Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-14 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 10/14/2015 11:56 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> OTOH perhaps this is a simple indicator why the port has been dying - if it
> takes a non-trivial amount of money to get a long-obsolete, over a decade
> old machine, it's not going to attract a lot of people.

The reactions to my survey regarding the resurrection of the sparc
port on debian-sparc have been thoroughly positive. There are many
users interested in getting the port back into shape.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:25:10AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 11:20 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I didn't claim that, I just said the shipping cost range can be 
> > unreasonable.
> > In fact, I would say even 40-50 EUR is entirely unreasonable for a machine 
> > that
> > *maybe* costs that much now, and which is so battered that it will probably
> > cost 0 EUR by the time it's rebooted once again - when it finally fails due
> > to any one of its many ailments.
> 
> Meh, it's still not that easy to get such hardware on eBay for that
> price, at least not in Europe. I would also still consider 50 Euros
> not to much for shipping.
> 
> > You don't need the specific hardware, the only thing of value on it is the
> > software, and you can have DSA rsync everything from the old machines, which
> > also costs 0 EUR if we ignore man-hours :)
> 
> Yeah, sure. But anyway, we will probably not need schroeder and lebrun
> anyway. However, if there are any useful hardware components in them
> that are hard to get by, it would still be great to keep them.

ISTR they're run-off-the-mill Fire V240s.

OTOH perhaps this is a simple indicator why the port has been dying - if it
takes a non-trivial amount of money to get a long-obsolete, over a decade
old machine, it's not going to attract a lot of people.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:37 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

> Sure: https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/10/msg00012.html

Wow, great news :)

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-14 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 10/14/2015 11:33 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:25 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
> 
>> a team at Oracle which is still actively supporting Linux on
>> SPARC
> 
> That seems surprising, do you have a reference for this?

Sure: https://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/10/msg00012.html

- -- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=+Yp7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:25 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

> a team at Oracle which is still actively supporting Linux on SPARC

That seems surprising, do you have a reference for this?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-14 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 10/14/2015 11:20 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I didn't claim that, I just said the shipping cost range can be unreasonable.
> In fact, I would say even 40-50 EUR is entirely unreasonable for a machine 
> that
> *maybe* costs that much now, and which is so battered that it will probably
> cost 0 EUR by the time it's rebooted once again - when it finally fails due
> to any one of its many ailments.

Meh, it's still not that easy to get such hardware on eBay for that
price, at least not in Europe. I would also still consider 50 Euros
not to much for shipping.

> You don't need the specific hardware, the only thing of value on it is the
> software, and you can have DSA rsync everything from the old machines, which
> also costs 0 EUR if we ignore man-hours :)

Yeah, sure. But anyway, we will probably not need schroeder and lebrun
anyway. However, if there are any useful hardware components in them
that are hard to get by, it would still be great to keep them.

In any case, we have several people who have offered hosted SPARC
machines for Debian SPARC now as well as a team at Oracle which
is still actively supporting Linux on SPARC. Thus, I already
sent a request to the Debian FTP and buildd teams as well as
Aurelien Jarno to get 'sparc' added to Debian Ports.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:35:58AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 10:31 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Which is entirely irrelevant to this case because schroeder and lebrun are
> > not in Germany, and someone already posted links to the online documentation
> > that says so?
> 
> Yes, but they are in Croatia and shipping 31.5 kg from Croatia to
> Germany costs approximately 40-50 Euros and not 500 something
> as you claimed.

I didn't claim that, I just said the shipping cost range can be unreasonable.
In fact, I would say even 40-50 EUR is entirely unreasonable for a machine that
*maybe* costs that much now, and which is so battered that it will probably
cost 0 EUR by the time it's rebooted once again - when it finally fails due
to any one of its many ailments.

You don't need the specific hardware, the only thing of value on it is the
software, and you can have DSA rsync everything from the old machines, which
also costs 0 EUR if we ignore man-hours :)

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-14 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 10/14/2015 10:31 AM, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Which is entirely irrelevant to this case because schroeder and lebrun are
> not in Germany, and someone already posted links to the online documentation
> that says so?

Yes, but they are in Croatia and shipping 31.5 kg from Croatia to
Germany costs approximately 40-50 Euros and not 500 something
as you claimed.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:04:23AM +0900, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> The cost of shipping depends on from where to where you ship them, obviously.
> 
> You can ship up to 31.5 kg within Germany for just 13.99 EUR. As long as you 
> don't have to ship acres the pond, it shouldn't be too expensive.

Which is entirely irrelevant to this case because schroeder and lebrun are
not in Germany, and someone already posted links to the online documentation
that says so?

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-12 Thread Frans van Berckel
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 14:58 +0300, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Wow, I am overwhelmed by all these offers. You people are amazing!

Anyone living in Gilbert, Arizona, United States? And do you have some
rack space left? Found a ebay ad, only US $29.99. But be ware, no HDDs.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sun-Fire-T2000-w-Niagra-8-core-procs-16x-2GB-ME
M-No-HDDs-/331588733955?hash=item4d343a8c03

Or in Brockport, New York, United States? US $89.99 and again no HDDs.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sun-Microsystems-SPARC-Enterprise-T2000-8-Core-
1-2GHz-T1-16GB-RAM-/201428747550?hash=item2ee616c51e

I found them with this search ...

http://www.ebay.com/dsc/i.html?_sop=2&_from=R40&_sacat=0&LH_TitleDesc=1
&_nkw=Sparc%20T2000%20Core&rt=nc&LH_PrefLoc=2&_trksid=p2045573.m1684

Thanks,


Frans van Berckel



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-12 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Wow, I am overwhelmed by all these offers. You people are amazing!

> On Oct 12, 2015, at 7:30 AM, david h.  wrote:
> 
> Hello, 
> I have 2 t2000 servers with 8 cores and 32 gigabytes of ram, each.
> I have to change some ram because at the moment they utilize only 16, but 
> then I will search for cheap rack space to put them in, and could set them up 
> as build servers. If there is need for that.
> 
> Greetings David
> Am 12.10.2015 03:04 schrieb "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" 
> :
>> The cost of shipping depends on from where to where you ship them, obviously.
>> 
>> You can ship up to 31.5 kg within Germany for just 13.99 EUR. As long as you 
>> don't have to ship acres the pond, it shouldn't be too expensive.
>> 
>> > On Oct 10, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Josip Rodin  wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:43:04AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> >> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb am Sonntag, dem 04. Oktober 2015:
>> >>
>> >>> Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be possible
>> >>> to keep them at their current place but hand the administration to the
>> >>> people working on the sparc/sparc64 ports?
>> >>>
>> >>> I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.
>> >>
>> >> The machines have broken disks so their raids have failed.  And the
>> >> mgmt stuff is complaining about CPU and/or other fans too.
>> >>
>> >> I don't think you'd want those machines.
>> >
>> > The cost of shipping any of them would probably exceed the cost of getting
>> > a new one from eBay these days. I did that search now just for kicks and
>> > the third result on the UK site literally says GBP 45.77 + 553.64 postage 
>> > :)
>> >
>> > I haven't seen the original message in this thread, but just make sure
>> > you mail the folks at CARNet when you pull the plug, so they can do that
>> > literally.
>> >
>> > --
>> > 2. That which causes joy or happiness.


Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-11 Thread david h.
Hello,
I have 2 t2000 servers with 8 cores and 32 gigabytes of ram, each.
I have to change some ram because at the moment they utilize only 16, but
then I will search for cheap rack space to put them in, and could set them
up as build servers. If there is need for that.

Greetings David
Am 12.10.2015 03:04 schrieb "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de>:

> The cost of shipping depends on from where to where you ship them,
> obviously.
>
> You can ship up to 31.5 kg within Germany for just 13.99 EUR. As long as
> you don't have to ship acres the pond, it shouldn't be too expensive.
>
> > On Oct 10, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Josip Rodin  wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:43:04AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> >> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb am Sonntag, dem 04. Oktober 2015:
> >>
> >>> Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be possible
> >>> to keep them at their current place but hand the administration to the
> >>> people working on the sparc/sparc64 ports?
> >>>
> >>> I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.
> >>
> >> The machines have broken disks so their raids have failed.  And the
> >> mgmt stuff is complaining about CPU and/or other fans too.
> >>
> >> I don't think you'd want those machines.
> >
> > The cost of shipping any of them would probably exceed the cost of
> getting
> > a new one from eBay these days. I did that search now just for kicks and
> > the third result on the UK site literally says GBP 45.77 + 553.64
> postage :)
> >
> > I haven't seen the original message in this thread, but just make sure
> > you mail the folks at CARNet when you pull the plug, so they can do that
> > literally.
> >
> > --
> > 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
>
>


Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
The cost of shipping depends on from where to where you ship them, obviously.

You can ship up to 31.5 kg within Germany for just 13.99 EUR. As long as you 
don't have to ship acres the pond, it shouldn't be too expensive.

> On Oct 10, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Josip Rodin  wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:43:04AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb am Sonntag, dem 04. Oktober 2015:
>> 
>>> Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be possible
>>> to keep them at their current place but hand the administration to the
>>> people working on the sparc/sparc64 ports?
>>> 
>>> I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.
>> 
>> The machines have broken disks so their raids have failed.  And the
>> mgmt stuff is complaining about CPU and/or other fans too.
>> 
>> I don't think you'd want those machines.
> 
> The cost of shipping any of them would probably exceed the cost of getting
> a new one from eBay these days. I did that search now just for kicks and
> the third result on the UK site literally says GBP 45.77 + 553.64 postage :)
> 
> I haven't seen the original message in this thread, but just make sure
> you mail the folks at CARNet when you pull the plug, so they can do that
> literally.
> 
> -- 
> 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Sounds awesome!

I would love to setup a buildd for sparc (32 bit) on this machine for Debian 
Ports.

I'm a DD and I will send you my SSH public key later. Currently at the airport 
and on mobile only.

Cheers,
Adrian

> On Oct 12, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Harka Gyozo SA  wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:57:17 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote
>> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:43:04AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>>> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb am Sonntag, dem 04. Oktober 2015:
>>> 
 Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be possible
 to keep them at their current place but hand the administration to the
 people working on the sparc/sparc64 ports?
 
 I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.
>>> 
>>> The machines have broken disks so their raids have failed.  And the
>>> mgmt stuff is complaining about CPU and/or other fans too.
>>> 
>>> I don't think you'd want those machines.
> 
> I have a T2000 as a "hot spare". We can fire it up and give access to it if
> DSA wants, or we can give access to "people working on the sparc/sparc64
> ports" while it's still hosted here.
> AFAIK it has 8GB ram, two working ~73G sff sas hdds, an optical drive, 4xGbit
> eth, and a working management. And it has T1 Naigara cpu (executes the SPARC
> V9 instruction set).
> AFAIK It has a virtualization support ( this works somehow with a solaris
> hypervisor, and works with linux guests, but I think the machine is too small
> to utilize this ).
> We can also add some backup space (on a slow nas with rsync, etc.).
> 
> But as I can see there is sompek and stadler still running...
> 
> It' a little bit noisy, but still works well.
> If I turn it on, I will not hear anything from it because there is an SGI UV
> 1000 in that room :D
> 
> I have a machine like schroeder, but that's still in use (armed to the teeth).
> 
> 
> HARKA Győző
> PTE-TTK SzSzK vez.h.



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-11 Thread Harka Gyozo SA
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:57:17 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:43:04AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb am Sonntag, dem 04. Oktober 2015:
> > 
> > > Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be possible
> > > to keep them at their current place but hand the administration to the
> > > people working on the sparc/sparc64 ports?
> > > 
> > > I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.
> > 
> > The machines have broken disks so their raids have failed.  And the
> > mgmt stuff is complaining about CPU and/or other fans too.
> > 
> > I don't think you'd want those machines.

I have a T2000 as a "hot spare". We can fire it up and give access to it if
DSA wants, or we can give access to "people working on the sparc/sparc64
ports" while it's still hosted here.
AFAIK it has 8GB ram, two working ~73G sff sas hdds, an optical drive, 4xGbit
eth, and a working management. And it has T1 Naigara cpu (executes the SPARC
V9 instruction set).
AFAIK It has a virtualization support ( this works somehow with a solaris
hypervisor, and works with linux guests, but I think the machine is too small
to utilize this ).
We can also add some backup space (on a slow nas with rsync, etc.).

But as I can see there is sompek and stadler still running...

It' a little bit noisy, but still works well.
If I turn it on, I will not hear anything from it because there is an SGI UV
1000 in that room :D

I have a machine like schroeder, but that's still in use (armed to the teeth).


HARKA Győző
PTE-TTK SzSzK vez.h.



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:43:04AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb am Sonntag, dem 04. Oktober 2015:
> 
> > Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be possible
> > to keep them at their current place but hand the administration to the
> > people working on the sparc/sparc64 ports?
> > 
> > I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.
> 
> The machines have broken disks so their raids have failed.  And the
> mgmt stuff is complaining about CPU and/or other fans too.
> 
> I don't think you'd want those machines.

The cost of shipping any of them would probably exceed the cost of getting
a new one from eBay these days. I did that search now just for kicks and
the third result on the UK site literally says GBP 45.77 + 553.64 postage :)

I haven't seen the original message in this thread, but just make sure
you mail the folks at CARNet when you pull the plug, so they can do that
literally.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-04 Thread Peter Palfrader
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schrieb am Sonntag, dem 04. Oktober 2015:

> Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be possible
> to keep them at their current place but hand the administration to the
> people working on the sparc/sparc64 ports?
> 
> I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.

The machines have broken disks so their raids have failed.  And the
mgmt stuff is complaining about CPU and/or other fans too.

I don't think you'd want those machines.

-- 
|  .''`.   ** Debian **
  Peter Palfrader   | : :' :  The  universal
 https://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'  Operating System
|   `-https://www.debian.org/



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-04 Thread Frans van Berckel
On Sun, 2015-10-04 at 11:25 +0900, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 7:56 PM, Paul Wise  wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 23:18 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > > 
> > > DSA would like to decomission lebrun and schroeder (old sparc
> > > build
> > > daemons). Please if you think this is a bad idea for some reason,
> > > let
> > > me know, otherwise those will be decomissioned in the following 
> > > weeks.
> > 
> > If there are people wanting to work on the sparc64 port perhaps we
> > could ship them to those people or turn them into sparc64
> > porterboxen?
> 
> Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be
> possible to keep them at their current place but hand the
> administration to the people working on the sparc/sparc64 ports?
> 
> I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.

The Sponsor (hosting+hw): Croatian Academic and Research Network
(CARNet). For more background, check about ...

https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=schroeder
https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=lebrun

Thanks,


Frans van Berckel



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-03 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Oct 2, 2015, at 7:56 PM, Paul Wise  wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 23:18 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>> 
>> DSA would like to decomission lebrun and schroeder (old sparc build
>> daemons). Please if you think this is a bad idea for some reason, let
>> me know, otherwise those will be decomissioned in the following 
>> weeks.
> 
> If there are people wanting to work on the sparc64 port perhaps we
> could ship them to those people or turn them into sparc64 porterboxen?

Where are those machines hosted at the moment and would it be possible to keep 
them at their current place but hand the administration to the people working 
on the sparc/sparc64 ports?

I would love to set them up as buildds for Debian ports.

Adrian


Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-02 Thread rod
I wouldn't be opposed to putting them back into service.  I have space
for them (in Missouri if that matters).

Rod

On 10/2/2015 6:11 AM, Frans van Berckel wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 12:56 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 23:18 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>>
>>> DSA would like to decomission lebrun and schroeder (old sparc build
>>> daemons). Please if you think this is a bad idea for some reason,
>>> let
>>> me know, otherwise those will be decomissioned in the following 
>>> weeks.
>>
>> If there are people wanting to work on the sparc64 port perhaps we
>> could ship them to those people or turn them into sparc64
>> porterboxen?
> 
> For what i have seen at the debian-sparc mailing list, Rod Schnell
> (CCing) just did that for the raverin porterbox ...
> 
> Frans van Berckel
> 



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-02 Thread Frans van Berckel
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 12:56 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 23:18 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> 
> > DSA would like to decomission lebrun and schroeder (old sparc build
> > daemons). Please if you think this is a bad idea for some reason,
> > let
> > me know, otherwise those will be decomissioned in the following 
> > weeks.
> 
> If there are people wanting to work on the sparc64 port perhaps we
> could ship them to those people or turn them into sparc64
> porterboxen?

For what i have seen at the debian-sparc mailing list, Rod Schnell
(CCing) just did that for the raverin porterbox ...

Frans van Berckel



Re: schroeder and lebrun EOL - decomission

2015-10-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2015-09-26 at 23:18 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:

> DSA would like to decomission lebrun and schroeder (old sparc build
> daemons). Please if you think this is a bad idea for some reason, let
> me know, otherwise those will be decomissioned in the following 
> weeks.

If there are people wanting to work on the sparc64 port perhaps we
could ship them to those people or turn them into sparc64 porterboxen?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part