Debian Sparc (Woody) and ATL support

2003-02-10 Thread daren
Hello,

I was curious to see if anyone has had any success using HP surestore 2/20
ATL with Debian on Sparc (Any flavor). I cannot find anything positive
about this combination anywhere.


Regards,

Daren





Re: [spamcatcher] Re: 2.4 boot disk

2003-01-31 Thread daren
> debian 3.0 r0-1 both default to 2.4.18 with the source,headers and
> images for both 2.4.18 and  2.4.19 as well

Er, make that images for both of those kernels are included as well -

sorry for the typo

Daren

>
> Daren
>
>> Nicolas WILL said:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a woody 3.0rx installation boot CD or floppy with a 2.4
>>> kernel (like the bf24 option on the Intel port)?
>>>
>>> I'm trying to setup boxes with RAID1 and LVM.
>>>
>>> Such a boot disk would simplify the setup process so much...
>>
>> I downloaded debian 3.0r0 ISO images about 3 weeks ago and they
>> defaulted to 2.4.something, at least on my ultra 1. perhaps if
>> you have a 32bit system it may try to use 2.2.x I'm not sure,
>> SILO wouldn't let me load a 32bit kernel even when I tried(didn't care
>> either way personally). or maybe it did but the kernel
>> wouldn't boot.
>>
>> nate
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: 2.4 boot disk

2003-01-31 Thread daren
debian 3.0 r0-1 both default to 2.4.18 with the source,headers and images
for both 2.4.18 and  2.4.19 as well

Daren

> Nicolas WILL said:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a woody 3.0rx installation boot CD or floppy with a 2.4
>> kernel (like the bf24 option on the Intel port)?
>>
>> I'm trying to setup boxes with RAID1 and LVM.
>>
>> Such a boot disk would simplify the setup process so much...
>
> I downloaded debian 3.0r0 ISO images about 3 weeks ago and they
> defaulted to 2.4.something, at least on my ultra 1. perhaps if
> you have a 32bit system it may try to use 2.2.x I'm not sure,
> SILO wouldn't let me load a 32bit kernel even when I tried(didn't
> care either way personally). or maybe it did but the kernel
> wouldn't boot.
>
> nate
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]





raid 1 on Sun E250 running 3.0 sparc r1 (kernel 2.4.18 - patched)

2003-01-28 Thread daren
All,

I am trying to mirror our root disk. I am on Debian
3.0, r1 kernel 2.4.18 with patches running on an E250
sun box.

Building the raid works fine (mkraid /dev/md0), and
has no complaints. Rebooting the system shows that the
raid is auto-detected and syncs just fine. mkfs.ext3
/dev/md0 runs fine as well. When I try and mount -o
error=remount-ro -t ext3 /dev/md1 /mnt (or any other
variation of mount) however- I get a kernel panic (See
/var/log/messages entry below).

the actual device partitions (/dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1)
are set to 0xfd (Linux Raid Autodetect)

here is the /dev/md1 entry from /etc/raidtab

raiddev /dev/md1
raid-level  1
nr-raid-disks   2
nr-spare-disks  0
persistent-superblock   1
chunk-size  4
device /dev/sdb1
raid-disk   0
device /dev/sdc1
raid-disk   1



I am at my wits end here. I have other raid partitions
running raid 5 , and they mount fine. I can even build a raid5 using these
same disks and it does not complain.

Thank you in advance for your help
-Daren Eason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
480.446.0500


Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
data_access_exception: SFSR[00801009]
SFAR[f800cbb095fc], going.
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
\|/  \|/
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
"@'/ .. \`@"
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
/_| \__/ |_\
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
\__U_/
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: mount(20385):
Dax
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: TSTATE:
004411009600 TPC: 02010c9c TNPC:
02010ca0 Y: 0700Tai
nted: P
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: g0:
000f g1: f8007dd70018 g2:
0001 g3: fff8
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: g4:
f800 g5: fffee0004dd99600 g6:
f800646f8000 g7: 0014
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: o0:
0002 o1: f8007dd7001c o2:
f8007ea1a5e0 o3: f80002299980
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: o4:
0002 o5: 0001 sp:
f800646fac61 ret_pc: f8007dd70020
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: l0:
f8007dd7 l1: f8007dd70448 l2:
0062e000 l3: 0002
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: l4:
 l5: 00626fe0 l6:
eb98 l7: 
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: i0:
0008 i1: fffee0004dd995dc i2:
 i3: 
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: i4:
0002 i5: f8007dd7 i6:
f800646fad21 i7: 02010e80
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[02010e80]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[020003c0]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[004e7a10]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[004e7b00]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[004e7cd0]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[0046787c]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[00493790]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[0046afa4]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[0046b5b0]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[0047e8b0]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[0047ebe8]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[0042de48]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[00410af4]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel:
Caller[0001288c]
Jan 24 11:04:49 SNIP_HOSTNAME kernel: Instruction
DUMP: f84763d8  b2067fdc  84073fff  80a0e000
 12480013  b938a000
c4064009
 80a0a000