Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
* on the Sun, May 11, 2003 at 11:45:53AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > You have to use egcs64 for 2.4 kernels. Yes, seems so. It boots. I verified also the whole patch-situation, and it seems I was wrong: This was with the USAGI-patch. The stock kernel (even with grsecurity and ipfilter-patch) has no problems with ICMP. > check this thread for 2.5 kernels > http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2003/debian-sparc-200304/msg00169.html Thank you. Only it doesn't really help, how do I compile my 2.5.69 now? ;) Peter -- Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
Hi, On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 10:08:56AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote: > * on the Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:03:37AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote: > > > Hello > > > [ ... ] > > Could you try 2.4.21-rc2? > > I'll try whatever I can. ;) Right now, all my self-built kernels > cannot boot with a "Data Access Exception", I suspect its a > compiler-problem. Which one should I use? It's a Sid. I tried 3.2.3-2 > 3.3-0pre8 (I'll try pre9 today) and 2.95 which wouldn't even compile. > Right now my /usr/bin looks like this: > I have recently compiled an 2.5.68 with gcc-3.0 and it boots. So you can try to get an gcc-3.0 and compile your kernel with this compiler. HTH, tim -- When confronted by a difficult problem, you can solve it more easily by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" Tim Weippert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG Key http://www.topf-sicret.org/kontakt.html
Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
On Sun, 11 May 2003, Peter Keel wrote: > > Could you try 2.4.21-rc2? > > I'll try whatever I can. ;) Right now, all my self-built kernels > cannot boot with a "Data Access Exception", I suspect its a > compiler-problem. Which one should I use? It's a Sid. I tried 3.2.3-2 > 3.3-0pre8 (I'll try pre9 today) and 2.95 which wouldn't even compile. > Right now my /usr/bin looks like this: > > /usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-2.95 > /usr/bin/gcc-2.95 > /usr/bin/gcc-3.2 > /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 > /usr/bin/gccbug -> gccbug-3.2 > /usr/bin/gccbug-3.2 > /usr/bin/gccbug-3.3 > /usr/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc -> gcc-2.95 > > I'm not quite sure whether /usr/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc -> gcc-2.95 makes > sense. Should I install egcs64? egcs64 seemed to produce bootable > kernels, but had problems compiling 2.5.6x (which I ultimatively want). You have to use egcs64 for 2.4 kernels. check this thread for 2.5 kernels http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2003/debian-sparc-200304/msg00169.html Fabio -- Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol "We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp4.html
Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
* on the Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:03:37AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote: > > Hello > > > > I know this probably doesn't really belong here, but this is the > > only Sparc-ML I'm reading, and it may be of interest to you. > > > > ping6 on an IPv6-enabled Sparc32 or Sparc64 on Kernel 2.4.20 > > bombs really nasty. Machine halts instantly. No matter what patches. Right now, I'm not quite sure whether I used USAGI on both systems. The Sparc10 had USAGI, and I thought I had compiled the kernel for the Ultra1 without USAGI. So this might actually be an USAGI-problem. I constantly try to recompile kernels (with and whithout this and that), but see below. > Could you try 2.4.21-rc2? I'll try whatever I can. ;) Right now, all my self-built kernels cannot boot with a "Data Access Exception", I suspect its a compiler-problem. Which one should I use? It's a Sid. I tried 3.2.3-2 3.3-0pre8 (I'll try pre9 today) and 2.95 which wouldn't even compile. Right now my /usr/bin looks like this: /usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-2.95 /usr/bin/gcc-2.95 /usr/bin/gcc-3.2 /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 /usr/bin/gccbug -> gccbug-3.2 /usr/bin/gccbug-3.2 /usr/bin/gccbug-3.3 /usr/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc -> gcc-2.95 I'm not quite sure whether /usr/bin/sparc64-linux-gcc -> gcc-2.95 makes sense. Should I install egcs64? egcs64 seemed to produce bootable kernels, but had problems compiling 2.5.6x (which I ultimatively want). Regards Peter -- Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote: > ping6 on an IPv6-enabled Sparc32 or Sparc64 on Kernel 2.4.20 > bombs really nasty. Machine halts instantly. No matter what patches. You're using ping6 from iputils-ping? I maintain that package, and use it on a number of sparc systems. I do quite a bit of IPv6 stuff on these machines, using one as a tunnel gateway and another as a dual-stack web server. Never have I seen any crashes related to IPv6 or ICMPv6 or ping6 or any related code. If you want, I can send you an image of one of the kernels that I use on my Ultra1s. I *know* they do IPv6. It would be interesting to see if they have problems on your machines. noah -- ___ | Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/ | PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html pgpaX9vyxdwKy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Peter Keel wrote: > Hello > > I know this probably doesn't really belong here, but this is the > only Sparc-ML I'm reading, and it may be of interest to you. > > ping6 on an IPv6-enabled Sparc32 or Sparc64 on Kernel 2.4.20 > bombs really nasty. Machine halts instantly. No matter what patches. Could you try 2.4.21-rc2? -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
Re: Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
Are you using standard debian kernels or a custom one?
Actually IPv6 works just fine on my sparc. Never had this problem.
Fabio
On Fri, 9 May 2003, Peter Keel wrote:
> Hello
>
> I know this probably doesn't really belong here, but this is the
> only Sparc-ML I'm reading, and it may be of interest to you.
>
> ping6 on an IPv6-enabled Sparc32 or Sparc64 on Kernel 2.4.20
> bombs really nasty. Machine halts instantly. No matter what patches.
>
> This is sparc32:
> oldlady:~# ping6 irc6.lugs.ch
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
> dereference<1>tsk->{mm,active_mm}->contextb
> tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pgd = fc00c400
>
> And this is sparc64:
> josephine:~# ping6 irc6.lugs.ch
> dING irc6.lRuEgJsE.CcThv(6v:e ncuasl.lpiancgi fiiccmap.vc6h_)s e5n6d
> oatUan abbyltee st
> handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
> tsk->{mm,active_mm}->context = 05d8
> tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pgd = f800324b1000
>
> USAGI or not, ip6filter-patch or not, grsec or not, doesn't seem to
> make any difference.
>
> I tried to run 2.5.6x instead, but I can't get it to boot anymore
> (I had 2.5.68 running once on the Ultra1). All it says is "Data
> Access Exception". I'm pretty sure I misconfigured something, so
> if any of you has a .config of a running 2.5.69 or something on a
> stock Ultra1 (143Mhz, Lance), I'd be glad if you could mail it to me.
>
> Cheers
> Peter
>
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues
http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp4.html
Kernel 2.4.20 and IPv6 ICMP on Sparc32/64 bomb
Hello
I know this probably doesn't really belong here, but this is the
only Sparc-ML I'm reading, and it may be of interest to you.
ping6 on an IPv6-enabled Sparc32 or Sparc64 on Kernel 2.4.20
bombs really nasty. Machine halts instantly. No matter what patches.
This is sparc32:
oldlady:~# ping6 irc6.lugs.ch
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference<1>tsk->{mm,active_mm}->contextb
tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pgd = fc00c400
And this is sparc64:
josephine:~# ping6 irc6.lugs.ch
dING irc6.lRuEgJsE.CcThv(6v:e ncuasl.lpiancgi fiiccmap.vc6h_)s e5n6d
oatUan abbyltee st
handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
tsk->{mm,active_mm}->context = 05d8
tsk->{mm,active_mm}->pgd = f800324b1000
USAGI or not, ip6filter-patch or not, grsec or not, doesn't seem to
make any difference.
I tried to run 2.5.6x instead, but I can't get it to boot anymore
(I had 2.5.68 running once on the Ultra1). All it says is "Data
Access Exception". I'm pretty sure I misconfigured something, so
if any of you has a .config of a running 2.5.69 or something on a
stock Ultra1 (143Mhz, Lance), I'd be glad if you could mail it to me.
Cheers
Peter
--
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
