Re: Recommendations for a GUI video editing program?
On 12/30/2015 07:35 AM, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > I *LOVE* OpenShot. You actually helped *me* out because I had used > another program (that was a little over my pay grade), but couldn't > remember the name. Avidemux, it was. *grin* I have used OpenShot in the past, and I liked it. However, it did seem to enjoy crashing. After a while it got to the point that I could tell that when I released the mouse it wasn't going to be there. That being said, it never once corrupted the save file, so if you make a habit of saving every few operations you should be fine. Also, it's worth noting that I had deb-multimedia enabled; if deb-multimedia had a separate version, it's entirely likely that the official Debian one doesn't have any of those problems :D. -- Anthony Mapes | PGP ID: 3A38547B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Digital signatures
On 12/27/2015 02:59 AM, Teemu Likonen wrote: > > If we change the subject to digital signatures I think that having the > signature in a separate MIME part is the modern way. You had the PGP > signature in the body of the message (and it's fine with me and my mail > client) but separate MIME parts allow clients to display and save > different parts correctly. OK. I use Engimail with Icedove/Thunderbird, and it warned me that some mail clients don't properly handle PGP/MIME, but that all clients should handle inline PGP. I wasn't sure how many clients out there didn't accept the MIME version, so I went with inline to be safe. I do have one question about the MIME version, though. I've seen mailing lists that add a footer to each message (in the form of a signature). With inline PGP, this footer gets appended after the signature block, and everything is wonderful. Would MIME work properly with that, since it doesn't seem to explicitly define the start and end of the signed message? -- Anthony Mapes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: OT: signatures (was Re: removing TexLive Docs packages)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 While we're on the topic of signatures, what do you consider to be good and bad to include in signatures? I've seen a lot of conflicting opinions online, particularly surrounding whether or not to include your email address. (Are there email clients out there that don't display who the sender was?) - -- Anthony Mapes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWfBFxAAoJEBNsAHU6OFR7ZtoP/i+2CtH4eRqik5CgPoFK9rAx FuXMVmWxFnEFJQ21XgCAyRQSvze1OuvqACaPlm+WA4P2q04M2CtgxapsKQeZNiKV 4ChP3I/sv7sBD71zPF2IxYG2MtC0W/WoAnfdesgbBCg7rabH9v2HXpQwTv4WI+lb n50/ozWEaeU6h3b0VYz2A39noBOpdizuG7lBgHrh/6rytt0SJaoQ+nzoGeEAwRY0 FoagLwYwNVTG+L2Gl0N0tUqW0x270k8vtXHkIAc3afM0vNlogkLe9dZc755zSspW dM0vkjBXXIzvLGRpLyIS5xUnaPfXh0XO/qM7pZWjb0FhKAZQcal6xtLt56U55L/7 w0qFrMJ9shkjAoVRVH5hil0mIX6prpFrDInCyI42JhNRrWOgkpO/wYX7ZaHB8v/8 crWRoTr/UVE3QDGtLtjpgNNCF6vGYAcJBc/Hnq8LczfCiBpPMswoGF+7YyjtscDt o6dE1247/nw0AAkBiDNEjzCzHqBqI6bFkdWYHh8XHSVG52mt2wciW9ztI3apNrOd Ld3dAihhIaOckr5+bk5XCGEkNIPyfNre9P0lr7+kzZMTXoXROEFABuqS9Kph1yXo vI6yR5nN7jvI5OgI8jBqpY1mET43Eks//J926zXCPTCDHjwESXA1jQ8a+lPTlE6S rEJNy/BiBi8G0NX5twIw =Xpik -END PGP SIGNATURE-
