Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi,
>>"Orn" == Orn E Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Orn> On 04-Sep-97 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>  The RFC are all the rules that actually apply to the
>> internet. And if we all start ignoring the rules, the cooperative
>> process that is the internet (and, indeed, Linux itself is the
>> product of a similar cooperative process).

Orn> The RFC are Request For Comments, and not rules.  And to be
Orn> perfectly sincere, there are only limited amount guidence taken
Orn> from them in the corporate world.  Maybe because they never fully
Orn> address the need of the Internet :-)

I know what letters stand for. I think you have no idea what
 the RFC's mean as far as the network is concerned, sorry. Also, I
 think you are wrong about "limited amount of guidance", unless, of
 course, you are talking about microsoft, which has a track record of
 ignoring standards.

In a sense you are correct, there are *no* rules on the
 internet; it is just a set of cooperative servers and people. We all
 choose to adhere to the internet standards called the RFC's. You may
 choose to ignore the standards, in which case you startbreaking the
 co-operation. Chances are, unless you get a whole lot of people to
 conform to your practice, the anomaly will not cause any change in
 the default behaviour for most software; and if the change gets to be
 radical enough to break current software, it is likely that the
 messages will get silently tossed (not that a malformed date header
 is likely to cause that).

Orn> There is no Debate... the question rose as somebody complained
Orn> about his server software breaking on my mail... and I guessed it
Orn> was because of my Date field being a quoted printable inside a
Orn> header field.  This is a standard, period.

Indeed?

Orn> However, I did start my mail client in the "C" locale, that
Orn> ensures that the Date was written in "C" locale... but I was
Orn> still "kicked" out of the list for it... so, I don't think the
Orn> problem has anything to do with my 'Date' field, do you? :-) So,
Orn> I'll just have it the way I see fit ;-)

You can of course set your mail any way you want to. It may
 not get very far, or delivered, but you can send it out any which way
 you please. 

Orn> There are still some 7-bit servers out there (and minds
Orn> ;-)... I'm not going to, neither now nor in future to comply in
Orn> making my software 7-bits just for those servers, they'll just
Orn> have to break, until the administrators find it with in their
Orn> time to comply to evolution.  These servers are out-dated by 50
Orn> years.  :-)

Or people just ignore what you say, cause they did not see
 them. You have every right to restrict distribution of your
 message. There is a tenet of software module design, that says "Be
 very precise in what you output, and be very permissive in what you
 accept" (my phraseology). Your statement violates that. Personally, I
 have found it less trouble in the long run to code defensively. I do
 remember when I was not as careful, though.

I have said all I wnat to say about this topic.

manoj

-- 
 "The sixties were good to you, weren't they?" George Carlin
Manoj Srivastava   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mobile, Alabama USAhttp://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Building Debian Packages

1997-09-04 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Thu, 4 Sep 1997, Will Lowe wrote:

[...]

> Things that probably ought to be included but aren't:
>   Specific instructions on what to change in the control, rules,
> etc. files.  This isn't very clear,  and requires a lot of hacking around
> with source to figure out. While hacking is good for understanding,  you
> don't neccessarily need to understand deb-make/dpkg to make a package.
> 

Yep.  That will certainly be in there.  In fact what I think I will do is
annotate the whole rules file output by deb-make line by line.

>   A *brief* listing of gcc options/makefile stuff.  Only the ones
> that are likely to be relevant to your average maintainer who just wants
> to run "rules" and have it work.  True gcc hackers/unix gurus will already
> know the esoteric stuff they'll need.
>

I think the LDP docs have something I can include or link too.  I'm not
going to attempt to write that stuff myself.

> Righto!  And the "Debian Developer's Reference" covers this in much
> detail.  Maybe just a line saying "If you want to become a maintainer and
> upload your package,  see the Developer's Reference at http://whatever.";
> 

Yes.  This didn't exist when I first wrote my piece but it deserves a
prominent mention now.

My draft is getting along quite nicely now and I hope to have it ready for
inspection soon.  When I do I suggest we move this discussion to the
debian-doc mailing list to cut down on the traffic in this one.

Thanks for your help.

-- Jaldhar


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread Orn E. Hansen
On 04-Sep-97 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>   The RFC are all the rules that actually apply to the
> internet. And if we all start ignoring the rules, the cooperative
> process that is the internet (and, indeed, Linux itself is the
> product of a similar cooperative process). 
>
>   If you must have a change, and you do not think that the
> current internationalization effort is not doing enough, use a Header
> like X-Time and fill it anyway you wish; at least automata that
> expects standard headers to bve standards conformant does not break.
>

   The RFC are Request For Comments, and not rules.  And to be perfectly
sincere, there are only limited amount guidence taken from them in the
corporate world.  Maybe because they never fully address the need of
the Internet :-)

  There is no Debate... the question rose as somebody complained about his
server software breaking on my mail... and I guessed it was because of my
Date field being a quoted printable inside a header field.  This is
a standard, period.  However, I did start my mail client in the "C" locale,
that ensures that the Date was written in "C" locale... but I was still "kicked"
out of the list for it... so, I don't think the problem has anything to do with
my 'Date' field, do you? :-) So, I'll just have it the way I see fit ;-)

  There are still some 7-bit servers out there (and minds ;-)... I'm not going
to, neither now nor in future to comply in making my software 7-bits just for
those servers, they'll just have to break, until the administrators find it with
in their time to comply to evolution.  These servers are out-dated by 50
years.  :-)


...Just me
 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Who knows stuff about WAN cards?

1997-09-04 Thread Dave Cinege
On Thu, 4 Sep 1997 14:13:30 -0400 (EDT), Pete Templin wrote:

>
>Hi there!!
>
>I'm doing some network consulting for a computer store, and we'd like to
>connect the store LAN to the Internet through a 56k or T1 connection.  If
>possible, we'd like to save the expense of the router and perhaps the
>CSU/DSU if possible.
>
>I think I've seen some adds in network magazines for WAN cards.  Are any
>of you using them?  If so, can you tell me about driver compatibility?
>Does it replace the CSU/DSU, or did you still have to rent/buy one?  What
>sort of interface options did you have to select from (I've heard that
>different telco boxes have different interface types)?

Check out 
http://www.sangoma.com/

I've heard good things about the wanpipe.

As for an internal CSU/DSU I consider it good practice to leave that as an 
external modular component.

www.bat.com seems to have good prices.
-
http://www.psychosis.com/emc/   Elite MicroComputers   908-541-4214
http://www.psychosis.com/linux-router/  Linux Router Project


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi,

I do not know what the debate seems to be about, but I must
 take exception to this statement.
>>"Orn" == Orn E Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Orn> The RFC are just guidelines... and not rules.  

The RFC are all the rules that actually apply to the
 internet. And if we all start ignoring the rules, the cooperative
 process that is the internet (and, indeed, Linux itself is the
 product of a similar cooperative process). 

If you must have a change, and you do not think that the
 current internationalization effort is not doing enough, use a Header
 like X-Time and fill it anyway you wish; at least automata that
 expects standard headers to bve standards conformant does not break.

Orn> And besides, the english language is good... but it is spoken by
Orn> a minority in the World.  And what are you going to do with the
Orn> poor suckers who can't read email?  Tell them they must learn
Orn> english or not know when the email they are receiving was sent?
Orn> that's silly :-)

No, this line of argument is silly. Do you also propose to
 change the header names (From:, Subject:, Date: etc)? If I can't read
 English, how do I know what the From and Sender and Reply-to headers
 mean?  Try and change them to your native language.

manoj
-- 
 "No problem is so formidable that you can't walk away from it."
 Schulz
Manoj Srivastava   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mobile, Alabama USAhttp://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: SCSI Host Adapter (+ Re: 2 CPU servers)

1997-09-04 Thread Nicola Bernardelli
 THANK YOU SO MUCH for all infos, I won't miss the doc and WEB site
you suggested (I also think they will deal with possible/real transfer
rates, of course related to the kind of hard disk or other device you
connect to the card).
 Cheers.

 Nicola Bernardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 Please use <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for messages from any kind of
robot, such as mailing lists. From that address no autoresponse
messages will return even when I'm not at home.
---



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: ppp connection a little too slow...

1997-09-04 Thread Ferenc Kiraly

Hi!

> I think my ppp conection is a little too slow ... I have a 33.6 modem 
> (but only a 8250 uart) and when I access a webpage from Linux, it 
> .
> Does someone know how to boost the speed a little ? Have I made som 
> settings wrong ?

No way. Not with that UART. To operate your modem at full speed you 
*need* a 16550A.

feri.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Colors in the prompt like in slackware ?

1997-09-04 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
See /usr/doc/fileutils/color-ls.gz which describes how to get colors in 
the directory listings. The quick answer is:

  ls --color
or
  alias ls='ls --color=auto'

in sh type shells.

I hope this helps.

// Heikki
-- 
Heikki Vatiainen  * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tampere University of Technology  * Tampere, Finland



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


WantWEB/Linux/IP Masquerading

1997-09-04 Thread Mike Patterson

Howdy all!

Just wanted to get some information from those of you out there that might 
have some...

I recently purchased a house, and I would like to get some sort of internet
hookup that my friends and I could use. There are 5 computers, each either 
running Linux or Win95 all connected to a common "fileserver" (saves diskspace)

What I'd like to do is have the server on-line 24/7. Other machines would drop
off and on as they were being used. The other machines could be accessing WWW,
email/news (from server), playing internet games (like using battle.net), or
using a communications program like speakfreely. 

I've been told that by using the miracles of IP masquerading, I can do this
by purchasing a single connection for the server, and letting the remainder 
of the machines "leach" off it in some way. 

Finally, one of the methods of connecting that looked interesting was something
called "WantWEB". The idea is that the downloads are VIA satellite, and very 
fast, but uploads had to go through a normal phone line and were limited to
the 56K modems. Has anyone tried using this on a Linux box? if so, how 
successful were you? was the "cable-modem" device difficult to find drivers 
for? 

Thanks,
Mike


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Colors in the prompt like in slackware ?

1997-09-04 Thread Michael Jensen
Hi !

Just wondering if it is possible to put some colors on the directory 
listings ... like there is in Slackware ? It sure makes it easyer to 
see which of the object that are directories, and which are files...

Regards,


badpixel of bad sector
michael legart
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NEW icq uin -> 2565176
--


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


ppp connection a little too slow...

1997-09-04 Thread Michael Jensen
Hi !

I think my ppp conection is a little too slow ... I have a 33.6 modem 
(but only a 8250 uart) and when I access a webpage from Linux, it 
loads most of the pictures at about 500 bytes/sec. Thats SLOW ! If it 
is a little bigger files, it can get to about 1.9-2 kb/sec, which is 
what the speed normaly is, when I use Win95. 

Does someone know how to boost the speed a little ? Have I made som 
settings wrong ?

Regards,

badpixel of bad sector
michael legart
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NEW icq uin -> 2565176
--


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: MPEG doesn't work from any gr browser; Netscape probs.

1997-09-04 Thread James D. Freels

On the recommendation of a colleague, I fixed the netscape-plugin 
problem by directly editing the netscape executable using emacs [just
search for the error message].  This eliminates the need to use bash
2.01 which I could not install consistently (did fix the plugin
problem but created new problems).

-- 
/--\
| James D. Freels, P.E._i, Ph.D.  | Phone:  (423)576-8645  |   | L |
| Oak Ridge National Laboratory   | FAX:(423)574-9172  | H | I |
| Research Reactors Division  | Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | F | N |
| P. O. Box 2008  | Reactor Technology | I | U |
| Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6392 | world's best neutrons! | R | X |
\--/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Who knows stuff about WAN cards?

1997-09-04 Thread Tim Sailer
Pete Templin wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi there!!
> 
> I'm doing some network consulting for a computer store, and we'd like to
> connect the store LAN to the Internet through a 56k or T1 connection.  If
> possible, we'd like to save the expense of the router and perhaps the
> CSU/DSU if possible.

Very possible.

> I think I've seen some adds in network magazines for WAN cards.  Are any
> of you using them?  If so, can you tell me about driver compatibility?
> Does it replace the CSU/DSU, or did you still have to rent/buy one?  What
> sort of interface options did you have to select from (I've heard that
> different telco boxes have different interface types)?

I've used the SDL 56k and T1 boards. Buoy.com is currently running
on the T1 board. I have a 56k card to sell... :)
They have worked tremendously for us, and clients I've used them at.
The 56k card runs about $600, and the T1 card about $1000. These are the
ones with the builtin csu, and you can buy them without it. Emerging
Technologies makes some cards too, but they are pricy (IMO), and they
cater to BSD systems... although they have a good driver for linux, and
a steady following. I've just had exceptional luck from SDL. The drivers
are working with 1.2.13 and 2.0.30 on our systems, and the T1 card will
do FT1 also, from 64k on up.

You really don't have interface options. They bring you a connector(56k)
or a smart jack (T1), which you simply plug a 10BaseT cable into, and
the other end into your WAN board, or csu if you choose the separate
components route.

Tim

-- 
 (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / (home) [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.buoy.com/~tps
  "The courage to imagine the otherwise is our greatest resource,
 adding color and suspense to all our life."
 - Daniel J. Boorstin
** Disclaimer: My views/comments/beliefs, as strange as they are, are my own.**


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread Orn E. Hansen
On 03-Sep-97 Clare Johnstone wrote:
>
>If not sorted at all, listed as they arrive, the threads are in good
>order. For example the date on 
>Orn's mail as received just now is:
>Date: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mi=F0,?= 03 Sep 1997 23:00:14 +0200 (CET DST)

Which is:

  Date: Mið, 03 Sep 1997 23:00:14 +0200 (CET DST)

>
>My "Received" time is:Thu, 4 Sep 1997 06:00:09 (Western Australia)
>
>My clock is undoubtedly permanently and irretrievably "mis-set" :)
>I think no-one really wants all dates in GMT.
>
>cheers, clare
>

  Every server that handles an email message, stamps the email.  An
email will thus have a long list of 'Received' lines.  The first in
the list will be the original server, which will be the server to
whom you sent the mail, when you hit the return key to 'send' the
email.  And have the same date stamp :-)

  However, in the case of mailing lists, as this one.  This does
become a little more complicated.  As an email is sent to the list,
and the list server stores the email, and when it sends it back to
you, the first stamp will thus be the date the list server sends you
the mail... and not the date when the author wrote it.

  But the problem lies in, that the 'Date' field is like the 'Subject'
field a display field, that will in many cases be in locale format.
As it is created by the email client, and not a system stamp.  But
since you're english :-) this particular date is in your locale
format, and your program can easily decipher it.  But in say, Sweden,
where a person will be sending 80% of his/her email to people
reading swedish, it makes sense that the Date they read on the
screan is in swedish, or their own locale :-)  But when your program
will start decyphering the date into machine readable format, using
'your' locale date-specifics... it'll just get lost ;-)



...just me


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread Orn E. Hansen
On 03-Sep-97 Olaf Weber wrote:
>
>RFC822 would be the appropriate one here, and it does impose some
>restrictions regarding what can and cannot be a date header:
>
> 5.  DATE AND TIME SPECIFICATION
>
> 5.1.  SYNTAX
>
> date-time   =  [ day "," ] date time; dd mm yy
> ;  hh:mm:ss zzz
>
> day =  "Mon"  / "Tue" /  "Wed"  / "Thu"
> /  "Fri"  / "Sat" /  "Sun"
>
>So it certainly looks like Orn needs to fix his mailer.
>

  The RFC are just guidelines... and not rules.  And the above
guideline applies to system times.  Not to the contents of subject
or date headers.  These are display fields, that are filled in by
the client programs.

  And besides, the english language is good... but it is spoken by
a minority in the World.  And what are you going to do with the
poor suckers who can't read email?  Tell them they must learn
english or not know when the email they are receiving was sent?
that's silly :-)


...just me


Quote of the Day: "Everybody who can't read english... will be shot!"


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Who knows stuff about WAN cards?

1997-09-04 Thread Pete Templin

Hi there!!

I'm doing some network consulting for a computer store, and we'd like to
connect the store LAN to the Internet through a 56k or T1 connection.  If
possible, we'd like to save the expense of the router and perhaps the
CSU/DSU if possible.

I think I've seen some adds in network magazines for WAN cards.  Are any
of you using them?  If so, can you tell me about driver compatibility?
Does it replace the CSU/DSU, or did you still have to rent/buy one?  What
sort of interface options did you have to select from (I've heard that
different telco boxes have different interface types)?

Thanks for your help,

Pete

--
Peter J. Templin, Jr.   Client Services Analyst
Computer & Communication Services   tel: (717) 524-1590
Bucknell University [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: ethernet card suggestions

1997-09-04 Thread Simon Karpen
I've had extremely good luck with the Kingston Tulip based cards.

They're fairly cheap ($50 or so for 10mb, $90 or so for 100mb),
and i've found them to be very fast, reliable, and well-supported
by Linux.

The 10mb card is a combo card (aui, utp, coax all on one card).

Simon Karpen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Fixing Unix is easier than living with NT."
--Larry McVoy


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: SCSI Host Adapter (+ Re: 2 CPU servers)

1997-09-04 Thread Jeff Noxon
Nicola Bernardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  There was mention of a specific model, Buslogic BT-948: is it such a
> "low-end" card or one with that CPU onboard? 

The BT-948 and all other "MultiMaster" models have onboard CPUs.  The 948
is BusLogic's equivalent to the Adaptec 2940U.  The 958 compares to the
2940UW (Wide).

The FlashPoint series of cards use the host CPU instead of a dedicated
CPU.  You can get the cheapest one (can't remember the model) for around
$120 if you shop around.  It also supports Ultra-20 transfers.  I really
like these cards, but I have not tried one with Linux.  I know they work,
but I don't know if you pay much of a performance penalty.

I suspect the performance penalty is small: the CPU on the other cards is
just a slow Intel 80186.  With a fast machine, it's probably worth 0.5% more
CPU utilization.  Has anyone benchmarked the difference with Bonnie on
identical systems and drives??

Note that the non-CPU FlashPoint models are the only ones available
with twin-bus configurations.  BusLogic is marketing these at the server
segment.  If the dedicated CPU was a big performance win, I don't think
they would do that.

>  Better question: what do you think is a medium-high level BusLogic
> card with good price/performance ratio and - most important - well
> performing (reliable and fast) with Debian GNU/Linux? 

I think if you can afford it, you should probably go with a MultiMaster
model.  Otherwise get the cheaper FlashPoint model -- unless you need
two SCSI buses on one card.  All of them will be reliable, while the
MultiMaster has a theoretical edge on speed.

>  And what about 2 CPU usage? I read on this list recently that the
> kernel is getting mature for Linux with such motherboards: 

Linux 2.2 will be a lot better, but 2.0 with the right patches seems to
work acceptably well.  It's probably not a good fit for most people at
this point.

If you have any other questions about the BusLogic SCSI adapters,
I suggest reading "drivers/scsi/README.BusLogic" in the kernel
source tree.  And check out the web page listed there, as well as
http://www.buslogic.com.

Thanks,

Jeff

-- 
Make it idiot-proof, and someone will breed a better idiot.
PGP mail welcome! Visit http://www.planetfall.com/pgp.html for my PGP key.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread Orn E. Hansen
On 03-Sep-97 George Bonser wrote:
>
>I STRONGLY disagree.  I want to know when you wrote it ... not when it
>arrived here.  If a mail was delayed a day or two in route, it might
>completely change how I look at the information in the email.  Example, a
>put-down of Princess Diana might be viewed in poor taste if it arrives
>after she died but might be perfectly acceptable expression of opinion if
>authored three days earlier and delayed in route.
>

  I could easily be using a custom mail client, and the 'date' field is
created when I write it.  But nothing says I have to actually send it
when I write it.  I can wait a day or two, and then hit the return key
to send it.

  The first system stamp, is the stamp of the original receiver, telling
when the email started it's 'email route'.  And thus the most reliable
source as to when the email was sent.  As it is the system that makes
these stamps when the email passes by, and not the user,

  However, the 'Date' field is displayed on my screen when I view my
email.  And It is therefore for display and will be in locale format,
in many situations.


...just me


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Is PPP helping me?

1997-09-04 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Aldrin Leal wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> On Thu, 4 Sep 1997, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
> 
> > You must be passing the defaultroute option to pppd. This option may
> > be specified on the pppd command line or in the /etc/ppp/options
> > file. Remove this option.
> 
> I tried with/without defaultroute. tried the "0.0.0.0:" kludge on
> /etc/ppp/options. After some discussion, i'm also suspecting of a misuse
> of network/broadcast/netmask.
> 
> This leads me to a quick question: is a broadcast address needed? :)

Yes, a net interface always wants a broadcast address.

-- 
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: xfs doesn't seem to be working

1997-09-04 Thread Rick Hawkins


> Xfs is running, but have you configured your xserver to use it? I did it by
> modifying my XF86Config, commenting out my old FontPath, and adding:
> 
> # Use font server.
> FontPath "tcp/localhost:7100"

This seems to do it.  Shouldn't the configuration program have done this when 
it asked about starting xfs?

The mouse continues to work, and top shows xfs taking bursts of cycles.  ps x 
shows
 973  ?  S  2:59 
/usr/X11R6/bin/X -auth /var/lib/xdm/authdir/authfiles/A:0-a00971 

should I be bothered that this doesn't include a reference to port 7100? (i 
recall that macbsd did, but i had to start x manually with the explicit 
reference.

rick





--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Segfault in free(), electric-fence for C++ ?

1997-09-04 Thread Alex Yukhimets
> Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > I have some strange problem with my C++ code: I get a segmentation fault
> > in destructor's delete[] operator. GDB says it happend in free().
> > What could be the cause of that? The only place I touch the pointer
> > I pass to delete[] is in the constructor while allocating memory with new.
> 
> I got this while trying to get xosview to compile and run cleanly.  It
> was calling the destructor for particular objects twice.
> 
> Try running it with different values of the environment variable
> MALLOC_CHECK_, i.e.:
> 

Thanks a lot for everybody.

After linking with electric-fence, I finaly nailed the place I write off
the array boundary. After fixing that, I have no more segfaults in
destructor. 

Thanks again. You literally saved my day.

Alex Y.

-- 
   _ 
 _( )_
( (o___   +---+
 |  _ 7   |Alexander Yukhimets|
  \(")|   http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/  |
  / \ \   +---+


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: xfs doesn't seem to be working

1997-09-04 Thread Joey Hess
Rick Hawkins wrote:
> The solution for this is xfs, which is supposedly running.  However, looking 
> at top from a regular console, it is X taking all the cycles, while xfs is 
> idle.

Xfs is running, but have you configured your xserver to use it? I did it by
modifying my XF86Config, commenting out my old FontPath, and adding:

# Use font server.
FontPath "tcp/localhost:7100"

-- 
see shy jo


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: a problem

1997-09-04 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Martin Bees wrote:
> 
> I would be very grateful if anyone could help me with a
> small problem concerning the boot disk of Debian/Linux
> (+all other Linux versions).
> Simply, version 2.0.29 boot disks crash on my Laptop
> shortly after it probes for the PCI devices.
> It says unrecognized PCI device and then crashes,
> saying "Unknown PCI device (1039:5107)."
> 
> Version 1.2.3 boot disk almost works but apparently
> fails to recognize 3 PCI devices.
> It says:
> Unknown PCI device.  PCI vendor id=1c.  PCI dev id=5107
> ---18   ---9660
> ---119b ---1221

This message is not harmful and probably has nothing to do with
the crash. Are you booting from CD? Many computers can't seem to 
boot from CD (including the two I've tried it on!).
 
> but recognizes other devices (Hitachi_dk225A-21, CD-211E ATAPI,
> ide0, ide1,  mcd=0x300,10 floppy drive fd0 1.44M,  FDC0 is a
> post-1991 82007, serial driver ver 4.11, PS/2 pointing dev.)

If I remember correctly, the mcd device is for the proprietary 
Mitsumi CD interface, but you say you have an ATAPI drive. This could
be a problem.
 
> My laptop is a Zitech Notebook (TFT, Pentium 166MHz, 32MB)
> with a 3COM 589D card that doesn't seem to be recognized at all.

pcmcia ethernet must be loaded after the boot, at least for the 
debian install. Sorry.
 
> Not everything works on ver 1.2.3
> (like the net, and I'm missing
> most of the useful stuff anyway).
> 
> The proc/pci file says:
> 
> bus 0dev 0 func 0
> host bridge:  Silicon Integrated Systems 85C501 (rev 0)
> bus 0dev 1 func 0
> ISA bridge :  Silicon Integrated Systems 85C503 (rev 1)
> 
> I would be most grateful if you had any suggestions/ideas...
> 
> I would really like to boot the ver 2.0.30 CD anyway.

If it crashes during the boot how do you get /proc/pci output?

-- 
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


libX11.a

1997-09-04 Thread Matthew Tebbens

I'm trying to compile a program and it's asking for libX11.a
What package contains this ??

Thanks,
Matthew



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Radius

1997-09-04 Thread Dave Cinege
On Wed, 3 Sep 1997 17:15:20 -0500, Tony Koehn wrote:

>Merit Radius 2.4.23C

Hmm then I can't help much since I never used that one.

What are you're logs showning? Anything?


-
http://www.psychosis.com/emc/   Elite MicroComputers   908-541-4214
http://www.psychosis.com/linux-router/  Linux Router Project


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


MPEG doesn't work from any gr browser; Netscape probs.

1997-09-04 Thread Alan Eugene Davis

I have installed both the ucbmpeg player and mtv player, and set up
netscape for each.  I have consistently not been able to view mpegs.
Each time an mpeg file comes over the line, this message is displayed
in a dialog box, from Netscape as well as from Mosaic:

   Using private color-map
   Bad MPEG? Giving up.
   Try mpeg_stat -verify to see if the stream is valid.

I cannot find a command "mpeg_stat".

I was able to run "mpeg_play" from an xterm on an FTPed test mpeg.

What is a "private color-map"?  

I have had other netscape proglems, such as the intermittent death by
"bus error" and a creeping and increasing slowness over hours of time,
in the responsiveness of only the netscape window to mouseclicks.  

A problem I had earlier has persisted, but is only an irritation:
often netscape won't boot up.  If I try again to start it from an
xterm, it might or might not boot on a second try.  In this case, a
message is recieved about a lock file, but that while netscape might
run, cache will not be able to be used, etc.  if the lock file isn't
removed.  Then if I just say, ok, netscape, once again, might not, or
might start.  

I tried 24bpp, 32bpp, 16bpp, with no difference.  (Did not affect the
mpeg player either).  

Sometimes I can get netscape to start with the -iconic switch.  It's
more or less random, as far as I can tell.  Sometimes it will start on
the third try.  

Once, amazingly, a netscape process was running, but wasn't showing
up, when I quit X.  For a split second the outline of the netscape
window appeared!  

Another thing: when I try to access a site with a live midi
background feed, netscape dies with the mysterious "bus error".  
I haven't been able to get my Yamaha Asound (OPL3-2A) sound card
configured yet for midi, but this happened before I installed a sound
card at all.

Sorry to ramble on so long.  I think these problems are related?  I
would appreciate any advice.  And I do appreciate the excellent advice
I have received many times over this mailing list.




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


How to upgrade a package safely?

1997-09-04 Thread Luka Pravica
Hi,

this happened to me for the second time, and I don't want to reinstall the
whole system again in the future:


Everythig worked fine, I was quite happy not to use win95.
Then I decided to update some packages. I downloaded some newer packages,
run dselect, and selected only xbase (X was not running). The upgrading
ended with many error messages like this:
file ... is a circular link ...
or 
cannot proceed, /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver is a directory

Then I tried to remove xbase but it didn't work.


The same thing happened to me few moths ago, so I knew what to expect. I
quit dselect and run fsck. But it made everything even worse, many important
(system) files were moved to /lost&found , which furthermore got many not
existing files, when I did ls -l, the output was:
...
#045236 file does not exist
and so on
...

dselect was not working any more because all configuration files were gone.
I shut down the system and decided to try to fix it tomorow.

Then during next booting, kernel complained about missing files and later
fsck started to fix the filesystem again. After that every command I typed,
printed file system error messages. And the worst thing was that e2fsck
couldn't even recognise the file system. 


Now I'm busy with reinstalling everything. The same thing happened few
months ago (actually I tried to upgrade packages only two times and both
times ended with compete reinstalation). 

My question is, what is the safe way to upgrade some package? Should I
remove it first? 


Thanks for any hints,

Luka


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Front page

1997-09-04 Thread Tony Koehn
Does anyone know where I can go to get some help on Front Page for Unix??

Don't seem to know what I am doing here

I am looking for any kind of help or list server or newsgroup.

Tony




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


[X] Changing input focus in X

1997-09-04 Thread Will Lowe
I have my fvwm desktop set up to be nine times the size of the actual
monitor.  I've got a little pager in the bottom of my screen that lets me
see all the desktops.

I'm a keyboard person,  as opposed to a mouse person.  I'd like
ALT-TAB to change focus *only* on the current desktop.  Right now,
ALT-TAB changes focus only *between* desktops ... so it moves me from one
desktop to another,  but not from application to application within one
desktop.  I'd prefer it to just stay in the current desktop and change
applications,  and require me to mouse over to the next desktop.

Can anyone tell me how to do this?

Will

---
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/
  For PGP Public Key,  visit my website.
---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Is PPP helping me?

1997-09-04 Thread Aldrin Leal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hello!

 I was building a proxy system yesterday, and i had a strange trouble.

 I've installed Linux, set up everything. A Dream of a Intranet. I can
ping back and forth between the ether.

 Set up pppd. But, when firing up, it messes up my routes. I cannot
ping home anymore. I even can't ping everything on the net who passes over
the remote router.

 Any hints? Any faulty bug related to this? How can i fix this up
without losing my faith in Smart Linux Boxes? :]

 done. Aldrin Leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQB1AwUBNA4aIIKH1wkmqet5AQFkugL+J13nVlyISVai+rdM+ndmn2XmLhGCaai9
+XmJQglMHb4ne6352Xax3WTho5rjI48tvuoXKNiQvw8ASifmT5UcVCZUsZF+jgtv
X+RuO3uca/3q5AJzWQNepn5Dhx89XmDj
=KAU9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread Lindsay Allen

On Wed, 3 Sep 1997, George Bonser wrote:

> 
> I STRONGLY disagree.  I want to know when you wrote it ... not when it
> arrived here.  If a mail was delayed a day or two in route, it might
> completely change how I look at the information in the email.  Example, a
> put-down of Princess Diana might be viewed in poor taste if it arrives
> after she died but might be perfectly acceptable expression of opinion if
> authored three days earlier and delayed in route.

[snip]

As often as not I seem to read the answers before I get to the originating
post, which is unhelpful.  This morning, for instance, there was a message
from the list with a timezone of BST. 

Date: Wed, 3 Sep 97 15:56 BST
From: [snip]
To: Debian developers list 

Pine does not know what BST is, or PDT either for that matter, and
neither do I.  The message was processed as originating at 15:56 local
time.  Is this way of describing timezones according to the RFC? 

Lindsay

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lindsay Allen   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Perth, Western Australia
voice +61 8 9316 2486modem +61 8 9364-9832  32S, 116E
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: MPEG doesn't work from any gr browser; Netscape probs.

1997-09-04 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Alan Eugene Davis wrote:
> 
> I have installed both the ucbmpeg player and mtv player, and set up
> netscape for each.  I have consistently not been able to view mpegs.
> Each time an mpeg file comes over the line, this message is displayed
> in a dialog box, from Netscape as well as from Mosaic:
> 
>Using private color-map
>Bad MPEG? Giving up.
>Try mpeg_stat -verify to see if the stream is valid.
> 
> I cannot find a command "mpeg_stat".
> 
> I was able to run "mpeg_play" from an xterm on an FTPed test mpeg.

Is your bash version 2.0? If so then this might be your problem. bash
2.0 has a parser error which incorrectly interprets subshell 
expressions like the ones netscape uses to start plug-in applications
like mpeg-play. So far the package mainainer has not stepped forward
to release 2.01 for debian version 1.3.1. I have compiled a binary
which can be got from http://gatekeeper.bdsinc.com/~jjorgens but it
depends on the termcap-compat package (ie. don't replace your existing
shell without having this package). 

On the other hand, this may not be your problem, in which case I can't
imagine what's going on. The errors you report are pretty weird.

> 
> What is a "private color-map"?

It's an X thang. Some display adapters can display a rainbow of colors,
but only 256 different colors at a time. Basically a color map is the
X representation of this "palette". You can see the effects when you
use a private color map when running X in 256 color mode and then 
display something with a lot of color (like a jpeg). When you switch
focus in and out of the jpeg-displaying window, the colors on the screen
will switch back and forth. That is, only the window with focus will
have "normal" color while everything else has seemingly random color.
You have to try it to really see what I mean. 
 
> I have had other netscape proglems, such as the intermittent death by
> "bus error" and a creeping and increasing slowness over hours of time,
> in the responsiveness of only the netscape window to mouseclicks.

I've had bus errors and they were due to the gnumalloc problem. Did you
use the debian installer .deb to set up netscape, or did you just get 
the tar.gz from netscape and install that?
 
> A problem I had earlier has persisted, but is only an irritation:
> often netscape won't boot up.  If I try again to start it from an
> xterm, it might or might not boot on a second try.  In this case, a
> message is recieved about a lock file, but that while netscape might
> run, cache will not be able to be used, etc.  if the lock file isn't
> removed.  Then if I just say, ok, netscape, once again, might not, or
> might start.
> 
> I tried 24bpp, 32bpp, 16bpp, with no difference.  (Did not affect the
> mpeg player either).

I also saw this behavior when the "fixes" for the gnumalloc problem
had not been applied. Netscape would hang forever, *never* coming up.
 
> Sometimes I can get netscape to start with the -iconic switch.  It's
> more or less random, as far as I can tell.  Sometimes it will start on
> the third try.
> 
> Once, amazingly, a netscape process was running, but wasn't showing
> up, when I quit X.  For a split second the outline of the netscape
> window appeared!

This was just because it was hung before it never got to "visualize"
the window. 
 
> Another thing: when I try to access a site with a live midi
> background feed, netscape dies with the mysterious "bus error".
> I haven't been able to get my Yamaha Asound (OPL3-2A) sound card
> configured yet for midi, but this happened before I installed a sound
> card at all.
> 
> Sorry to ramble on so long.  I think these problems are related?  I
> would appreciate any advice.  And I do appreciate the excellent advice
> I have received many times over this mailing list.

Again, if you didn't install netscape with the netscape debian package
this is most likely your problem. Note that even with the debian package
installer you'll have problems with plug-in apps due the the bash
problem I mentioned above.

-- 
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Segfault in free(), electric-fence for C++ ?

1997-09-04 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Wed, Sep 03, 1997 at 05:07:11PM +0200, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote:
> > I have some strange problem with my C++ code: I get a segmentation fault
> > in destructor's delete[] operator. GDB says it happend in free().
> > What could be the cause of that? The only place I touch the pointer
> > I pass to delete[] is in the constructor while allocating memory with new.
> 
> There can be lots of causes.  If you write beyond bounds anywhere in
> your program, this kind of errors can occur some place after the error,
> or not at all.

I suggest having a lunch break. Today I was working on a C++
problem with a team for some hours, and memory seemed to be getting
clobbered. We were using cvs, and we all committed changes
etc and went to lunch. When we came back, checked out fresh
source copies, and it worked. Two programs were having
the same bug in one of the base classes. We don't know
what changed, but it works now.

So, take a lunch break. :-)

> of error is extremely hard to pin down, especially in larger programs.
> The simple fact that your program runs OK on one platform using one
> compiler doesn't mean there are no errors which can turn out fatal with
> different compilers or on different platforms.  I have been able to
> crash ddd on this particular problem :(.

Try a different compiler, perhaps. I have not found g++ to be
the most helpful ever, eg it will not tell you which exception
occurred, just Abort. We are developing on Solaris so we have
Sun CC, which is nicer. The compiler finds more problems,
gives exception messages (and supports exceptions without
the -fhandle-exceptions kludge), and never gives interal compilre
errors, which g++ has been quite a bit. (2.7.2.2)


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student, computer science & computer systems engineering.3rd year, RMIT.
http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [* ] 53%
The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.  --Bohr


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Front page

1997-09-04 Thread Adam Shand
>Does anyone know where I can go to get some help on Front Page for Unix??

Yep.

>Don't seem to know what I am doing here

Welcome to hell.  It gets worse from here.  On the plus side the new
version of Frontpage (FP98) is by all accounts much better.

>I am looking for any kind of help or list server or newsgroup.

http://larry.earthlight.co.nz/frontpage.html
http://frontpage.netnation.com/

There is also a Frontpage news group, dedicated to the discussion of the FP
extensions on UNIX.  It's called something like comp.ms.frontpage.unix but
I can't remember.  Just search for anything with frontpage in it.

Adam.

-- Earthlight Communications Limited -
P.O. Box 5301   Adam Shand  (fax) +64 3 477 5463
Dunedin, New Zealand   Systems Manager  (voice) +64 3 479 0303
--- http://larry.earthlight.co.nz/ ---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: can't locate module char-major-10

1997-09-04 Thread Luis Francisco Gonzalez
--- Begin Message ---
By the way, there is something wrong with your mailer as replying to you doesn't
work.

Luis.
-- 
Luis Francisco Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Fingerprint = F8 B1 13 DE 22 22 94 A1  14 BE 95 8E 49 39 78 76


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
--- End Message ---


Newbe question...

1997-09-04 Thread Swanson, Glenn, KB1GW


Greetings,

I'm trying to install Debian (latest release)  from floppies onto a '386 
system that has only 4 Meg of RAM. (I'm going to try using lmemroot.bin on 
floppy2.)

1) Is this "too little" RAM for such a system?

2) Will I have a "usable" system if I can pull this off?

Apologies to the grizzled veterans on this reflector.  :-)

Glenn in Connecticut

My personal home page--about ham radio:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1138/index.html

Interested in learning about Amateur Radio (aka ham radio)?
Try surfing to the ARRL home page at:
http://www.arrl.org/index.html


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Installing the official CD

1997-09-04 Thread Tom Malloy
I have 3.1 installed from floppys.   There were some problems with some
of the packages I tried to install.  Most of these were caused by modem
errors I think.  It was certainly a mistake to try to install so many
packages simultaniously. Anyway I decided to order the 3.1.1 cd  and
work from there.  It will give me a stable platform to return to if I
have trouble in the future.  I do not actually have a cd rom drive yet.
(minor technical detail :) I am in the procces of ordering one. I have
the following questions
1.  May I assume that any standard ide cd rom device will work with
debian?
The CDs do not come with any instructions so I am really not sure what
to do with them
2. How do I tell my existing installation about the cd rom drive?
3. Would it be better to scrap the old 3.1 install and do a fresh
install with 3.1.1 disks and then install packages from the CD?
4. Since the CDs do not also come with install disks  I presume there
must be some way to install directly from the CDs, but since my macine
does not boot from the rom drive How is this done?
Any other general information about installing devices in debian, or
about installing from the CD set is appriciated.   Thank you for any
assistance


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: How to upgrade a package safely?

1997-09-04 Thread Brandon Mitchell
> Then during next booting, kernel complained about missing files and later
> fsck started to fix the filesystem again. After that every command I typed,
> printed file system error messages. And the worst thing was that e2fsck
> couldn't even recognise the file system. 

Warning, the following suggestion will destroy any data remaining on the
harddrive.  With that said, run badblocks from a rescue disk on your
harddrive.  Use the -w switch which uses a write test and should pick up
any problems.  Bad blocks wants the block count, which I think you can get
from fdisk.  I personnally first run mke2fs -c /dev/???, see what
badblocks options it uses, cancel mke2fs and run badblocks adding the -w,
go watch some tv, return and run mke2fs.

I say this because your symptoms point to a hardware problem (unless maybe
you are running an unstable kernel from the 2.1 set).  A bad harddrive is
the first thing that comes to mind.  It may be correctable, and badblocks
will let you know if there are problems (I seem to recall using the -o
 option, and passing the file back to mke2fs once).

Anyway, read the man pages of these two, and good luck,
Brandon

-
Brandon Mitchell E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Homepage: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/7877/home.html
  PGP: finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
"We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds."
--Linus Torvalds


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread Olaf Weber
Jason Gunthorpe writes:
> On 8859 xxx 2001, Orn E. Hansen wrote:
>> On 02-Sep-97 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

>>> Orn, your mailer is formatting dates in a way that pine doesn't understand

>> HDate: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mi=F0,?= 03 Sep 1997 19:14:09 +0200 (CET DST)

> I noticed that, why is your mailer putting such an unusual date, is that
> specified in the various mail RFCs?

RFC822 would be the appropriate one here, and it does impose some
restrictions regarding what can and cannot be a date header:

 5.  DATE AND TIME SPECIFICATION

 5.1.  SYNTAX

 date-time   =  [ day "," ] date time; dd mm yy
 ;  hh:mm:ss zzz

 day =  "Mon"  / "Tue" /  "Wed"  / "Thu"
 /  "Fri"  / "Sat" /  "Sun"

So it certainly looks like Orn needs to fix his mailer.

-- 
Olaf Weber


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Is PPP helping me?

1997-09-04 Thread Aldrin Leal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

On Thu, 4 Sep 1997, Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:

> You must be passing the defaultroute option to pppd. This option may
> be specified on the pppd command line or in the /etc/ppp/options
> file. Remove this option.

I tried with/without defaultroute. tried the "0.0.0.0:" kludge on
/etc/ppp/options. After some discussion, i'm also suspecting of a misuse
of network/broadcast/netmask.

This leads me to a quick question: is a broadcast address needed? :)

done. Aldrin Leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQB1AwUBNA7Y7IKH1wkmqet5AQE/xwMAujjOCXu5KgWmKSw81cWEGHwDI+PzcGTA
S8iYOVdq6RsSbYyLrft6RS8/ISO55d9UiiiWujlK065zWsemJVzPrmwobH1XSs5j
xeWURgXYJ31TLF8Rnihj9ejKZ82AJa3i
=M0xS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


ethernet card suggestions

1997-09-04 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Tomorrow we're moving our company server machine to a new ISP.
Right now it has a UTP SMC 8216 Ultra in it, but the new
ISP only has coax (:-(), and we're not too sure what to do
about an ethernet card. We would like to spend a little
bit more than just a PCI NE2000 and get something we know
is reliable. We can Intel EtherExpress for around $115-$145
Australian, which is acceptable, but we can get the NE2000 for $30.
Is it worth it? 3Com are even more expensive again it seems.
SMC might be a possibility but harder to get.

What do people recommend? I will have this machine back
to fiddle with for perhaps an hour, so we want it to work
and keep working, but it isn't mission critical so if it
dies, it does. Cost is an issue.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student, computer science & computer systems engineering.3rd year, RMIT.
http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [* ] 53%
The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.  --Bohr


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Building Debian Packages

1997-09-04 Thread Will Lowe
On Tue, 2 Sep 1997, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:

> On Tue, 2 Sep 1997, Will Lowe wrote:
> 
> > I'd reccomend the "Makeing a debian Package" page,  which is pretty good

> As the author of that article, I am gratified that someone actually finds
> it useful. 

Very!

> 
> It's too easy.  This is by design.  My target audience was people like me.

Please keep it this way.  Let's make things as obvious and idiot-proof as
possible.

> It's too hard.  One suggestion I had was to include stuff about gcc
> options, makefiles etc.  There is a need for something like this but it's

Things that probably ought to be included but aren't:
Specific instructions on what to change in the control, rules,
etc. files.  This isn't very clear,  and requires a lot of hacking around
with source to figure out. While hacking is good for understanding,  you
don't neccessarily need to understand deb-make/dpkg to make a package.

A *brief* listing of gcc options/makefile stuff.  Only the ones
that are likely to be relevant to your average maintainer who just wants
to run "rules" and have it work.  True gcc hackers/unix gurus will already
know the esoteric stuff they'll need.

And:
> conf files, install scripts and integrating with the  menu package 

> It doesn't explain how to become a Debian maintainer, upload your package
> etc.  I have mixed feelings about this.  You don't need to be Debian
> maintainer to want to create .debs.  Though I am one now, I originally

Righto!  And the "Debian Developer's Reference" covers this in much
detail.  Maybe just a line saying "If you want to become a maintainer and
upload your package,  see the Developer's Reference at http://whatever.";

Will

---
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/
  For PGP Public Key,  visit my website.
---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: [Common Lisp] I'm working on the clisp package...

1997-09-04 Thread Will Lowe
On 31 Aug 1997, John Goerzen wrote:

> How does this differ from gcl (GNU Common Lisp)?
> 

I haven't used GCL much.  Clisp is GPL'd,  so it's just as distributable
as GCL.  I'm using clisp because it appeared o be a little further along
in the development stage.  Clisp is also (now) available as a debian
package :)

Will

---
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.cis.udel.edu/~lowe/
  For PGP Public Key,  visit my website.
---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Private XF-Mail package available

1997-09-04 Thread George Bonser

On 02-Sep-97 Craig Sanders wrote:
>anyway, that's all beside the point. what i'm really writing to say is:
>if you'd like to maintain the package for debian, i'll send you what
>i've done so far.

Sure, I will take it.  I will send you an address where you can put it by anon
ftp via private email.

Which version did you make?  The later versions are supposed to be much
enhanced though 

>
>from memory, my package doesn't need much work (maybe a little tidying up)
>to be suitable for inclusion in non-free.  
>
>(its copyright says "This software can be freely distributed and modified
>for non-commercial purposes as long as the above copyright message and
>this permission notice appear in all copies of distributed source code or
>included as separate file in binary distribution.  Commercial use of this
>software requires the permission of the authors.") 
>
>craig
>
>--
>craig sanders
>networking consultant  Available for casual or contract
>temporary autonomous zone  system administration tasks.
>
>
>
>--
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
>Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Red Hat's Xconfigurator for Debian?

1997-09-04 Thread Arthur Jerijian
Hi,

I tried to install the XConfigurator and newt RPM packages from Red Hat
onto Debian, using the alien program.  I was able to start XConfigurator,
but it was apparently looking for some Red Hat administrative files.  Is
there a version of XConfigurator for Debian?  The default XF86Setup
program does not work very well with my video card and monitor.

Thanks!

--Arthur


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Red Hat's Xconfigurator for Debian?

1997-09-04 Thread Paul Seelig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur Jerijian) writes:

> I tried to install the XConfigurator and newt RPM packages from Red Hat
> onto Debian, using the alien program.  I was able to start XConfigurator,
> but it was apparently looking for some Red Hat administrative files.  Is
> there a version of XConfigurator for Debian?  The default XF86Setup
> program does not work very well with my video card and monitor.
> 
The Debian version of XConfigurator is your favourite editor! ;-) 

Why don't you simply try tweaking your /etc/X11/XF86Config manually in
combination with 'xvidtune'?  Worked like a charm for me streamlining
my custom monitor modeline! :-)
  Cheers, P. *8^)
--
   Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
   Johannes Gutenberg-University   -  Forum 6  -  55099 Mainz/Germany
   My Homepage in the WWW at the URL http://www.uni-mainz.de/~pseelig 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


[OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++

1997-09-04 Thread E.L. Meijer (Eric)
Jeff Gunter:
> FWIW, I have also had problems with SGI's C++ compiler and g++ (on the same
> SGI) being incompatible.   The incompatibilities are even to the level where
> code will compile cleanly under one compiler and not compile at all under the
> other.  These two compilers are definitely not interchangable.

Wildly off topic, but a fun view into `commercial quality software', let
me show you the output of CC under IRIX 64 with the following
application:

hw.cc:

#include 
int main() { cout << "Hello world." << endl; return 0; }

> CC -fullwarn -o hw hw.cc
"/usr/include/CC/iostream.h", line 236: remark(1506): implicit
conversion from
  "long" to "int":  rounding, sign extension, or loss of
accuracy may
  result
x_blen= (eb>b) ? (eb-b) : 0 ;
^

"/usr/include/CC/iostream.h", line 265: remark(1506): implicit
conversion from
  "long" to "int":  rounding, sign extension, or loss of
accuracy may
  result
return x_gptr Suggestion: If possible take a step backwards and get g++ and SGI C++ both on
> the SGI and do a side-by-side comparison.  If the both work and give the same
> output (maybe even the RIGHT output if you know what that should be), then you
> have grounds for suspecting your problem of being linux (or g++ under linux)
> related.

Probably yes.  But you're never sure.  That's why I'm happily awaiting
gcc 2.8.0 for some time now ... :(

I know I shouldn't ask, but has anybody a hint when this beast will hit
the, er, `market'?

Eric Meijer

-- 
 E.L. Meijer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])  | tel. office +31 40 2472189
 Eindhoven Univ. of Technology | tel. lab.   +31 40 2475032
 Lab. for Catalysis and Inorg. Chem. (TAK) | tel. fax+31 40 2455054


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: X11R6?

1997-09-04 Thread jdassen
On Sep 3, Britton wrote
> I have one of these CD's also, with lots of problems with X.  I am having
> trouble upgrading via the ftp method.  I choose pretty much the standard
> options, and it hangs like this:
> 
> Using FTP to check directories...(stop with ^C)
> 
> Connecting to ftp.debian.org...
> Login as anonymous...
> 
> Then nothing.  Now here is the sad part:  It was working less before, and
> I got an error on line 7 of a script (the name of which I forget).  I
> forget what I did to fix this error exactly, I think it had to do with
> getting the new dpkg-ftp installed, although I think I thought I had done
> that before.  Unfortunately, I had already edited this script in an effort
> to fix things, it was a line with ftp:Net or something like that in it.  I
> suspect this may be what is getting me.  I reinstalled dpkg-ftp in an
> effort to fix this problem, but no luck.  Would it be helpful and safe to
> purge and reload dpkg itself (mayby that is where the script is)?  I am
> reluctant to try it.  Any ideas greatly appreciated.

My guess is that you fixed something in a script belonging to ?libnet-perl?
which provides libnet [*] on which dpkg-ftp depends. Try reinstalling that
package.

[*] look for "Provides:.*libnet" in /var/lib/dpkg/available to find the
precise package name.

HTH,
Ray
-- 
POPULATION EXPLOSION  Unique in human experience, an event which happened 
yesterday but which everyone swears won't happen until tomorrow.  
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


exim - smail - sendmail: my experience.

1997-09-04 Thread Johann Spies
I regard myself still as a newby as far as linux is concerned.  I have
been using smail for about a year now. 

After receiving a cd with Debian 1.3.1 on it, I decided to try out the
exim as well.  I have read somewhere that it is faster and easier to
configure than the others.  Not for me. I could not get it working
properly.  The configuration script looks like smail's.  The same answers,
however, does not have the same effect.  So I removed exim again.  I think
I have tried it out about 5 or 6 times now without success.

I then tried out sendmail and was impressed by the configuration script.
When I tried to send mail, however, it seemed to take ages to receive mail
from pine.  I supposes that I did something wrong in the configuration
process.  Manual configuration looks very complicated, so I removed
sendmail again.

Now I am working with smail again...

Johann.


Johann Spies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Windsorlaan 19
Pietermaritzburg
3201
Suid Afrika (South Africa)
Tel/Faks Nr. +27 331-46-1310


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


440LX chipset

1997-09-04 Thread Carl Flippin
I am considering buying a new computer and would like to get a 
Pentium II with the new 440LX chipset. My concern is over the AGP 
graphics. Would I be able to use debian with AGP? Are there any 
compatibility issues with 440LX?


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


test, please ignore

1997-09-04 Thread Nico De Ranter

Hi,

sorry for this mail but I don't seem to be receiving any mails
from the debian-user list anymore :-(.  Just testing.

Nico.

-- 
--
Nico De Ranter
Sony Objective Composer (SOCOM)
Sint Stevens Woluwestraat 55 (Rue de Woluwe-Saint-Etienne)
1130 Brussel (Bruxelles), Belgium, Europe, Earth
Telephone: +32 2 724 17 41 Telefax: +32 2 726 26 86
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Segfault in free(), electric-fence for C++ ?

1997-09-04 Thread Carey Evans
Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have some strange problem with my C++ code: I get a segmentation fault
> in destructor's delete[] operator. GDB says it happend in free().
> What could be the cause of that? The only place I touch the pointer
> I pass to delete[] is in the constructor while allocating memory with new.

I got this while trying to get xosview to compile and run cleanly.  It
was calling the destructor for particular objects twice.

Try running it with different values of the environment variable
MALLOC_CHECK_, i.e.:

% ./xosview
zsh: segmentation fault  ./xosview
% MALLOC_CHECK_=0 ./xosview
% MALLOC_CHECK_=1 ./xosview
malloc: using debugging hooks
free(): invalid pointer 805af60!
free(): invalid pointer 805af70!
free(): invalid pointer 805af80!
free(): invalid pointer 805af90!
free(): invalid pointer 805b098!
free(): invalid pointer 805b0b0!
free(): invalid pointer 805b0c8!
free(): invalid pointer 805b0e0!
free(): invalid pointer 805b1e8!
free(): invalid pointer 805b200!
free(): invalid pointer 805b218!
free(): invalid pointer 805b230!
free(): invalid pointer 805b328!
free(): invalid pointer 805b338!
free(): invalid pointer 805b348!
free(): invalid pointer 805b358!
free(): invalid pointer 805b460!
free(): invalid pointer 805b478!
free(): invalid pointer 805b490!
free(): invalid pointer 805b4a8!
% MALLOC_CHECK_=2 ./xosview
zsh: abort  MALLOC_CHECK_=2 ./xosview

-- 
  Carey Evans  <*>  http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/

kernel: Warning: possible SYN flooding. Sending cookies. 
kernel: validated probe(17f, 17f, 11557, 5010, -1645409555) 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: SCSI Host Adapter (+ Re: 2 CPU servers)

1997-09-04 Thread Nicola Bernardelli
 BusLogic supports free software and is well supported under Linux? 
Very well. Probably I'll have one customer of mine buy new machines very
soon, they will buy what I say. (Maybe me too - going to buy a new
harddisk - will replace my Adaptec 2940 with a BusLogic instead of a
2940UW or 3940W or anything else from Adaptec.) 


> > Even the "low-end" BusLogic cards are pretty good.  They just lack an 
> > onboard
> > CPU to process SCSI requests.  But thanks to BusLogic, the SCSI manager code
> > was GPL'd and is integrated into the Linux driver.

 There was mention of a specific model, Buslogic BT-948: is it such a
"low-end" card or one with that CPU onboard? 
 Better question: what do you think is a medium-high level BusLogic
card with good price/performance ratio and - most important - well
performing (reliable and fast) with Debian GNU/Linux? 
 And what about 2 CPU usage? I read on this list recently that the
kernel is getting mature for Linux with such motherboards: 

> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 11:50:02 -0700
> From: Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: 2 CPU servers
>
> [snip]
> 2.0.31-pre7 seems to be working ok (no deadlocks).
> 2.0.30 or 2.0.29 with the deadlock-patch 6 works fine too.
> [snip]


 Nicola Bernardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 Please use <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for messages from any kind of
robot, such as mailing lists. From that address no autoresponse
messages will return even when I'm not at home.
---
















--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread Carey Evans
Olaf Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> RFC822 would be the appropriate one here, and it does impose some
> restrictions regarding what can and cannot be a date header:

[snip]

> So it certainly looks like Orn needs to fix his mailer.

RFC2047 is also applicable - it's responsible to the mangled addresses
you see sometimes if you MUA isn't aware of the proposed standard.
However, I don't think it should be applied to Date: headers.

Also, I note that RFC822 defines the day part of a date as only the
English names, not something like "Mið" (however that turns out when
TM and various MTA's get done with it).  And the only valid
non-numeric time zones are: UT GMT EST EDT CST CDT MST MDT PST PDT, or
a single letter except J (not "BST").

RFC822 also seems to have a year-2000 bug.

-- 
  Carey Evans  <*>  http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/

kernel: Warning: possible SYN flooding. Sending cookies. 
kernel: validated probe(17f, 17f, 11557, 5010, -1645409555) 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Date in mail headers

1997-09-04 Thread David Wright
On 4 Sep 1997, Carey Evans wrote:

> Olaf Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > RFC822 would be the appropriate one here, and it does impose some
> > restrictions regarding what can and cannot be a date header:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > So it certainly looks like Orn needs to fix his mailer.

I agree. I think it's screwing up the interaction of our IMAP server and 
Debian pine 3.96 - I keep getting "bogus date" errors.

> RFC2047 is also applicable - it's responsible to the mangled addresses
> you see sometimes if you MUA isn't aware of the proposed standard.
> However, I don't think it should be applied to Date: headers.

I agree. Dates are not "text", nor "phrase", and only these can be encoded.

> Also, I note that RFC822 defines the day part of a date as only the
> English names, not something like "Mið" (however that turns out when
> TM and various MTA's get done with it).  And the only valid
> non-numeric time zones are: UT GMT EST EDT CST CDT MST MDT PST PDT, or
> a single letter except J (not "BST").

I wrote a DOS perl script a while back to make reading mailbox files 
tolerable without an MUA (i.e. with less). It stripped out almost all the 
headers, and to make up for the lack of an index to the messages, it 
sorted them by Date:. Naturally it had to make sense of the timezones, 
and these were the ones used I filtered from one week's contributions on 
debian-user:

@timezonenames = ("+1200 NZST",
  "+1000 EST",
  "+0930 CST",
  "+0900 JST",
  "+0800 WST",
  "+0400 MSD",
  "+0200 SAT",
  "+0200 CEST",
  "+0100 MET", "+0200 MET DST",
  "- GMT", "+ GMT", "+0100 BST",
  "-0300 SAT",
  "-0400 AST",
  "-0500 EST", "-0400 EDT",
  "-0600 CST", "-0500 CDT",
  "-0700 MST", "-0600 MDT",
  "-0800 PST", "-0700 PDT");

There were also some bizarre ones like SGT, but I couldn't add them to my 
dataset unless I could work out what they were. Note that some, like EST 
and CST are ambiguous (in the emails, not in the RFC), so I put the most 
likely/legal ones last in my array to overwrite the others.

As far as I know, I think I'm guilty of using BST, and even bst, from 
Debian and PC- pine, but only in parentheses. (For Lindsay, BST is 
British Summer Time.)
--
David Wright, Open University, Earth Science Department, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
U.K.  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  tel: +44 1908 653 739  fax: +44 1908 655 151




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Is PPP helping me?

1997-09-04 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
Aldrin Leal wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> 
> Hello!
> 
>  I was building a proxy system yesterday, and i had a strange trouble.
> 
>  I've installed Linux, set up everything. A Dream of a Intranet. I can
> ping back and forth between the ether.
> 
>  Set up pppd. But, when firing up, it messes up my routes. I cannot
> ping home anymore. I even can't ping everything on the net who passes over
> the remote router.
> 
>  Any hints? Any faulty bug related to this? How can i fix this up
> without losing my faith in Smart Linux Boxes? :]

You must be passing the defaultroute option to pppd. This option may
be specified on the pppd command line or in the /etc/ppp/options
file. Remove this option.

-- 
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Newbe question...

1997-09-04 Thread Frits Daalmans
>Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 12:05:00 -0400
>From: "Swanson, Glenn,  KB1GW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Newbe question...
>
>Greetings,
>
>I'm trying to install Debian (latest release)  from floppies onto a '386 
>system that has only 4 Meg of RAM. (I'm going to try using lmemroot.bin on 
>floppy2.)
>
>1) Is this "too little" RAM for such a system?
Well.. I'll give you my personal history: other people might disagree.
It depends on a lot of factors: your RAM speed, disk speed, daemons you
want to have running, etc.

I have used Debian on a 4M '486 at work, a very slow machine (had to set
all BIOS settings to slowest). It is really not commendable;
Your programs will work OK but dselect becomes painfully slow; also,
first thing you MUST do when installing is creating and activating the
swap partition otherwise things might crash during installation, because
fsck needs lots of memory. If it is not done for you, you can do this by 
escaping to a shell ("ash" shell IIRC) during installation,
and manually creating *and activating* the swappartition. 

After the long and painful process of installation, recompile your kernel!
>
>2) Will I have a "usable" system if I can pull this off?
I use Linux on a '386dx40 at home since 1993 :-) But I noticed a big
performance increase after buying memory to 8M. I now have 8M at work and
at home and it works fine. Also X-windows and compilations. You just need
to plan compilations: if you want to compile large programs or the kernel,
go do something else and make it beep when ready :-)

In 4M memory, you will notice:
- big compilations bring the computer to its knees if you have anything
running; you need to kill almost all processes, and compile from your one
left console screen; on largish modules (>40k or so) the machine already
starts swapping, making things very slow. Kernel compilation takes HOURS.
Still, after you successfully installed Debian, first thing you should do
is install all necessary development tools and make your own custom kernel.
A couple of hundred K of kernel size make a big difference for a 4M system.
Compile as much as possible as modules; MSDOS fs, serial driver, 
network drivers, and use kerneld to automatically load them (edit 
/etc/modules and put "auto" there)

- X-windows programs and large executables take a long time (seconds) to
start up; once running it's OK (once non-used portions of the program are
swapped out)
>
>Apologies to the grizzled veterans on this reflector.  :-)
Not necessary, it's a good question. Why spend all your money on a big computer
instead of saving it until your current one breaks down? (I'm dutch).
>
>Glenn in Connecticut
Frits in Leiden.
>


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Red Hat's Xconfigurator for Debian?

1997-09-04 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On 4 Sep 1997, Paul Seelig wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur Jerijian) writes:
> 
> > I tried to install the XConfigurator and newt RPM packages from Red Hat
> > onto Debian, using the alien program.  I was able to start XConfigurator,
> > but it was apparently looking for some Red Hat administrative files.  Is
> > there a version of XConfigurator for Debian?  The default XF86Setup
> > program does not work very well with my video card and monitor.
> > 
> The Debian version of XConfigurator is your favourite editor! ;-) 
> 
> Why don't you simply try tweaking your /etc/X11/XF86Config manually in
> combination with 'xvidtune'?  Worked like a charm for me streamlining
> my custom monitor modeline! :-)

And don't forget to take a look at /usr/doc/HOWTO/mini/Modeline.gz for a
good explanation of what those modelines really mean.

Remco
--
System Error, hit any user to continue


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


a problem

1997-09-04 Thread Martin Bees

I would be very grateful if anyone could help me with a
small problem concerning the boot disk of Debian/Linux 
(+all other Linux versions).
Simply, version 2.0.29 boot disks crash on my Laptop
shortly after it probes for the PCI devices. 
It says unrecognized PCI device and then crashes,
saying "Unknown PCI device (1039:5107)."

Version 1.2.3 boot disk almost works but apparently
fails to recognize 3 PCI devices.  
It says:
Unknown PCI device.  PCI vendor id=1c.  PCI dev id=5107
---18   ---9660
---119b ---1221

but recognizes other devices (Hitachi_dk225A-21, CD-211E ATAPI,
ide0, ide1,  mcd=0x300,10 floppy drive fd0 1.44M,  FDC0 is a 
post-1991 82007, serial driver ver 4.11, PS/2 pointing dev.)

My laptop is a Zitech Notebook (TFT, Pentium 166MHz, 32MB) 
with a 3COM 589D card that doesn't seem to be recognized at all.

Not everything works on ver 1.2.3
(like the net, and I'm missing
most of the useful stuff anyway).

The proc/pci file says:

bus 0dev 0 func 0 
host bridge:  Silicon Integrated Systems 85C501 (rev 0)
bus 0dev 1 func 0
ISA bridge :  Silicon Integrated Systems 85C503 (rev 1)


I would be most grateful if you had any suggestions/ideas...

I would really like to boot the ver 2.0.30 CD anyway.

Thank you.

Martin Bees.




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: libX11.a

1997-09-04 Thread joost witteveen
> 
> I'm trying to compile a program and it's asking for libX11.a
> What package contains this ??

$ dpkg -S libX11.a
xslib: /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.a

(You can view the Contents file on the ftp site to search for
packages not on your system).


-- 
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: a problem

1997-09-04 Thread Steffen Mueller
On Thu, Sep 04, 1997 at 02:32:27PM +, Martin Bees wrote:


Hi Martin,
> 
> I would be very grateful if anyone could help me with a
> small problem concerning the boot disk of Debian/Linux 
> (+all other Linux versions).
> Simply, version 2.0.29 boot disks crash on my Laptop
> shortly after it probes for the PCI devices. 
> It says unrecognized PCI device and then crashes,
> saying "Unknown PCI device (1039:5107)."
> 

This one is the SiS Hot Docking Controller. The problem is well known
meanwhile and was even reportet to the mail adresses mentioned in the pci.h
file. So far there seems to be no solution. The notebooks are also referred
as SAGER, AJP or other brands.

There must be a solution and i'm regularly on search for further information
but haven't found anything reasonable.

Greetings,

Steffen
---
NTG Netzwerk und Telematic GmbH, Sitz Chemnitz.
Kreisgericht Chemnitz/Stadt HRB 4217 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michael Rotert
-
Steffen R. Mueller __  ___ _   _ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTG Netzwerk und Telematic GmbH\ \/ / (_)_ __ | | __ fax  : +49 2203 304614
Geschaeftsbereich Xlink \  /| | | '_ \| |/ / phone: +49 2203 304647
Theodor-Heuss-Str. 43   /  \| | | | | |   <  RIPE : SM25-RIPE
D-51149 Koeln, Germany /_/\_\_|_|_| |_|_|\_\ WWW.Xlink.net/~steffen
   INTERNET. MIT SICHERHEIT


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


can't locate module char-major-10

1997-09-04 Thread Aria Prima Novianto

Hi,
Every time I connect using pppd, I got this message in my console
after get connected:

pppd[257]: remote IP address 128.10.16.110
modprobe: can't locate module char-major-10

I can't find char-major-10 module in my kernel source. Is it safe to
put 'alias char-major-10 off' in /etc/conf.modules?

Thanks,
-- 
*) Aria


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: can't locate module char-major-10

1997-09-04 Thread jdassen
On Sep 4, Aria Prima Novianto wrote
> Every time I connect using pppd, I got this message in my console
> after get connected:
> 
> pppd[257]: remote IP address 128.10.16.110
> modprobe: can't locate module char-major-10
> 
> I can't find char-major-10 module in my kernel source. Is it safe to put
> 'alias char-major-10 off' in /etc/conf.modules?

On Sep 4, Luis Francisco Gonzalez answered
> char-major-10 is the mouse. If this appears right after the pppd is
> started, I would guess that you have somehow set the mouse to be connected
> to the serial port where in reality you have your modem. Check for links
> in /dev or the configuration of gpm or something similar.

char-major-10 is non-serial mice _and miscellaneous features_ (e.g. APM
BIOS and real time clock). 

I'd suggest 
alias char-major-10-??? off
^^^ minor device number.

Ray
-- 
PATRIOTISM  A great British writer once said that if he had to choose 
between betraying his country and betraying a friend he hoped he would
have the decency to betray his country.  
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .