Re: Module-assistant error when installing fglrx ATI proprietary driver. (Debian Sid).
Hi, is it possible that this errors are due to trying to install 9.1 version, then? Should I install the previous version of the proprietary driver (8.12)? On 2/16/09, Lalit Dhiri my_li...@live.com wrote: __ Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:26:09 +0100 Subject: Module-assistant error when installing fglrx ATI proprietary driver. (Debian Sid). From: parla...@gmail.com To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Hi, I'm trying to install the last ATI proprietary driver which I've downloaded from AMD webpage. I did a sh ati-driver-installer-9-1-x86.x86_64.run --buildpkg Debian/sid and installed the resulting DEB packages with dpkg. Can you help me troubleshoot this?Sorry it appears I was a bit too keen to post and missed the Debian Sid. I hope someone can help... and I shall be getting myself some coffee :( _ Twice the fun—Share photos while you chat with Windows Live Messenger. Learn more. http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windows/windowslive/products/messenger.aspx -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Module-assistant error when installing fglrx ATI proprietary driver. (Debian Sid).
Hi, I'm trying to install the last ATI proprietary driver which I've downloaded from AMD webpage. I did a sh ati-driver-installer-9-1-x86.x86_64.run --buildpkg Debian/sid and installed the resulting DEB packages with dpkg. Then, I've run module-assistant prepare and module-assistant auto-install fglrx, without much luck. The last command failed with the following output: /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' dh_testroot rm -f configure-stamp rm -f fglrx.ko fglrx.mod.c *.o libfglrx_ip.a rm -f .version .*.o.flags .*.o.d .*.o.cmd .*.ko.cmd rm -rf .tmp_versions rm -rf patch dh_clean rm -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control rm -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/dirs make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules binary_modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' if [ -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control.template ]; then \ cat /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control.template /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control; \ fi dh_testdir touch configure-stamp dh_testdir /usr/bin/make -C /lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/fglrx modules make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.26-1-686' CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.o /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function 'KCL_MEM_VM_GetRegionPhysAddrStr': /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3223: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3224: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3225: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3227: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/kcl_acpi.o CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/kcl_agp.o CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/kcl_debug.o CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/kcl_ioctl.o CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/kcl_io.o CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/kcl_pci.o CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/kcl_str.o CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/kcl_wait.o LD [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/fglrx.o Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 1 modules CC /usr/src/modules/fglrx/fglrx.mod.o LD [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/fglrx.ko make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.26-1-686' dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_clean -k rm -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/dirs sed -e 's/#KVERS#/2.6.26-1-686/g' \ -e 's/#VERSION#/1:8-12-4/g' debian/control.template /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control sed -e 's/#KVERS#/2.6.26-1-686/g' debian/dirs.template /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/dirs dh_installdirs dh_install fglrx.ko lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/misc dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_installdocs dh_installmodules dh_installchangelogs dh_link dh_strip dh_compress dh_fixperms dh_installdeb dh_gencontrol -- -v1:8-12-4+2.6.26-13 dh_md5sums dh_builddeb --destdir=/usr/src dpkg-deb: building package `fglrx-kernel-2.6.26-1-686' in `/usr/src/fglrx-kernel-2.6.26-1-686_8-12-4+2.6.26-13_i386.deb'. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' Build time: 13 seconds Can you help me troubleshoot this?
/etc/issue still showing Lenny after upgrading to Sid...
Hi, I've recently upgrading my Debian flavour from Testing to Unstable but I'm still getting reference to Lenny: car...@debian:~$ cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 \n \l car...@debian:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (lenny) Release:5.0 Codename:lenny By the way, here is my sources.list in case it matters (obviously, I did an aptitude update aptitude dist-upgrade after changing the file. car...@debian:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list # official sid deb http://ftp.es.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.es.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free # debian testing security #deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free #deb-src http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free # debian multimedia deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ unstable main deb-src http://www.debian-multimedia.org/ unstable main # opera deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ unstable non-free # Compiz Fusion deb http://download.tuxfamily.org/shames/debian-sid/desktopfx/unstable/ ./ # Switfox deb http://getswiftfox.com/builds/debian unstable non-free Why is it showing that I'm using Lenny? Regards.
Re: /etc/issue still showing Lenny after upgrading to Sid...
Ok, I see. Thanks. On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote: On 2009-02-09 22:16 +0100, Carlos Parada wrote: Hi, I've recently upgrading my Debian flavour from Testing to Unstable but I'm still getting reference to Lenny: That should change in a few days when a new base-files package enters sid. car...@debian:~$ cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 \n \l car...@debian:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID:Debian Description:Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (lenny) Release:5.0 Codename:lenny It's a known issue, see http://bugs.debian.org/508772. If you're relying on the output of lsb_release you can create an /etc/lsb-release file like this (mine): --8---cut here---start-8--- DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_RELEASE=UNRELEASED DISTRIB_CODENAME=sid DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Debian GNU/Linux --8---cut here---end---8--- Otherwise it's mainly a cosmetic problem. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Sound and video freezes intermitently in Debian Lenny.
Hi, I've got a very weird problem with audio and video playing in my Debian Lenny laptop. It all started 3 or 4 days ago... now when I play music with Rythmbox or when I play streaming videos en Youtube, for example, in Firefox, both freeze intermitently... I mean, audio/video freezes for an indetermined number of seconds and then recovers... It's really annoying. Can you help me troubleshooting this issue?
Re: Weird error while upgrading fglrx-glx.
Anyone knows who happens with this ?? Thanks On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Carlos Parada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've got the following error when performing an apt-get dist-upgrade. Can you help me? Unpacking fglrx-glx (from .../fglrx-glx_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb) ... Removing `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-driver' dpkg-divert: `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-glx' clashes with `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-driver' dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-glx_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 Preparing to replace fglrx-driver 8.476-1 (using .../fglrx-driver_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb) ... Stopping atieventsd: done. Unpacking replacement fglrx-driver ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-driver_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libfglrx_dm.a', which is also in package fglrx-driver-dev dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/atieventsd missing LSB style header Starting atieventsd: done. Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for menu ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-glx_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-driver_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Re: Weird error while upgrading fglrx-glx.
I solved the issue with your feeback, Damon. You rule, man. Thanks so much. Carlos On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 15:11 +0200, Carlos Parada wrote: Anyone knows who happens with this ?? Thanks On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Carlos Parada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've got the following error when performing an apt-get dist-upgrade. Can you help me? Unpacking fglrx-glx (from .../fglrx-glx_1% 3a8-4-1_i386.deb) ... Removing `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-driver' dpkg-divert: `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-glx' clashes with `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-driver' dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-glx_1% 3a8-4-1_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 Preparing to replace fglrx-driver 8.476-1 (using .../fglrx-driver_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb) ... Stopping atieventsd: done. Unpacking replacement fglrx-driver ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-driver_1% 3a8-4-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libfglrx_dm.a', which is also in package fglrx-driver-dev dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/atieventsd missing LSB style header Starting atieventsd: done. Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for menu ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-glx_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-driver_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) See this part dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-driver_1% 3a8-4-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libfglrx_dm.a', which is also in package fglrx-driver-dev ? That is your problem. When you see this come up on any package, the next thing to do is: apt-get -f install If that does not work do this: dpkg -i --force-overwrite /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-driver_1% 3a8-4-1_i386.deb or run dpkg -i --force-overwrite /path/stated/in/apt-get -f install/ The problem is another package owns the file dpkg is trying to overwrite and by default dpkg will not do that. This is a badly packaged .deb (or the one that owns it is). You will run into this problem when you do a dist-upgrade from stable to testing or from testing to stable. This work-around does not fix anything, it just forces dpkg to ignore some other package is using this file as a config and dpkg will write to it. Anytime you run into issued during a dist-upgrade that do not allow the progression of installed programs to keep going, just run apt-get -f install, then aptitude update, then aptitude upgrade, then aptitude dist-upgrade to continue. It may take several attempts to get it. In fact at some point, you might even have to reboot to continue (due to low level packages having been replaced and the old ones running in memory no longer have any config files). HTH -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser
Weird error while upgrading fglrx-glx.
Hi, I've got the following error when performing an apt-get dist-upgrade. Can you help me? Unpacking fglrx-glx (from .../fglrx-glx_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb) ... Removing `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-driver' dpkg-divert: `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-glx' clashes with `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libGL.so.1.2 by fglrx-driver' dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-glx_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 2 Preparing to replace fglrx-driver 8.476-1 (using .../fglrx-driver_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb) ... Stopping atieventsd: done. Unpacking replacement fglrx-driver ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-driver_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libfglrx_dm.a', which is also in package fglrx-driver-dev dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/atieventsd missing LSB style header Starting atieventsd: done. Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for menu ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-glx_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/fglrx-driver_1%3a8-4-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Re: Etch -- Upgrading X.Org to 7.2
Hi, Wei. I think I'm definitely not going to upgrade to Sid anytime soon so I'll stick to Lenny for the moment. Thanks!
Re: Etch -- Upgrading X.Org to 7.2
Finally I ended up upgrading to Lenny and with the new version of X.Org I have no problem. Nevertheless, I've been reading the Debian FAQ and It says that Unstable is recommended over Testing (Lenny) for a variety of reasons... so I'm now thinking on an upgrading to Sid (still thinking). Is the upgrading to Sid process similar to Lenny upgrading? I mean, if I change the entries in my sources.list from lenny to sid and testing to unstable, then applying apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade I finally ended up in Sid distribution or is it necessary something more?
Etch -- Upgrading X.Org to 7.2
Hi! I'm currently using Debian Stable ('Etch') and obviously my X.Orgversion is
7.1.1.
Is there any problem with manually upgrading X.Org to 7.2??
Re: Etch -- Upgrading X.Org to 7.2
I don't find X.Org 7.2 on Backports. Is there any other way of upgrading
X.Org but keeping Debian Stable distro?
I'm so hesitant of upgrading to Lenny, I've heard there are almost no
security updates aside from other disadvantages.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/05/08 08:16, Carlos Parada wrote:
Hi! I'm currently using Debian Stable ('Etch') and obviously my X.Org
version is 7.1.1.
Is there any problem with manually upgrading X.Org to 7.2??
You'll have to look at backports.org, I think. Or upgrade to Lenny.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
The kniiife..., the kniiife... The life of the wife is ended
by the knife.
Stewie Griffin Eliza Pinchley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHzq2TS9HxQb37XmcRAi0BAKDjcxYpcFzUvAd6K+FT2BmA0zFj/gCfYtRu
YgvX7sRvCcBGT0AV+vVuKJs=
=ipXo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ATI Radeon X1400 + Debian Etch + Compiz Fusion = White Screen
Thanks, Dotan. When I get home I'll copy your xorg.conf and acpi-support files. Let's see if that makes Compiz work in my box. I'll tell you.
Re: ATI Radeon X1400 + Debian Etch + Compiz Fusion = White Screen
Dotan, are you able to run Compiz with -- Option Composite Disable -- in your Extensions Section? I get the following error when I launch Compiz Fusion from the terminal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=true compiz-manager --replace ccp [1] 7492 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Checking for Xgl: not present. xset q doesn't reveal the location of the log file. Using fallback /var/log/Xorg.0.log Detected PCI ID for VGA: 01:00.0 0300: 1002:7145 (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Checking for texture_from_pixmap: present. Checking for non power of two support: present. *Checking for Composite extension: not present.* aborting and using fallback: /usr/bin/metacity
ATI Radeon X1400 + Debian Etch + Compiz Fusion = White Screen
Hello, I'm trying to install Compiz Fusion on my Debian 4.0 Etch machine but It has been completely impossible so far... I've got a annoying white screen every time I ran it. My graphics card is a ATI Radeon X1400 and I've installed the latest ATI proprietary driver for it from ATI website. The output of fglrxinfo command says that It's properly installed. Here is my XORG.CONF file: # /etc/X11/xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server configuration file) # # This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using # values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the /etc/X11/xorg.conf manual page. # (Type man /etc/X11/xorg.conf at the shell prompt.) # # This file is automatically updated on xserver-xorg package upgrades *only* # if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xorg # package. # # If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated # again, run the following command: # sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg Section ServerLayout Identifier Default Layout Screen 0 aticonfig-Screen[0] 0 0 InputDevice Generic Keyboard InputDevice Configured Mouse InputDevice Synaptics Touchpad Option AIGLX on EndSection Section Files # path to defoma fonts FontPath /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc FontPath /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic FontPath /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1 FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 FontPath /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi FontPath /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi FontPath /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi FontPath /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType EndSection Section Module Load i2c Load bitmap Load ddc Load dri Load extmod Load freetype Load glx Load int10 Load vbe EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Keyboard Driver kbd Option CoreKeyboard Option XkbRules xorg Option XkbModel pc105 Option XkbLayout es EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device /dev/input/mice Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Synaptics Touchpad Driver synaptics Option SendCoreEvents true Option Device /dev/psaux Option Protocol auto-dev Option HorizScrollDelta 0 EndSection Section Monitor Identifier Generic Monitor Option DPMS EndSection Section Monitor Identifier aticonfig-Monitor[0] Option VendorName ATI Proprietary Driver Option ModelName Generic Autodetecting Monitor Option DPMS true EndSection Section Device Identifier Generic Video Card Driver vesa BusID PCI:1:0:0 EndSection Section Device Identifier aticonfig-Device[0] Driver fglrx Option XAANoOffscreenPixmaps on Option VideoOverlay on Option TexturedVideo on Option TexturedVideoSync on Option UseFastTLS 1 Option BackingStore on EndSection Section Screen Identifier Default Screen Device Generic Video Card Monitor Generic Monitor DefaultDepth 24 SubSection Display Depth 1 Modes 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x800 1280x768 1200x800 1152x864 1152x768 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 4 Modes 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x800 1280x768 1200x800 1152x864 1152x768 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 8 Modes 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x800 1280x768 1200x800 1152x864 1152x768 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 15 Modes 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x800 1280x768 1200x800 1152x864 1152x768 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 16 Modes 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x800 1280x768 1200x800 1152x864 1152x768 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 24 Modes 1400x1050 1280x1024 1280x800 1280x768 1200x800 1152x864 1152x768 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection EndSection Section Screen Identifier aticonfig-Screen[0] Device aticonfig-Device[0] Monitor aticonfig-Monitor[0] DefaultDepth 24 SubSection Display Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection Section DRI Mode 0666 EndSection Section Extensions Option RENDER Enable Option DAMAGE Enable Option Composite Enable EndSection And here is the output from the fglrxinfo command: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/X11$ fglrxinfo display: :0.0 screen: 0 OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc. OpenGL renderer string: ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 OpenGL version string: 2.1.7281 Release Can you help me troubleshoot this, please?
Displaying hardware devices on Debian.
Can you recommend any program for displaying machine's hardware on Debian? Thanks
Re: Displaying hardware devices on Debian.
Thanks for your answers. Now I have a lot of commands to give a try ;)
Re: ATI Radeon X1400 + Debian Etch + Compiz Fusion = White Screen
Well, I am registered in Compiz forums and I posted a thread with my problems installing Compiz but I didnt receive too much help. I think I've tried everything in an atempt to configure my graphics card for running Compiz Fusion and I'm really going nuts with this issue, everytime I try something new (based on tutorials or forum posts from the web) I always get that freaking white screen... with Beryl too.
Missing option in GNOME Control Center
Hello, I've noticed that in my GNOME Control Center the Window Manager capplet is missing... Any hint? Thanks
Re: Missing option in GNOME Control Center
Hi, Micaela. I've recently installed Debian 4.0 'Etch' as a VMWARE Virtual Machine (under Windows XP). I don't really know if some time that capplet was present, I've executed GNOME Control Center for the first time a couple of days ago. I've performed the updates that Update Manager suggested me and installed some software like Compiz, Xfe File Manager, Sawfish, Enlightenment... On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Micaela Gallerini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/2/14, Carlos Parada [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I've noticed that in my GNOME Control Center the Window Manager capplet is missing... Any hint? Thanks hi, what do you do before the Window Manager capplet is missing, please? Do you update the system? Do you change anything in the system or in the desktop manager? Do you install any new software or update any software? Regards, -- The capability to hear give possibility to understand much things Rashna Micaela Gallerini -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Missing option in GNOME Control Center
So is there any way of make appear the Window Manager Capplet?? Perhaps installing the newest version of GNOME Control Center...? aptitude install packet_name...
