Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)
Kotlin needs jdk 8 to build. On Tue, 28 May 2019, 3:13 pm John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hi! > > On 5/27/19 11:04 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The packages are now accepted and the 8u212-b03 upstream version is now > uploaded > > as well. > > > > The changes and buildinfo files didn't exist anymore for the powerpc, > ppc64, > > sparc64 and x32 binaries, so if a porter wants to restore those, please > rebuild > > them with manually installed openjdk-8 packages from snapshot.debian.org > . > > Yes, I can do that. So, if I understand correctly, Kotlin requires > OpenJDK-8 > to work? > > Adrian > > -- > .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org > `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de > `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 > >
Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)
Hi! On 5/27/19 11:04 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > The packages are now accepted and the 8u212-b03 upstream version is now > uploaded > as well. > > The changes and buildinfo files didn't exist anymore for the powerpc, ppc64, > sparc64 and x32 binaries, so if a porter wants to restore those, please > rebuild > them with manually installed openjdk-8 packages from snapshot.debian.org. Yes, I can do that. So, if I understand correctly, Kotlin requires OpenJDK-8 to work? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)
On 26.05.19 21:13, Matthias Klose wrote: > The openjdk-8 packages which were unfortunately removed from unstable > (although > the issue #915620 only asked for the removal of some binaries), are now again > in > NEW, targeting unstable. One of the FTP assistants is objecting to the upload > to unstable, apparently because somebody (security team, Moritz?) asked to > restore these packages in experimental instead of unstable. Otoh, we still > need > these packages in unstable to bootstrap kotlin (yes we can bootstrap in > experimental, but then it's not assured how to build kotlin for unstable with > an > experimental build). > > I honestly don't understand why FTP master would have such an objection, so > please clarify what prohibits the acceptance to unstable with an RC issue to > not > propagate these packages to testing. The packages are now accepted and the 8u212-b03 upstream version is now uploaded as well. The changes and buildinfo files didn't exist anymore for the powerpc, ppc64, sparc64 and x32 binaries, so if a porter wants to restore those, please rebuild them with manually installed openjdk-8 packages from snapshot.debian.org. Matthias
