Re: Firefox no longer able to play videos on Facebook
On 10/03/2018 04:49 AM, John Crawley wrote: The extended support firefox-esr is available in Debian Stretch (not Buster atm) at version 60.2.1, so enabling sid is not necessary: Thanks. Brads solution worked nicely. Neither Sid or Stretch were enabled, so one or the other... Although, nice to know for another time, if a Sid would require multiple dependencies. ~Per
Re: Burn Blu-Ray video on Linux
On 10/02/2018 09:02 PM, Bob McGowan wrote: Hi, I have a high def (4K) mp4 video I would like to put on a Blu-Ray disk, to play in a standard Blu-Ray player. So I did the Google search and found several posts, all of which mentioned an application tsMuxeR, which is available for Linux and is in the Debian repos. However, it is a 32 bit application, but hey, no problem, I have multi-arch configured, and I've been able to run some 32 bit apps without issues. Except this one. The ldd command (is it ok to use the 64 bit command on a 32 bit binary?) says the file is "not a dynamic executable", yet when I run it, it complains about libraries not being found (which probably answers the question about ldd): tsMuxeR: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6: But: $ find /usr/lib* -name libstdc++\* /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/libstdc++fs.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/libstdc++.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/libstdc++.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.22 /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.22 /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 /usr/libx32/libstdc++.so.6.0.22 /usr/libx32/libstdc++.so.6 Only one directory in the above with 32 bit, so I tried adding it to LD_LIBRARY_PATH: $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/libx32 tsMuxeR tsMuxeR: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6: No joy. And there is no file matching libstdc++.so.6 in /lib* or /usr/local/lib, either Have I misconfigured something with multi-arch? Is there a bug I couldn't find a reference too? Any help or suggestions on other software to try? Thanks, Bob This package? https://packages.debian.org/sid/libstdc++6 -- Jimmy Johnson Devuan Jessie - KDE 4.14.2 - AMD E2-6110 EXT4 at sda1 Registered Linux User #380263
Burn Blu-Ray video on Linux
Hi, I have a high def (4K) mp4 video I would like to put on a Blu-Ray disk, to play in a standard Blu-Ray player. So I did the Google search and found several posts, all of which mentioned an application tsMuxeR, which is available for Linux and is in the Debian repos. However, it is a 32 bit application, but hey, no problem, I have multi-arch configured, and I've been able to run some 32 bit apps without issues. Except this one. The ldd command (is it ok to use the 64 bit command on a 32 bit binary?) says the file is "not a dynamic executable", yet when I run it, it complains about libraries not being found (which probably answers the question about ldd): tsMuxeR: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6: But: $ find /usr/lib* -name libstdc++\* /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/libstdc++fs.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/libstdc++.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/libstdc++.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.22 /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6.0.22 /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 /usr/libx32/libstdc++.so.6.0.22 /usr/libx32/libstdc++.so.6 Only one directory in the above with 32 bit, so I tried adding it to LD_LIBRARY_PATH: $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/libx32 tsMuxeR tsMuxeR: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.6: No joy. And there is no file matching libstdc++.so.6 in /lib* or /usr/local/lib, either Have I misconfigured something with multi-arch? Is there a bug I couldn't find a reference too? Any help or suggestions on other software to try? Thanks, Bob
Re: Firefox no longer able to play videos on Facebook
On 02/10/2018 16.37, Brad Rogers wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:17:52 +0200 Per Dalgas Jakobsen wrote: Hello Per, Until a few days ago, Firefox played videos on Facebook without issues, v52 is too old. IDK whether it's being blocked, or sites are using features not available in v52. This issue affects not only FB, but also Spotify and an increasing number of other sites. Unfortunately, Ff migration from sid to testing is being blocked ATM. Easiest solution is (temporarily) add sid as a repo and install Ff 60.2. Once you're done, remove sid as a repo so you don't end up with anything unwanted added to your system. The extended support firefox-esr is available in Debian Stretch (not Buster atm) at version 60.2.1, so enabling sid is not necessary: https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=all=all=any=names=firefox-esr -- John
[SOLUCIONADO] Fail2ban y expresión regular
Hola Julher. Me funcionó perfecto, muchas gracias por tu ayuda !!! Había que ir a lo más sencillo vergüenza me da :P Muchas gracias nuevamente. Saludos. Diego. El mar., 2 oct. 2018 a las 10:28, escribió: > > El lun, 01-10-2018 a las 22:12 -0300, Diego H. Cancelo escribió: > > Buenas... > > Estoy renegando con fail2ban y las expresiones regulares (no son mi > > fuerte), a ver si alguien me puede tirar una mano. > > Estuve mirando varias paginas y los filtros ya creados en el servicio > > para tomarlos como referencia pero no doy en la tecla. > > Tengo varios logs como estos que genero mediante IPTABLES: > > > > Sep 27 17:50:03 vps371545 kernel: [157374.491843] Flood detectado: > > IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:16:3e:fb:99:f2:00:0c:db:4b:fd:00:08:00 > > SRC=139.99.118.123 DST=69.61.93.33 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=119 > > ID=15669 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=45161 DPT=80 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN > > URGP=0 > > > > En jail.conf tengo: > > > > [flooddetectado] > > enabled = true > > port = all > > filter = flooddetectado > > logpath = /var/log/messages > > maxretry = 10 > > action = iptables-allports[name=flooddetectado, > > port="22,25,80,443", > > protocol=tcp] > > > > y en los filtros, dentro de flooddetectado.conf : > > > > [Definition] > > failregex = ^Flood\ detectado:\ IN=*\ OUT\=\ MAC=*\ SRC=$ > > Intenta con algo más simple, por ejemplo: > > failregex = Flood detectado: .* SRC= .*$ > > Un saludo > > JulHer > >
Re: Thunderbird 60 ignores LC_TIME environment variable
On 2018-10-02 3:07 p.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 02:47:52PM -0400, Ken Heard wrote: $ LC_TIME=de_DE.utf8 thunderbird This command doesn't work for me. You have to generate the locales that you want to use. dpkg-reconfigure locales > Check it by running "locale -a" to see which locales are available on your system. I had long since already done that. Among the available locales was and still is en_DK.utf8. Ken
Re: Thunderbird 60 ignores LC_TIME environment variable
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 02:47:52PM -0400, Ken Heard wrote: > > > > $ LC_TIME=de_DE.utf8 thunderbird > > This command doesn't work for me. You have to generate the locales that you want to use. dpkg-reconfigure locales Check it by running "locale -a" to see which locales are available on your system.
Re: Thunderbird 60 ignores LC_TIME environment variable
On 2018-08-20 3:27 p.m., Stefan Pietsch wrote: On 20.08.18 11:57, Curt wrote: On 2018-08-20, Stefan Pietsch wrote: Dear list, after the upgrade from Thunderbird 52.9.1 to 60.0 (Debian sid) it seems for me that the environment variable LC_TIME is ignored. I used the following command to set 24h time format in Thunderbird. $ LC_TIME=de_DE.utf8 thunderbird This command doesn't work for me. With Thunderbird 60 setting the LC_TIME or LANG variables will not help. Can someone confirm this? I can't confirm anything but this bug report https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1426907 looks both pertinent, and, after a cursory read (recent posts re 60 toward the bottom), discouraging concerning your plight (at least for the moment). Thanks for the hint to that bug id. I had to set the "Date and Time Formatting" option (exists since TB version 56) in the Advanced Preferences AND the variable LC_TIME when starting Thunderbird to get it working. Regards, Stefan The date and time option for me has two choices: Application locale: English (United States) Regional settings locale: English (Canada) The result for me is the same for both. It is the ISO 8601 format for the date, but for time the format is 12 hour plus AM/PM. How did you manage to the ISO 8601 time format be setting the LV_TIME format? Regards, Ken
Re: filigranes avec imagemagick
- Mail original - > De: "Bernard Schoenacker" > À: "ML Debian User French" > Envoyé: Mardi 2 Octobre 2018 19:11:38 > Objet: filigranes avec imagemagick > > bonjour, > > je rechercher la fonction me permettant de mettre des > filigranes dans une image > > > #!/bin/bash > for each in *.jpg > do > convert $each -size 10x20 xc:White -background White -append > -gravity SouthEast -font NewCenturySchlbk-Italic -pointsize 18 > -draw "text 5,5 'Tu écrit ton texte ici '" $each > done > > > source : > https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=301750 > > > comment faire pour avoir le texte en filigrane à 45° avec une police > cursive > > merci > slt > bernard bonjour, j'ai retrouvé un exemple : https://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/annotating/#wmark_text reste plus qu'à l'orienter à 45° avec une police cursive merci slt bernard
Re: Firefox no longer able to play videos on Facebook
Sven Joachim wrote: > the issue is that Firefox 52 is not compatible with FFmpeg 4.0 > (libavcodec58). As a result, there is no H.264 support which breaks > video playback on numerous sites. The same appears to be valid for Seamonkey. Its latest version 2.49.4 works fine in stable (FFmpeg 3.2), but in testing (FFmpeg 4.0) it has trouble with html5 audio and video. For me, this unofficial build, version 2.53, solved it: www.wg9s.com/comm-253/
filigranes avec imagemagick
bonjour, je rechercher la fonction me permettant de mettre des filigranes dans une image #!/bin/bash for each in *.jpg do convert $each -size 10x20 xc:White -background White -append -gravity SouthEast -font NewCenturySchlbk-Italic -pointsize 18 -draw "text 5,5 'Tu écrit ton texte ici '" $each done source : https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=301750 comment faire pour avoir le texte en filigrane à 45° avec une police cursive merci slt bernard
Re: Syncing GnuPG between 2 system
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:11:32PM +0100, mick crane wrote: > On 2018-09-30 18:39, deloptes wrote: > > >Here is something I do not get - to encrypt I am asked for password - I > >guess it is for my secret key, no? > > with the mail GPG plugin I never use but tested between 2 email > identities. > you can choose to generate a passphrase when you first make key pair > to encrypt you use the recipient public key and to decrypt they > enter their passphrase To complete this: your private key is stored in an encrypted form: this is to reduce possible damage should anyone with access to your data to steal your private key (they'd need the passphrase for it). If your account is compromised, you have at least the time to revoke your key while "they" brute-force its encryption... You have the revocation key, don't you? Cheers -- tomás signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: WPA error: TLS Alert write:fatal:protocol version
Hi, On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:08:41PM +0200, Pétùr wrote: > On debian sid, I have the following error when trying to connect to a WPA2 > Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with : > > Tue Oct 2 14:07:43 2018 : Error: TLS Alert write:fatal:protocol version > Tue Oct 2 14:07:43 2018 : Error: rlm_eap: SSL error error:1408F10B:SSL > routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number > Tue Oct 2 14:07:43 2018 : Error: SSL: SSL_read failed in a system call (-1), > TLS session fails. > Tue Oct 2 14:07:43 2018 : Auth: Login incorrect (TLS Alert > write:fatal:protocol version): [lo...@myuniversity.com] OpenSSL 1.1.1, and pretty much everything using it, is now disabling TLS 1.1 by default. That's probably what you see here, and it means that your RADIUS server supports only deprecated TLS versions. You can enable TLS 1.1 in your wpa_supplicant config, but the real fix is to enable TLS 1.2 on your RADIUS server. That has been enabled by default in freeradius in Debian since at least jessie, to give you an idea of how outdated the setup is ;). -nik signature.asc Description: PGP signature
WPA error: TLS Alert write:fatal:protocol version
On debian sid, I have the following error when trying to connect to a WPA2 Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with : Tue Oct 2 14:07:43 2018 : Error: TLS Alert write:fatal:protocol version Tue Oct 2 14:07:43 2018 : Error: rlm_eap: SSL error error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number Tue Oct 2 14:07:43 2018 : Error: SSL: SSL_read failed in a system call (-1), TLS session fails. Tue Oct 2 14:07:43 2018 : Auth: Login incorrect (TLS Alert write:fatal:protocol version): [lo...@myuniversity.com] It is probably a bug with a package. I tried to downgrade openssl and libgnutls-openssl27 without any change. Any idea? Pétùr
Re: SFConservancy misleads in "update" explaining GPLv2.
freedomfromr...@redchan.it writes: [ blabla ] I see you're probably new here: I think we need more info to be able to help you; for example you might start by telling us which version of Debian you're using, Stefan
Re: Fail2ban y expresión regular
El lun, 01-10-2018 a las 22:12 -0300, Diego H. Cancelo escribió: > Buenas... > Estoy renegando con fail2ban y las expresiones regulares (no son mi > fuerte), a ver si alguien me puede tirar una mano. > Estuve mirando varias paginas y los filtros ya creados en el servicio > para tomarlos como referencia pero no doy en la tecla. > Tengo varios logs como estos que genero mediante IPTABLES: > > Sep 27 17:50:03 vps371545 kernel: [157374.491843] Flood detectado: > IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:16:3e:fb:99:f2:00:0c:db:4b:fd:00:08:00 > SRC=139.99.118.123 DST=69.61.93.33 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=119 > ID=15669 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=45161 DPT=80 WINDOW=8192 RES=0x00 SYN > URGP=0 > > En jail.conf tengo: > > [flooddetectado] > enabled = true > port = all > filter = flooddetectado > logpath = /var/log/messages > maxretry = 10 > action = iptables-allports[name=flooddetectado, > port="22,25,80,443", > protocol=tcp] > > y en los filtros, dentro de flooddetectado.conf : > > [Definition] > failregex = ^Flood\ detectado:\ IN=*\ OUT\=\ MAC=*\ SRC=$ Intenta con algo más simple, por ejemplo: failregex = Flood detectado: .* SRC= .*$ Un saludo JulHer
Re: all files moved to lost+found
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 23:18:13 -0700 David Christensen said: > On 10/1/18 8:40 PM, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: > > I'm not sure how an on-disk cache problem could definitively be caught > > without power cycling. What if on-disk controller is ignoring all cache > > related commands? (cache bypass, cache invalidate, cache flush) > > I must depend upon Seagate to get their firmware and their diagnostics > right. If their firmware were so bad as to ignore all cache related > commands, we'd probably hear about it. I am not questioning the quality of the diagnostic tool, but there can be situations where it is technically impossible to detect a failure. For instance, a destructive cache test can write some data to disk, flush the cache, invalidate the cache, and then reread the data just written. But if both cache flush and cache invalidate don't work, then this scheme will produce a false positive result. * Write test data to disk --> OK * Flush on-disk cache --> Controller returns "OK" but doesn't do it. * Invalidate the cache --> Controller again returns "OK", without doing it. Now, diag tool thinks the data is recorded on media and the cache is clear. In fact, it is not recorded and is solely on cache. * Reread the data --> Success. Controller reads it from cache, while the diag tool thinks it is coming from the media. In such a case, there is no way the diag tool can definitively test on-disk cache. Only sure way is power-cycling, as far as I can see. > Then again, as the OP's computer seems to be a newer model, some > hardware could be unsupported and/or the supporting device drivers could > be incomplete and/or buggy. I know Intel provides reference FOSS > drivers for their stuff; does AMD? Without a shopping list of the key > chips in the OP's computer, there is no way to check support status. Agreed. Regards -- Abdullah Ramazanoğlu
Re: Syncing GnuPG between 2 system
On 2018-09-30 18:39, deloptes wrote: Here is something I do not get - to encrypt I am asked for password - I guess it is for my secret key, no? with the mail GPG plugin I never use but tested between 2 email identities. you can choose to generate a passphrase when you first make key pair to encrypt you use the recipient public key and to decrypt they enter their passphrase mick -- Key ID4BFEBB31
Re: (solved) Re: is it possible to install previous mplayer
Hi, On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 21:04:15 +0200 deloptes wrote: > Li Wei wrote: > > > mencoder of jessie doesn't have some feature I need > > I can't use option vcodec=mpeg4 > > both wheezy and stretch have such option. > > why not try backport from stretch if available? > or maybe, in case some codec is missing from Stretch's default mplayer, the multimedia version might be worth a try. Regards Michael .-.. .. ...- . .-.. --- -. --. .- -. -.. .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-. Schshschshchsch. -- The Gorn, "Arena", stardate 3046.2
Re: No sound after installing debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 07:49:30AM +, Curt wrote: > [...] (in the case of Gnome where extirpation is > impossible without taking the kitchen sink, the bath water, and the baby > along with it). ...which is the path I ultimately took :-) Cheers - -- t -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAluzLtwACgkQBcgs9XrR2kb9eQCfUn7WB5TSch+/fHdsBQoGrD86 ihUAn1AT8b783KmICGZWX9OValAuNCIg =+Yj6 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Firefox no longer able to play videos on Facebook
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 10:11:15 +0200 Sven Joachim wrote: Hello Sven, >This has nothing to do with those sites, the issue is that Firefox 52 is >not compatible with FFmpeg 4.0 (libavcodec58). Thanks for that, Sven. Nice to know the root problem. My searches weren't designed to find causes, just solutions. TBH, they weren't even successful at that. I ended up installing Ff from sid more or less out of desperation. Obviously, it worked. At least it got the wife and kids off my back. :-) -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" If a thought came in your head it would die of loneliness I Don't Like You - Stiff Little Fingers pgp7GxjJhoZRU.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Firefox no longer able to play videos on Facebook
On 2018-10-02 08:37 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:17:52 +0200 > Per Dalgas Jakobsen wrote: > > Hello Per, > >>Until a few days ago, Firefox played videos on Facebook without issues, > > v52 is too old. IDK whether it's being blocked, or sites are using > features not available in v52. This issue affects not only FB, but also > Spotify and an increasing number of other sites. This has nothing to do with those sites, the issue is that Firefox 52 is not compatible with FFmpeg 4.0 (libavcodec58). As a result, there is no H.264 support which breaks video playback on numerous sites. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906897 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909722 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1435212 Cheers, Sven
Re: No sound after installing debian
On 10/2/2018 9:49 AM, Curt wrote: > On 2018-10-01, > wrote: >> >> Hi all, I am a blind user of Debian and have made several attempts to >> install Debian both stretch and testing with the same strange problem. I >> have speech during the install prosses and the system installs with no >> problem. How ever after booting into the new system the speech is not >> there. I tried going to alsamixer with root access and razing the sound >> valume with no luck. This happens both with the alfa and stable installs. >> I tried with both isos installing with a gnome install as well as a mate >> install. I don't recall ever having this problems with this. I do not have >> any bare bones system to try with so using a virtual machine. Any one here >> have any ideas on how to rectify getting speech back aftr installing. >> > > Some troubleshooting ideas here: > > https://wiki.debian.org/accessibility#Speech_support > > Apparently pulseaudio is a problem and either must be run as root, > removed, or disabled (in the case of Gnome where extirpation is > impossible without taking the kitchen sink, the bath water, and the baby > along with it). > Regarding Debian stable (Stretch) this bug only happened when switching from desktop Manager (DM) to the console. So the OP should have speatch working when booting for the first time after installation. To the OP: Are you able to play any sounds at all? -- John Doe
Re: Firefox no longer able to play videos on Facebook
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:46:45 +0200 Per Dalgas Jakobsen wrote: Hello Per, >Well, that worked! As I knew it would. :-) Seriously, though; We had the same issue here a little while back. It didn't bother me, as I don't use FB or Spotify, but it was an issue for the rest of the family. I had to find a solution. Fast. >I gather then, that it did not have anything to do with installation >and uninstallation of other software after all!? Indeed not. That was just a coincidence. >Thanks :-) You're very welcome. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" Looking for something I can call my own Chairman Of The Bored - Crass pgpKP3QVL_o2x.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: No sound after installing debian
On 2018-10-01, wrote: > > Hi all, I am a blind user of Debian and have made several attempts to > install Debian both stretch and testing with the same strange problem. I > have speech during the install prosses and the system installs with no > problem. How ever after booting into the new system the speech is not > there. I tried going to alsamixer with root access and razing the sound > valume with no luck. This happens both with the alfa and stable installs. > I tried with both isos installing with a gnome install as well as a mate > install. I don't recall ever having this problems with this. I do not have > any bare bones system to try with so using a virtual machine. Any one here > have any ideas on how to rectify getting speech back aftr installing. > Some troubleshooting ideas here: https://wiki.debian.org/accessibility#Speech_support Apparently pulseaudio is a problem and either must be run as root, removed, or disabled (in the case of Gnome where extirpation is impossible without taking the kitchen sink, the bath water, and the baby along with it). > Thanks again. > > > > Matthew > > > > > > -- "Now she understood that Anna could not have been in lilac, and that her charm was just that she always stood out against her attire, that her dress could never be noticeable on her." Leo Tolstoy, Anna Karenina
Re: Firefox no longer able to play videos on Facebook
Hi Brad, Well, that worked! I gather then, that it did not have anything to do with installation and uninstallation of other software after all!? Thanks :-) ~Per On 10/02/2018 09:37 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:17:52 +0200 Per Dalgas Jakobsen wrote: Hello Per, Until a few days ago, Firefox played videos on Facebook without issues, v52 is too old. IDK whether it's being blocked, or sites are using features not available in v52. This issue affects not only FB, but also Spotify and an increasing number of other sites. Unfortunately, Ff migration from sid to testing is being blocked ATM. Easiest solution is (temporarily) add sid as a repo and install Ff 60.2. Once you're done, remove sid as a repo so you don't end up with anything unwanted added to your system.
Re: Firefox no longer able to play videos on Facebook
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:17:52 +0200 Per Dalgas Jakobsen wrote: Hello Per, >Until a few days ago, Firefox played videos on Facebook without issues, v52 is too old. IDK whether it's being blocked, or sites are using features not available in v52. This issue affects not only FB, but also Spotify and an increasing number of other sites. Unfortunately, Ff migration from sid to testing is being blocked ATM. Easiest solution is (temporarily) add sid as a repo and install Ff 60.2. Once you're done, remove sid as a repo so you don't end up with anything unwanted added to your system. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" This disease is catching Into The Valley - Skids pgpfAR6jWTys1.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: No sound after installing debian
Hella Matthew, There is a dedicated mailing list for Debian accessibility: https://lists.debian.org/debian-accessibility/ >From what you describe I would surmise that you do have sound after install but lack accessibility features like an audio screen reader. Sorry, I have never installed or set up a system for a blind person, so I do not know what is really important or difficult in this process. Here are three links that could of help: - Accessibility in the Debian wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/accessibility - the accessibility project on the Debian website: https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-accessibility/ - Orca screen reader wiki (part of the Gnome standard Debian Desktop Environment): https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y-screen-reader.html.en
Firefox no longer able to play videos on Facebook
Hi, Until a few days ago, Firefox played videos on Facebook without issues, but now it cannot play the same videos anymore. It may coincide with me installing and uninstalling some Industrial Camera software (the only major change I remember doing in the meantime). It included make install, but I thought I got it cleaned up fine... I've tried to reinstall Firefox, *codec*, *plugin*, *pepperflash* and some other packages, and tried to disable hw-accel in Firefox, without any change in luck. I know it's hard to tell what went wrong, I'm also aware of the problematic deb-multimedia, but perhaps you guys can help me find out where to punch the system to get it to work again? Facts: 1) A few days ago Firefox played FB videos nicely. 2) Now Firefox console says (tried a few videos): Error: The manifest specifies content that cannot be displayed on this browser/platform. 5-rDEXaxCbl.js:393:371 The video on this page can’t be played. Your system may not have the required video codecs for: video/mp4; codecs="avc1.4D401E", video/mp4; codecs="avc1.4D401E", video/mp4; codecs="avc1.4D401F", video/mp4; codecs="avc1.4D401F", audio/mp4; codecs="mp4a.40.5", video/mp4; codecs="avc1.42E01E mp4a.40.2", video/mp4; codecs="avc1.4D401E mp4a.40.2", video/mp4; codecs="avc1.4D401F mp4a.40.2", video/mp4; codecs="avc1.640032 mp4a.40.2", video/mp4; codecs="avc1.640033 mp4a.40.2" 3) Youtube plays fine both before and now. 4) I downloaded the FB Video with youtube-dl and played the video through Nautilus on VLC and Totem without problems. 5) Fully upgraded Debian Buster/Sid - Linux 4.18.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.18.6-1 (2018-09-06) x86_64 GNU/Linux. /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://ftp.dk.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.dk.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security testing/updates main contrib non-free deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org testing main non-free /var/log/apt/history.log (around the time I installed/uninstalled the Cam software): Start-Date: 2018-09-25 08:13:59 Install: libgirepository1.0-dev:amd64 (1.58.0-1), libzip4:amd64 (1.1.2-1.1+b1, automatic), libgstreamer1.0-dev:amd6 4 (1.14.3-1), libffi-dev:amd64 (3.2.1-8, automatic), libudev-dev:amd64 (239-9), libzip-dev:amd64 (1.1.2-1.1+b1), li btinyxml-dev:amd64 (2.6.2-4), python3-setuptools:amd64 (40.2.0-1) End-Date: 2018-09-25 08:14:03 Start-Date: 2018-09-25 08:16:11 Commandline: apt-get install gstreamer1.0-tools gstreamer1.0-x gstreamer1.0-plugins-base gstreamer1.0-plugins-good gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly libxml2 libpcap0.8 libaudit1 libnotify4 python3-pyqt5 python3-gi Install: gstreamer1.0-tools:amd64 (1.14.3-1) End-Date: 2018-09-25 08:16:12 Start-Date: 2018-09-25 08:22:02 Commandline: apt-get install git g++ cmake pkg-config libudev-dev libudev1 libtinyxml-dev libgstreamer1.0-dev libgs treamer-plugins-base1.0-dev libglib2.0-dev libgirepository1.0-dev libusb-1.0-0-dev libzip-dev uvcdynctrl python-set uptools libxml2-dev libpcap-dev libaudit-dev libnotify-dev autoconf intltool gtk-doc-tools python3-setuptools Install: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev:amd64 (1.14.3-dmo1), libpcap0.8-dev:amd64 (1.8.1-6, automatic), libwebcam 0:amd64 (0.2.4-1.1+b2, automatic), libegl1-mesa-dev:amd64 (18.1.7-1, automatic), docbook-to-man:amd64 (1:2.0.0-42, automatic), libnotify-dev:amd64 (0.7.7-3), highlight:amd64 (3.41-2, automatic), libpng-dev:amd64 (1.6.34-2, automat ic), libcap-ng-dev:amd64 (0.7.9-1, automatic), uvcdynctrl:amd64 (0.2.4-1.1+b2), docbook-xsl:amd64 (1.79.1+dfsg-2, a utomatic), liborc-0.4-dev:amd64 (1:0.4.28-2, automatic), highlight-common:amd64 (3.41-2, automatic), libwayland-bin :amd64 (1.16.0-1, automatic), libosp5:amd64 (1.5.2-13+b1, automatic), libwayland-dev:amd64 (1.16.0-1, automatic), o pensp:amd64 (1.5.2-13+b1, automatic), libxml2-dev:amd64 (2.9.4+dfsg1-7+b1), libgles2-mesa-dev:amd64 (18.1.7-1, auto matic), python-setuptools:amd64 (40.2.0-1), libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev:amd64 (2.38.0+dfsg-6, automatic), gtk-doc-tools:am d64 (1.28-1), libaudit-dev:amd64 (1:2.8.4-2), python-funcsigs:amd64 (1.0.2-4, automatic), uvcdynctrl-data:amd64 (0. 2.4-1.1, automatic), liborc-0.4-dev-bin:amd64 (1:0.4.28-2, automatic), libpng-tools:amd64 (1.6.34-2, automatic), xs ltproc:amd64 (1.1.32-2, automatic), intltool:amd64 (0.51.0-5), docbook:amd64 (4.5-6, automatic), python-mock:amd64 (2.0.0-3, automatic), python-pbr:amd64 (4.2.0-4, automatic), libpcap-dev:amd64 (1.8.1-6) End-Date: 2018-09-25 08:22:10 Start-Date: 2018-09-25 09:02:42 Purge: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev:amd64 (1.14.3-dmo1), libpcap0.8-dev:amd64 (1.8.1-6), libwebcam0:amd64 (0.2. 4-1.1+b2), libegl1-mesa-dev:amd64 (18.1.7-1), docbook-to-man:amd64 (1:2.0.0-42), libnotify-dev:amd64 (0.7.7-3), hig hlight:amd64 (3.41-2), libpng-dev:amd64 (1.6.34-2),
Re: all files moved to lost+found
On 10/1/18 9:07 PM, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 21:31:27 -0300 Beco said: I've done the bootable seagate HD test. It came up 100% ok, all tests. The HD is new, I wouldn't expect different, but it is always reassuring to do the real test and see the results. I am not familiar with seatools, but there are usually destructive and non-destructive test suites in such tools. I hope you have run a destructive one (which destroys data on disk) as some marginal errors can only be caught by destructive tests. The only destructive test I recall from SeaTools is writing zeros to the disk. Of course, you don't want to do that until the data recovery effort is complete. And, the OP seems to be ignoring recovery and still trying to use the drive (!). Is the "swap" partition something that could cause that if turned off by "swapoff"? I don't think so. +1 I read above from Abdullah, that it is very unlike to have such major FS fail, and it looks like it didn't "flush" the night I turned off. This is also my guess, it is the only thing that make sense. Maybe the inode table was in the memory and got corrupted. But it is strange to figure that, since the filesystem is EXT4, and it is very stable nowadays. I'm not sure how much isolation the various parts of the Linux kernel now have from each other. In the bad old days of monolithic kernels, everything inside the kernel could touch everything else in the kernel. A buggy driver in one subsystem could wreak havoc in any other subsystem. But the journal is passing through on-disk controller, too. If the drive is mishandling its on-drive cache, then an FS corruption is still possible. Even if journal writes are "direct", the drive could be ignoring that (i.e. caches it nevertheless) without flushing it prior to power-off, corrupting the journal as well. If the FS survives through reboots, but falters when the laptop is power cycled, then a cache flush issue is still probable. Another test method might be hibernation. If resume from hibernation works, then that rules out on-disk caching problem. Regards Hypotheses require experiments to confirm or refute them. The chicken-and-egg problem is to get some solid data to start with. We'll see if the OP responds to my shopping list of requested commands. David
Re: all files moved to lost+found
On 10/1/18 8:40 PM, Abdullah Ramazanoğlu wrote: On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:06:20 -0700 David Christensen said: If Seagate Seatools is happy with the 2 TB drive, that should eliminate the 2 TB drive, the cable, and the motherboard port as sources of the problem. I'm not sure how an on-disk cache problem could definitively be caught without power cycling. What if on-disk controller is ignoring all cache related commands? (cache bypass, cache invalidate, cache flush) I must depend upon Seagate to get their firmware and their diagnostics right. If their firmware were so bad as to ignore all cache related commands, we'd probably hear about it. Every disk that I have seen fail the manufacturer's diagnostic has also exhibited bad behavior in whatever computer it occupied. But, the contrary is not true. When it is false (e.g. bad behavior, passes diagnostic), either I'm confused, some other part of the computer is having issues, or both. (PEBKAC is a common root cause.) Then again, as the OP's computer seems to be a newer model, some hardware could be unsupported and/or the supporting device drivers could be incomplete and/or buggy. I know Intel provides reference FOSS drivers for their stuff; does AMD? Without a shopping list of the key chips in the OP's computer, there is no way to check support status. David
