up CRTC atyfb: set primary CRT to 1152x900 NN composite P atyfb: CRTC_H_TOTAL_DISP: 8f00be atyfb: CRTC_H_SYNC_STRT_WID: 300296 atyfb: CRTC_V_TOTAL_DISP: 38303a8 atyfb: CRTC_V_SYNC_STRT_WID: 240385 atyfb: CRTC_OFF_PITCH: 2400 atyfb: CRTC_VLINE_CRNT_VLINE: 0 atyfb: CRTC_GEN_CNTL: b000210 atyfb: atyfb_set_par atyfb: Set Visible Mode to 1152x900-8 atyfb: Virtual resolution 1152x7246, pixclock_in_ps 10644 (calculated 10644) atyfb: Dot clock: 93 MHz atyfb: Horizontal sync: 61 kHz atyfb: Vertical refresh:65 Hz atyfb: x style: 93.10108 1152 1210 1338 1528 900 902 906 937 atyfb: fb style: 10644 190 1152 58 128 31 900 2 4 debug atyfb: Mach64 non-shadow register values: debug atyfb: 0x2000: 008F00BE 00300296 038303A8 00240385 debug atyfb: 0x2010: 0388 2400 0801 0B002210 debug atyfb: 0x2020: 003A0556 01200522 debug atyfb: 0x2030: 00110202 C001 debug atyfb: 0x2040: debug atyfb: 0x2050: debug atyfb: 0x2060: 36BB3121 24FBA121 debug atyfb: 0x2070: 01003300 0005 debug atyfb: 0x2080: debug atyfb: 0x2090: 00803000 0100 debug atyfb: 0x20A0: 7B23A040 0101 007F8091 E5000C81 debug atyfb: 0x20B0: 10151A3B 0001 0001 debug atyfb: 0x20C0: 00FF 86010182 debug atyfb: 0x20D0: 0100 0008 00C2 debug atyfb: 0x20E0: 27004752 00400014 debug atyfb: 0x20F0: B14D 037FFCF8 debug atyfb: Mach64 PLL register values: debug atyfb: 0x00: ADD541E4 8A0301CF 8E9E6501 801B debug atyfb: 0x10: 06CF4000 10B6AC10 408024FD 0002 debug atyfb: 0x20: 06AC06AC 1424FD00 00255500 debug atyfb: 0x30: Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 144x56 atyfb: fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 signature.asc Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
IDE on SB100 (was Re: Elite3D PCI, anyone?)
tency 64, IRQ 8024352 Memory at 01ff0400 (32-bit, prefetchable) [disabled] [size=32M] Memory at 01ff0600 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=64K] Memory at 01ff0680 (32-bit, prefetchable) [disabled] [size=8M] Expansion ROM at 0604 [disabled] [size=256K] Capabilities: [68] Power Management version 1 Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 signature.asc Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
Re: Elite3D PCI, anyone?
Il giorno mar, 01-03-2005 alle 15:54 -0800, David S. Miller ha scritto: > It's a totally different chipset (3dlabs), there is no documentation > available and therefore there will likely never be a driver for Linux. > > Take that PCI card out and use the on-board PGX64 (ATI > mach64 based) video, Linux works on that just fine. Thanks David, I'm already using the ATI on-board chip. I'm just having some small issues with the latest 2.6.10 and a 19" CRT. DDC never worked and finding the correct mode was a bit difficult. Is there any PCI videocard that's worth the money? I was thinking about trying a Millennium II I have somewhere... Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 signature.asc Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
Elite3D PCI, anyone?
Hi, I'm pleased to become part of the debian sparc minority (as some folks on -devel want to point out: "let's remove all of them!!!"). :-) So here I have my brand new Sun Blade 100 (not that new...) to help debian spread on Sparc. Installation went fine, new kernel as well. Just the Elite3D PCI is not recongnized by X: :01:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intergraph Corporation: Unknown device 07a0 I've seen the SBus drivers, and will be hacking the next days on them. Did anyone already solved the puzzle? (just asking). Ok. In the end this message was only to say "I'm here too". If this machine can be of any help as a testing or building machine, raise your hand. Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 signature.asc Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
