Re: Debian packages tag tools

2006-07-02 Thread Forrest Smith
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 01:55:52AM -0400, T wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I saw now Debian packages almost all come with tags. E.g.:
> 
> Tag: admin::forensics, hardware::storage, interface::commandline, 
> role::sw:utility, use::scanning
> 
> Is there any tools to search tools based on the tags?

  apt-get install debtags-edit

> 
> Where is the vocabulary collection that available for tagging and
> searching the tools?

try:

   http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/

google returns friendly results with the following search string:

   debian package tag query


Forrest


-- 
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion
of knowledge." 

-- S. Hawking


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: xcircuit in debian testing

2006-06-21 Thread Forrest Smith
You could manually download it from the Stable repo and install it,
but the version would be 3.1.19.

The last version that was in testing was something like 3.1.19 and
that's way behind the current stable release according to the xcircuit
homepage. 

Check here, that current stable release is 3.4.26 :

http://bach.ece.jhu.edu/~tim/programs/xcircuit/

Forrest


On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:20:46PM +0100, Carl Jackson wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am not sure who to contact regarding this.  But xcircuit used to be in 
> testing and as of this week 19 June, 2006 it has disappeared.  It still 
> appears to be listed in stable and unstable distributions. 
> 
> Can you please advise how to get it back into testing or who to contact?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Carl Jackson 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: fetchmail (package) for testing

2006-04-26 Thread Forrest Smith
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 07:58:08PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> searching for a package providing fetchmail for testing didn't show up
> any packages. What's the way to go?


I'm running the same version of fetchmail that's in stable now on my
testing box. 


Forrest

> 
> + use a replacement like getmail4
> + try installing the version from stable
> + wait for a version for testing
> + get the source and compile myselfe
> 
> 
> Since I had some fun to find out how to configure fetchmail to use
> the

?? Did you use fetchmailconf ??

> correct addresses and have a working config, I don't like the idea of
> using a replacement. But if fetchmail is not to be available in Debian
> anymore, I'd try getmail4.
> 
> 
> GH
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
"If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed 
at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after 
straw until he found the object of his searchI was a sorry 
witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation 
would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor."

--N. Tesla


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: port forwarding problem. Probably easy if you know how.

2006-04-23 Thread Forrest Smith
The folks on the Shorewall project have done all this for you:

  apt-get install shorewall

F.S

On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:27:21AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm running sarge on a vintage Pentium as a gateway machine for a home 
> network.
> 
> My machine was cracked last December and I reinstalled everything
> from scratch using a sarge netinstall CD. (I checked all scripts I 
> resurrect from the old system,  and recompiled all my *own* binaries 
> from original source code.  The script I mention below hasn't been 
> molested.)
> 
> I run the same script for port-forwarding and masquerading that I used 
> before the reinstall.
> 
> But it doesn't work.
> 
> Lines like
> 
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING --protocol tcp -d 216.138.195.194 --dport 27012 
> -j DNAT --to-destination 172.25.1.5:27012 --verbose
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING --protocol udp -d 216.138.195.194 --dport 27012 
> -j DNAT --to-destination 172.25.1.5:27012 --verbose
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING --protocol udp -s 172.25.1.5 --sport 27012 -j 
> SNAT --to-source 216.138.195.194:27012 --verbose
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING --protocol tcp -s 172.25.1.5 --sport 27012 -j 
> SNAT --to-source 216.138.195.194:27012 --verbose
> 
> have no effect at all (as checked by iptables --list)
> 
> but the line
> 
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE
> 
> works like a charm.
> 
> I suspect there's probably a missing kernel module.  But which one?
> And where do I find it?  The docs for iptables way that it will attampt 
> to load any necessary modules, so I presume a simple modprobe isn't 
> enough.  Or else that it doesn't try hard enough.
> 
> -- hendrik
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Hundreds of years in the future
  there could be computers
looking for life on earth

--Coldplay


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: O.T. dvd burning from the command line

2006-04-21 Thread Forrest Smith
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:18:43PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> It's been a while since I attempted to burn a DVD from the command
> line. I'm using Tsunami DVD authoring software under wine, and yes I
> own my copy.
> 
> When it generates the dvd structure, is has the AUDIO_TS & VIDEO_TS
> structure complete.
> 
> For the life of me, I gleaned the burning info from this group.
> 
> I have, so far
> 
> growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/(my burner) _ /path/to/dvd-structure
> 
> I cannot remember how to get it to look at the dvd structure path.


Are you passing growisofs the path to an ISO?

I use something like the following on a dvd directory (containing 
the AUDIO_TS & VIDEO_TS folders):

mkisofs -dvd-video -o /NEW.ISO /path/to/dvd-directory

then

   growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/(myburner)=NEW.ISO

Forrest


> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -- 
> Rodney D. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   
> Registered Linux User #96112
> ICQ#: AIM#:   YAHOO:
> 18002350  mailman452  mailman42_5
> 
> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a 
> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
> Ben Franklin - 1759



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Thunderbird and deleting msgs in threaded display

2005-11-22 Thread Forrest Smith
I use Mutt and have no problems deleting 3000 msgs at a time :)

It's also more tuned to list browsing.

Forrest


On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:25:25PM +, Oliver Lupton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Adam Hardy wrote:
> > I'm using Thunderbird 1.0.2 which is the latest available Debian
> > packaged release, and I'd like to know if anyone else sees this bug,
> > which is giving me grief at the moment due to my heavy use of the delete
> > button.
> > 
> > I wonder whether this is a bug on all platforms, or is it just in Linux
> > Debian under Gnome that I run it under?
> > 
> > I expand all the threads in the folder, and start deleting them, either
> > with the delete key or the delete menu button. With the current message
> > highlighted/focussed and all further messages unread, TB quickly marks
> > the msg read and moves it to the trash folder. If I go fast because I
> > want to delete the whole thread, after on average every 10 deletes, TB
> > forgets which msg should have the focus, the highlight disappears and I
> > have to use the down button to move onto a msg.
> > 
> > This didn't happen in Mozilla Suite, which I was using until last week.
> > 
> > Does anyone else experience this?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Adam
> > 
> > 
> 
> I have the same problem, it's just never bothered me enough to do
> anything about it.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> - -ol
> 
> - --
> I will live forever, or die trying.
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFDbnTEOq/GuNpXGggRAivvAKDXayOeRg5CUt1tLD4FwhncIJDEUwCfetIA
> eul8mjL5OatzvHxecairFUI=
> =9xNA
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
 A dry riverbed
 glimpsed
 by lightning.

--Issa


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: nVidia kernel drivers not working

2005-11-22 Thread Forrest Smith
Have you looked into using Xorg's driver for this?

If you have Xorg see 'man nv'.

Forrest




On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:19:58AM +0100, Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
> I tried to compile nvidia kernle module using both m-a and the binary
> package from nvidia site. The building always fails in the same way.
> 
> I have:
> Kernel  2.6.14-1-k7
> gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2)
> NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-7667
> 
> I have the right kernel headers installed
> 
> I cannot compile kernel modules, i get these errors, and many many more
> 
> 
> NVIDIA: calling KBUILD...  ?
> ? make CC=gcc-4.0 -C /usr/src/linux SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/n ?
> ? make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-1-k7'   ?
> ? echo \#define NV_COMPILER \"`gcc-4.0 -v 2>&1 | tail -n 1`\" > /usr/src/mod ?
> ?   CC [M]  /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.o   ?
> ? In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:11,   ?
> ?  from /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv-linux.h:45, ?
> ?  from /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c:14:   ?
> ? include/linux/linkage.h:5:25: error: asm/linkage.h: No such file or direct ?
> ? In file included from include/linux/posix_types.h:47,  ?
> ?  from include/linux/types.h:13,?
> ?  from include/linux/kernel.h:13,   ?
> ?  from /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv-linux.h:45, ?
> ?  from /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c:14:   ?
> ? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/include/asm/posix_types.h:13:22: error:  ?
> ? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/include/asm/posix_types.h:14:35: error:  ?
> ? In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:13,   ?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Did anyone have the same problem?
> 
> Thnx
> Paolo

-- 
The day went away
The file still puts its weight on
   the tired mode-line.

--Oliver Scholz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Gnome doesn't see user's PATH

2005-06-22 Thread Forrest Smith
Hi all!

 Does anyone know why apps run from the panel aren't aware of
user's environment vars, specifically PATH?

 Example, if Mutt is executed from my panel, I can't execute
commands that are in my PATH.  If I run it from a terminal window,
I can.  The same goes for Emacs.

 I'm using Gnome 2.8.2 in Sarge.


Thank ya,
  Forrest Smith





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]