Re: Etch on sunblade 150 : installer menus problem

2007-12-17 Thread Jim Watson

Didrik Madheden wrote:

I also had problems getting the kernel to load correctly over network.
My solution to this was to connect the sparc over a serial console to
some other box. Provided that the terminal on the other side is
working correctly, the installation menus will work ok, although
they'll be a bit sluggish at 9600 bps. To force the OPB into serial
console mode, you need to boot without a keyboard connected.

You may also need to give the command output-device without parameters
in OPB before trying to do that, since otherwise OPB may ignore the
fact that there's no keyboard, and still go into video mode.

Tell us your results!

/Didrik Madheden

On 17/12/2007, Vera Mickael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Hi,

I try to install etch on a sunblade 150, I reached the stage
  where I can see the first installer menu. For those who
encountered the same problems as me, I used the boot command:

boot net video=atyfb:off

My problem is that the menu isn't displayed correctly,
instead of colors on the border of the menu, special
caracters are displayed. The screen's background is white
and caracters are printed in black. I can't see which
element is selected, there is no element highlighted.
It's not possible to install this way.

Is there an option to pass to the installer ? Is it possible
to disable ncurses ?

Thanks,
Mickaël



I had this problem too on sunblade 100. I was able to install by taking 
the defaults - just keep hitting Enter - but the difficult part is the 
disk formatting - need to use the terminal mode (from memory Ctrl-Alt-F2 
or something like that?) then run  the fdisk or whatever from the 
command line.


Maybe someone can make an installer with a later kernel - the video 
problem is fixed by 2.6.23-rc4.  Another neat idea would be an auto- 
option for the installer to self-install, or is there already?


jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Building SPARC32PLUS

2007-12-16 Thread Jim Watson

Hi,

I am building some applications (openoffice.org) using gcc and g++
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/vanilla$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.2.3 20071123 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-4)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/vanilla$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.2.3 20071123 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-4)

When running the file command I have noticed the object files are 
SPARC e.g.

$ file something.o   blah ... SPARC

$ file everything.so  blah -... SPARC32PLUS

I assume the shared libs are different because they are linked to 
SPARC32PLUS files in /usr/lib...

is that right?

Also I notice that gcc -mcpu=v9 is needed to get object files like 
SPARC32PLUS.

Is that the correct behaviour?
I suppose I am wondering why gcc doesn't produce SPARC32PLUS by default.

thanks
jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Messy screen with ATI Mach64 on UltraIIi

2007-09-28 Thread Jim Watson

Hernest wrote:

Hi,

I am trying to upgrade an UltraIIi from an old Aurora Linux (kernel 2.4.20)
to Debian Etch (2.6.18), but I cannot get a workable framebuffer using the
PCI video card on the system (an ATI Mach64 GT, see logs below).

I am booting with the Debian netinst CD, but at all resolutions I tried,
I always get a black verical stripe in the middle of the screen and sometimes
the right half of the screen remains black. The thing is barely usable as I 
cannot see most of the comman line. With 2.4.20 everything is OK.


If I disable the framebuffer (with video=atyfb:off fb boot option) the screen 
does not get messy, but the Debian menu is unusable, so I have to find a way

to make the fb to work.
  
I recall I saw this too - I think the default options will work - just 
keep hitting enter. Except when you get to the disk formatting. Switch 
to another terminal (Ctrl-Alt-F2) and use the command line fdisk. Some 
trial and error or good luck is involved.



jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



linking SPARC applications

2007-07-21 Thread Jim Watson

Hi,

I have been building SPARC applications -  I mean the shared libraries 
report SPARC in response to the file command.


Now I noticed these are linked to various standard libs in /lib/v9 which 
report SPARC32PLUS, instead of linking to the required SPARC libs in /lib


Is this something that has to be configured when building or is it 
something happens when running ldd? (I only have sun4u here)


thanks

jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: linking SPARC applications

2007-07-21 Thread Jim Watson

Martin wrote:

On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:53 +1000, Jim Watson wrote:
  

Hi,

I have been building SPARC applications -  I mean the shared libraries 
report SPARC in response to the file command.


Now I noticed these are linked to various standard libs in /lib/v9 which 
report SPARC32PLUS, instead of linking to the required SPARC libs in /lib


Is this something that has to be configured when building or is it 
something happens when running ldd? (I only have sun4u here)



IIRC the output of ldd is something like

libraryNameInProgram = /where/it/maps/to/on/this/system

if the first is incorrect, you have to change you build system /
environment.  If the second is incorrect you have to change how ld is
set up on your system.

Thus it would sound, to me, like your system was behaving correctly and
the binaries should work on sun4m.


  


Yes, but I like them to run on sparc (32) systems too.
Previously they always linked to /lib/blah.
Now something has changed so they now link to /lib/v9/blah
But I didn't change my build system so I guess it is something changed 
in debian.

Thats the bit I don't understand - what has changed?

thanks

jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: linking SPARC applications

2007-07-21 Thread Jim Watson

Julien Cristau wrote:

On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:38:05 +1000, Jim Watson wrote:

  

Yes, but I like them to run on sparc (32) systems too.
Previously they always linked to /lib/blah.
Now something has changed so they now link to /lib/v9/blah
But I didn't change my build system so I guess it is something changed in 
debian.

Thats the bit I don't understand - what has changed?



You have installed libc6-sparcv9.  ld.so uses the optimized libraries if
available and if the hardware supports it.
  


Thank you Julien, that was it. I removed that package and the linking is 
fixed.



jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#403364: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2007-07-02 Thread jim watson

निशांत / Nishant wrote:

Hi,

On 7/2/07, Thomas Köllmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  Maybe this is useful to the next guy installing Etch (or some other
  post-2.6.16 kernel) on a Blade 150 (or 100).

 Can you confirm that with a 2.6.16 kernel the problem is not
 reproducible?


But now I am facing the problem with 2.6.18-4-sparc64. I need to use
video=atyfb:off to
be able to boot.

I am on a SunBlade150.

regards,
Nishant

On my Sunblade100 this is fixed in debian unstable 2.6.21-1 but 
video=atyfb:off is still needed anyway to avoid those red dots.


jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Sunblade 100 IDPROM not valid

2007-04-06 Thread Jim Watson
Rebooting my Sunblade 100 stopped at the ok prompt, the startup  
information included something like this:

Ethernet address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, Host ID 
And there was a message about the IDPROM being not valid.
ok


The Debian installation guide mentions this briefly:
---
5.1.4. IDPROM Messages

If you cannot boot because you get messages about a problem with  
“IDPROM”, then it's possible that your NVRAM battery, which holds  
configuration information for you firmware, has run out. See the Sun  
NVRAM FAQ for more information.



The suggested FAQ link is very detailed and helpful but involves  
replacing the dead battery chip:

http://www.squirrel.com/sun-nvram-hostid.faq.html

The machine is about 5 years old and has run almost continuous all  
that time. But it was powered off for about a week recently.
When it failed I wanted a quick fix that did not involve hardware and  
found the following which may be helpful to someone else.


I have only tried it with a reboot command, not power-off or net boot  
yet.


Step 1
boot failed.
Ethernet address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, Host ID 
Machine fails to boot, does not load SILO, stops at ok
Now it appears that most commands do not work, but fortunately boot  
works

ok boot

Step 2
SILO loads, select required kernel from the menu
Boot sequence stops with message CLOCK: Clock was stopped. Kick start 
Then it appears to hang.
But wait a minute or less and the boot continues...
The machine boots up but ifconfig shows the ethernet address is  
FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF

and network cannot be reached.

Step 3
Gentoo gives a clue here in Code List 3.2/3.4
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-sparc-faq.xml
So i did this as root:
# eeprom local-mac-address?=true
# reboot

If I understand correctly, this forces the MAC address from the  
network card and the machine reboots with a valid MAC address.

Maybe I was just lucky, or the battery is not completely dead yet?
But i am reporting this as it might be a temporary fix that will help  
someone in a hurry.

The mentioned NVRAM FAQ explains the proper solution.

thanks

Jim


Re: Please test the new kernel (2.6.18.dfsg.1-9)

2007-02-08 Thread Jim Watson


On 08/02/2007, at 10:05 PM, Karl Goetz wrote:


Jim Watson wrote:

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 22:28:12 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:


Hi,

A set of new kernel images has been uploaded to unstable a  
couple of

days ago, including

linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_sparc.deb



Jurij,

This works on my sunblade100, ( as before, it needs   
video=atyfb:off )




How do you pass this parameter? i tried `expert video=atyfb:off`  
and it

failed.
kk



When the system is powered on, look for the SILO message then hold  
down the tab key and it will stop with a list of available kernels  
and the boot: prompt. Assuming you want the default kernel labeled  
Linux, type as below after the boot prompt and hit enter:


boot: Linux video=atyfb:off

I suppose this could be configured in /boot/silo.conf too...

jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Please test the new kernel (2.6.18.dfsg.1-9)

2007-01-29 Thread Jim Watson

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 22:28:12 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:


Hi,

A set of new kernel images has been uploaded to unstable a couple of
days ago, including

linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64_2.6.18.dfsg.1-9_sparc.deb



Jurij,

This works on my sunblade100, ( as before, it needs  video=atyfb:off )


jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problems booting Sun Blade 100: still unable to boot from CD

2006-12-30 Thread Jim Watson


On 31/12/2006, at 2:25 AM, Holger Wansing wrote:


Hello,

On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:40:49 +0100 Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:
I have no idea what video cards are in a Sun Blade 100. If it is  
something
other than an ATI card, you may need a different parameter. The  
kernel


Yes, is ATI card.


My SunBlade 100 boots 2.6.18 OK from internal disk drive with  
video=atyfb:off. (This was not required with 2.6.16)
As mentioned in the thread, net boot may be required - at least I  
have not seen any reports of success with CDROM.

jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SunBlade 150 problems - can anyone confirm?

2006-12-16 Thread Jim Watson


On 17/12/2006, at 5:55 AM, Thomas Köllmann wrote:


On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:38:58 -0800
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Please try booting it with the boot parameter video=atyfb:off, i.e.
instead of just pressing enter at the silo boot prompt type

Linux video=atyfb:off


Yes, that works.

Does this have any drawbacks regarding the use of xorg? (I haven't  
yet installed that...)


I can confirm this problem exists on Sunblade100 with the 2.6.18-3  
(Mon 4 Dec) and the same fix works.


I have been using xorg and also using video=atyfb:off to avoid the  
red dots issue, no problems I can see, only the alternative  
consoles have some unusable frame outside, about 20% of the screen area.


Jim



Re: Unidentified subject!

2006-11-02 Thread Jim Watson


On 03/11/2006, at 7:42 AM, Marco Abderhalden wrote:


Hello,

I tried to install Debian and Gentoo on a Sunblade 100. But I  
didn't have success.


Debian error:
 cramfs: wrong magic
 Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00

Gentoo error:
 Loaded Kernel Version 2.6.17
 Loading Initial ramdisk (645016 bytes at 0x2F802000 phys,  
0x40C virt)...

 Illegal Instruction

Do I have some problem with the ramdisk. The SB100 has 512MB of ram.

Thanks in advance for useful hints.

Regards,
 Marco



Marco,
To get help I think you should  give exact details where you got the  
boot disks, what versions etc.


My cdrom died years ago but a method that always works for me is net  
boot using tftp

http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/sparc/ch04s04.html.en

jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: problems building amarok 1.4.4 on sparc

2006-11-02 Thread Jim Watson


On 03/11/2006, at 5:12 PM, Jurij Smakov wrote:



actual build) is built fine with gcc, however fails to build with the
-std=iso9899:1990 option, which amarok appears to be using. I don't


I dont know, just quoting from a book here:

if you are writing code using the ANSI C conventions, you must use  
the __asm__ keyword instead of the normal asm keyword. that fixes  
the test case.


jim 



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Fixed kernels for SunBlade 100/150 - please test ASAP

2006-10-21 Thread Jim Watson


On 21/10/2006, at 2:35 PM, Jurij Smakov wrote:

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 07:07:18PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:

Ok, this kernel works on SB100, but only if atyfb is disabled.

Thanks, Luigi. I hope it will work for others too, so that we can go
ahead and commit the changes.


same here - works but only if atyfb off




I attached the dmesg output, which shows some issues while scanning
the of tree.



I will attach mine too, for debian 2.16 (where atyfb works OK) and  
latest 2.18.

Looking for things different ...BogoMIPS(?)
2.16 = 1001.47
2.18 = 11.12

jim

PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 4.0.45 2001/02/08 14:33
Linux version 2.6.16-1-sparc64 (Debian 2.6.16-12) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc 
version 4.0.4 20060422 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-2)) #2 Thu May 4 12:36:43 PDT 
2006
ARCH: SUN4U
Ethernet address: 00:03:ba:04:a4:ab
On node 0 totalpages: 31986
  DMA zone: 31986 pages, LIFO batch:7
  DMA32 zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:0
  Normal zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:0
  HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:0
CPU[0]: Caches D[sz(16384):line_sz(32)] I[sz(16384):line_sz(32)] 
E[sz(262144):line_sz(64)]
Built 1 zonelists
Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda2 ro video=atyfb:off
PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 10, 32768 bytes)
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 262144 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 131072 bytes)
Memory: 253360k available (2032k kernel code, 696k data, 136k init) 
[f800,0ff24000]
Calibrating delay loop... 1001.47 BogoMIPS (lpj=2002944)
Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized
SELinux:  Disabled at boot.
Capability LSM initialized
Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
checking if image is initramfs... it is
Freeing initrd memory: 979k freed
NET: Registered protocol family 16
PCI: Probing for controllers.
PCI: Found SABRE, main regs at 01fe
SABRE: Shared PCI config space at 01fe0100
SABRE: DVMA at c000 [2000]
PCI quirk: region 0800-083f claimed by ali7101 ACPI
PCI quirk: region 0600-061f claimed by ali7101 SMB
PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ 8] map[0] to INO[23]
PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ c] map[0] to INO[06]
PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ c] map[0] to INO[1c]
PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ c] map[0] to INO[24]
PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[ d] map[0] to INO[0c]
PCI-IRQ: Routing bus[ 0] slot[13] map[0] to INO[0f]
PCI0(PBMA): Bus running at 33MHz
isa0: [dma - (floppy) (parallel)] [power] [serial] [serial]
ebus0: [flashprom] [eeprom] [idprom]
power: Control reg at 01fe02000800 ... powerd running.
usbcore: registered new driver usbfs
usbcore: registered new driver hub
audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled)
audit(1161450046.196:1): initialized
VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1
Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 8192 bytes)
Initializing Cryptographic API
io scheduler noop registered
io scheduler anticipatory registered (default)
io scheduler deadline registered
io scheduler cfq registered
Activating ISA DMA hang workarounds.
Console: switching to mono PROM 80x34
rtc_init: no PC rtc found
[drm] Initialized drm 1.0.1 20051102
ttyS0 at MMIO 0x1fe020003f8 (irq = 7246432) is a 16550A
ttyS1 at MMIO 0x1fe020002e8 (irq = 7246432) is a 16550A
isa bounce pool size: 16 pages
RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 16384K size 1024 blocksize
loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
rtc_sun_init: Registered Mostek RTC driver.
usbmon: debugfs is not available
usbcore: registered new driver usbhid
drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: v2.6:USB HID core driver
mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
NET: Registered protocol family 2
IP route cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 16384 bytes)
TCP established hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 65536 bytes)
TCP bind hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 65536 bytes)
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 8192 bind 8192)
TCP reno registered
TCP bic registered
NET: Registered protocol family 1
NET: Registered protocol family 17
ohci_hcd: 2005 April 22 USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver (PCI)
ohci_hcd :00:0c.3: OHCI Host Controller
ohci_hcd :00:0c.3: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
ohci_hcd :00:0c.3: irq 9,7e4, io mem 0x1ff0200
usb usb1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 1-0:1.0: 4 ports detected
ALI15X3: IDE controller at PCI slot :00:0d.0
ALI15X3: chipset revision 195
ALI15X3: 100% native mode on irq 4,7cc
ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1fe02000a20-0x1fe02000a27, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
ide1: BM-DMA at 0x1fe02000a28-0x1fe02000a2f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
Probing IDE interface ide0...
usb 1-1: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2
usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
hda: ST315320A, ATA DISK drive
input: Logitech USB Receiver as /class/input/input0
input: USB HID v1.10 Mouse [Logitech USB Receiver] on 

Re: blade 150 and 2.6

2006-10-08 Thread Jim Watson


On 09/10/2006, at 6:42 AM, Riccardo Tortorici wrote:

Now I've upgraded from 2.6.8 to 2.6.18 but I get this error if I  
boot with the new image:


NVRAM: Low battery voltage!
CLOCK: Clock was stopped. Kick start

Boot with 2.6.8 is ok.
As far as I can see, this message is in time.c from kernel  
sources... What if I'll comment those lines?  Is it a dirty  
procedure or it's safe?


With 2.6.18-1 I get the same error message on my sunblade 100,
mailed http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2006/10/msg00032.html
It is right after Booting Linux...

jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cannot boot 2.6.18-1 on sunblade 100

2006-10-07 Thread Jim Watson

Hi,

I just installed linux-image-2.6.18-1-sparc64 which I think is the  
latest available on debian/unstable.


But booting linux-image-2.6.18-1-sparc64 on sunblade100 fails:

Booting Linux...
NVRAM: Low Battery Voltage!
CLOCK: Clock was stopped. Kick start

The cursor just stops after Kick start
The upgrade left Linux.OLD in place, which still boots fine and  
things work as usual.
Linux sun 2.6.16-1-sparc64 #2 Thu May 4 12:36:43 PDT 2006 sparc64 GNU/ 
Linux


thanks

jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AW: One more

2006-09-25 Thread Jim Watson


On 25/09/2006, at 4:33 PM, Hamish Greig wrote:

default install either has an /etc/profile with logic to detect  
root and add

*/sbin/* or a root profile in /root/* ?




debian/unstable updated yesterday...

/etc/profile:
if [ `id -u` -eq 0 ]; then
  PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/ 
bin:/usr/bin/X11

else
  PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games
fi

~/.profile invokes ~/.bashrc, neither has any PATH

jim


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#306476: quick question about Bug#306476

2006-02-24 Thread Jim Watson
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
 SunBlade 100 systems are notorious though. I tried installing one at a 
 developers meeting recently and ran into the weirdest problems which were 
 not even consistently reproducible. I did succeed in installing from CD 
 some times, but at other times had errors halfway through the 
 installation.
 The only really successful installation reports we've had, have been with 
 netboot installs.

I remember when I bought my sunblade 100 there were 2 type of solaris boot
disks in the package, one special was for the sunblade 100, the other would
fail half-way through.

Anyway the cdrom stopped working when it was just after warranty, and since
then it has installed debian by net boot several times with no problems.

jim


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: sparc developer machines

2006-02-02 Thread Jim Watson
Quoting Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Could you try repeatedly installing and purging the build-dependencies
 for openoffice.org while running kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64-smp on your
 SB1000?
 
 The objective is to reproduce a crash that occurs on the dual-proc
 autobuilders.

Hi Clint,

can you give more info about the crash, where it occurs in building
openoffice.org? tail of the build log would be good. 

I am continually building the upstream version of openoffice.org on sparc64
(sunblade 100, NOT SMP), maybe I can look for some clue that helps, such as
warning message, relevant code or something?

thanks

jim



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sun Blade 150 install - fails on reboot, fails to configure X?

2005-12-12 Thread Jim Watson
Quoting Andrew M.A. Cater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   found or some such. The card is an ATI Rage of some description -
   I'm not at work now so can't check exactly - does anyone have a
   working XF86Config. System running Sarge i.e. Stable apart from
   needing the netinst disk to bootstrap it.

SunBlade 100:
lspci says:
:00:13.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)

I use xorg but I attached an old config that was working:

from silo.conf (files are in /boot)

root=/dev/hda2
partition=1
default=Linux
read-only
timeout=100

image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux
initrd=/initrd.img

jim

XF86Config-4.works
Description: Binary data


silo.conf
Description: Binary data


Re: Installing on a Sun Blade 100: CD Mounting issue

2005-12-06 Thread Jim Watson
Quoting Simon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Dear All,
 
 Using the stable install CD's I've got the error found here:
 
 http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2005/04/msg00052.html
 
 The install CD cannot be mounted to continue the installation.
 
 Has this problem been fixed somewhere? If so could somebody point me to
 an ISO that I can use to install from, or a link to a TFTP netboot thing
 that will work.


On sunblade 100 I have done tftp boot several times now using the tftp images
referenced by the installation manual on the debian main page go to Installation
Manual and choose the sparc version. It explains the procedure and provides
links to images. I did a minimal installation then upgrade to unstable.

jim



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



SABRE0: Uncorrectable Error

2004-09-23 Thread Jim Watson
Hi,

i got the kernel as follows for my sunblade 100:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dmesg
PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 4.0.45 2001/02/08 14:33
Linux version 2.6.8-1-sparc64 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-7)) #1 Sat Aug 28 04:28:53 PDT 2004
ARCH: SUN4U
snip

and the SABRE0 message:
snip
ext3: No journal on filesystem on hda1
SABRE0: Uncorrectable Error, primary error type[DMA Write:Translation Error]
SABRE0: bytemask[00ff] dword_offset[0] was_block(0)
SABRE0: UE AFAR [0fa7c000]
SABRE0: UE Secondary errors [(none)]
SABRE0: IOMMU Error, type[Invalid Error]
SABRE0: IOMMU TAG(2)[RAW(00c6f800)error(Invalid
Error)wr(0)sz(8K)vpg(df00)]
SABRE0: IOMMU
DATA(2)[RAW(6fe0)valid(1)used(1)cache(0)ppg()
Adding 831080k swap on /dev/hda3.  Priority:-1 extents:1
snip

everything seems to be working OK, so i am not sure if i need report
anything?
jim



Re: 2.6.x kernel for Sparc?

2004-04-27 Thread Jim Watson
Mihamina, 

I run a 2.6.5 on sunblade 100, I built it from kernel.org sources with Ben
Collin's patch here:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/debian-sparc-200402/msg00013.html

but i have not figured out how to get sounds yet...

Linux sun 2.6.5 #13 Sun Apr 18 14:59:35 EST 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
 
jim

On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:55:14AM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
 Joshua Kwan wrote:
 sparc32 support is EXTREMELY dodgy at the moment for 2.6.x,
 
 And how about sparc64 (those with ultraproc) ?



Re: Problems with Kernel 2.6.5 and xserver, sorry wrong subject [was: serial-console]

2004-04-19 Thread Jim Watson
works for me ;)

http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/debian-sparc-200402/msg00013.html



Re: U5 - woody (2.4.24) - 3com 3crdag675 - pci wifi adapter - madwifi driver

2004-04-18 Thread Jim Watson
Hi,

i got the source from kernel.org and build on debian/unstable, out of the
box, just removed from config anything that broke the build on my
sunblade100
dmesgsnip
Linux version 2.6.5 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401)) 
#13 Sun
Apr  18 14:59:35 EST 2004
ARCH: SUN4U
 
thanks to ben collins for the hints and xfree patch

On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 01:29:57PM +0200, Pieter-Paul Spiertz wrote:
 
 Why are you actually compiling your own kernel? Do you really

because its there ;)



Re: help with getting sarge cds to boot

2004-04-11 Thread Jim Watson
sorry i dont know if this is right or wrong, it is just information.

my silo.conf has lines like
image=1/vmlinuz

there are no subdirectories in /boot 

sun4u sunblade100
2.4.24

jim
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 06:54:05PM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
 
 This is the silo.conf we are using right now in the cds:
 
 partition=1
 timeout=600
 read-only
 message=/boot/debian.txt
 default=linux
 append=cdrom devfs=mount
 initrd=/boot/initrd.gz
 root=/dev/rd/0
 
 # Standard boot images
 image[sun4c,sun4d,sun4m]=/boot/sparc32
label=linux
 image[sun4u]=/boot/sparc64
label=linux
 
 Can anybody see anything wrong here?



Lab manual for SPARC

2004-04-08 Thread Jim Watson
Hi,

I got that Laboratory Manual for SPARC and found the debian package for
tkisem. How can I build from assembler to execute on my machine?  

Have I missed something or do I need another book :(


I can build the example foo.s  and load and run foo in tkisem OK thus:
$ as -als -o foo.o foo.s
$ ld -m sun4 -o foo foo.o

tkisem loads and runs as expected.

Now I would like run the program foo on my sunblade 100
$ uname -u
Linux sun 2.4.24-sparc64 #1 Fri Jan 30 18:32:22 EST 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linu

The foo for iesm I guess sshould not run:
$ file foo
foo: sparc demand paged executable not stripped
$ foo
-bash: ./foo: cannot execute binary file

I try this:
$ ld -e start -m elf32_sparc -o foo foo.o
ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol start; defaulting to 00010074

$ file foo
foo: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, SPARC, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked,
not stripped

$ ./foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./foo
Segmentation fault


Here was the as output
snip
SPARC GAS  foo.spage 2


DEFINED SYMBOLS
   foo.s:2  .data: x
   foo.s:3  .data:0004 y
   foo.s:4  .data:0008 z
   foo.s:7  .text: start
   foo.s:17 .text:002c end

thanks

jim



Re: Building custom kernel

2004-03-05 Thread Jim Watson
I have tried burning frankincence and threw snillocneb three times over
my shoulder but still it is not working :(
jim

On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:52:39AM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
 
 I've just been here myself. The following works for me :



openoffice linux sparc

2004-03-05 Thread Jim Watson
Hi,

i am looking for someone with sparc knowledge who would like to help with
the openoffice.org linux sparc porting on a regular basis, this involves
helping to solve any problems upstream to reduce the workload for debian
packagers.

i can do the building but need a sparc mentor to review somecode, help
interpret error messages, suggest fixes etc, as SUN people are always very
helpful but it would be nice to get some other support.

jim
 



Re: Reccomendations for Sun Linux

2004-03-05 Thread Jim Watson
elaborate the problem? this is sunblade 100, as we speak, running mail, web,
testing, unstable, openoffice, potato man, etc
;)

On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:16:30PM +0200, D Lambrou wrote:
 Hi there.
 We are planning to buy some new machines (Sun) to run services such as
 mail ,web etc..
 
 Nothing too fancy . Can you recommend some machines that you know that
 are working fine with Debian ?
 For example I have a Sun blade 100 which has a problem with dma and I
 cannot use it as a live system. I want to install woody.
 
 Thanks
 
 -- 
 -
 D Lambrou
 http://crazylinux.net
 
 You can always get my public key block from
 http://crazylinux.net/public.asc
 Fingerprint: C7B3 A112 3704 7202 2B33  6B28 5418 78DD 774A 7BCB
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



Re: Reccomendations for Sun Linux

2004-03-05 Thread Jim Watson
Hi,

i am just wondering what do you mean by problem?  

as my sunblade runs OK with kernel 2.4.18 for 12 months and 2.4.24 since
yesterday, using debian stable and testing and unstable at different times,
so if you can say what is the problem it can surely be easy to fix, as there
are many who will be happy to help :)

On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:55:26PM +0200, D Lambrou wrote:
 I could elaborate on the problem. Thats true. Just I dont have time at
 the moment :-)



Re: Building custom kernel

2004-03-04 Thread Jim Watson
I did as  described by Mustafa (thanks) but

 LD  .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/sparc64/kernel/built-in.o(.init.text+0x72c): In function Setup_arch':
: undefined reference to Rd_image_start'

I have searched around and find some old discussions but nothing that helps
me see what is missing? any suggestions appreciated...

another jim


On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 06:23:10PM -0600, Mustafa Hussein wrote:
 
 Are you running this from a sparc32 bash?
 If not, you need to switch to it:
 sparc32 bash
 make ARCH=sparc64 menuconfig
 or just from your current shell:
 sparc32 make ARCH=sparc64 menuconfig



openoffice.org680

2004-03-02 Thread Jim Watson
A contrib linux sparc build of openoffice.org680 for developers/experimenting
is now available on mirrors in openoffice/contrib/linuxsparc. This is not a
debian package but a tarball that may be installed in the user home
directory, but was built on a debian sparc system. Any comments would be
appreciated.
jim

  



linux sparc openoffice 111fix2

2004-01-21 Thread Jim Watson
Hi,

I put a tarball for openoffice.org version 111fix2 -b preview of 1.1.1 on
mirrors openoffice/contrib/linuxsparc. Now has java and database access. Any
reports would be appreciated. This is not a debian package but is built on
debian :D

thanks
jim
 



Re: ot: we've been scraped

2003-09-22 Thread Jim Watson
me too - but many of those emails have a 142k attachment.

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:26:34 -0400, Steve Pacenka wrote
 Fellow Sparcers,
 
 I've gotten about 70 virus/worms today of the current Wintel 
 variety. My Sparcs w/Debian are quite immune, fortunately.

--
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
Debian Project (http://www.debian.org)



Re: LCD on a Sun Blade 100

2003-09-10 Thread Jim Watson
I have benq fp767 it is beautiful :) on sun blade 100 debian unstable.

here is my XF86Config

get openoffice.org from your favourite mirror
pub/openoffice/contrib/linuxsparc

regrads

jim



On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:04:35PM +0200, Michael Daum wrote:
 Hi everybody,
 
 has anybody managed to get a Fujitsu Siemens 4312 FA LCD display
 or similar configured on debian/unstable (xserver-xfree86  4.2.1-11)? 
 
 I've got the datasheet of that model specifying horiz. freq. 30-81 kHz
 and vertical freq. 56-75 Hz. No success reconfiguring
 xserver-xfree86 with this info. No reactions on the display, black screen. 
 
 The LCD is ok connected to another machine. I've managed to get
 it up and running on a SuSE linux PC using sax2.
 So that's no hardware problem I tried to copy the modlines calculated
 by sax2 over to the debian/sparc XF86Config-4 file. That didn't help
 neither. 
 
 The display is running fine with 1280x1024-75 on solaris as well using.
 
 Anyone that could help, please?
 
   Micha.
 
 -- 
 -- Michael Daum
 -- Natural Language Systems (NatS)
 -- University of Hamburg, Department for Informatics
 -- http://nats-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/~micha
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page.
# (Type man XF86Config-4 at the shell prompt.)
#
# If you want your changes to this file preserved by dexconf, only make changes
# before the ### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION line above, and/or after the
# ### END DEBCONF SECTION line below.
#
# To change things within the debconf section, run the command:
#   dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86
# as root.  Also see How do I add custom sections to a dexconf-generated
# XF86Config or XF86Config-4 file? in /usr/share/doc/xfree86-common/FAQ.gz.

Section Files
FontPathunix/:7100# local font server
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi
FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi
EndSection

Section Module
LoadGLcore
Loadbitmap
Loaddbe
Loadddc
Loaddri
Loadextmod
Loadfreetype
Loadglx
Loadint10
Loadrecord
Loadspeedo
Loadtype1
Loadvbe
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Generic Keyboard
Driver  keyboard
Option  CoreKeyboard
Option  XkbRules  xfree86
Option  XkbModel  pc104
Option  XkbLayout us
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Configured Mouse
Driver  mouse
Option  CorePointer
Option  Device/dev/input/mice
Option  Protocol  ImPS/2
Option  Emulate3Buttons   true
Option  ZAxisMapping  4 5
EndSection

Section Device
Identifier  ATI RAGE
Driver  ati
BusID   PCI:00:19:00
EndSection

Section Monitor
Identifier  Generic Monitor
HorizSync   30-70
VertRefresh 50-160
Option  DPMS
EndSection

Section Screen
Identifier  Default Screen
Device  ATI RAGE
Monitor Generic Monitor
DefaultDepth24
SubSection Display
Depth   1
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   4
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   8
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   15
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   16
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600
EndSubSection
SubSection Display
Depth   24
Modes   1280x1024 1024x768 800x600
EndSubSection
EndSection

Section ServerLayout
Identifier  Default Layout
Screen  Default Screen
InputDevice Generic Keyboard
InputDevice Configured Mouse
EndSection

Section 

OpenOffice 1.1RC3 for linux sparc

2003-08-22 Thread Jim Watson

OpenOffice 1.1RC3 for linux sparc can be found here and other mirrors

http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/openoffice/contrib/linuxsparc/

Any reports would be appreciated - please see the README

This was built on debian/unstable but is the standard OOo, not debian.

thanks

Jim