Re: Kernel for a sparc5...

2004-01-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:24:52PM +0100, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
 
 I've a ss5 uniprocessor that happily runs:
 
   neo:~# uname -a
   Linux neo 2.2.21 #1 Wed Jul 24 14:42:52 CEST 2002 sparc unknown
 
 from years. ;)
 
 
 If i want to upgrade the kernel, it is better i go to latest 2.2, 2.4
 or 2.6?!
 This is my mail/dhcp/dns/... production kernel, so i don't want speed
 or some exotic feature, only a kernel that run. ;)

I'd say stick with what works :)

You could go with a newer 2.2 kernel with no problem. You could try a
2.4 kernel, since they work pretty well on uni-proc sparc32's. I can't
even suggest 2.6, since I've no idea how they are working.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/



Re: Kernel for a sparc5...

2004-01-16 Thread Momo
Hi boyzs

Just have a look at http://osinvestor.com/sparc/

I run a 2.4.24 on a SS5 uniprocessor, it works very well
I'm about to test jumping to 2.6, maybe this sunday .

Have a nice day

Momo


 On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:24:52PM +0100, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
  
  I've a ss5 uniprocessor that happily runs:
  
  neo:~# uname -a
  Linux neo 2.2.21 #1 Wed Jul 24 14:42:52 CEST 2002 sparc unknown
  
  from years. ;)
  
  
  If i want to upgrade the kernel, it is better i go to latest 2.2, 2.4
  or 2.6?!
  This is my mail/dhcp/dns/... production kernel, so i don't want speed
  or some exotic feature, only a kernel that run. ;)
 
 I'd say stick with what works :)
 
 You could go with a newer 2.2 kernel with no problem. You could try a
 2.4 kernel, since they work pretty well on uni-proc sparc32's. I can't
 even suggest 2.6, since I've no idea how they are working.
 
 -- 
 Debian - http://www.debian.org/
 Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
 Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
 WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 










---
This mail was sent via DEBIAN GNU/Linux v3.0.r4 running IMP3.2 Webmail.



Re: Kernel for a sparc5...

2004-01-16 Thread Antonio Luiz Pacifico
Had you experimented some problems with ffb_*.o drivers at 
/usr/src/linux.../drivers/char/drm ?
Yesterday I tried to compile 2.4.24 (in stable, using egcs64) and always 
the process stoped compiling the kernel image at this point. I couldn't 
find a way to solve the problem.
I decided to come back to 2.4.21 that was the last I had compiled. My 
machine is a ultra30.


Another question: some days before, I was trying to compile a kernel in 
testing (gcc3.3, and so on). Using sparc32 make ARCH=sparc64 menuconfig 
everthing went well. But only until that. make dep, and the others in 
sequence don't work at all. I gave up and come back to stable. Some 
times what really import is that the system works, and works with 
confidence :^)


Regards,

A. L. Pacifico

Momo wrote:

Hi boyzs

Just have a look at http://osinvestor.com/sparc/

I run a 2.4.24 on a SS5 uniprocessor, it works very well
I'm about to test jumping to 2.6, maybe this sunday .

Have a nice day

Momo




On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:24:52PM +0100, Marco Gaiarin wrote:


I've a ss5 uniprocessor that happily runs:

neo:~# uname -a
Linux neo 2.2.21 #1 Wed Jul 24 14:42:52 CEST 2002 sparc unknown

from years. ;)


If i want to upgrade the kernel, it is better i go to latest 2.2, 2.4
or 2.6?!
This is my mail/dhcp/dns/... production kernel, so i don't want speed
or some exotic feature, only a kernel that run. ;)


I'd say stick with what works :)

You could go with a newer 2.2 kernel with no problem. You could try a
2.4 kernel, since they work pretty well on uni-proc sparc32's. I can't
even suggest 2.6, since I've no idea how they are working.

--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]














---
This mail was sent via DEBIAN GNU/Linux v3.0.r4 running IMP3.2 Webmail.





--
Antonio Luiz Pacifico
Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnologicas do Estado de Sao Paulo S/A
Agrupamento de Engenharia Termica
Av. Prof. Almeida Prado, 532 - Cidade Universitaria
Cep: 05508-901  Sao Paulo - SP
Tel: (11) 3767-4520
Fax: (11) 3767-4784




Re: Kernel for a sparc5...

2004-01-16 Thread Peter
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:45, Momo wrote:
 Hi boyzs
 
 Just have a look at http://osinvestor.com/sparc/
 
 I run a 2.4.24 on a SS5 uniprocessor, it works very well
 I'm about to test jumping to 2.6, maybe this sunday .

I run a 22.23 kernel from osinvestor on my IPX webserver and it works
great, whereas the stock Debian kernels from Woody  testing would crash
every 5 days or so. Very nice to have these kernels available.

Peter




Re: Kernel for a sparc5...

2004-01-16 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:31:21 EST, Ben Collins writes:
You could go with a newer 2.2 kernel with no problem. You could try a
2.4 kernel, since they work pretty well on uni-proc sparc32's. 

hmm, I don't concur: I'm running three sun4ms (one SS4-110 and two SS5-110)
and I've had oopses in the ext3 code on two of the three boxes 
(2.4.20 to .23) between once every two days and once a week :-((

The kernels used are stock kernel.org-issue, and I don't know the extent
of fixes in the Debian kernel-source packages. Ben?

regards
az

-- 
+ Alexander Zangerl + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291)
cc:Mail is a wonderful application, as long as you don't want to
read or send mail. -- Jan van den Broek


pgpyQmnQ1uN9C.pgp
Description: PGP signature