BogoMips on Netra 240 ?
Hi ! I've succesfully installed Etch on a Sun Netra 240. I'm curious as to this: The BogoMIPS value (see below). I expected it to be much higher. Anyone has a possible explanation ? Any suggestions for another good benchmark test ? Thx in advance ! Best regards Per 240-1:~# 240-1:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo cpu : TI UltraSparc IIIi (Jalapeno) fpu : UltraSparc IIIi integrated FPU prom: OBP 4.11.4 2003/07/23 08:04 type: sun4u ncpus probed: 2 ncpus active: 2 D$ parity tl1 : 0 I$ parity tl1 : 0 Cpu0Bogo: 24.00 Cpu0ClkTck : 4c4b4000 Cpu1Bogo: 24.00 Cpu1ClkTck : 4c4b4000 MMU Type: Cheetah+ State: CPU0: online CPU1: online 240-1:~# -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BogoMIPS
Does anyone know why the BogoMIPS value on my SunBlade 100 is shown as 11.11 instead of the correct value, when running a 2.6.x kernel? This is not Debian specific at all, I had the same problem under Gentoo... Just wondering what causes it. -- . | Daniel Liikamaa | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BogoMIPS
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:35:14PM +0200, Daniel Liikamaa wrote: Does anyone know why the BogoMIPS value on my SunBlade 100 is shown as 11.11 instead of the correct value, when running a 2.6.x kernel? This is not Debian specific at all, I had the same problem under Gentoo... Just wondering what causes it. $ cat /proc/cpuinfo cpu : TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) fpu : UltraSparc IIe integrated FPU promlib : Version 3 Revision 17 prom: 4.17.1 type: sun4u ncpus probed: 1 ncpus active: 1 D$ parity tl1 : 0 I$ parity tl1 : 0 Cpu0Bogo: 1001.47 Cpu0ClkTck : 1debe980 MMU Type: Spitfire running stock 2.6.16-2-sparc64 What is your cpu frequency? Is it still 500 MHz? BTW: linux-image-2.6.17-2-sparc64 would not boot up on my blade 100; it stops just before it should initialize the framebuffer). Anyone else with this problem? (Or with a blade 100 which does run 2.6.17?) Admar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BogoMIPS
On ons, 2006-09-13 at 17:01 +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote: What is your cpu frequency? Is it still 500 MHz? cpu : TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) fpu : UltraSparc IIe integrated FPU prom: OBP 4.17.1 2005/04/11 14:31 type: sun4u ncpus probed: 1 ncpus active: 1 D$ parity tl1 : 0 I$ parity tl1 : 0 Cpu0Bogo: 11.12 Cpu0ClkTck : 1debe980 MMU Type: Spitfire Hard to tell from this... This is while running 2.6.17.9. BTW: linux-image-2.6.17-2-sparc64 would not boot up on my blade 100; it stops just before it should initialize the framebuffer). Anyone else with this problem? (Or with a blade 100 which does run 2.6.17?) I had that problem also... I enabled atyfb with mach64 support in the kernel, and also pci framebuffers, all under graphics support in the device driver section, then it worked. Oh yeah, I always compile my own kernels, I kinda dislike the whole module thing, I want everything I need compiled into the kernel and everything I don't need not compiled at all. -- . | Daniel Liikamaa | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BogoMIPS
Daniel == Daniel Liikamaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel On ons, 2006-09-13 at 17:01 +0200, Admar Schoonen wrote: What is your cpu frequency? Is it still 500 MHz? Daniel cpu : TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) Daniel fpu : UltraSparc IIe integrated FPU Daniel prom: OBP 4.17.1 2005/04/11 14:31 Daniel type: sun4u Daniel ncpus probed: 1 Daniel ncpus active: 1 Daniel D$ parity tl1 : 0 Daniel I$ parity tl1 : 0 Daniel Cpu0Bogo: 11.12 Daniel Cpu0ClkTck : 1debe980 Daniel MMU Type: Spitfire Daniel Hard to tell from this... Daniel This is while running 2.6.17.9. hex(1debe980) = dec(50200). So yes, it looks like running at 500MHz. On my Netra-AX1105 (strange crossover between a Netra-X1 and a Blade-100), I have the following : cpu : TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) fpu : UltraSparc IIe integrated FPU prom: OBP 4.0.3 2001/05/14 09:52 type: sun4u ncpus probed: 1 ncpus active: 1 D$ parity tl1 : 0 I$ parity tl1 : 0 Cpu0Bogo: 22.23 Cpu0ClkTck : 1dcd6500 MMU Type: Spitfire That's with 2.6.17, and twice your number. Note that the machine is doing great (my main file server...), despite the i486-like bogomips number... ;-) M. -- And if you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BogoMIPS
Admar Schoonen a écrit : On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:35:14PM +0200, Daniel Liikamaa wrote: Does anyone know why the BogoMIPS value on my SunBlade 100 is shown as 11.11 instead of the correct value, when running a 2.6.x kernel? This is not Debian specific at all, I had the same problem under Gentoo... Just wondering what causes it. $ cat /proc/cpuinfo cpu : TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) fpu : UltraSparc IIe integrated FPU promlib : Version 3 Revision 17 prom: 4.17.1 type: sun4u ncpus probed: 1 ncpus active: 1 D$ parity tl1 : 0 I$ parity tl1 : 0 Cpu0Bogo: 1001.47 Cpu0ClkTck : 1debe980 MMU Type: Spitfire running stock 2.6.16-2-sparc64 What is your cpu frequency? Is it still 500 MHz? BTW: linux-image-2.6.17-2-sparc64 would not boot up on my blade 100; it stops just before it should initialize the framebuffer). Anyone else with this problem? (Or with a blade 100 which does run 2.6.17?) Admar ~1000 Bogo It's very light... On 4 Xeon I find this : shyrka:~/sbin# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz stepping: 9 cpu MHz : 2399.779 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid bogomips: 4751.36 processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz stepping: 9 cpu MHz : 2399.779 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid bogomips: 4784.12 processor : 2 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz stepping: 9 cpu MHz : 2399.779 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 3 siblings: 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid bogomips: 4784.12 processor : 3 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz stepping: 9 cpu MHz : 2399.779 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 3 siblings: 2 fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe cid bogomips: 4784.12 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
