Re: My email is rejected by some sites

2003-12-14 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Joerg Rossdeutscher:
 
 Censorship? Nonsense.

Blah, blah, blah.  *plonk*


-- 
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)   http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling 
- -


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Next On The Checklist - VNC

2003-12-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:04:23 -0800, 
Scarletdown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On 14 Dec 2003 at 11:28, Deryk Barker wrote:
 
  Thus spake Scarletdown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
  
  You need to run vncserver as that user.
  
   
   2:  The VNC session always gives me the KDE desktop.  However, I
   would like to run other desktops as well (GNOME in particular). 
   Is there any way to state which Window Manager gets used each VNC
   session?
  
  Checkout the xstartup script in the .vnc directory
  
   
   3:  My VNC desktop always comes up at 640x480.  How do I get it to
   come up at a higher resolution?  When logged into an X-Session
   directly at the console, I have 800x600 as my resolution, and my
   Windows system is set for 1024x768.
  
  vncserver -geometry 1024x768
  
 
 Okay now.  So far, I've managed to finally get a non-root KDE desktop
 set to 800x600 - 32 Bit depth.  I did indeed have to log in as a
 normal user and then start the vncserver with
 
 vncserver geometry 800x600 depth 32
 
 So I am making some headway on this project.  Now, here is what I am 
 ultimately shooting for.
 
 1:  Have vncserver load automatically at boot time with the above 
 parameters.  (800x600 is plenty suitable for my needs here) I do not
 want to have to ssh in to the system first to start the server

..you could do this the same way X is started, check in /etc/init.d/ .

..but, I don't understand why you prefer vnc over X?  Or Xnest?
If security is an issue like on internet, wrap it in a ssh pipe, works
for vnc too, and X sessions usually use port 6000-n-up, and I believe
this is useable even from M$IE, or is there a full M$ boycott on X? 

..note that X is deaf in Debian, Knoppix etc, this is set with the
nolisten option, you _may_ wanna comment out those, if you 
do, watch out on your firewalling.  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ldap based /etc/passwd with md5 vs crypt

2003-12-14 Thread hanasaki
The sarge setup supports selecting crypt for passwds in ldap.  How can 
MD5 be used?mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Orphaning of Firebird RDBMS

2003-12-14 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W licie z nie, 14-12-2003, godz. 07:21, John L. Fjellstad pisze: 
 Hi Grzegorz,
 
 I read that you might not have time to work on the maintance of the firebird 
 package.  I was wondering what kind of work is involved in maintaining a 
 debian package?

There's nothing particularry unachievable.

You don't have to be a DD but you should be willing to become one.
For more informations see 
1. http://www.debian.org/devel/join/
2. http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint

It takes a longer while to become a DD. Only DDs can upload packages.
But any DD can (theoretically) sponsor your uploads before you become
a DD. I can do this too (I am even willing to do this :)

Then in fact maintaining a package involves (no special order):
1. Making sure that the package has no (serious) bugs:
  a) by testing it yourself
  b) by solving bugs reported in BTS (http://bugs.debian.org/firebird)
  c) making sure the package abides ex. Debian Policy
  d) sometimes discussing with others best approaches in packaging
2. Uploading new versions when you're convinced they're ready for masses
3. Taking general care of package and its users (ex. answering some
random questions/inquiries from users or other developers or upstream)
4. Being nice, informative and helpful to upstream developers (ex. when
you've got a bug that's not debian-specific and you don't know how to
handle it yourself - you need to forward it upstream)
5. Paying attention to software licensing, DFSG compatibility etc. [1]
6. Improving your package and yourself beyond what's _required_ :-)

You're not alone with these tasks. Ex. altough you're not required to
subscribe to debian-devel mailing list - you'll find there a lot of
clues about usual problems, important changes under way that may affect
your package etc. You can ask on debian-newmaint mailing list (to which
you definitely should subscribe) As you'll learn during the New
Maintainer process - there are other means of getting help and
informations.

In summary: you need to want persistently :)
All the rest can be derived.

And all in all - it's a lot of fun. A lot of people to meet. A lot of
new things to learn. And a lot of satisfaction - when you have it done.

Cheers,

Grzegorz B. Prokopski

PS: I am willing to discuss these things in a more detailed way with
a person seriously interested in maintaining FB. I'll be glad to help
such a person with my knowledge. I do have some time resources to do it.

[1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines

Some other links:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/developers-reference/
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/

-- 
Grzegorz B. Prokopski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux  http://www.debian.org
SableVM - LGPLed JVM  http://www.sablevm.org


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Next On The Checklist - VNC

2003-12-14 Thread Roberto Sanchez
Nunya wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:29:59AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:

True, but there is no preservation of the session. The original
developers of VNC (Olivetti UK) wanted this feature so that people
could disconnect their viewer at work, go home, reconnect and be
exactly where they had left off.


Question: there is no way to disconnect an X Server from an X Client, 
and later attach to a different one later? that'd be a neat trick


There is an extension to the X11 protocol, I forget the exact name,
that allows just that.  You can move the client app from one
X server to another.
-Roberto


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: aic7xxx kernel freeze...

2003-12-14 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 23:44:18 +0100, 
Ignacio Más Ivars [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
 Hi all!
 
 I have a problem that is driving me crazy. I am trying install a
 custom version of the 2.4.22 kernel 

..why not your custom 2.4.23?  It _may_ have been fixed in there.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Copy all desktop settings for a new user

2003-12-14 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:41:34AM +0100, Philipp Schulte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Hello,

 lets say I have a few users (not all of them with prior GNU/Linux
 ^
 '

 experiance) and I want to setup a common profile for their accounts.
 By profile I mean things like desktop-icons, desktop-theme, menues,
 MUA-settings, browser-settings, printer ...
 
 The users will most likely either use KDE or Gnome and applications
 like Firebird, Thunderbird and OpenOffice.
 
 I would like to create a role-account, configure everything for this
 account and copy all those settings everytime a new user is created.
 I know about /etc/skel but I am not sure if it's possible to use this
 because some paths are absolute in configuration files.

What files, and what paths?

I presume you're looking for a turnkey solution of some sort.  I'm not
aware of one, though I suspect that some (much?) of the current
corporate interest in GNOME and KDE is just this capability:  rolling
out a standard profile.  To what extent have you researched this?  Your
initial post and followups don't indicate this.

I'd look myself at a divide and conquer approach:

  - What is my standard configuration?  Presumably you've got a standard
desktop config in mind.

  - What files _don't_ have personalizations in them?  These are
candidates for /etc/skel or some similar default configuration
installation library or tool.

  - What files have personalizations in them?  These need addressing
either by:

- Allowing installation with user-specific configurations, or

- Pointing personalizations at a system- (or group-) specific
  repository of configurations.  Some files may not be amenable such
  configuration.


As for _how_ to provide for user-specific configurations, what you're
essentially asking for is a templating system.  I suspect that most of
the tools you're looking at already have existing templates.  Some of
these, if well-designed, may already be configured to look at /usr/local
paths as well as /usr, for configurations, and take /usr/local by
preference.

Otherwise, one simple proxy is to substitute shell variables where
necessary for current user.  If your installation script runs as the
user in question, simply using ${USER} within the context of a shell
script or here document may be sufficient.


Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of Gestalt don't you understand?
First they came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up, because I
wasn't a Communist.  Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak
up, because I wasn't a Jew.  Then they came for the Catholics, and I
didn't speak up, because I was a Protestant.  Then they came for me,
and by that time there was no one left to speak up for me.
-- Rev. Martin Niemoller, 1945


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Next On The Checklist - VNC

2003-12-14 Thread Scarletdown
On 15 Dec 2003 at 1:28, Arnt Karlsen wrote:

 On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:04:23 -0800, 
 Scarletdown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  So I am making some headway on this project.  Now, here is what I am 
  ultimately shooting for.
  
  1:  Have vncserver load automatically at boot time with the above 
  parameters.  (800x600 is plenty suitable for my needs here) I do not
  want to have to ssh in to the system first to start the server

 ..you could do this the same way X is started, check in /etc/init.d/ .

Okay.  What should I be looking for there?

Here is what is in /etc/init.d/

README
dns-clean
inetd
mountall.sh
rc
ssh
apache
exim
inetd.real
mountnfs.sh
rcS
sysklogd
atd
fetchmail
iptables
networking
reboot
umountfs
bind9
gdm
kdm
nfs-common
rmnologin
umountnfs.sh
bootmisc.sh
gpm
keymap.sh
nfs-kernel-server
samba
urandom
checkfs.sh
halt
klogd
nviboot
sendmail
xdm
checkroot.sh
hostname.sh
lpd
omniorb-nameserver
sendsigs
xfs
console-screen.sh
hwclock.sh
lwresd
portmap
setserial
xinetd
cron
hwclockfirst.sh
makedev
ppp
single
devpts.sh
ifupdown
modutils
procps.sh
skeleton

Which of those files do I need to edit?  Or do I need to create a new 
file for vnc there?




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ICMP redirect

2003-12-14 Thread David Z Maze
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I would like to ask about the icmp messasages sending in linux
 2.4.x. I have two subnets: 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24 on the
 same ethernet segment. There is a gateway in each subnet
 (192.168.0.1 and 192.168.1.1). Clients use netmask
 255.255.255.0. Routers have their own default routes (through DSL)
 and additional route to neighboring subnet:

 For example, router on 192.168.0.1:

 ip route add 192.168.1.1 dev eth0
 ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 192.168.1.1

 The problem is that client get redirect only for 1 hop: for instance 
 192.168.0.x client accesses 192.168.1.x, receives redirect from 192.168.0.1 
 that advises to send through 192.168.1.1.

Unless I'm confused about what ip(8) does, there shouldn't be ICMP
redirects issued at all.  Reading RFC 777 makes it clear that, in this
case, a redirect is inappropriate: a message from
192.168.0.17 to 192.168.1.34 goes to 192.168.0.1 first, which forwards
it on to 192.168.1.1, but that's not on 192.168.0.0/24 and so the
source and next hop aren't on the same network.

 How can I configure routers so the clients could send traffic
 directly to each other?

You don't.  You could configure the clients so that they know they're
on both networks, though; it's probably easier if you gave each
machine an IP address on both networks so things don't get confused.

(Which leads to the question of why you're doing this.  I have
something similar set up at home, but one network gets NATted and the
other goes through an IP-over-IP tunnel.  My desktop machine has
addresses on both networks; my laptop only on the tunnelled network,
the wireless access point only on the NAT network.  I can ping the
WAP's IP address just fine, with everything going through the router,
but that's not a big deal.)

 Is it necessary to add additional address'es to gateway so they
 would have their own addresses for each subnet?

Probably wouldn't hurt; I'd guess it is necessary but can't say for
sure.  Or you could do all of this with just one gateway, still on
both networks.

-- 
David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/
Theoretical politics is interesting.  Politicking should be illegal.
-- Abra Mitchell


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT:Message to all computer vendors

2003-12-14 Thread Paul Morgan
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:26:49 -0500, alex wrote:

[snip]
 we tell which ones?  My guess is that there just hasn't been any incentive
 for manufacturers to 'bother' with even trying them on Linux.  Could it 
 be that
 they don't have any Linux knowledgeable people working for them?.
 If manufacturers were targeted with mass mailing, I'll bet you'll see  
 Wanted,
 Linux  geeks' in their hiring notices.
 
 
 Who knows, perhaps if the machines available today were tested,  there 
 might
 be many that are fully compatible with Linux.  There's no incentive to 
 do this.
 

If I were a PC manufacturer, I would answer Linux queries, I have no
reason to believe that any of my PCs are not compatible with at least one
current release of Linux, but I can't guarantee that.  I'll ship it to you
with Windows XP/2003/whatever installed, and what you do with it after you
get it is up to you. We don't currently provide Linux drivers, and we
don't provide Linux technical support.

Why would I do this?  Because more than 99% of my home PC market, and just
about 100% of my corporate business (and that's where the big bucks are)
is Windows.  I am pressured on price anyway, because I am manufacturing a
commodity, and I'm not about to significantly increase my technical
support and call center costs in order (those costs considered) to make a
loss on selling a relatively miniscule number of Linux PCs.

If, and it's still a big if, demand increases substantially for Linux
desktop PCs, then I will be inclined to reconsider, as I am already doing
with my medium-size corporate server business.

And that is, unfortunately, the way it is in a free market economy.

In any case, it's not hard to determine beforehand whether a PC will run
Linux.  Or to build your own with Linux in mind.

-- 
paul

Do the little things (Gwnewch y pethau bychain)

St. David (Dewi Sant) of Wales, last sermon, Sunday 27th February 589



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: yet another NVIDIA problem (4496)

2003-12-14 Thread Stewart Jenkins
On Saturday 13 December 2003 02:05, Paul Johnson wrote:

 That is the crap driver I'm talking about.  BTW, you can get it easier
 with apt...the nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx packages are it.

snip

Interesting.  I had lots of problems with the two debian packages, but have 
had rock solid performance from the downloaded drivers from Nvidia.  This 
backward than what is usual in the Debian community.

-- 

Stewart...



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Next On The Checklist - VNC

2003-12-14 Thread Johann Koenig
On Sunday December 14 at 07:33pm
Roberto Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nunya wrote:
  On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:29:59AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
  
 True, but there is no preservation of the session. The original
 developers of VNC (Olivetti UK) wanted this feature so that people
 could disconnect their viewer at work, go home, reconnect and be
 exactly where they had left off.
  
  
  Question: there is no way to disconnect an X Server from an X
  Client, and later attach to a different one later? that'd be a neat
  trick
  
  
 
 There is an extension to the X11 protocol, I forget the exact name,
 that allows just that.  You can move the client app from one
 X server to another.

xmove and teleport are packages designed to do that sort of thing, but I
haven't had any luck getting either one working.
-- 
-johann koenig
Now Playing: The Allman Brothers Band - Sailin' 'Cross The Devil's Sea :
An Evening With The Allman Brothers Band (2nd Set)
Today is Pungenday, the 56th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3169
My public pgp key: http://mental-graffiti.com/pgp/johannkoenig.pgp


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: My email is rejected by some sites

2003-12-14 Thread Wesley J Landaker
On Sunday 14 December 2003 2:37 pm, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
 Am So, den 14.12.2003 schrieb Al Davis um 17:21:
  On Thursday 11 December 2003 03:56 pm, Joerg Rossdeutscher
 
  wrote:
   Yes, many ISPs do that, and it's a good thing.
   We all would drown in spam if they accepted mail from
   everywhere. There is absolutely nothing you can do except to
   use your providers mailserver.
 
  On Saturday 13 December 2003 04:46 am, Joerg Rossdeutscher
 
  wrote:
   It is a good thing. What kind of mail comes from dynamic IPs?
   In 99% it will be spam from open relays, misconfigured
   adresses ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),...
  
   .. Not everyone should use a private
   mailserver. Hobbyists and Freaks should not run such service,
   it's a job for professionals, and those have a static ip. I'm
   really tired of writing a lot in mailinglists an get lots of
   You mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] could not be delivered...
 
  So you believe the ISP should censor our mail, or at least be
  given the opportunity?  You believe that Hobbyists and Freaks
  especially need for their mail to be subject to screening, but
  corporations don't?

 Censorship? Nonsense.

 Running and maintaining a mailserver is a difficult job. Incorrect
 configured mailservers can cause a lot of problems to others. So
 everyone should be forced to use a providers machine as smarthost.

Running and maintaing software is a difficult job. Incorrect configured 
software can cause a lot of problems to others. So everyone should be 
forced to use a providers machine to run software.

 If your provider filters mail, adds advertisings etc... blame the
 provider. Choose another. We don't talk about modifying content.

If your provider filters your software use, adds advertising etc... 
blame the provider. Choose another. We don't talk about modifying 
content.

 Examples:
 My provider allows just some thousand mails to be sent (sent! Not
 received!). This is a lot more I can write, but whenever I cause a
 mailloop it will not be endless.

Examples:
My provide allows just some thousand programs to be used (used! Not 
looked at!). This is a lot more I can use, but whenever I cause a crash 
it will not be fatal.

 Whenever I misconfigure my MUA and send mail with an invalid Reply-To
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) my provider will not deliver the mail.

Whenever I misconfigure my preferences and use an invalid Menu command 
(File-Save As...) my provider will not save the file.

 If I misconfigure my machine as an open relay and someone sends lots
 of spammails from my machine, a lot of providers will not accept that
 mail. And if I configured it to use my providers smarthost after some
 thousand mails my providers stops it, see example 1.

If I misconfigure my machine with users having no passwords and someone 
runs lots of annoying programs from my machine, a lot of providers will 
not accept those packets.

 Local mailservers are childish, dangerous and nonsense.

Local software is childish, dangerous and nonsense.

-- 
Wesley J. Landaker - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094  0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2



pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


gethostbyname() always does DNS lookup when DISPLAY is set

2003-12-14 Thread Frank Dekervel
hello,

i'm facing a really weird problem on my machine. when doing telnet localhost 
my machine always does a DNS lookup even if

- host.conf: order hosts, bind
- nsswitch.conf: hosts: files dns
- localhost is defined in /etc/hosts

now, if i do 'unset DISPLAY' this behaviour goes magically away ...

- DISPLAY not set - network not touched
- DISPLAY=:displaynum - dns lookup made
- DISPLAY=host:displaynum - network not touched

this looks extremely weird to me: dns does not have anything to do with X, 
does it ? also, on the debian machine of a friend i cannot trigger this 
behaviour, even with identical /etc/hosts, /etc/host.conf, /etc/
resolv.conf, /etc/nsswitch.conf

this is very annoying too, since when the network is down, starting KDE/gnome 
apps takes ages (it takes as long as a DNS timeout)

another very weird thing: on my system, by default, libraries come from 
/lib/tls, on my friends system they come from /lib. ld.so.conf is identical. 
moving away /lib/tls has no effect on the dns lookup behaviour.

Someone knows what could be the origin of this problem ? and somebody knows 
what /lib/tls is for ?

thanks,
greetings,
frank


-- 
Frank Dekervel
Mechelsestraat 88
3000 Leuven
[EMAIL PROTECTED], (nieuw) 0473/94.34.21


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: How to know correct hardware options for compiling 2.4.23 kernel

2003-12-14 Thread Kenward Vaughan
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:49:29AM -0600, J N wrote:
 ... I'm noticing that I appear to need to know more specific technical 
 information than I currently have access to for my laptop: Dell Latitude 
 CPI-A 366XT.  Can anyone point me to a FAQ that would tell me what kind 
 of chipsets were in the machine (such as FLASH chipsets), or the type of 
 IDE controller that was in use, etc?  I've read the online help, which 
 would be most helpful if I knew what was under the hood...

http://www.dell.com ???  They still had my old 486 on site...


Kenward
-- 
In a completely rational society, the best of us would aspire to be 
_teachers_ and the rest of us would have to settle for something less, 
because passing civilization along from one generation to the next 
ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone 
could have. - Lee Iacocca


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PDF spec (Was: Re: ooh! debian jewelry)

2003-12-14 Thread Monique Y. Herman
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 at 15:54 GMT, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) penned:
 On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 14:08:21 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
 Hrm, I could have sworn that PDF was a spec published by Adobe and
 freely usable, but google seems to disagree.
 
 Google isn't quite the all-seeing eye yet. 
 
 http://partners.adobe.com/asn/tech/pdf/specifications.jsp has e.g.
 the PDF Reference, Fourth Edition, Version 1.5 (1172 pages). xpdf
 seems to handle the Acrobat 5 version of it just fine.
 
 HTH, Ray


Thank you!

-- 
monique


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Applications are too big

2003-12-14 Thread Monique Y. Herman
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 at 08:02 GMT, Mark Healey penned:
 On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 00:31:03 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
 
Are you running X directly from x/k/gdm?
 
 gdm,  for some reason the install procedure didn't have a console
 login option.  I'd like to hace a console login screen.


There have been a number of threads here recently on how to disable
g/k/xdm ... they were all pretty explicit.  I'd recommend checking back
over the last week or two's posts.

Anyway, if you do disable the display manager, you can instead run
startx.  It's pretty verbose as it's starting up, so it may give you
some hints.

 
 
 
 - Please leave this.  It is a
 filter term.  ferulebezel -
 Mark Healey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't bothor CCing or emailing
 this address.  Since spammers seem to be harvesting this list anything
 that doesn't come from the list server is assumed to be spam and
 deleted.  ASUS A87V8X mobo w AMD Athalon Broadcom 4401 onboard nic
 with static IP Address ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Video card.  Sampo
 Alphascan 17mx monitor using the vesa module
 
 


-- 
monique


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Kernel options - how to determine which are needed?

2003-12-14 Thread Steve Lamb
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..shorewall is neat.  Using the webmin gui module?
Nope, editing the configuration file by hand.

..if you're a iptables newbie fresh from the ipchains bronze age world,
just make sure you understand the subtle new meanings to a few
things in iptables.  ;-)
Heh, I never got into either of them more than the basics needed to get 
IPMASQing up and running.  I let shorewall take care of the details and learn 
how to get the basic stuff I need done with it's syntax.

--
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
   PGP Key: 8B6E99C5   | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Earthlink and Swen

2003-12-14 Thread Steve Lamb
Kevin Mark wrote:
more viruses, more cpu time, more MONEY. Its always money in the end.
snip
Well, not always money.  Money is the final factor, to be sure, but I can 
say with a resonable level of assurance that there are other factors.  Factors 
such as space and power.  Granted one can get more space and power by forking 
out more money but no matter how much money one throws at those problems it 
doesn't drop the amount of time it would take to bring up an accepteble space 
for computers with a reliable source of power and cooling.

--
 Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
   PGP Key: 8B6E99C5   | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: software raid

2003-12-14 Thread Antony Gelberg
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 07:43:31PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
 
 hi ya lucas
 
 On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote:
 
  I've been trying to get debian stable working with software raid using
  various documentation.
 
 collection of um
   http://www.1U-Raid5.net
 
  If you can think of any good software raid (running on your root partition)
  documentation for debian STABLE please send it over.
 
 good sw raid is already part of the linux kernel..
 you dont need anything else ... other than to turn on the raid options
 in the kernel  and create your raid config files

I've been wondering about this.  We have a server with a Asus A7N8X
mobo, which has the Silicon Image SATA RAID.  I couldn't get the kernel
module to recognise the HW RAID array when it was set up in the BIOS.

I finished up only using one drive until we got to the bottom of the
problem (clue: we never did).  Using Linux SW RAID, can I create a
RAID-1 array using my existing single partition ext3 disk and one
other without losing all my existing data?

A


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Next On The Checklist - VNC

2003-12-14 Thread Antony Gelberg
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 06:59:58PM -0800, Scarletdown wrote:
 Okay, I just installed the VNC package and successfully accessed a KDE 
 desktop from my Windows-98 system.  And I must say, I became instantly 
 enamored with VNC.  However, I now have a bunch of questions.
snip

I suggest you peruse the documentation in /usr/share/doc/vncserver.
Especially the README.inetd file.

A


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



can't logout on consoles

2003-12-14 Thread Shawn Lamson
Hello -

Recently I have experienced that when logging out on a console the
message logout appears and the session hangs there.  The screen
accepts keypresses and I can CTRL+ALT+F7 back to an XSession.  The
logout just seems to hang indefinitely.  Happens on exit or logout
for all users, including root.

I don't recall this being related to any upgrade.  Anyone have a clue
for me?

TIA

Shawn Lamson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PDF spec (Was: Re: ooh! debian jewelry)

2003-12-14 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
Monique posts:

 I could have sworn that PDF  was a spec published by Adobe and freely
 usable, but google seems to disagree

Should  the PDF  format be  used  and recommended  by governments?   The
Govt. of India is calling for opinions and this link is interesting

http://gnu.org.in/philosophy/mitrules.html

-- 
ragOO
http://puggy.symonds.net/~fsug-kochi  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Easing the load.

2003-12-14 Thread ben_foley
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:36:05AM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
 On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 19:35:58 +
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
[huge snippage]
  very disappointed to see anyone receive those as a response to a
  genuine query on this list. while independent inititiative is well
  recommended, the latent discouragement in that response is not
  reflective of this community and would do it no positive service
  whatsoever.
  
  ben
 
 Thank you, Ben, but that is actually an incorrect attribution that you
 are referring to.
 These three points were all the recourse that Paul Morgan was prepared
 to concede to a Debian sys. admin in trouble.
 The point I made in the original post was in accord with your statement
 with the endorsement of the community factor.
 Regards,
 
 David.
 
apologies for the false attribution. the poster i was responding to
didn't take care to properly quote.

ben


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: My Debian box can't connect Internet

2003-12-14 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi Paul,

Thanks for your advice.

On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 04:13, Paul Johnson wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:54:22PM +0800, Stephen Liu wrote:
  # cat /etc/resolv.conf 
  search domain.com\000 
  nameserver 192.168.2.1 
 
 Ah ha!  You might try adding a nameserver on the outside or make sure
 that nameserver is able to get a connection to the outside world.

That is the original 'resolv.conf' file.  I have not touched it and also
I was not allowed to alter this file even as ROOT.  This was very
strange to me.  The said file can be opened with a Text editor, 'nano'
or 'kedit', and editing also allowed.  'Saving changes' to the file was
not allowed.  You can save the file but it only retains its original
content.

If no solution found then I think I have to make another clean
installation of Debian 3.0 again.  I will use net-installation.  I am
connecting to broadband of 3MB bandwidth.  If it is not installing from
source code, like Gentoo 1.4, the download time won't be long and I can
have the maybe uptodate packages.

B.R.
Stephen




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: scott wiseman is pissing me off

2003-12-14 Thread ben_foley
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:10:54AM -0800, Scott M. Wiseman wrote:
 To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 Subject: RESUME - Client Development Specialist for Technology firms
 
 IF this resume reaches you in Error. 
 
 Please forward to your Human Resources Department
 
  
 
  
 
 Resume
 
  
 
 Scott Wiseman
 13428 Maxella Ave Ste 207
 Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
 310-967-4593
 

this wanker has surely proved his incompetence to such a degree that it
seems entirely justified to feed the web with sufficient evidence to
ensure that any employer who values intelligence rejects his
application. as for the others, please hire this fool so that the rest
of us can be spared witnessing his unwitting self-immolation.

ben


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: can't logout on consoles

2003-12-14 Thread Shawn Lamson
On Sun, December 14 at 10:44 PM EST
Shawn Lamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello -

Recently I have experienced that when logging out on a console the
message logout appears and the session hangs there.  The screen
accepts keypresses and I can CTRL+ALT+F7 back to an XSession.  The
logout just seems to hang indefinitely.  Happens on exit or logout
for all users, including root.

I don't recall this being related to any upgrade.  Anyone have a clue
for me?

replying to my own post.  Still need help but at least I realized that
the problem is actually with the new getty (i think)... after the
logout/exit hangs for a while I will get a ID 5: getty respawning too
fast stopping for 5 minutes type of message.  If I mark the tty in
question off in inittab and run telinit q as root, then make it
respawn again and rerun telinit q - I often, but not always, get a
login back.  I get the stall no matter what user logs out, but it is
much worse on the console I use to startx.. I background X and logout,
this is the one that hangs irreparably.  

Still need help,

Shawn Lamson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



hard drive recognition for 2.4.16 kernels

2003-12-14 Thread TJ Sellari

I've been trying without success to run 2.4.22, 2.4.23, or 2.6.0 kernels on Sarge. The 
problem seems to be that they see my hard drive as hda rather than as hde.

2.4.16 (and Windows XP) sees the drive as hde, as do several versions of tomsrtbt and 
Knoppix, and they all boot with no problems.

The drive is a Maxtor 6Y080L0 ATA.

Using devfs, the drive is /dev/ide/host2/bus0/target0/lun0 on 2.4.16, but 
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0 on the newer kernels.

Error messages vary depending on the kernels, but they all end with:

mount: /dev2/boot2 is not a valid block device

/sbin/init: 338: cannot open dev/console: No such file

Then the kernel panics.

Any suggestions?


Tom


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: My email is rejected by some sites

2003-12-14 Thread ben_foley
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:41:59PM +0100, Magnus von Koeller wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
 On Sunday 14 December 2003 17:21, Al Davis wrote:
  It is worth putting up with some spam to get a free, uncensored,
  fast email system.
 
 Free, uncensored and worthless would be a better description for my 
 email account if it wasn't for my Spam filtering - considering that 
 95% of my email is Spam.
 
i'm old enough to remember the first spam that ever happened, from a
husband/wife team of lawyers who proposed immigration solutions for
those who came from south of the u.s. border. at that time, everyone on
the web reacted negatively, and, yet, we're still stuck with the same
drivel, though, now, en masse. government regulation is, as always, a
joke. unilateral censorship of undesired email is the only means
that makes sense. thanks be to those who enable the means. i'd rather
prime my own filter(s) than have it done by whatever rote appeals my
isp. even on a per-minute dialup.

ben


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Linux is not for consumers!

2003-12-14 Thread jerry garcia
On Thursday 11 December 2003 12:26 pm, David Baron wrote:
 Problems persist and have gotten nowhere!

 1. Connecting ADSL -- edited everything including ppp_on_boot,
 dsl_provider, pap_secrets, all that stuff. No go. Running pon ppp_on_boot
 gives me a bad tdb and quits. The only tdb reference is from Openoffice so
 is irrelevant here. (All of the little utilities for adding connections
 assume dialups. Windows has a virtual VPN adapter to handle that--says it's
 dialing but it ain't.)

 I am using an Alcatal speedtouch-home modem connected to a T100 card which
 is correctly detected and configured. Can ping the modem 10.0.0.138 and the
 computer 10.200.1.1. I can even get into the modem's own configuration page
 (use at your own risk as we have said!).

 2. Running Java stuff--Open office works. I installed netbeans (a Java
 programming IDE) but cannot get it to run.

 3. The Adobe Acrobat reader looks gosh-awful. Like Windows 2! I have a
 version 5.08 linux distribution--maybe this will look better?

 4. Oldie-but-goody hardware which I really would like to use:

 sw60xg MIDI sound generator--no IRQ, no DMA, just a port address. This card
 should be accessable from MPU401 (done this way under W2K). That driver is
 there but I havent the foggiest on how to get it running and set it up. I
 would then like to control it through a WINE session (lot's of luck!).

 USB -- have a roland MIDI device on this, correctly detected but not shown
 on KINFO. This is of recent vintage and there should be some way of using
 it. I also need some sort of hot-plug support for a development project
 on which I am working, also in various windows flavors.

 dman2044 audio interface -- PCI, IRQ11--the linux detects that as an AGOSP
 Maestro card. There are no linux or even modern windows (W2K, XP) drivers
 around for this--have to do my production work in Win98. I have an old
 pro-audio16 clunker, an ISA card but I think Linux will support that one
 for listening to MP3s or CDs (I havent even tried them yet!).

 Davicom32 Fax modem -- ISA, detected. Fairly standard and NOT a win modem
 (these have never worked on this computer for whatever reason). Haven't the
 foggiest how to set up KFax or anything else to use this modem. IRQ5, I
 believe, sitting on COM3. Suppose I could try talking to it through KPPP.

 I would like to go over to Linux for everything except music production
 (since there is no appropriate software yet).


I also am subscribed here

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

go here to subscribe

http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Hope that helps!

jaz



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Next On The Checklist - VNC

2003-12-14 Thread Nate Duehr
On Sunday 14 December 2003 10:56 pm, Scarletdown wrote:

 Oh, and after looking at everything I posted above here, I am now
 wondering...  Since the lines added to /etc/inetd.conf call Xvnc, is it
 possible that I am calling up the wrong server when I test this stuff
 manually?  I've been using vncserver :59xx...

Yes.  The 59X0 correlates on most platforms to :0, 59X1 = :1, etc.

-- 
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: can't logout on consoles

2003-12-14 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
Shawn posts:

 experienced that when  logging out on a console  the message logout
 appears and the session hangs

Have had a similar experience after upgrading `util-linux'.  The package
util-linux  supplies getty, getty  is the  culprit here  as it  does not
immediately free the tty after logout. 


 don't recall this  being related to any upgrade.   Anyone have a clue
 for me? 

I recall this being related to an `util-linux' upgrade.  Downgraded
util-linux to  2.12-3 (sarge's  version) and now  all is  normal.  Maybe
bsdutils and mount should also be downgraded.

Hack getty!
-- 
ragOO
http://puggy.symonds.net/~fsug-kochi  


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



kernel expolit. is 2.4.18-bf2.4 affected?

2003-12-14 Thread Paul William
Hi all,

Is the stock woody 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel affected by the kernel exploit
that was used to attack the debian.org servers? If it is affected then
what kernel is safe? 

Thanks

Paul
-- 

 .''`. Paul William
: :'  :Debian admin and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Trying to boot after Debian installer ran

2003-12-14 Thread Damon L. Chesser
I have run the debian installer, installed a base system, chose the 
default LILO install choice.  The installer did NOT wright (I watched 
the drive light to verify this, it SHOULD have written) to the disk, 
system re-booted.  I have mounted the Debian partitions to examine 
them.  Debian root = hdb6 with /boot as a sub dir.  Here is the contents 
of Debian /boot:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/Debianboot/boot$ ls -l
total 4568
-rw-r--r--1 root root   518609 Oct  3 23:59 
System.map-2.4.22-1-386
-rw-r--r--1 root root  512 Dec 14 09:46 boot.0340
-rw-r--r--1 root root42261 Sep 27 03:17 config-2.4.22-1-386
-rw-r--r--1 root root  3264512 Dec 14 09:45 
initrd.img-2.4.22-1-386
-rw---1 root root53760 Dec 14 09:46 map
-rw-r--r--1 root root   769886 Oct  3 23:59 vmlinuz-2.4.22-1-386

Here is my grub menu.lst:

titleLibranet GNU/Linux, kernel 2.4.23 NEW
root(hd0,5)
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.23 root=/dev/hda6 ro hdc=scsi hdd=scsi  
vga=792
savedefault
boot

titleLibranet GNU/Linux, kernel 2.4.23 (single user mode)
root(hd0,5)
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.23 root=/dev/hda6 ro hdc=scsi hdd=scsi 
single
savedefault
boot

titleDebian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.4.22-1-386
root(hd1,5)
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1-386 root=/dev/hdb6 ro hdc=scsi 
hdd=scsi 
savedefault
boot

The above Debain GNU/Linux entry will boot, but stops with an error 
message cant find image, please amend root= entry to the correct root 
image  or words to that effect.   Here is the question:

Given the above, how can I get Debian to boot?  cd into the Debain / 
(while running Libranet) and run lilo?  Modify in some unknown to me way 
the above grub entry?

I have removed the hdc=scsi entries.  I have changed values for (hd1,5) 
and /dev/hdb6 on the chance that my understanding was flawed.  I have 
found a different source for the iso image and downloaded/burned/loaded 
it. 

The Installer worked very well, except it seems to fail in allowing me 
access to my new shiny base system!!!  Talk about security!  The distro 
was sarge, ext3 was chosen for file systems, hdb6 /, hdb7 /home, hdb5 
/var (as reiserfs).  All partitions seem written to with out errors (as 
checked out from Libranet).

--
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Trying to boot after Debian installer ran

2003-12-14 Thread panda
Damon L. Chesser wrote:
I have run the debian installer, installed a base system, chose the 
default LILO install choice.  The installer did NOT wright (I watched 
the drive light to verify this, it SHOULD have written) to the disk, 
system re-booted.  I have mounted the Debian partitions to examine 
them.  Debian root = hdb6 with /boot as a sub dir.  Here is the contents 
of Debian /boot:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/Debianboot/boot$ ls -l
total 4568
-rw-r--r--1 root root   518609 Oct  3 23:59 
System.map-2.4.22-1-386
-rw-r--r--1 root root  512 Dec 14 09:46 boot.0340
-rw-r--r--1 root root42261 Sep 27 03:17 config-2.4.22-1-386
-rw-r--r--1 root root  3264512 Dec 14 09:45 
initrd.img-2.4.22-1-386
-rw---1 root root53760 Dec 14 09:46 map
-rw-r--r--1 root root   769886 Oct  3 23:59 
vmlinuz-2.4.22-1-386

Here is my grub menu.lst:

titleLibranet GNU/Linux, kernel 2.4.23 NEW
root(hd0,5)
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.23 root=/dev/hda6 ro hdc=scsi hdd=scsi  
vga=792
savedefault
boot

titleLibranet GNU/Linux, kernel 2.4.23 (single user mode)
root(hd0,5)
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.23 root=/dev/hda6 ro hdc=scsi hdd=scsi 
single
savedefault
boot

titleDebian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.4.22-1-386
root(hd1,5)
kernel/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1-386 root=/dev/hdb6 ro hdc=scsi 
hdd=scsi savedefault
boot

The above Debain GNU/Linux entry will boot, but stops with an error 
message cant find image, please amend root= entry to the correct root 
image  or words to that effect.   Here is the question:

Given the above, how can I get Debian to boot?  cd into the Debain / 
(while running Libranet) and run lilo?  Modify in some unknown to me way 
the above grub entry?

I have removed the hdc=scsi entries.  I have changed values for (hd1,5) 
and /dev/hdb6 on the chance that my understanding was flawed.  I have 
found a different source for the iso image and downloaded/burned/loaded it.
The Installer worked very well, except it seems to fail in allowing me 
access to my new shiny base system!!!  Talk about security!  The distro 
was sarge, ext3 was chosen for file systems, hdb6 /, hdb7 /home, hdb5 
/var (as reiserfs).  All partitions seem written to with out errors (as 
checked out from Libranet).

Hi,

I don't know much about this. I used to have some similar problems which 
were solved by using the idebus option while booting

I used idebus=66

U might need to check the boot options for ur specific coniguration.

panda

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Trying to boot after Debian installer ran

2003-12-14 Thread Damon L. Chesser
On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 16:16, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Snip

This got it going: (grub menu.lst of Libranet)

title   Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.4.22-1-386
root(hd1,5)
kernel  /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1-386 root=/dev/hdb6 ro hdc=scsi hdd=scsi  
initrd=/boot/initrd.img-2.4.22-1-386 **this line WAS missning and
adding it makes it work
savedefault
boot


 

 -- 
 Damon L. Chesser
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Next On The Checklist - VNC

2003-12-14 Thread Scarletdown
On 14 Dec 2003 at 23:14, Nate Duehr wrote:

 On Sunday 14 December 2003 10:56 pm, Scarletdown wrote:
 
  Oh, and after looking at everything I posted above here, I am now
  wondering...  Since the lines added to /etc/inetd.conf call Xvnc, is it
  possible that I am calling up the wrong server when I test this stuff
  manually?  I've been using vncserver :59xx...
 
 Yes.  The 59X0 correlates on most platforms to :0, 59X1 = :1, etc.

What I meant was, should I be using Xvnc :59xx instead of vncserver 
:59xx?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



<    1   2   3   4