Re: ATI Mach64 Problem
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:25:03PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:42:10PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote: > > > > > > > > This second card works perfectly well. Any ideas anyone? > > > > > > Which Xs have you tried? > > > > 4.1.0 doesn't work, i.e. shows wrong endianess, 3.3.6 works ok, but > > the RedHat 3.3.6 I used does an mmap on /dev/fb, not /proc/bus/pci/XX/YY.Z > > All 3.3.x ones do that for ultrasparc. The current Debian packages use a > new patch from Dave Miller that mmap's /proc/bus/pci/XX/YY.Z. Seems it > doesn't work on your card (no idea why). Yes, and the patch is completely fine. Does anyone have any info on that particular card? - It does not seem to be doing big-endian mode on the upper aperture, I know what I expect, as I do have a very similar card, which works correctly. /~\ Eddie C. Dost ASCII ribbon campaign \ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]against HTML mailX / \
Re: ATI Mach64 Problem
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 06:25:03PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:42:10PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote: > > > > > > This second card works perfectly well. Any ideas anyone? > > > > Which Xs have you tried? > > 4.1.0 doesn't work, i.e. shows wrong endianess, 3.3.6 works ok, but > the RedHat 3.3.6 I used does an mmap on /dev/fb, not /proc/bus/pci/XX/YY.Z All 3.3.x ones do that for ultrasparc. The current Debian packages use a new patch from Dave Miller that mmap's /proc/bus/pci/XX/YY.Z. Seems it doesn't work on your card (no idea why). -- .--===-=-==-=---==-=-. / Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
Re: ATI Mach64 Problem
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:42:10PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote: > > > > This second card works perfectly well. Any ideas anyone? > > Which Xs have you tried? 4.1.0 doesn't work, i.e. shows wrong endianess, 3.3.6 works ok, but the RedHat 3.3.6 I used does an mmap on /dev/fb, not /proc/bus/pci/XX/YY.Z /~\ Eddie C. Dost ASCII ribbon campaign \ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]against HTML mailX / \
Re: ATI Mach64 Problem
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 03:42:10PM +0100, Eddie C. Dost wrote: > > This second card works perfectly well. Any ideas anyone? Which Xs have you tried? -- John Lenton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Random fortune: Look before you leap. -- Samuel Butler
ATI Mach64 Problem
Hi, I have an ATI mach64 VT about which Linux says: atyfb: mach64VTA4 (ATI264VT) [0x5654 rev 0x40] 2M SDRAM, 14.31818 MHz XTAL, 200 MHz PLL, 67 MHz MCLK This card seems not to do any byte swapping whatever the settings for the apertures in the MEM_CNTL register are. Does anyone have any documentation specific to this card, or any experience with this special card? I have another card which Linux says about: atyfb: mach64VTA4 (ATI264VT) [0x5654 rev 0x40] 2M DRAM, 14.31818 MHz XTAL, 200 MHz PLL, 63 Mhz MCLK This second card works perfectly well. Any ideas anyone? /~\ Eddie C. Dost ASCII ribbon campaign \ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]against HTML mailX / \
