Hey 😃
Hi dear https://pusdissgicu1976.blogspot.hk/
Hi dear
Yo! r0119097.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document
Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2017 #975
The emacs (non-DFSG) info pages will be useful for novices, but will be absent unless you install them. The emacsNN-common-non-dfsg package for the corresponding version (NN) of emacs is one way to do so. Geany +1 ( with the addon packages). Also Bluefish. Novices are on a steep learning curve as it is. If you're trying to encourage them to consider programming as a viable use of time, minimising the number of new things to learn before they achieve a result is important. Most computer users already know how to interact with an Office text editor; changing the paradigm to that of vim or emacs condemns them to having to learn a whole new way of opening/ writing/ saving. While I have used emacs & vim, there's a feeling of intense satisfaction on actually managing to save a changed file without any unpleasant surprises. It shouldn't be that much of a relief! If copy/move/edit/save requires significant cognitive effort, there's something wrong with the process and only the stubborn will survive. Pointing people to the manual for that basic a process is not a solution; if I bought a bicycle that required me to read the manual before I could ride it, it'd be returned unfit for purpose a.s.a.p. Ian.
Re:Ian Martin
http://level.mclaughlindevelopmentgroup.com/wu.wir Ian Martin 5:03 PM
Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2011 #1691
Hi, I bought myself a Dell L502X recently with Optimus technology (= dual graphics card). After a lot of playing, I discovered the latest edition of Mint Debian Edition (the iso came out mid- August) will install and run on it without any hitches. There doesn't seem to be a lot of benefit buying the card if running Linux, but this is the first distro I found where the dual card didn't result in loss of output. I suspect if you get any distro running a kernel more recent than 2.39 you should be fine (which is probably why your Ubuntu iso is OK). I did try to change to the proprietary Nvidia driver a few days back; ended up reinstalling. I'm sure it's possible, but didn't have time or energy to chase it up. The basic idea (in my understanding) is not that you run 2 separate graphics cards. The secondary ( more featureful/ expensive/ power hungry) card is not directly linked to your main display; if the primary(basic) card can't handle graphics demand, it passes it on to the secondary, which then writes back to to graphics buffer of the first, _not_ to the display. Just to make it fun, apparently MS has access to the API for that, but nobody else has. The theory is that the OS can shut off the second graphics card or turn it on as requested by programs which know to pass info on their graphics demand. Alternatively, the OS can ask for the card to activate if it recognises a demanding program or if the user has specified that graphics mode. Ignoring the technology won't help; it looks like it may be the defacto standard in most new laptops soon. The problem is when you install an OS, it's got to recognise Optimus (the name for the graphics switching) technology is on the motherboard; if not, it seems to assume the display is on the high end card output and you end up with a blinking cursor. With some laptops you can turn off the high end card in the BIOS; not much of a solution, but you do get a working display. The low end card _has_ to be working; it does the actual drawing of the buffer on the screen, even if the high end card does the processing to fill the buffer. The relevant Linux projects are bumblebee (you need to have watched Transformers to appreciate the name) and ironhand. They're both currently in development+++, have a look http://www.martin-juhl.dk/2011/08/reassemble-of-the-bee/ at that for the back story. Ian From: "debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org"To: debian-user-dig...@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, 15 September 2011 1:53 PM Subject: debian-user-digest Digest V2011 #1691 undefineddebian-user-digest Digest Volume 2011 : Issue 1691 Today's Topics: USB ACM vs USB memory device conflic [ "Thomas H. George" ] Re: Free drivers for AMD Radeon (Vai [ Dan ] Re: Console access using F1 etc [ John Foster ] Re: 'apt-get dist-upgrade' from Lenn [ Alex ] Re: Console access using F1 etc [ Whit Hansell I recently had to do a new installation of squeeze on a production server. Excellent! > Its been a LONG time since I did that and I see a few things are different > since my last time. I can not access the consoles by hitting ctrl,alt, > delete. You mean Control-Alt-F1 instead. Or Control-Alt-F2 and similar for other function keys. After
Re: Holiday Project for my job
>1. Which distro to use? I've used Mint before in a similar setting >(and was pleased) but I'm now stuck with 6 year old Dells with almost no >video acceleration and .5 G memory each. I'm thinking XFCE with Mint or >Xbuntu, but am open to others (even a stock debian install which I use >on my home machine) but I will not be able to update unless I do so >manually (which a CD or thumbdrive). >2. How do I 'clone' the machine to a CD or, preferably, a thumb drive >so I can install the same configuration to all machines (limiting menu >options, put in educational games, add openoffice or libreoffice, etc.)? Another option would be to roll your own with Debian live ( http://live.debian.net/ ) and add the packages you want. If you're going to do that, stable is the easiest distro to use.
Installation on a new laptop.
Hi, I've just had a whole bunch of fun installing on a Dell XPS. The problems sound similiar, but my impression on the Dell was that it was the Optimus graphics that caused the problem- neither Intel, NVIDIA or Radeon apparently have any responsibility (except to users of a decrepit OS), so they haven't made any effort to get the software functional for the hardware you bought. If you google the bumblebee project you'll see the sterling work that has been done to reverse engineer it, and it should hopefully be getting to a distro near you soon. Essentially, new laptops apparently have stuffed graphics due to a closed code powersaving mechanism. I eventually managed to get it working with a Linux Mint Debian Edition install; with the (pure) Debian netinstall the best I got was a terminal with V4l driving the graphics. The Ethernet card I still don't have working. In a rather surprising twist, the wireless works out of the box- go figure (and now that I'm back in my lazyboy I don't have much incentive to figure out the ethernet problem...) Ian. >Re: Still can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMacS30/08/11 13:51 >Hi again, >I was directed to the wiki: >http://wiki.debian.org/iMacIntel >Apparently this section has been updated: >Update (2011/08/12) : aluminium iMac Intel 12,1 / Wheezy , see the >"video" section. >However this didn't work for me. Even applying the radeon.modeset=0 >line in the boot parameters just leads to a blank screen with a flashing >cursor at the top. Booting into rescue mode gives me a root shell, and >I applied the suggested updates to /etc/apt/sources.list, but aptitude >update failed with messages saying the server locations couldn't be >resolved. I tried a ping to the actual IP address, but got the message >"Network unreachable". >So I'm still stuck. I think this could possibly be bug # 627705, lack >of kernel support for the Broadcom ethernet card. But I'm not sure. My >installer was a weekly build from a few weeks ago -- should I try a >later build? I don't want to take the time if I'm just going to end up >in the same place. >Cheers, Mike.