Re: imposer une IP à une seconde carte réseau

2023-10-15 Thread Pierre Malard
Bonjour,

Le système de gestion par Network Manager n’a d’intérêt que dans le cas d’un 
portable qui peut facilement changer de contexte réseau.

Pour ce qui est d’un serveur c’est plutôt une source de difficultés et d’emm…

Perso, je retourne à la gestion classique sous /etc/network/interface en virant 
MN si il est installé :
https://debian-facile.org/doc:reseau:interfaces

> Le 14 oct. 2023 à 19:42, Alex PADOLY  a écrit :
> 
> Bonsoir à tous,
> 
> 
> 
> La dernière fois que j'ai configuré des cartes réseau sur un système Debian, 
> celles-ci s'appelaient eth0 , eth1, eth2.
> 
> 
> 
> Aujourd'hui, je commence la configuration d'un serveur LTSP et je 
> souhaiterais imposer une adresse réseau à la seconde carte réseau reliée au 
> switch pour les différents clients.
> 
> Le système d'adressage IP des cartes réseau sous Debian a-t-il 
> fondamentalement changé.
> 
> Comment aujourd'hui imposer une adresse IP fixe à la seconde carte réseau?
> 
> Merci pour vos réponses et éclairages.
> 
> Alex PADOLY
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Pierre Malard

  « on ne risque rien à livrer le secret professionnel car
 on ne livre pas la façon de s’en servir »
   Jean Cocteau - « Le secret professionnel » - 1922
   |\  _,,,---,,_
   /,`.-'`'-.  ;-;;,_
  |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'
 '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)   πr

perl -e '$_=q#: 3|\ 5_,3-3,2_: 3/,`.'"'"'`'"'"' 5-.  ;-;;,_:  |,A-  ) )-,_. ,\ 
(  `'"'"'-'"'"': '"'"'-3'"'"'2(_/--'"'"'  `-'"'"'\_): 
24πr::#;y#:#\n#;s#(\D)(\d+)#$1x$2#ge;print'
- --> Ce message n’engage que son auteur <--



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


Re: LTSP: commande introuvable

2023-10-15 Thread Frédéric MASSOT

Le 15/10/2023 à 19:29, Lamourec Alain a écrit :

Bonsoir

Je crois que désormais /usr/sbin n'est plus dans la vaiable PATH

Le retour de :

echo $PATH

serait intéressant.

Si c'est le cas, il faudra rajouter ce dossier



"/usr/sbin" est dans le path de root, pas d'un utilisateur.




--
==
|  FRÉDÉRIC MASSOT   |
| http://www.juliana-multimedia.com  |
|   mailto:frede...@juliana-multimedia.com   |
| +33.(0)2.97.54.77.94  +33.(0)6.67.19.95.69 |
===Debian=GNU/Linux===



Re: LTSP: commande introuvable

2023-10-15 Thread Lamourec Alain

Bonsoir

Je crois que désormais /usr/sbin n'est plus dans la vaiable PATH

Le retour de :

echo $PATH

serait intéressant.

Si c'est le cas, il faudra rajouter ce dossier

Michel Verdier  writes:


Le 15 octobre 2023 Alex PADOLY a écrit :


La commande renvoie :

- le nom du paquet installé;

- sa version;

- sa description


Donne plutôt le vrai résultat.

Le paquet est bien installé dans /usr/sbin mais sous forme d'un 
lien
symbolique qui renvoie vers /usr/share/ltps où l'exécutable 
ltsp y figure

bien.


Donne le résultat de :
type -a ltsp



--
Lamourec Alain



Automatic installation of Debian 11 on ARM64

2023-10-15 Thread Frank Wilson
Hi,

Has anyone successfully used the "automatic installation" option for the
Debian 11 installer? I was expecting this option to give me screen where I
can enter the URL to my preseed file (which it does on x86), but all I get
on arm64 is a black screen and a blinking cursor. There are no apparent
error messages.

Any tips on how to debug further would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Frank


Re: Does debian installer use volume names for LVM? (was: Re: trixie update/upgrade strangeness)

2023-10-15 Thread Anders Andersson
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 10:32 AM Max Nikulin  wrote:
>
> I am curious if debian installer uses volume names in /etc/fstab when
> LVM is involved (either guided or manual partitioning).

I'm pretty sure it does, I checked a few of my machines that I'm
reasonably sure I haven't modified too much, and the mounts from LVM
are indeed specified as /dev/mapper/. in /etc/fstab.

I don't know what grub does, though.



Re: Unit prefixes [was: Alt-Shift-P freezes XTerm]

2023-10-15 Thread gene heskett

On 10/15/23 04:44, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:

On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 03:34:52AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:

[...]


I can beat that Tomas. At one point in the early 90's we had a PDP-11 to run
a 7 meter C band dish, The VT 220 died and DEC wanted nearly 2G for a VT-550


This one keeps tripping me up: the "G" in your "2G" means "grand", yes?
So it would be what others call "K".

Sorry Tomas, Yes of coarse. In our "slanguage", 2G means $2000, a 2 
grand price IOW.  I keep forgetting that non English slang might be 
interpreted differently.  My bad.  Take care & stay well.



I consistently read it as "giga" and then go "wait, what?".

Cheers


Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis



Re: Does debian installer use volume names for LVM?

2023-10-15 Thread Erwan David

Le 15/10/2023 à 10:32, Max Nikulin a écrit :


I am curious if debian installer uses volume names in /etc/fstab when 
LVM is involved (either guided or manual partitioning).


In guided partitionning, it uses the /dev/mapper name : here is what the 
installer put in the fstab of my laptop (/boot and /boot/efi outside 
lvm, encrytted lvm for / and swap)


#            
/dev/mapper/maine--ocean--vg-root /   ext4 
   errors=remount-ro 0   1

# /boot was on /dev/nvme0n1p2 during installation
UUID=6657c315-cc1f-4727-adac-2997c8a34b5b /boot   ext2 
   defaults    0   2

# /boot/efi was on /dev/nvme0n1p1 during installation
UUID=8C47-97E7  /boot/efi   vfat    umask=0077  0   1
/dev/mapper/maine--ocean--vg-swap_1 none    swap    sw 
 0   0






Unit prefixes [was: Alt-Shift-P freezes XTerm]

2023-10-15 Thread tomas
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 03:34:52AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:

[...]

> I can beat that Tomas. At one point in the early 90's we had a PDP-11 to run
> a 7 meter C band dish, The VT 220 died and DEC wanted nearly 2G for a VT-550

This one keeps tripping me up: the "G" in your "2G" means "grand", yes?
So it would be what others call "K".

I consistently read it as "giga" and then go "wait, what?".

Cheers
-- 
t


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Does debian installer use volume names for LVM? (was: Re: trixie update/upgrade strangeness)

2023-10-15 Thread Max Nikulin

On 12/10/2023 09:55, Jeffrey Walton wrote:

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:49 PM Andy Smith wrote:


- they were using LVM
- they'd taken a snapshot of their root fs
- they were finding and mounting their root fs by fs UUID
- snapshot obviously had same fs UUID
- the kernel was finding the snapshot first at boot

...

I can't help but wonder how many hundreds or thousands of man hours
were wasted because LVM was not designed to avoid the problem by
default.


It is not responsibility of block-level device to deal with UUID of file 
systems.


I would expect that manuals recommending UUID or file system labels have 
warnings concerning LVM.


I am curious if debian installer uses volume names in /etc/fstab when 
LVM is involved (either guided or manual partitioning).





Re: LTSP: commande introuvable

2023-10-15 Thread Michel Verdier
Le 15 octobre 2023 Alex PADOLY a écrit :

> La commande renvoie :
>
> - le nom du paquet installé;
>
> - sa version;
>
> - sa description

Donne plutôt le vrai résultat.

> Le paquet est bien installé dans /usr/sbin mais sous forme d'un lien
> symbolique qui renvoie vers /usr/share/ltps où l'exécutable ltsp y figure
> bien.

Donne le résultat de :
type -a ltsp



Re: Alt-Shift-P freezes XTerm

2023-10-15 Thread gene heskett

On 10/15/23 02:06, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:

On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 09:52:16AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:

[...]


P.S. I believed that most confusing (while still useful) feature of
terminals is [Ctrl+s]. It takes some time to realize that it has been hit by
mistake, so [Ctrl+q] is required to resume output.


Old age gotta have some advantages: I grew up with "real" terms
(VT520 and clones, mostly), so this one is "built in" for me.

Now don't get me started with CTRL-E, the source of many a prank ;-)

Cheers
I can beat that Tomas. At one point in the early 90's we had a PDP-11 to 
run a 7 meter C band dish, The VT 220 died and DEC wanted nearly 2G for 
a VT-550 but would not guarantee it would work in place of a VT-220. I 
was then a fan of the TRS-80 color computer and OS9, an aftermarket OS 
that was a mini UNIX. And a fellow named Brian Marquette had written a 
VT-100 program that was quite well organized, so well organized that I 
was able to make a 100% compatible VT-220 out of it in just a few hours.


So my office coco logged into that PDP-11 and updated the satellite 
schedule daily. But that PDP-11 was not stable, crashing several times 
daily toward the end. It got to be such a pita, and DEC changed every 
part in it except the frame rail engraved with the serial number, w/o 
any effect.


Hugo was the network guy at CBS, so he had DEC trade his test mule 
serial number for ours, and traded me PDP-11. His Just Worked. But he 
was not able to fix mine which put him out of business maintaining the 
rest of the CBS networks machines. 2 months later I show up for work, 
there's two huge cartons from CBS, he was forced to find a new platform 
which was an industrial grade IBM PC, with an ARTIC card for the real 
time stuff, he had to convert the whole CBS networks satellite systems.


Here we get into another problem, when the dish was installed, it came 
with 4 copies of the site drawings so I had a hole dug, poured the 
concrete, quite a few yards of it, all according to the drawings, I find 
6 weeks later there was a note in just one of the 4 sets of site docs 
that the base was to be oriented to offset the magnetic north diff at 
our site, some like 17 degrees, and the sat hardware could not 
compensate for that much error w/o re drilling the base jacks attachment 
to the post. A big Roland jack about 12 feet long. They took over the 
move instructions by a dial up circuit, but because of that base error, 
my satellite table looked bogus as can be, but it was exact for my site. 
I finally gave up resetting it because they would helpfully fix it, and 
disconnected the phone line so I didn't have to screw around for a week 
re finding the the satellites again and again. Being a non equatorial 
mount, it was an AZ-EL setup, that is not as simple as equatorial, but 
more accurate than equatorial. At 40 degrees north, equatorial has an EL 
error of over a degree over the span of sat positions because of the 
down angle to get to the equatorial orbit positions. Not easily noted on 
a 3 meter home dish, but quite important for a 7 meter's much narrower 
beam width.


Satellites aren't really stationary, the moon pulls on them so they do a 
figure 8 daily and only expend station keeping fuel when they are in 
danger of going outside their assigned box, with a 7 meter dishes 
accuracy, stations on both coasts had to get another bit of software 
that monitored incoming signal strength and if it got too weak, would go 
on a half a degree search for a stronger signal. Some satellites moved 
so far and fast that a station re-broadcasting the signal w/o a good 
time base corrector, were out of FCC specs for color subcarrier's +- 10 
hz requirement due to the doppler effect of the satellites motion. The 
FCC I suspect looked the other way many times.


Broadcasting can be an interesting business.

Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis



Re: LTSP: commande introuvable

2023-10-15 Thread Alex PADOLY



Bonjour,

Je vous remercie pour votre réponse.

La commande renvoie :

- le nom du paquet installé;

- sa version;

- sa description

Le paquet est bien installé dans /usr/sbin mais sous forme d'un lien 
symbolique qui renvoie vers /usr/share/ltps où l'exécutable ltsp y 
figure bien.


De mon côté, je recherche également, je vais installer le paquet ltsp 
sur une autre machine Debian


MERCI

Le 2023-10-15 08:39, Jean-Michel OLTRA a écrit :


Bonjour,

Le samedi 14 octobre 2023, Alex PADOLY a écrit...

La configuration du serveur LTSP nécessite l'utilisation de la 
commande

ltsp,  sous root,  le bash

me renvoie que la commande est introuvable

J'ai vérifié, LTSP est bien installé et j'ai bien créé le fichier de
configuration.


La commande `dpkg -l ltsp` te renvoie donc quelque chose ? Certain ?

J'ai regardé sur debian.org, le paquet ltsp donne ltsp dans /usr/sbin. 
Il y

est, ou pas ?

Re: Alt-Shift-P freezes XTerm

2023-10-15 Thread tomas
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 09:52:16AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:

[...]

> P.S. I believed that most confusing (while still useful) feature of
> terminals is [Ctrl+s]. It takes some time to realize that it has been hit by
> mistake, so [Ctrl+q] is required to resume output.

Old age gotta have some advantages: I grew up with "real" terms
(VT520 and clones, mostly), so this one is "built in" for me.

Now don't get me started with CTRL-E, the source of many a prank ;-)

Cheers
-- 
t


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature