dynamic linker bug?

1999-11-25 Thread ferret

Just updated potato yesterday, now I'm getting
---
nasal:/usr/local/packages/modutils-2.3.6# debian/rules binary
BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 57: elf_get_dynamic_info:
Assertion `! bad dynamic tag' failed!
Segmentation fault
--- Trying to self-compile modutils.

I downgraded ldso to 1.9.10-1 (slink) and get the same thing, so it
doesn't look like a problem with ldso. Is this known?

-- Ferret no baka



Re: dynamic linker bug?

1999-11-25 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 09:46:08AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Just updated potato yesterday, now I'm getting
 ---
 nasal:/usr/local/packages/modutils-2.3.6# debian/rules binary
 BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 57: elf_get_dynamic_info:
 Assertion `! bad dynamic tag' failed!
 Segmentation fault
 --- Trying to self-compile modutils.
 
 I downgraded ldso to 1.9.10-1 (slink) and get the same thing, so it
 doesn't look like a problem with ldso. Is this known?
 
 -- Ferret no baka

A reboot should cure this. Just a note, ld.so in potato is supplied by
libc6 (except for libc5 programs, which use the ld.so in the ldso
package). No one has been able to track this down, but I suspect it's
caused by the glibc-pre 2.0.105 - 2.1 upgrade.

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'


Re: dynamic linker bug?

1999-11-25 Thread ferret


On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Ben Collins wrote:

 On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 09:46:08AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  Just updated potato yesterday, now I'm getting
  ---
  nasal:/usr/local/packages/modutils-2.3.6# debian/rules binary
  BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 57: elf_get_dynamic_info:
  Assertion `! bad dynamic tag' failed!
  Segmentation fault
  --- Trying to self-compile modutils.
  
  I downgraded ldso to 1.9.10-1 (slink) and get the same thing, so it
  doesn't look like a problem with ldso. Is this known?
 
 A reboot should cure this. Just a note, ld.so in potato is supplied by
 libc6 (except for libc5 programs, which use the ld.so in the ldso
 package). No one has been able to track this down, but I suspect it's
 caused by the glibc-pre 2.0.105 - 2.1 upgrade.

Ah. No, unfortunately this is still happening after reboot. I had my Sparc
down overnight (didn't have a working console for it due to smacking
around a serial card with a clueby4 -- another story)
Oh, I had some MAJOR breakage during the last upgrade. nscd was somehow
getting respawned so I disabled it, then dselect crashed and dpkg was
still configuring things in the background.. Maybe I should
force-reinstall libc6?

-- Ferret no baka