Re: blade 150 and 2.6
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:26:30AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 10 October 2006 01:11, Riccardo Tortorici wrote: > > If everyone is experiencing issues with those kernel releases, maybe > > it's better to remove them from unstable. > > That is not really an option. The 2.6.18 kernel is scheduled for release > with Etch. > What needs to happen is that the bug is fixed in 2.6.18 in Debian before > the release. For that it would be good if an RC bug was filed against > linux-2.6. I just filed an RC bug. It will probably take a while for BTS to process it though. -- Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 01:11, Riccardo Tortorici wrote: > If everyone is experiencing issues with those kernel releases, maybe > it's better to remove them from unstable. That is not really an option. The 2.6.18 kernel is scheduled for release with Etch. What needs to happen is that the bug is fixed in 2.6.18 in Debian before the release. For that it would be good if an RC bug was filed against linux-2.6. I see that the issue is already being worked on by Jurij with the upstream Sparc kernel maintainer: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-sparc&m=116038215730519&w=2 Cheers, FJP pgpvxgn7G2oL3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 9, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Luigi Gangitano wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il giorno 08/ott/06, alle ore 22:42, Riccardo Tortorici ha scritto: The latest kernel version in unstable is 2.6.18. You do know that the kernel packages got renamed from kernel-image to linux-image at some point, right? :-). Yeah, I was convinced i did a dist-upgrade but not :) Now I've upgraded from 2.6.8 to 2.6.18 but I get this error if I boot with the new image: NVRAM: Low battery voltage! CLOCK: Clock was stopped. Kick start Boot with 2.6.8 is ok. As far as I can see, this message is in time.c from kernel sources... What if I'll comment those lines? Is it a dirty procedure or it's safe? I can confirm this on my SunBlade 100 too. It appeared in 2.6.17. Last known-to-work version is 2.6.16 even if I can't make the aty framebuffer work again when compiling with gcc-4.1 (which, BTW, is default for sid as of now). I've tried to bypass the check of NVRAM by comment the functions in time.c and removing all the references. This time freezes in "Booting Linux", it seems those functions are mandatory. I've attached the commented lines. If everyone is experiencing issues with those kernel releases, maybe it's better to remove them from unstable. Ric - - Riccardo Tortorici - Linux Registered User #365170 Count yourself @ http://counter.li.org/ ! - -- Encrypted Mails Welcome GPG key: 0xF3FCE306 available on wwwkeys.pgp.net GPG key fingerprint = C1C4 CA17 5135 8F5C 94C2 3347 4A22 67DB F3FC E306 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFKtc4SiJn2/P84wYRAq+0AJ4jjYGeRK6KD6T+xtii8akGW/ZWLQCbBSx1 cAeGnXgdp/CEftgS18cRKvo= =XpLG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il giorno 08/ott/06, alle ore 22:42, Riccardo Tortorici ha scritto: The latest kernel version in unstable is 2.6.18. You do know that the kernel packages got renamed from kernel-image to linux-image at some point, right? :-). Yeah, I was convinced i did a dist-upgrade but not :) Now I've upgraded from 2.6.8 to 2.6.18 but I get this error if I boot with the new image: NVRAM: Low battery voltage! CLOCK: Clock was stopped. Kick start Boot with 2.6.8 is ok. As far as I can see, this message is in time.c from kernel sources... What if I'll comment those lines? Is it a dirty procedure or it's safe? I can confirm this on my SunBlade 100 too. It appeared in 2.6.17. Last known-to-work version is 2.6.16 even if I can't make the aty framebuffer work again when compiling with gcc-4.1 (which, BTW, is default for sid as of now). Regards, - -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFKoW98ZumGJJMDCYRAmvfAJ9A5OfOMJU2PbhuxQZYPgHI5e/8CACdEOfb pyBj1hT6u7dbCIS+gnaTNkI= =4JS8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
On 09/10/2006, at 6:42 AM, Riccardo Tortorici wrote: Now I've upgraded from 2.6.8 to 2.6.18 but I get this error if I boot with the new image: NVRAM: Low battery voltage! CLOCK: Clock was stopped. Kick start Boot with 2.6.8 is ok. As far as I can see, this message is in time.c from kernel sources... What if I'll comment those lines? Is it a dirty procedure or it's safe? With 2.6.18-1 I get the same error message on my sunblade 100, mailed http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2006/10/msg00032.html It is right after Booting Linux... jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 7, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:15:41AM +0200, Riccardo Tortorici wrote: I have a Sunblade 150 (sparc64) with 2.6.8 running. I've just downloaded the netboot image from here[1]. By the way... No one knows when newer kernel version will be available in unstable? Ric The latest kernel version in unstable is 2.6.18. You do know that the kernel packages got renamed from kernel-image to linux-image at some point, right? :-). Yeah, I was convinced i did a dist-upgrade but not :) Now I've upgraded from 2.6.8 to 2.6.18 but I get this error if I boot with the new image: NVRAM: Low battery voltage! CLOCK: Clock was stopped. Kick start Boot with 2.6.8 is ok. As far as I can see, this message is in time.c from kernel sources... What if I'll comment those lines? Is it a dirty procedure or it's safe? Regards, Ric - - Riccardo Tortorici - Linux Registered User #365170 Count yourself @ http://counter.li.org/ ! - -- Encrypted Mails Welcome GPG key: 0xF3FCE306 available on wwwkeys.pgp.net GPG key fingerprint = C1C4 CA17 5135 8F5C 94C2 3347 4A22 67DB F3FC E306 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFKWK+SiJn2/P84wYRAp+MAJ9xp04yVEBu1ydRkt2P3rzYNN9qMwCeM5B+ +MI9iiYCb14OfTBJRzf3iEk= =t8C1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
On Sunday 08 October 2006 10:33, Hamish Greig wrote: > This is all the things I would be looking at in your situation, plus check silo.conf isn't using obsolete devfs names for your hardware. hamish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
On Sunday 08 October 2006 01:09, Enrique Morfin wrote: > It complains about the hdd device. > > something about diferences of /dev/hda and > /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5 what is in your /etc/fstab ? devfs style naming ? Where does the boot halt? right where the root filesystem should be mounted ? does /dev have static entries or was it an empty dir because devfs was creating them ? boot with an install cd to find out if /dev/* entries for your hardware exist or if you know they do then boot with kernel parameter init=/bin/bash and then 'mount -o remount,rw /' to edit your fstab. Lastly does that kernel have an initrd, does it need drivers loaded for ide? This is all the things I would be looking at in your situation, as I don't have an uptodate debian sparc box to check any of these things, my entire email might be sending you in the wrong direction. Hamish -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
> > Hi! > > > > Does anyone have a blade 150 with kernel 2.6 > running? > > > > If so, how? > > > > I can't boot on 2.6 kernels, just 2.4 (currently > using > > 2.4.26-sparc64) :( > > > > I'm using etch. > > What version of the installer and what installation > method you are using, and what > specific errors are you getting? > The box was installed almost 3 years ago. It was installed using netboot. It was installed using woody, then upgraded to sarge. Some time after that it was upgraded to etch. To intall the kernel i tried: aptitude install linux-image-2.6.17-2-sparc64 Aparently all is ok, but at boot time fails :( It complains about the hdd device. something about diferences of /dev/hda and /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5 I don't remmember exactly and i don't have the box right here, till monday i go to work. Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:15:41AM +0200, Riccardo Tortorici wrote: > I have a Sunblade 150 (sparc64) with 2.6.8 running. > I've just downloaded the netboot image from here[1]. > By the way... No one knows when newer kernel version will be > available in unstable? > Ric The latest kernel version in unstable is 2.6.18. You do know that the kernel packages got renamed from kernel-image to linux-image at some point, right? :-). Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:30:48PM -0700, Enrique Morfin wrote: > Hi! > > Does anyone have a blade 150 with kernel 2.6 running? > > If so, how? > > I can't boot on 2.6 kernels, just 2.4 (currently using > 2.4.26-sparc64) :( > > I'm using etch. What version of the installer and what installation method you are using, and what specific errors are you getting? -- Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: blade 150 and 2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 6, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Enrique Morfin wrote: Hi! Does anyone have a blade 150 with kernel 2.6 running? If so, how? I can't boot on 2.6 kernels, just 2.4 (currently using 2.4.26-sparc64) :( I have a Sunblade 150 (sparc64) with 2.6.8 running. I've just downloaded the netboot image from here[1]. By the way... No one knows when newer kernel version will be available in unstable? Ric [1] http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/images/daily/sparc64/ netboot/2.6/ - - Riccardo Tortorici - Linux Registered User #365170 Count yourself @ http://counter.li.org/ ! - -- Encrypted Mails Welcome GPG key: 0xF3FCE306 available on wwwkeys.pgp.net GPG key fingerprint = C1C4 CA17 5135 8F5C 94C2 3347 4A22 67DB F3FC E306 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFJuOgSiJn2/P84wYRAr4MAJsGbYkDO+wVhQ/h40MqGlgBQcRKNACeNssD QAQJdADXM19/IdeAZNFlur4= =keRX -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blade 150 and 2.6
Hi! Does anyone have a blade 150 with kernel 2.6 running? If so, how? I can't boot on 2.6 kernels, just 2.4 (currently using 2.4.26-sparc64) :( I'm using etch. Bye. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
