Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-11 Thread Dave Love
"David S. Miller"  writes:

> If the upper 32-bits of some parameter we pass in has garbage in
> it, we'll totally die in the firmware.

>From experience reported in my last message, it looks as if this is
specific to the installer (or at least only shows up there for some
reason) and it's leaving some bad state behind, since reset will get
it going after the installation.  Sarge's silo got the system booted
eventually.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-10 Thread Jason Wever
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:23:30 -0600 (MDT)
Jason Wever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'll try this tonight when I get home and report back.

To clarify, the SILO error we get with 1.4.9 on UltraSPARC IIIs (at
least on a Blade 1000 with 'OBP 4.16.4 2004/12/18 05:18') looks like the
following;

Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:f  File and args:
SILO Version 1.4.9
 ERROR: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],70: Last Trap: Fast Data Access MMU Miss
   

Cheers,
-- 
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead


pgpyahZqYYaAC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-08 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 04:37:26PM -0700, Tyler wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> 
> >>If the upper 32-bits of some parameter we pass in has garbage in
> >>it, we'll totally die in the firmware.
> >>
> >>It's something to consider.
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >Thanks, I'll keep that in mind when looking into this. Just wish I could
> >reproduce it.
> > 
> >
> 
> Ben, could it be a timing issue? ... one thing I can think of is that a 
> CD is not going to be able to get to data as quickly as a hard drive 
> does.  The error message mentions "fast mmu access" .. only a guess.. 
> but thought I would share :)

By the time this message hits we've already loaded the kernel and the
initrd from the cd into memory. There's no cd access after that.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
SwissDisk  - http://www.swissdisk.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-08 Thread Jurij Smakov

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Ben Collins wrote:


So SILO from hd works, but SILO from cd doesn't? I can't think of anything
that is different when booting from CD other than the first stage
bootloader (which is pretty trivial).

The only thing could could possibly be the issue is something to do with
initrd. Maybe some bug haas crept in, maybe it's a memory mapping issue
particular to the III/IIIi's. Could be that SILO is writing the initrd
over top of the kernel or writing the value into the wrong place in the
kernel.


We have tried to do some debugging on a SunFire 280R which Andres Salomon 
has access to. It also displays the same bug (#261824 in BTS [0]). The 
conclusion there was that it does not even come to initrd loading. It dies 
in PROM when the command to open the cdrom is issued from SILO. I have 
tried to do some debugging on the PROM side (see the message before last 
in the bug trail), but I don't know how to monitor/intercept the calls to 
the PROM's entry point routine prom_cif_handler().


[0] http://bugs.debian.org/261824

Best regards,

Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/   KeyID: C99E03CC


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-08 Thread Tyler

Ben Collins wrote:


If the upper 32-bits of some parameter we pass in has garbage in
it, we'll totally die in the firmware.

It's something to consider.
   



Thanks, I'll keep that in mind when looking into this. Just wish I could
reproduce it.
 



Ben, could it be a timing issue? ... one thing I can think of is that a 
CD is not going to be able to get to data as quickly as a hard drive 
does.  The error message mentions "fast mmu access" .. only a guess.. 
but thought I would share :)


Tyler.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-08 Thread Ben Collins
> If the upper 32-bits of some parameter we pass in has garbage in
> it, we'll totally die in the firmware.
> 
> It's something to consider.

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind when looking into this. Just wish I could
reproduce it.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
SwissDisk  - http://www.swissdisk.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-08 Thread David S. Miller
From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 15:11:24 -0400

> So SILO from hd works, but SILO from cd doesn't? I can't think of anything
> that is different when booting from CD other than the first stage
> bootloader (which is pretty trivial).
> 
> The only thing could could possibly be the issue is something to do with
> initrd. Maybe some bug haas crept in, maybe it's a memory mapping issue
> particular to the III/IIIi's. Could be that SILO is writing the initrd
> over top of the kernel or writing the value into the wrong place in the
> kernel.
> 
> Quick test of this would be to see if you could boot from CD with no
> initrd and mounting a hd for root.

Ben, one thing I've been considering a lot lately while reading
these reports is a somehow corrupted sign extension when calling
into the OBP.

SILO is, for better or for worse, a 32-bit Sparc binary.  However,
we go into 64-bit mode when we jump into the firmware.

If the upper 32-bits of some parameter we pass in has garbage in
it, we'll totally die in the firmware.

It's something to consider.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-08 Thread Jason Wever

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Ben Collins wrote:


So SILO from hd works, but SILO from cd doesn't? I can't think of anything
that is different when booting from CD other than the first stage
bootloader (which is pretty trivial).


Correct, booting from the HD with 1.4.9 works just fine.


The only thing could could possibly be the issue is something to do with
initrd. Maybe some bug haas crept in, maybe it's a memory mapping issue
particular to the III/IIIi's. Could be that SILO is writing the initrd
over top of the kernel or writing the value into the wrong place in the
kernel.

Quick test of this would be to see if you could boot from CD with no
initrd and mounting a hd for root.


I'll try this tonight when I get home and report back.

Cheers,
- -- 
Jason Wever

Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCztK3dKvgdVioq28RAipAAKCQafvHwCIl2N1I57LwJ9YKSNhKfwCeN470
XMVHZeGrhcZLgcrjLnDeIyU=
=NjKw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-08 Thread Ben Collins
So SILO from hd works, but SILO from cd doesn't? I can't think of anything
that is different when booting from CD other than the first stage
bootloader (which is pretty trivial).

The only thing could could possibly be the issue is something to do with
initrd. Maybe some bug haas crept in, maybe it's a memory mapping issue
particular to the III/IIIi's. Could be that SILO is writing the initrd
over top of the kernel or writing the value into the wrong place in the
kernel.

Quick test of this would be to see if you could boot from CD with no
initrd and mounting a hd for root.

On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:37:05AM -0600, Jason Wever wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Jon BIddell wrote:
> 
> >Boon - the one time I managed to get Gentoo to install from CDROM I had
> >the same problem on the SunBlade 1000.
> 
> We've found that when combining bootable CDs and UltraSPARC III and IIIi 
> CPUs (at least in the case of the Blade 1000 and the Netra 240 we have to 
> test with in Gentoo land), that anything newer than SILO 1.2.6 will 
> generate the "Fast Instruction Access MMU Miss" error.
> 
> Cheers,
> - -- 
> Jason Wever
> Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFCzp2jdKvgdVioq28RAiHwAJ455DKiDdx9zXwSGmdwpuVeYhgejgCeJtBw
> A6hH0mat/mRrS3Q3Kw0h0R8=
> =cTv5
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
SwissDisk  - http://www.swissdisk.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



AW: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-08 Thread Jurzitza, Dieter



-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:Jason Wever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet:   Fr 08.07.2005 17:37
An: Jon BIddell
Cc: Boon Siong; debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Betreff:Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240


***
Diese E-Mail enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte 
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail 
irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und 
loeschen Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe 
dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
 
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please 
notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, 
disclosure or distribution of the contents in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
***


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Jon BIddell wrote:

> Boon - the one time I managed to get Gentoo to install from CDROM I had
> the same problem on the SunBlade 1000.

We've found that when combining bootable CDs and UltraSPARC III and IIIi 
CPUs (at least in the case of the Blade 1000 and the Netra 240 we have to test 
with in Gentoo land), that anything newer than SILO 1.2.6 will 
generate the "Fast Instruction Access MMU Miss" error.

Cheers,
- -- 
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCzp2jdKvgdVioq28RAiHwAJ455DKiDdx9zXwSGmdwpuVeYhgejgCeJtBw
A6hH0mat/mRrS3Q3Kw0h0R8=
=cTv5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]











***
Diese E-Mail enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte 
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail 
irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und 
loeschen Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe 
dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
 
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please 
notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, 
disclosure or distribution of the contents in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
***



Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-08 Thread Jason Wever

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Jon BIddell wrote:


Boon - the one time I managed to get Gentoo to install from CDROM I had
the same problem on the SunBlade 1000.


We've found that when combining bootable CDs and UltraSPARC III and IIIi 
CPUs (at least in the case of the Blade 1000 and the Netra 240 we have to 
test with in Gentoo land), that anything newer than SILO 1.2.6 will 
generate the "Fast Instruction Access MMU Miss" error.


Cheers,
- -- 
Jason Wever

Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCzp2jdKvgdVioq28RAiHwAJ455DKiDdx9zXwSGmdwpuVeYhgejgCeJtBw
A6hH0mat/mRrS3Q3Kw0h0R8=
=cTv5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-07 Thread Jon BIddell
Boon Siong wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> I have a Sun Fire V240 with 1GB Ram,
>  
> i get this msg when i try to boot up with debian installation cd,
>  
> ok boot cdrom
> Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED],0:f  File and args:
> SILO Version 1.4.9
> \
> boot:
> Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
> Loaded kernel version 2.4.27
> Loading initial ramdisk (3041649 bytes at 0x3F80 phys, 0x40C0
> virt)...
> -
> Remapping the kernel... Fast Instruction Access MMU Miss
> ok

Boon - the one time I managed to get Gentoo to install from CDROM I had
the same problem on the SunBlade 1000.

Try a netboot - did it last night and it works perfectly (you can
specify CD/DVD as the source for packages when you get to that point).

jon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-07 Thread stefan t








Huh! ADVICE : REMOVE 512 MB OF RAM! Read
previous posts about this problem ! 

And read this :

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%23315978

I guess this is a well known problem/bug. We
should make a private forum or something dedicated to this problem!

 

Regards,

Stefan T 

 

 

 









From: Boon Siong
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 7 iulie 2005 12:10
To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Installation Problem
on Sun Fire V240



 



any one succesfully installed debian on
v240?





can give some advise?







- Original Message - 





From: stefan t 





To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org 





Sent: Thursday, July 07,
2005 4:45 PM





Subject: RE: Installation
Problem on Sun Fire V240





 



 

 









From: stefan t
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 7 iulie 2005 11:40
To: 'Boon Siong'
Subject: RE: Installation Problem
on Sun Fire V240



 

I have same problem ! Try removing 512 mb
of ram! 

There is not a kernel bug, I guess, since
HIGHMEM support is for > 4GB. Anyway, I’ve recompiled many kernel
versions (2.4.*, 2.6.*). Same problem! L 

 









From: Boon Siong
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 7 iulie 2005 09:15
To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Installation Problem on
Sun Fire V240



 



Hi,





 





I have a Sun Fire V240 with 1GB Ram,





 





i get this msg when i try to boot up with
debian installation cd,





 





ok boot cdrom
Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:f  File and args:
SILO Version 1.4.9
\
boot:
Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
Loaded kernel version 2.4.27
Loading initial ramdisk (3041649 bytes at 0x3F80 phys, 0x40C0 virt)...
-
Remapping the kernel... Fast Instruction Access MMU Miss
ok





 





appreciate your prompt of reply.





 





Thank You.





 





Regards,





Lee












Re: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-07 Thread Boon Siong



any one succesfully installed debian on 
v240?
can give some advise?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  stefan t 
  To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org 
  
  Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 4:45 
  PM
  Subject: RE: Installation Problem on Sun 
  Fire V240
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
  From: stefan 
  t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7 iulie 2005 11:40To: 'Boon Siong'Subject: RE: Installation Problem on Sun 
  Fire V240
   
  I have same problem ! 
  Try removing 512 mb of ram! 
  There is not a kernel 
  bug, I guess, since HIGHMEM support is for > 4GB. Anyway, I’ve recompiled 
  many kernel versions (2.4.*, 2.6.*). Same problem! L 
  
   
  
  
  
  
  From: Boon 
  Siong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7 iulie 2005 09:15To: 
  debian-sparc@lists.debian.orgSubject: Installation Problem on Sun Fire 
  V240
   
  
  Hi,
  
   
  
  I have a Sun Fire V240 
  with 1GB Ram,
  
   
  
  i get this msg when i 
  try to boot up with debian installation cd,
  
   
  
  ok boot cdromBoot 
  device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:f  File and args:SILO Version 
  1.4.9\boot:Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for 
  kernelLoaded kernel version 2.4.27Loading initial ramdisk (3041649 
  bytes at 0x3F80 phys, 0x40C0 virt)...-Remapping the kernel... 
  Fast Instruction Access MMU Missok
  
   
  
  appreciate your prompt 
  of reply.
  
   
  
  Thank 
  You.
  
   
  
  Regards,
  
  Lee


RE: Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-07 Thread stefan t








 

 









From: stefan t
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 7 iulie 2005 11:40
To: 'Boon Siong'
Subject: RE: Installation Problem
on Sun Fire V240



 

I have same problem ! Try removing 512 mb
of ram! 

There is not a kernel bug, I guess, since HIGHMEM
support is for > 4GB. Anyway, I’ve recompiled many kernel versions
(2.4.*, 2.6.*). Same problem! L 

 









From: Boon Siong
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 7 iulie 2005 09:15
To: debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Installation Problem on Sun
Fire V240



 



Hi,





 





I have a Sun Fire V240 with 1GB Ram,





 





i get this msg when i try to boot up with
debian installation cd,





 





ok boot cdrom
Boot device: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:f  File and args:
SILO Version 1.4.9
\
boot:
Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
Loaded kernel version 2.4.27
Loading initial ramdisk (3041649 bytes at 0x3F80 phys, 0x40C0 virt)...
-
Remapping the kernel... Fast Instruction Access MMU Miss
ok





 





appreciate your prompt of reply.





 





Thank You.





 





Regards,





Lee










Installation Problem on Sun Fire V240

2005-07-06 Thread Boon Siong



Hi,
 
I have a Sun Fire V240 with 1GB 
Ram,
 
i get this msg when i try to boot up with 
debian installation cd,
 
ok boot cdromBoot device: 
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:f  File and args:SILO Version 
1.4.9\boot:Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for 
kernelLoaded kernel version 2.4.27Loading initial ramdisk (3041649 bytes 
at 0x3F80 phys, 0x40C0 virt)...-Remapping the kernel... Fast 
Instruction Access MMU Missok
 
appreciate your prompt of 
reply.
 
Thank You.
 
Regards,
Lee