Re: [ss20]cdrom
All my CD's boot fine, it really look like a module isn't being loaded. As I say, Sarg loads fine. The installer starts, and then hangs when doing hardware detection for modules. On 17/07/07, Eric Rapilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: did you try to clean it with a cleaner Cdrom ? you may be able to find one in any computer shop -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ss20]cdrom
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 17:58, Chris Andrew wrote: All my CD's boot fine, it really look like a module isn't being loaded. As I say, Sarg loads fine. The installer starts, and then hangs when doing hardware detection for modules. Possibly this is covered by the errata for the Etch installer (esp module broken) [1]. It is one of the many issues that contribute to the decision to drop support for sparc32... [1] http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/debian-installer/ pgpmRFwVKBiG5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ss20]cdrom
I did modprobe esp and it didn't work. I remember in previous years that I had to insert esp and that was fine, so it sounds like you may be right. I am currently trying an install of netbsd :-(. Cheers, Chris. On 17/07/07, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 17 July 2007 17:58, Chris Andrew wrote: All my CD's boot fine, it really look like a module isn't being loaded. As I say, Sarg loads fine. The installer starts, and then hangs when doing hardware detection for modules. Possibly this is covered by the errata for the Etch installer (esp module broken) [1]. It is one of the many issues that contribute to the decision to drop support for sparc32... [1] http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/debian-installer/
Re: [ss20]cdrom
Hi, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Possibly this is covered by the errata for the Etch installer (esp module broken) [1]. It is one of the many issues that contribute to the decision to drop support for sparc32... [1] http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/debian-installer/ ESP has been rewritten since then, so perhaps newer kernel versions would work (or fail differently ;-)). Thanks, Ludovic. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ss20]cdrom
Ludovic, That's interesting. Do you know where I can download an ISO that has the re-written module? I prefer debian, but at the moment, any linux would do. Many thanks, Chris. On 17/07/07, Ludovic Courtès [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Possibly this is covered by the errata for the Etch installer (esp module broken) [1]. It is one of the many issues that contribute to the decision to drop support for sparc32... [1] http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/debian-installer/ ESP has been rewritten since then, so perhaps newer kernel versions would work (or fail differently ;-)). Thanks, Ludovic. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ss20]cdrom
(Please do _not_ CC people who obviously read the mailing list!) On Tuesday 17 July 2007 22:56, Chris Andrew wrote: That's interesting. Do you know where I can download an ISO that has the re-written module? I prefer debian, but at the moment, any linux would do. The daily built images of the installer for sparc [1] have kernel 2.6.20. I don't know if the rewrite happened before or after that release, but it is somewhat more recent than the Etch kernel. Cheers, FJP [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ pgpnnfyg83451.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ss20]cdrom
Hi, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The daily built images of the installer for sparc [1] have kernel 2.6.20. I don't know if the rewrite happened before or after that release, but it is somewhat more recent than the Etch kernel. The rewrite dates back to April [0] while 2.6.20 was released two months earlier [1]. Apparently, the new ESP driver first appeared in 2.6.22 [2]. Thanks, Ludovic. [0] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/7534 [1] http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.20 [2] http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_2_6_22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ss20]cdrom
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 23:35, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The daily built images of the installer for sparc [1] have kernel 2.6.20. I don't know if the rewrite happened before or after that release, but it is somewhat more recent than the Etch kernel. The rewrite dates back to April [0] while 2.6.20 was released two months earlier [1]. Apparently, the new ESP driver first appeared in 2.6.22 [2]. In that case there is unfortunately extremely little chance that this will become available in Debian. The only option seems to be a self-compiled kernel. pgptALRA5GtpZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [ss20]cdrom
Chris Andrew wrote: Ludovic, That's interesting. Do you know where I can download an ISO that has the re-written module? I prefer debian, but at the moment, any linux would do. Many thanks, Chris. The latest gregbeta release of splack should work. Be warned, however, that it is still in the beta stage and the non-usa keyboard mappings are broken. ftp://ftp.splack.org/pub/splack/gregbeta/bobware-10.2/iso/bobware-10.2.rc3.iso -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ss20]cdrom
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 23:44 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 17 July 2007 23:35, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The daily built images of the installer for sparc [1] have kernel 2.6.20. I don't know if the rewrite happened before or after that release, but it is somewhat more recent than the Etch kernel. The rewrite dates back to April [0] while 2.6.20 was released two months earlier [1]. Apparently, the new ESP driver first appeared in 2.6.22 [2]. In that case there is unfortunately extremely little chance that this will become available in Debian. The only option seems to be a self-compiled kernel. Unless I'm mistaken, wouldn't booting using an earlier version of Debian and then upgrading or netbooting also be options for at least the install? Cheers, - Martin