PPPD Not working?

1998-05-17 Thread Carroll Kong
I cannot believe I am asking this since I had it working with Debian
1.3R6.  After upgrading to Debian 2.0 via hamm, and reinstalling minicom,
I tried doing my usual, login via minicom, quit without reset, run 'pppd
/dev/modem 57600 crtscts defaultroute modem' then it hangs up instantly!
Any ideas guys?  Oh yeah... on kernel bootup, it says PPP loaded, with BSD
PPPD compression (is this what is causing problems, the PPP compression?)
Thanks in advance guys!

-Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sshd and utmp

1998-05-05 Thread Carroll Kong
Hey guys... I have sshd running.. and it seems to work. My friends and I
can 'ssh' to my system.  But there is one minor problem... a 'w' command will
NOT show the ssh conneciton.  Is this proper?  And if not... how can I fix it?
Should I recompile sshd?  I do not remember where to find it... I guess I could
hunt it down at sunsite.unc.edu, but if anyone has it handy, could they please
post it up?  Or... is this some kind of configuration or permission issue for
utmp to work with sshd?  I am using debian 2.0 glibc2... can that be affecting
sshd if sshd was compiled in libc5?  Thanks in advance guys.


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-I- where? is source for sshd?

1998-05-05 Thread Carroll Kong
I am sorry, I usually can find these things on my own, but i searched
with www.linuxhq.com, and sunsite.unc.edu is down for me right now, and I
searched the debian packages via www and I ran through dselect.. i could not
find the source for sshd.  Can someone please tell me the main ftp site where
sshd is located?  Thanks in advance.


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-i- Thanks

1998-05-05 Thread Carroll Kong
Thanks guys for the ftp sites.  ssh is being compiled as we speak... 


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Installation Millenium2

1998-05-02 Thread Carroll Kong



Carroll Kong

On Sat, 2 May 1998, Olivier wrote:

 Hye , I want to install my Millenium 2 video card , and my Linux version
 don't support it ( Linux Mnis octobrer 97 kernel 2.0.30 / 2.1.56 ).
 I don't find the drivers for it .
 So , i want to know how do to get it or how do to configure the Linux
 system for this card .
 
 Thanks .
 
 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 and 
 mailto :[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux supports the mill II card.  Your problem is that X will not, right?  If
so, get Xfree86 3.3.2 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: text mode IDE?

1998-04-29 Thread Carroll Kong
I use xwpe myself.. but try wpe.  xwpe is very close to borland's dos
ide, and wpe is just... well weird.  :)  (you need X for xwpe).  


Carroll Kong

On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Dave Elliot wrote:

 I was wondering if there's a decent text mode IDE for debian/linux.  
 Something similar to RHIDE or Borland's DOS IDE.  I would use something for 
 X, but I can't get that working yet.  Hopefully someday.  Anyways, anything 
 would be great.  Thanks for the info.
 
 Peace,
 -dave


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: bugs in latest ncftp package?

1998-04-28 Thread Carroll Kong
I think you can compile back in name completion.  I got a bug where it
would resume files improperly and append MORE data than the original file was
supposed to have.  (ncftp 3.0 beta 9)


Carroll Kong

On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Ted Cabeen wrote:

 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hamish Moffatt writes:
 On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 06:56:34PM -0600, Britton Leo Kerin wrote:
  error.log looks like:
  
 I think this is because you had NcFTP 3.0 (which was in non-free),
 and have now upgraded to NcFTP 2.4.3 (now GPL).
 
 Yup, that's it.  And its a good thing too, because 3.0 sucks.  (No completion,
 no paging of long directory entries.  What is it good for?
 
 --
 Ted Cabeenhttp://fnord.rh.uchicago.edu   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Check Website or finger for PGP Public Key[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I have taken all knowledge to be my province. -F. Bacon   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Human kind cannot bear very much reality.-T.S.Eliot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Linux + Win95 + Win NT on one HD

1998-04-22 Thread Carroll Kong
I got this setup.. in fact.. I even have FreeBSD to do a quad boot.
However... I am not positive if you can directly boot off of a hda6... since for
me to successfully implement the quad boot, I had to make 3 primary partitions.
Windows 95, FreeBSD, Linux.  They all mount different drives... Windows NT is
sitting on a logical drive on an extended partition.  I use NT Bootloader.  Make
sure you ran the

dd if=/dev/hda6 of=/bootsect.lnx bs=512 count=1 
and cp the bootsect.lnx to your FAT C:\ somehow.  Modify the boot.ini.  (I am
assuming you did this.. but just in case).  

If that fails to work... odds are you need to make a /hda3 as your
/ root.  


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 22 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I am trying to install three OSs on one HD: Win 95, Win NT and Linux. I was
 partially succesfull; th eonly problem at the moment is, that I can't boot
 linux without a boot floppy.
 
 Here is what I did:
 1. Partition my hard disk ( 3GB) with fdisk (the DOS program):
  - hda1 Primary Bootable for Win 95 (as c:\) (1.6 B)
 - hda2 as Extended with logical partitions:
 - hda5 logical for Win NT (as d:\) (0.8 GB)
 2. Partition my hard disk with the debian partition program
 - hda6 as / (0.12 GB)
 - hda7 as swap (0.034 GB)
 - hda8 as /usr (0.53 GB)
 3. Installed the OSs (it really worked!)
 4. Used the NT boot loader as primary OS loader
 5. Patched this loader as described in the Linux and Win NT mini HowTo, but
 it didn't work

 Is there a possibility to use only ONE partitioning program? (the debian
 linux partitioner seems not to work, because it does not create DOS
 accessible C: or D: drives (i.e. with linux fdisk I can't run format c: and
 therfore I can't install Windows)
 
 Thanks in advance for any helpful hints ...
 
 Philipp.
 
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Xlock with shadow passwords

1998-04-21 Thread Carroll Kong
Hey guys, I recently lot a LOT of suid bit that slaughtered a lot of
system functionality.  I reinstalled xlock via package.. or at least i thought
i did.  It has perms 2755 xlock chowned to root.shadow.  Problem is... for some
odd reason the group shadow although it has suid (s)... cannot execute for
non-root users.

(chmod 2755 xlock may be better if shadow has group read for root group)

How can I make the shadow group have read for root group?  
Thanks in advance.


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Windoze 95 is not multi-tasking, it just pretends it is multitasking.

1998-04-20 Thread Carroll Kong
Windows 98 and NT require more ram to be faster than 95.  Otherwise,
it's overbloated kernel and other system sucking resources will force you to hit
your harddrive (memory paging via swap file / disk) and that wil cause such a
slow down.  Personally, I find windows 95 and nt have faster response times on
some windows vs my X all oses have their purposes, I personally favor Linux
with X11 rather than MS for my general internetting pleasure.
I only tried a few betas of Windows 98, like I said.. needs more ram.
:)

Carroll Kong

On Sat, 18 Apr 1998, Paul Miller wrote:

 On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, C.J.LAWSON wrote:
 
  Well for what it is worth my own opinion is that 95 just like its forbears
  is an app. loaded on dos and for this reason I think we should be talking
  about whether or not dos is a true multi-tasking OS ... It certainly is
  capable of becoming one. The question is, has it be implemented?
 
 Ever try Windows '98?  Well, if you haven't, don't count on M$ ever
 learning how to design a real operating system.  Yesterday I heard a
 commercial on the radio about Win98 being the OS of future businesses...
 Win98 runs one hell of a lot slower than Win95 and multitasks even worse.. 
 I don't know where M$ came up with Win98 running programs faster than
 Win95..   Win98 is a disaster; _never_ install it, it is a complete waste
 of time and money.
 
 Maybe Gates should fire all the so-called programmers and hire a few
 monkeys to get the job done!  I guess that comment was a little harsh,
 but necessay to get the point across
 
 -Paul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: question about kernel

1998-04-20 Thread Carroll Kong
Yes.  There is the new 'nestea' attack ... linux is linux, regardless of
distribution.  In other words, debian is definately vulnerable, there are
patches available.  I forgot exactly where I got mine, (sorry), but it is
something like ip_fragment.c and you throw it into your kernel source tree and
recompile it... 


Carroll Kong

On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Maarten Bezemer wrote:

 
 Hi!
 A lot of the people here are running RH linux, and this morning all of 'em
 crashed. RH seems to have a patch available, Debian doesn't.
 Question: is Debian vulnerable for this?
 
 -Maarten


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks... but.. need to reset dpkg

1998-04-19 Thread Carroll Kong
Ok guys... I got my system working again, had to reinstall.  Backed up
some stuff, but now I got some problems... the dpkg thingy is freaking out.  It
will not update to the ftp.debian.org since I updated the /var/lib/dpkg/status
file.  How do I reset the file?  Or at least change the date of this file so I
can let ftp.debian.org update it?


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Cannot login?

1998-04-18 Thread Carroll Kong
Hey guys.  Big problem... I had freebsd 3.0 sitting around, decided to
mount my linux ext2fs partitions with it.  I umounted it... rebooted back
into linux.  Now I can ONLY login as root.  If I login as myself it says.

cannot cd /home/damascus

And.. if I su damascus as root it says

su:  cannot run /usr/bin/zsh permission denied:

I was guessing my SUID bits are ripped off, but they are still there, I
think?  The lower case 's' is still there for a lot of binaries.  Is there
any EASY way to restore system functionality aside from backing up and
reinstalling?  Like.. rerunning a particular package or something?  Thanks
in advance guys.  

BTW, I checked most permissions, like /home and /bin/login and
/home/damascus and /usr/bin/zsh.  I even tried su as a different user, but
I get the same permission denied error.  I really do not think this is an
operator error in the sense that I do not know anything about
permissions.  (error operator in the sense that I should never have mounted
ext2fs with freebsd. :(  )  

In the end it seems like a permission error, does anyone know what kind of
files are required to do such a thing?  



-Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Dselect fails?

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
Hm...  sorry for bothering everyone with my feeble questions... but
after installing Debian 2.0... i try running dselect, and everytime I try to get
files, it say file does not exist blah blah blah... I updated my database
across the ftp.debian.org with the hamm contrib non-free.  Is this wrong?  Any
ideas guys?  I am pretty sure the links really do work and exist, I tried to
trace them myself.  Not that I mind running around in ncftp and dpkg -i deb.deb
packages myself.. but it would be nice.  :)  


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Another Debian 2.0 Question - GMT

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
Okay... this is getting semi-annoying, I do not know why my clock
automagically changes back about 4 hours behind.. maybe 5.  My local clock is
fine, it worked fine in Debian 1.3R6, but after installing Debian 2.0
(upgrading), it changed into some odd time.  I think it has something to do with
/usr/lib/zoneinfo/localtime but it is a weird binary?  Can I turn my clock
back to Eastern Standard Time?  Or does anyone know why it is doing this?  Does
hwclock -a $GMT have anything to do with it (this is in my /etc/init.d/boot).


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Upgrading to hamm

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
I was in the same position as you as of yesterday.  I upgraded,
although, i had to use the upgrade script three times (well just to make sure, I
only needed to do it twice) for dependencies.  However, I could not figure out
how to reexecute the script installation after the first time, so I redownloaded
all the files again!  No big deal to me since i have a good inet connect, anyone
know how do resolve this?  (can i just goto /var/lib/dpkg/methods/ftp/base/ and
install all the .debs manually?!?  How can i get the script to auto continue and
do it again without redownloading everything?!?)
Ok... after that, I rebooted.  I did the /var/wtmp and utmp fix which is
told in the autoup.sh.  (or else who and last do not work... and they really
don't unless you do it. :)  )  Then.. the dreaded hamm upgrade! I advise not
doing this while you are in X (the hamm upgrade).  Use dselect to get the hamm
package, (I had a cd of the packages so I escaped unscathed), ftp dselect failed
for me... but someone told me how to do it.  Try this.

Use dists/frozen/main dists/frozen/contrib dists/frozen/non-free.  It
works fine for me. 

This is quoted from Bob who assisted me.  I did not try it, but it should work.
ftp.debian.org has the newest packages btw.  

My grep was broken on the CD, however, the new package fixes it.  My sendmail
broke too after the hamm packages upgrade, I got sendmail.8.8.8-14.deb and had
to install it twice.  (weird eh?)  Then it finally went.  I had to do some funky
things with the sendmail.mf and .cf and what not to get it working... although
it works now.  (heheh i should get the crab book).  Aside from that, not too
painful, but reconfiguring afterstep 1.4 took a bit of time. Generally took 8
hours for me to fully reconfigure and feel happy about the system again.  (it
takes me a while for these things).

Hope this helps.  (no unstablility yet...)

Carroll Kong

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:

 
 Hi,
 
 I am currently running a debian bo system, and I am considering upgrading
 (or more to the point - re-installing) to a hamm system.
 
 I am, however, conserned about stablility...
 
 Does anyone know of any major problems with a hamm system?
 
 Chris


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: why debian?

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
There is no better distribution.  It is a matter of taste and style.
I like slackware, but it has no package system.  :)  I find Debian to be a nice
combination in between.  It has a good package system and does not seem to have
as many bugs as redhat.  Although I could be wrong since red hat has a lot of
patches.  Try them yourself and get a feel for it.


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris de Weth wrote:

 Hi!
 
 I was just wondering if anyone can tell me why so much people use Red 
 Hat linux? To me it seems that they have a far greater community to 
 support others questions.
 I'm thinking of going to use Linux at work, so security is quite
 important. From a friend I just got this list address, and I don't know 
 where to ask this question to Red Hat users. Maybe someone can tell me 
 what distribution is better?
 
 
 __
 Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


email sendmail problems?

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
For odd reasons, I cannot send email to one user on my college network.
Pine immediately says, blahblah username not found.  Not sending.  I thought it
is supposed to send it with sendmail?!?!  Have I configured sendmail improperly?


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-I- Re: email sendmail problems?

1998-04-15 Thread Carroll Kong
Ignore this.. i think i may have fixed it.  :(  Sorry about the flood of
'newbie' questions.  Heheeh :)


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:

   For odd reasons, I cannot send email to one user on my college network.
 Pine immediately says, blahblah username not found.  Not sending.  I thought 
 it
 is supposed to send it with sendmail?!?!  Have I configured sendmail 
 improperly?
 
 
 Carroll Kong
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Debian 2.0

1998-04-14 Thread Carroll Kong
Ok guys... i risked it all for Debian 2.0 again.  I got the new
autoup.sh, ran the ftp install about 3 times to make sure.  (i had to manually
fix the dpkg upgrade itself, not a big deal at all though).  Oddly enough, this
time around, I did NOT have problems running X.  And everything seemed to move
smooth as cake, aside from the fixing of wtmp and utmp, but that was nothing. 

Thanks guys... I really did not realize they fixed up the autoup.sh and
whatever else was damaged in the older hamms.  Although it still says Debian 1.3
on the outside...once again, no big deal to fix.  /etc/issue and /etc/issue.net,
right?  Any other caveats I gotta watch out for?  All my stuff seems to work for
the most part.  (knock on wood).  Dpkg seemed to freak out.. now that i updated
it.. maybe I can successfully update it now.. before it said files were
missing... from the ftp sites?!?!  

Thanks again.  


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Grep... in Debian 2.0

1998-04-14 Thread Carroll Kong
Doh... ok.  I vaguely remember someone speaking of this problem before..
but my grep is dead.  Should I get the old package and install it?  The
newone... although it seems to work.. once I try grep text string * it does
not return anything?  Have I been using this the wrong way before?  It worked
fine that way before 


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


CD-Rs In Linux

1998-04-13 Thread Carroll Kong
Hi guys.  I normally did not have any problems with Linux, Windows 95,
Windows NT with the Yamaha CDRW4260.  
However, when I tried doing a disc at once extraction in windows 95 or
windows nt, I faced odd errors.  There is a jumper on this CD-RW for 512 byte
/head access, which I enabled because they said it was needed for Unix
operation.  I tested a regular CD in both OS (MS and Unix-clone) and it worked
fine.  But with Disc-at-once in Microsoft, I got errors until I moved the
jumper.  I am going to test it in Linux now (no unix jumper enabled), but I
was also wondering... I have a .raw or .bin file... it is a raw extraction of a
CD image.  Can cd-record successfully burn this type of file?  Thanks in
advance guys.  


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [OFF TOPIC] Paul Atreides

1998-04-13 Thread Carroll Kong
Actually Paul Atreides becomes a blind super prophet while his son, Leto
II becomes the actual Worm of Lore.  He then dies at the hands of his sister's
troops as Leto II breaks in and slaughters everyone.  But... hehehe I guess
either way they are in a different category.  :)


Carroll Kong

On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Tamas Papp wrote:

  Oh wow, is Paul Atreides an actual world leader? I voted for him too--in my 
  case
  because he's the primary character of Frank Herbert's Dune, in which he 
  becomes
  emporer of the known universe.
 But later on he becomes a wormlike creature so he is in a different
 category :-) Sorry.
 
 jabberwock
 
 ###By lack of understanding they remained sane. (George Orwell)###
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Default FTP installation

1998-04-13 Thread Carroll Kong
Ok... this is trolling since I do not have Debian 2.0, but Debian 1.3.
However, I would guess they would have it enabled by default.  If not, check
/etc/inetd.conf and check for the 'ftp' daemon and see if it is enabled through
there.  That is where the ftpd is usually started up.  


Carroll Kong

On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Will Smith wrote:

 Hello,
 Could anyone clarify whether or not the FTP daemon is configured and
 enabled automatically upon a default installation of Debian (2.0)? Thanks
 for your reply.
 --
 Will Smith
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Debian 2.0

1998-04-13 Thread Carroll Kong
A get a mixed bag from this a lot of people say Debian 2.0 is stable
and fine to upgrade from 1.3.  Then.. there are people who say that Debian 2.0
breaks applications.  I am willing to upgrade again... but these are my
concerns.

last time i did it.. all went well. but X was killed.  I do NOT think i upgrade
the X package to get glibc2 X libs.  Is this the cause?  And... after upgrading
libs, I can just run the Accelerated X binary and I should be ok?  (somewhat
answered before, but i want to verify, all i do is do minimal installation for
x, right?)

I run Bind (forgot which ver... pretty sure the newest one)

Sendmail 8.8.8

apache httpd (pretty sure the newest one)

staroffice

file runner

pine and fetchmail

netscape 4.05

xwpe (Windows Programming Environment)

Can anyone see any impending problems with me upgrading from 1.3R6 to 2.0?  I
think I can fix the X problem... that is the main thing.  Plus.. it would be bad
if any of the apps I mentioned above fail or act oddly in Debian 2.0.  If there
is ANY oddity... please tell me.  I do not want to upgrade if that is the
case... 

Thanks in advance guys, this will save me a lot of trouble!


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Setting transparent xterms

1998-04-12 Thread Carroll Kong
Some people once told me that they saw a xterm window in X that had a
transparent -background so you could easily see the wallpaper in the back.  How
is this possible?  (So basically it is like me calling an xterm window and
seeing my nice background and I will look like I am typing directly into the
background.)  Thanks in advance.


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [pwink@ibm.net: telnet does not allow login as root]

1998-04-12 Thread Carroll Kong
I believe that the /etc/securetty or something of that nature, denys,
login as root.  Root is supposedly never supposed to be directly accessed ever.
A form of security against remote invasion of monumental proportions.
(considering you can wipe out the local system or shutdown / reboot the system
remotely...)


Carroll Kong

On Sun, 12 Apr 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:

 -Forwarded message from Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED]-
 
 This is my first experience setting up a Debian (or UNIX) server.
 
 The server is running Debian 1.3.1.  I am not able to telnet into the
 server and login as root, I can however telnet and login as other
 users.  I can also ftp and login as root.
 
 An explanation as to why this is occuring and how I might remedy it
 would be appreciated.  Thanks in advance.
 
 Paul
 
 -End of forwarded message-
 
 -- 
  / Martin Schulze  http://home.pages.de/~joey/
 / Linux - the choice of a GNU generation  [EMAIL PROTECTED] /


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Motif

1998-04-10 Thread Carroll Kong
Motif is not freeware.  Lesstif is.. but you need Motif to run XMCD.
There is a statically compiled version somewhere... 


Carroll Kong

On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Helmut Leinfellner wrote:

 Hi !
 
 I was trying to install XMCD and I think what I'm lacking is ... Motif.
 
 Where do I get it ?
 
 Thanks, Helmut
 
 
 
---
Accept the challenge!   http://fbma.tuwien.ac.at/~e8426331/
... and write to me !
---
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-I- Re: lesstif not motif

1998-04-10 Thread Carroll Kong
Oh yes, sorry, I stand corrected.

Carroll Kong

On Fri, 10 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, Apr 09, 1998 at 08:00:05PM -0400, Carroll Kong wrote:
  Motif is not freeware.  Lesstif is.. but you need Motif to run XMCD.
 
 No you don't. The xmcd package in frozen uses LessTif, not Motif.
 
 Ray
 -- 
 Obsig: developing a new sig
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Need help with da requirements

1998-04-08 Thread Carroll Kong
It should work.  My friend runs Red Hat 5.0 with a Pentium II.  


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hey,
 No, in the installation readme file it says that Linux works on Pentium,
 Pentuim Pro, now, what about Pentium II?
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CD-R, CD-RW

1998-04-08 Thread Carroll Kong
Yeah.   I burned ~ 5 CDs in Linux.  My overall record with the Ricoh and
Yamaha is still ~ 30 successful vs 0 misburns.  Only the Yamaha worked, not the
Ricoh1060, in Linux.  I use cdrecord ver 1.6alpha 14 with mkisofs.  (It comes
with mkisofs).  I did not try the RW discs on it yet but I cannot see why it
would not work.  :)


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Martin Oldfield wrote:

 
 Has anyone any experience of using a CD-R, or preferably a CD-RW drive 
 with Linux ? I'm particularly interested in SCSI based drives.
 
 Cheers,
 -- 
 Martin Oldfield. 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mill 2

1998-04-05 Thread Carroll Kong
You do not need hamm for mill ii support.  Xfree86 3.3.1 supported mill
ii just had lots of bugs with it.  XFree86 3.3.2 is all you need.


Carroll Kong

On Sun, 5 Apr 1998, Robert Rozman wrote:

   Hello !
 
 I'm new in the Linux field. I've installed bo, but my Matrox Millenium II 
 isn't working. Now I want to get to hamm, for my card to get working. I 
 follow all those messages in user mail list and I'm really confused. Some are 
 saying no problems - other reporting problems.
 I can in fact do also clean install of Hamm over bo, cause I haven't really 
 used bo yet.
 Is it Hamm alreay stable enough to be used ?
 
 So, what is the easiest way not to have any problems installing hamm and to 
 get my card working.
 
 Robert Rozman


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Glibc2

1998-04-02 Thread Carroll Kong
What kind of success would I get if I simply got a tarball of the
glibc2 libs and ran the mozilla package?  It should work... right?


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mozilla.deb, get it while its hot

1998-04-01 Thread Carroll Kong
Wow.. is mozilla the web browser of choice for linux?  (like... less
bugs?).  Hm... I do not have a lot of those libs you mentioned, can I install
them without replacing my libc5 libs?  Or will I definately get a conflict?  
The site is down now... :(  at least for me, do you know of any mirrors
with ISO images?!?!  
Hm... when you say glitches in html rendering is there any glitches
like netscape' dreaded 'bus error'?  (critical fatal errors?)


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Johnie Ingram wrote:

 
 A Mozilla 5 package by Joey Hess is now in our master Incoming, and
 will be soon at an Incoming mirror near you.  :-) You can already get
 it from:
 
  
 ftp://ftp1.us.debian.org/pub/debian/Incoming/mozilla-smotif_5.0b1-0.0_i386.deb
 
 To run it you need libc6, libstdc++2.8, xlib6g, and xpm4g installed.
 (The 0.0 version means it still needs a permanent maintainer.)
 
 And yes, its actually usable, and has at least one convenient new
 feature in the Window menu.  There are some glitches in HTML rendering
 though.
 
 In addition to Incoming, this site also has a full mirror of the
 mozilla source (/mozilla/1998-03-31/) and an ISO image of Debian 2.0
 suitable for burning to CDR (/CD/Debian-2.0.iso, updated nightly at
 0200 GMT).
 
 It looks like the Debian and Openscape developers will work
 side-by-side on this -- irc.openscape.org and irc.debian.org are the
 same network.  :-)
 
 
 -  PGP  E4 70 6E 59 80 6A F5 78  63 32 BC FB 7A 08 53 4C
  
__ _Debian GNU Johnie Ingram [EMAIL PROTECTED]  mm   mm
   / /(_)_ __  _   ___  __netgod irc.debian.org  mm mm
  / / | | '_ \| | | \ \/ / m m m
 / /__| | | | | |_| |Those who do not understand UNIX   mm   mm
 \/_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\ are doomed to repeat it, poorly.   GO BLUE
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Help with X

1998-04-01 Thread Carroll Kong
I ran this


/home/damascus% xset r rate
Xlib:  extension XFree86-Misc missing on display :0.0.
server does not have extension for r rate option


I get this odd error... when i try to run xset r rate?  Not sure if I ran it
improperly... but the idea of me missing an extension in X-Free does not make me
happy.  :)  I use Accelerated X, but since that is a mere XServer binary,
(right?)  can I install a glibc2 or libc5 version of XFree86 3.3.2 into
/usr/X11R6 and re symlink my Accelerated X binary to X and still expect it to
work?  

Also... I had problems with debian 2.0 because my Accelerated X did not seem to
work, is it possible that I had to upgrade my version of the Xlibs since I
only upgraded the core system and not the X system?  And... if that is true,
would my original plan of installing Xfree86 3.3.2 glibc2 while resymlinking my
Accelerated X binary help me get glibc2 working 100% on my system?

Btw, any odd bugs with glibc2?  I heard of some apps breaking... not sure if I
should dare to make the move to glibc2 yet since it does not seem to have 100%
dominance yet.  (but I guess it is getting there?)

So... is hamm frozen safe to get and install.  The idea of having a frozen
distro... if there are bugs, sounds like there will be fixes... ?


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Killing NetBios Network Connections

1998-04-01 Thread Carroll Kong
How exactly do I kill an active Network Connection (NETBIOS) so they are
forced to reconnect to me?  (reauthenticate themselves)?  netstat -kill?
hehehe?  Basically something analagous to MS's net use /delete IPC$
Thanks!


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Samba config/password problem; Win95 OEMSR2

1998-03-31 Thread Carroll Kong


Carroll Kong
Aha, this is an interesting angle I haven't thought of!  I tried it, 
 here's what
 happens; I get the error message of:
 
 ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or 
 Session
 Setup are invalid.)
 
Ok.  If you got an error running smbclient to your own box check to see if
you did it properly?  smbclient -L hostname -U username?  And try your password.
If you did this properly... from linux to samba... and it failed.  Odds are you
have encrypted passwords enabled in /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf?

This is a guess of mine.. or you do not have security = user but ... you seem to
have that setup.  Or... it was not a valid user?  

Ok... assuming you can get yourself connected to samba... you can enable
encrypted passwords, which I do suggest, both ways are insecure but if this
network you are describing has relatively good security and is more LAN than
WAN, having encrypted passwords is not such a bad thing.  You should read the
/samba-1.9.1.8p4/docs/ENCRYPTION.TXT.  run the cat /etc/passwd |
./mksambapass.sh or what not... there is a line in the .txt file.  After you run
that though, you should run ./smbpasswd username for each user.  I could NOT
find a way around this at all.  I do not think the /./mksambapasswd successfully
ports the unix hashed passwords since the unix hashed passwords cannot be
converted to the smb hashed passwords.  (sorry for the bad terminology.. heheh).
So in essense, the smb password will be different from their telnet login
password.  

Once again, double check the linux smbclient to linux samba.  If you cannot do
that successfully, I cannot imagine you getting the Win 95 logging in
successfully before your own linux smbclient to samba.  

  And how do you setup plain text passwords through NetBios in windows 95?
 
   Perhaps plain text is the wrong terminology, I just meant unencrypted.  
 It's done
 by adding a registry key and is documented in /usr/doc/samba's Win95.txt.

  Randy|  / /__  / / / \// //_// \ \/ /

Ah.. a registry add on.  That is what I meant... plain text passwords is the
right terminology, I believe, I did not know it was a registry key fix.  :)  


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SAMBA w/ TCP/IP

1998-03-31 Thread Carroll Kong
I thought SAMBA uses Netbios which can be tunneled through any protocol?
Tcpi/ip, ipx/spx, or netbeui?  

Carroll Kong

On Tue, 31 Mar 1998, Leonardo Ruoso wrote:

 I've heard about SAMBA! SAMBA uses NetBeui to do Network
 Neighborhood?
   
   If uses my wokgroup will be based on NetBeui and I'll get colised
 again. If what i want is use only TCP/IP in my Network... SAMBA'S
 NetBeui woks encapsuled on TCP (IP os UDP)?
 
   When I get to configure my Windows95/NT Network Clients i will use the
 Microsof Network Client in the same way I even do?
 
   TIA


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: More on XDM?

1998-03-30 Thread Carroll Kong
I use Accelerated X which defaults to 24 bit color.  Did you misread my
message?  Or does xdm not use accelerated X?  I never installed xf86config,
at least not on Linux.. I do it for freebsd and am happy with 16 bit color
there.  :)  

My question was that logging in remotely gives me less color than
logging in locally.  via xdm.  


Carroll Kong

On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Oliver Elphick wrote:

 Carroll Kong wrote:
     Where do I go to
   increase color depth allocation per user?  I want to have maximized 
 resource
   s
   allocated Thanks in advance guys!
   
   Debian 1.3R6 running XDM-Shadow 
 
 -- 
 Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Isle of Wight  http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
 
 PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
 
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Samba config/password problem; Win95 OEMSR2

1998-03-30 Thread Carroll Kong
I am not sure if osr2 forces encrypted passwords, but it sounds like a
possibility.  Can you smbclient to yourself in Linux to see if it will browse?
If that is successful, the problem is definatley password related... you set it
up as security=user and since windows 95 does not let you connect as (at least
in the older versions I worked with), make sure your microsoft client login
matches a unix client.
I resorted to the encrypted passwords methods which is very annoying
when adding new users... :)  But I have a lot of NT clients, I did not test it
fully with windows 95 clients, but maybe windows 95 now forces encrypted
passwords by default as well.  And how do you setup plain text passwords
through NetBios in windows 95?  Can you browse the network at all?


Carroll Kong

On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Randy Edwards wrote:

I'm running my Linux box (hamm) to two Win95 machines which are
 running OEMSR2 with the Dial-Up Networking 1.2 upgrade.
 
After upgrading to the latest Samba I am having trouble getting
 access to my printer (which is on the Linux box) and my home
 directories.  I have read and reread the Samba docs and have tried
 just about every combination of parameters but I still have Win95
 complaining that my password to Samba is incorrect (both Win95
 machines are set up with identical networking logins/passwords).
 
To eliminate the problem of Win95's encrypted passwords, I have set
 up one Win95 machine to use plain text passwords and left the other
 as default.  Still no luck.
 
What I am curious about are several things.  First, anyone have any
 ideas on how to tackle this problem?  Secondly, does anyone know for
 sure what type of password Win95 OEMSR2 (aka Win95B) with DUN 1.2
 upgrade uses?  Thirdly, does anyone have a working /etc/smb.conf that
 they could send me (I'm fairly sure that mine is okay -- it checks out
 with testparm -- but just wanted to see what works).


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: More on XDM?

1998-03-30 Thread Carroll Kong
But I was able to run another xdm session on another server, same
terminal and get the same application working with enough colors.  The only
difference is a wharf bar... if that is draining all the extra colors that the
app needs, i guess I am stuck.  So I have to reduce the color load on my
Accelerated X and hope that it will go?


Carroll Kong

On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Ossama Othman wrote:

 
  I use Accelerated X which defaults to 24 bit color.  Did you misread my
  message?  Or does xdm not use accelerated X?  I never installed xf86config,
  at least not on Linux.. I do it for freebsd and am happy with 16 bit color
  there.  :)  
 
 Xdm will use whatever is Xserver is configured.  I had my xdm using the
 Acclerated-X demo server, for example. 
 
  My question was that logging in remotely gives me less color than
  logging in locally.  via xdm.  
 
 If the graphics card on your remote machine can't support as many colors
 as the graphics card on your local machine then you will get less colors
 on the remote machine.  Xdm uses whatever X server is available on the
 machine you are going to display your X session on.
 
 -Ossama
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: XDM with Debian 1.3E6

1998-03-29 Thread Carroll Kong
Whoa... big problems.  I checked my /etc/init.d/xdm... it is a zero byte
file.  Apparently, when I installed the system, I never setup xdm.  Is there
some kind of setup script to get xdm on my system working again?  I have
shadowed passwords... and I am looking for a package called xdm, but there does
not seem to be any.  Thanks!


Carroll Kong

On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Oliver Elphick wrote:

 Carroll Kong wrote:
  re xdm ...
  Everytime I try to login with a valid user account, it says, login
   failed.  I have a .xsession in the users' home dir.  I added the 
 *.domain.na
   me
   in the Xaccess part.  I am guessing my xdm-config is setup improperly for
   authentification.  I added DisplayManager*authenticate:true and a few 
   other
   things... still no go.  And... I cannot get xdm to start up locally so I 
 can
   test it easier.  Even when I did get it running locally, still get that 
 log
   in
   failed even with valid user logins (telnets works fine).  
 
 Perhaps you should be using xdm-shadow?  I seem to remember having had
 this problem in the days when I was running bo.
 
 Look at /etc/init.d/xdm and see whether it starts xdm or xdm-shadow. Try
 swapping which one it starts (provided that they are not effectively the
 same file, as they are on my hamm system).
 
 -- 
 Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Isle of Wight  http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
 
 PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
 
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mouse Driver?

1998-03-29 Thread Carroll Kong
Yes.  Modify your .xinitrc and add the line xset m 5 2.  I would
experiment with it.  Do a man xset to get all of it.. but basically xset m 5 2
means set the mouse acceleration to 5x and 2 means something about the
deceleration I believe.  Experiement with it.  :)  It is a lot faster than the
default.  


Carroll Kong

On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, Carl Brown wrote:

 Greetings!
 I am new to Debian  Linux, so I'll be asking lots of dumb questions.G In
 Win-xx and OS/2, the mouse movement can be accelerated, so the speed of cursor
 movement is proportional to the speed of mouse movement. It would be an
 especially handy feature in Linux-X with all the virtual destop space.
 gpmconfig or XF86Setup didn't offer me any setting for this. Is there a way to
 do this?
 
   /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\-\
Carl Brown, Whitefield, NH, USA Proud Member of TEAM OS/2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Boycott Micro$oft!   
   \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/-/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Frozen Hamm...

1998-03-29 Thread Carroll Kong
Still testing the xdm thing, but thanks for everyone's help on it.  (I
got to run to a remote system to test it).
This Frozen Hamm deal is confusing me.  I tried hamm, and I know I am
not nearly as experienced with Linux as alot of people who have tried hamm, so I
got problems left and right with backward compatibility.  Actually now that I
think about ... my problem was only Accelerated X... but Accelerated X is just a
replacement for like XF86_SVGA, right?  The binaries and libs of Xfree86 3.3.2,
if I grab the ones for glibc2 should work fine, right?  Hm... although hamm is
the latest thing, I wonder if it is worth all my effort to try to go to hamm
since a lot of things I use now still seem to use libc5.  I tried glibc2 for a
little bit, performance gains did not seem to significant.
So... basically, I read, Hamm is frozen for testing... does this mean it
IS stable?  Or they are testing it.. if they find bugs, then they will fix it,
then release it?


Carroll Kong

On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, Oliver Elphick wrote:

 Stan Brown wrote:
  I noticed on my local mirror, that some subdirectories called slin: ar
   e being
  created. Is this new, or have I just not noticed it before. What are th
   ese for?
  
 I presume you mean `slink', as in the subject line.
 
 slink is the next release after hamm; it should now be `unstable', while
 hamm is `frozen'.  When Debian 2.0 (hamm) is finally released, it will
 become `stable' and `frozen' will disappear until it is nearly time to release
 slink.
 
 -- 
 Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Isle of Wight  http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
 
 PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
 
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-I- XDM Works Great.. Thanks!

1998-03-29 Thread Carroll Kong
Hey thanks a lot guys, XDM is working great.  I just need to make a few
modifications since the remote system's video card can't handle high res and
high color depth so my background looks.. heheh crappy.
Nonetheless, thanks to everyone to helped me out here!


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


More on XDM?

1998-03-29 Thread Carroll Kong
Hm... i originally thought my wallpaper sucked up all the resources...
but even when I take it off, I cannot run one of my programs in workable color
anymore.  And... it works fine if I xdm to another server aside my own on the
same terminal so it is not the terminal.  I looked into the .Xresources but all
it seems to talk about is how to setup the login screen.  Where do I go to
increase color depth allocation per user?  I want to have maximized resources
allocated Thanks in advance guys!

Debian 1.3R6 running XDM-Shadow 


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


XDM with Debian 1.3E6

1998-03-28 Thread Carroll Kong
Hi guys, I have returned to the list, had to get my processor fixed.
Anyway, I am running Debian 1.3R6 and I want to have an XDM setup so I can
remotely use my resources and afterstep setup rather than another computer's
limited resources and crappy windows manager.  (afterstep doesn't seem to
install on their side very easily).  
I am using typical run levels... run level 2, goes to terminal mode.  I
run xdm... and one time... i ran it with some arguments and I got it to go to
the xdm login screen... where I got stuck.  Now, I remotely login through a
computer with xdm, and I see my xdm login screen again but this is the stuck
part.  
Everytime I try to login with a valid user account, it says, login
failed.  I have a .xsession in the users' home dir.  I added the *.domain.name
in the Xaccess part.  I am guessing my xdm-config is setup improperly for
authentification.  I added DisplayManager*authenticate: true and a few other
things... still no go.  And... I cannot get xdm to start up locally so I can
test it easier.  Even when I did get it running locally, still get that login
failed even with valid user logins (telnets works fine).  
Thanks in advance guys!


Carroll Kong


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: long filenames in M$Dos partition

1998-03-12 Thread Carroll Kong
Did you try mounting as vfat?


Carroll Kong

On Thu, 12 Mar 1998, Arunas Norvaisa wrote:

   Dear list,
 
   Can anybody of you please explain to me (hopeless newbie) why
 when I can't see long filenames on mounted msdos partition? This
 causes me some pain in the neck as I can't freely manipulate files
 between linux and dos...
 
   Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks.
 
 
 
 --
 greetz... Arunas Norvaisa - little guy, The Masses Inc.
 PGP keys on keyservers: IDs: 0x4CE4774E (DSS/DH), 0xC90D7E21
 PGP for idiots page http://www1.omnitel.net/an
 and a US mirror site http://www.post1.com/~arunas
 Nice computers don't go down.
 
 
 --
 E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: X at higher resolutions, and embedding lower resolutions

1998-03-11 Thread Carroll Kong
I heard that XFree86 3.3.2 has default color depth options during setup.


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 11 Mar 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote:

 edit /etc/X11/XF86zConfig (on a hamm system) or /etc/XF86Config (on a bo 
 system)
 and add the following line in the Screen section (the sae section that
 lists  which monitor, vid card, and resolutions and server all in one)
 DefaultColorDepth 16
 it really does helpI can't stand 8 bit color
 I love running X in 1024x768 32bpp   :)
 -Steve
 
 Maximiano C. Francisco III wrote:
 
  How do you enable X to run at say 16 bpp?  I know you can tell X to run
  at 16bpp by running X as:
  X -bpp 16
  But how do you make sure that everytime I log on it goes to this
  resolution automatically?
 
  Also, I have some applications which run only in 8bpp mode, and I HATE
  having to restart X each time I need to run these apps.  Is there a way
  I can run my default X session in 16 bpp, but still run these 8bpp apps?
 
  thanx...
 
  --
  E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL 
  PROTECTED] .
 
  --
  E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL 
  PROTECTED] .
 
 
 
 
 --
 E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
 
 


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Kernel compilation

1998-03-09 Thread Carroll Kong
Unless I am in serious error, if uname -a gives you Kernel Linux 2.0.29,
it really means you still are running that kernel.  What I usually do now, (i
dont' wipe out the headers anymore) is the standard make mrproper, make
menuconfig, make dep, make clean, make zImage, make modules, make
modules_install.  Modify my /etc/lilo.conf, run lilo.  Do an update on
bootsect.lnx since I am quadbooting.  Then... this is new to me, since I am used
to slackware and modifying rc.d/rc.modules. I copied the zImage to /vmlinuz
(probably better off copying zImage to /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.33 then remaking the
symlink in the /)  I rebooted, made sure I was running the new kernel via
uname -a.

Then instead of modifying /etc/rc.d/rc.modules (slackware), I realized
Debian has this cool modconf which lets you add modules you add them all
in.  It saves them into the /etc/modules and you reboot, and it should have
everything working 100%.

I did miss the earlier part of this thread, so sorry if this info is not helpful
or redundent.  


Carroll Kong

On Sun, 8 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thank you. 
 mv /lib/modules/2.0.29  /lib/modules/2.0.29.old did it.
 I think it ought to be in the README file, toghther with the other 
 differences 
 between the stable and unstable behaviour of the package.
 
 BTW: Why does the kernel compilation number don't get updated in the uname 
 command ?
 
   $ uname -a
   Linux rakefet 2.0.29 #1 Sat Mar 7 19:54:49 UTC 1998 i586 unknown


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian 2.0 unstable

1998-03-08 Thread Carroll Kong
Wow... this thing really is unstable.  I got about 6 or so packages that
said that dependency errors were floating around... sigh.  Well, no big deal,
right?  I did what you guys said, got it installed via ftp some packages
failed, no big deal.  I rebooted... now Accelerated X 4.1 is dead.  Gave me some
odd segmentation fault errors.. Ok... no big deal, reinstall it... now it can
figure out some symbols and dependencies.  Someone once told me to install
debian 1.3.1R6 RAW... then immediately run the script to avoid problems like
this.  Anyone know what is causing these things to kill my Accelerated X?


Carroll Kong


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Debian 2.0 unstable

1998-03-08 Thread Carroll Kong
Fails to startup... says.. cannot solved unresolved symbols 
X_global_lock
XUnlockMutex_fn
XlockMutex_fn

I am seriously considering nuking the partition and starting over.  Or... should
I ... gasp  consider Red Hat instead?

Carroll Kong

On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, George Bonser wrote:

 
 
 If some packages failed to install, it might be because they depended on
 packages that got installed AFTER them.  Fire dselect up and select the
 install option a couple of different times. I think I had to go through
 the install and configure options a two or three times to get everything
 installed.
 
 As for the Accel-X, is it starting and then dying later or is it failing
 to start at all?
 
 
 George Bonser 
 If NT is the answer, you didn't understand the question. (NOTE: Stolen sig)
 http://www.debian.org
 Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.
 
 


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Upgrade...

1998-03-08 Thread Carroll Kong
I am using debian 1.3R6... but i wanted to upgrade the libc since
supposedly the old 5.4.34? had a lot of problems.  I went to 5.4.38.  Now.. when
I type in who .. no one comes up... not even ttys.. (my own).  Is this somehow
related?  And if so, how do I fix it?


Carroll Kong


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: deltree for linux

1998-03-07 Thread Carroll Kong
rm -rf 'dirname' be VERY careful, this command does NOT warn you, and it
will delete everything in  those dirs.. and remove the dir.  Irrevocably
destroying everything without prompts.

in other words, you run this rf -rf / ... kiss your system GOOD bye.  (not sure
if it'll affect mount points?  hopefully not.. heheh minimize dmg)


Carroll Kong

On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, Alain Toussaint wrote:

 does exist a deltree lookalike for linux (or a good way to get rid of some
 directory and their files) ???
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 --
 E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
 
 


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


How to i check for deb 2.0

1998-03-07 Thread Carroll Kong
How do I know if i have deb 2.0?  I ran the autoup.sh, and i ran the
packages, although, i didn't see it do a bunch of mystical untarring or
anything!  Anyway I can check if I upgraded the system and binaries properly?


Carroll Kong


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: How to i check for deb 2.0

1998-03-07 Thread Carroll Kong
Ok. I seem to have the libc6 libs.  But when i did a ldd /sbin/init , it
showed libc5.0.  This is odd, eh?


Carroll Kong

On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:

 On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:
 
  How do I know if i have deb 2.0?  I ran the autoup.sh, and i ran the
  packages, although, i didn't see it do a bunch of mystical untarring or
  anything!  Anyway I can check if I upgraded the system and binaries 
  properly?
 
 See if you have libc6 binaries installed (ls -l /lib/libc*), then check if
 important programs are using libc6 (e.g. ldd /sbin/init).
 
 LLaP
 bero
 
 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ/UIN 6545964 - http://www.star-trek.ml.org/ --
 
 Nobody will ever need more than 640k RAM!
-- Bill Gates, 1981
 Windows 95 needs at least 8 MB RAM.
-- Bill Gates, 1996
 Nobody will ever need Windows 95.
-- logical conclusion
 
 
 


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: AccelX

1998-03-06 Thread Carroll Kong
Accel X 4.1 with patches works fine.  (accel x specific patches).  I
just told Debian not to install it's Xserver binary.  Even then, it should not
make a difference.  Depending if they changed it or not, Accel X 4.1 uses a
termcap based install via binary, I would advise installing term-cap
compatibility or else the install might fail.  


Carroll Kong

On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Jonas Bofjall wrote:

 How well does Accelerated X (a commercial X server from www.xig.com) work
 with Debian GNU/Linux? Is there a Debian installer for it? Can I skip
 installation of XFree if I buy AccelX (if so, won't Debian dependencies
 of XFree give me problems)?
 
 thanks
   // Jonas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2:201/262.37]
 
 
 --
 E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
 
 


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Upgrading to glibc2

1998-03-06 Thread Carroll Kong
Ok... I see an autoup.sh lying around on the net that lets me upgrade
my debian 1.3.1R6 to 2.0 in the sense that it gives me glibc2 and I can
finally grab hamm packages.  Anyone notice any particular bugs with glibc2 or
the hamm packages? (unstable?)  I know they say they are unstable, but someone
told me that debian 2.0 is close to release and that the unstable stuff is
actually pretty stable now?  Should I bother?  My system is working great
now what kind of other advantages should I see?


Carroll Kong


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


autoup.sh

1998-03-06 Thread Carroll Kong
Whoa... tried upgrading and I think I got confused.  Shouldn't I erase
my old packages via dselect? Then change my access to ftp and get all the hamm
packages, then run autoup.sh?


Carroll Kong


--
E-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: [off-topic] not only a server, what hardware?

1998-03-05 Thread Carroll Kong

Carroll Kong

On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:

 WD don't make SCSI disks, unless they have recently started. Buy
 Seagate or IBM, Quantum aren't that good.
 
 
 Hamish

Yeah WD makes scsi.  I think for a while now just never hit major
popularity I guess?


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Debian vs. FreeBSD

1998-03-05 Thread Carroll Kong
I have both FreeBSD and Debian installed.  I will use Debian and Linux
interchangably... from what I hear and so far I already begin to feel (i haven't
used freebsd nearly as much as linux), that FreeBSD is a more structured OS.
From what I hear from other admins, ex-Linux admins, freebsd is easier to
maintain, more secure, and more stable than Linux.  

Linux is more fun and I guess the more 'in' thing with a LOT more
hardware support and generally more software support.  (there is the freebsd
linux binary emulator)   Just for the record, I run Linux as my main personal
os. :)  


Carroll Kong

On Thu, 5 Mar 1998, Y.A.Uvarov wrote:

 Hi!
 
 Could somebody compare Debian with FreeBSD.
 I currently work on FreeBSD and I want to
 know if there are any reasons to try Debian.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 Yury.
 
 
 --
 TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
 Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
 
 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Kernel Install

1998-03-04 Thread Carroll Kong



Carroll Kong

 tar zpfxv linux_2.0.33.tar.gz

technically you forgot..

cd /usr/include
rm -rf asm linux scsi
ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm-386 asm
ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/linux linux
ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/scsi scsi

 cd linux
 make mrproper
 make menuconfig
 make dep
 make clean
 make zlilo

you also did not seem to check /etc/lilo.conf

 make modules
 make modules_install
 reboot
 
 Now, on ANY other machine.. doing a uname -a or checking /proc/version I'd
 have Linux 2.0.33 blah lah lah... But not on this box... it's still saying
 2.0.29. Now I left the machine running for an hour.. and still.. 2.0.29..
 so I rebooted.. still 2.0.29.. I copied the kernel I compiled to a disk
 and boot the disk in another machine.. kernel 2.0.33. Now I check the
 'screwed' machine by attacking it with land/teardrop to see if it was just
 a version screw up and it was really running 2.0.33 just not reporting
 it.. and it bombed. 

you mean you thought it was running 2.0.33 because uname -a isn't going to
lie on you.  If uname -a says 2.0.29... you can immediately start thinking
something about this box is different, the computer isnt' going to change
kernels on you.  Try different methods of approach to solve the problem then,
your solutions of leaving it on for an hour did not help, but your land /
teardrop was a good way to confirm the kernel.

 so it's still running 2.0.29. does anyone hve ANY
 ideas about this? I have recompiled, reinstalled, reunpacked and
 redownloaded the kernel multiple times and it still will nt update.

This is how I would do it.. make zImage instead of make zlilo.

*backup /vmlinuz, most likely a link to /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.29, to something like 
/boot/vmlinuz.old*  

cp /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/zImage /vmlinuz
 
*consider copying to /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.33 then recreating the /vmlinuz symlink*

*check /etc/lilo.conf, make sure it is pointing to the right hd and /vmlinuz*

lilo

*check date of /vmlinuz or wherever dest file is.  Since the dest file is
/boot/vmlinuz-2.0.29, you might want to change it when you confirm it's file
size and date is different and than vmlinuz.old*

then reboot.  on the other hand, you can check /etc/lilo.conf first... then run
make zlilo.  (considering the other steps as well)

Hope this helps.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Zero Length Files on the CD...

1998-03-04 Thread Carroll Kong
Hopefully it'll turn to symlinks... he needed to burn with ISO9660 with
Rockridge extensions.  Didn't he say he burned with EZCD Pro?  Mine for Win 95 /
NT had no such option.  They have joliet.. maybe even romeo so he can try to
patch his kernel for fat32 support / joliet (combo patch), and mount the cd-rom.
Semi-primitive, but at least he'll get a lot of the default packages on a fast
medium.

Carroll Kong

On 4 Mar 1998, Carey Evans wrote:

 P. D. Tisdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 I'm not sure if this problem is normal for
  these CDs, but there are quite a few ZERO LENGTH FILES on the CD.  Is
  this normal or did I do something wrong??  I used EZCD Pro for Windows
  3.1, and a 650Mb CD.  (My CD Burner is a Creative Labs 4210).
 
 Are these files like FROZEN amd STABLE?
 
 These will turn into symlinks (like Win95 shortcuts) when you look at
 them in Linux.
 
Carey Evans  http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


-I- Re: mtools: mmove usage sorry, could not help...

1998-03-04 Thread Carroll Kong
I never could get the mtools to have full functionality... especially on
logical drives in extended partitions for dos.  Is that how you do it?  just do
a 
mcopy a: /dos/e?  and it'll hunt for logical partition named E:?  I tried mcopy
a: e: and no go (a while back in FreeBSD). 

I got around it by just mounting my drives and manually copying them mmove
should ignore perms and multiple file systems, 
the mv command freaks out when i move from partition to partition because mved
file retain old perms... so it makes sense that it'll 'fail' on a destination
fat drive.  


Carroll Kong

On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler wrote:

 Hi,
 
  how am I supposed to use mmove?
 
  I think it should be called just like mcopy. However, while
  'mcopy a: /dos/e' works, 'mmove a: /dos/e' doesn't. The man
  page and the info file didn't help.
 
  Any hints? Or is it a bug?
 
  Thank you,
 
   Ulf


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Kernel Install

1998-03-04 Thread Carroll Kong
My bad.  Sorry for the misinformation then.  I am new to
Debian... used
to old school Slackware.  

Although it says it will break compilations... it seemed to work fine
for the most part.  But from now on, I will not do it.

Carroll Kong

On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Scott Ellis wrote:

 On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:
 
   tar zpfxv linux_2.0.33.tar.gz
  
  technically you forgot..
  
  cd /usr/include
  rm -rf asm linux scsi
  ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm-386 asm
  ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/linux linux
  ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/scsi scsi
 
 
 NO, DON'T DO THIS.  Read /usr/doc/libc5/FAQ.gz or
 /usr/doc/libc6/FAQ.Debian.gz for the reasons why not.
 
 -- 
 Scott K. Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gate.net/~storm/
 
 


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .