Re: Gnome-Panel no longer starts at login, or after

2004-10-02 Thread Ian Thomas

--- Jules Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:19:38 +0200, Andrea
> Vettorello wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:31:48 -0700 (PDT), Ian
> Thomas
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> [GNOME panel doesn't start using Sawfish WM]
> >> 
> > Have you deleted the ~/.sawfish dir too, or at
> least the
> > ~/.sawfish/sessions dir?
> 
> I can confirm that this worked for me just now,
> where nothing else I tried
> fixed that problem.  Thank you.

This didn't work for me.  I upgraded to testing/Sarge.
 No problems as of yet.  The new Gnome is outstanding.
 


Ian



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Gnome-Panel no longer starts at login, or after

2004-09-29 Thread Ian Thomas

--- Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> --- Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:34:35 -0700 (PDT), Ian
> Thomas
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > --- Andrea Vettorello
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > If you open an xterm (or gnome term) and
> launch
> > the
> > > > "panel &" command,
> > > > the panel start?
> > > 
> > >  $ panel &
> > > 
> > > GLib-CRITICAL **: file gstrfuncs.c: line 1348
> > > (g_strsplit): assertion `string != NULL' failed.
> > > 
> > > No panel starts.  I haven't found any
> information
> > > about how to fix this problem from the following
> > > sources:
> > > 
> > > debian mailing list archives
> > > gnome mailing list archives
> > > google
> > > 
> > > I'm a little disappointed that this would happen
> > in
> > > Debian Stable and surprised that no one else has
> > > encountered this problem.  I'll keep looking for
> > an
> > > answer and post if I find one.
> > > 
> > 
> > I suspect a stale/broken config somewhere in your
> > home. Have you tried
> > with a freshly created dummy account?
> 
> I tried previously by renaming my entire .gnome
> directory to something else.  This didn't bring back
> the panel.  However, after creating a guest account,
> I
> got a panel on login.  I'm going to rename all of
> the
> gnome related directories in my home folder and see
> if
> that doesn't bring back the panel.  The solution
> appears to be close now.

Final update:

I deleted every file in my home directory that could
possibly be related to gnome, leaving only the
following config files:

.bash_profile, .bashrc, .emacs, .fetchmailrc,
.procmailrc, .ssh

Gnome started up with default settings and still
failed to show a panel.  Watching the icons appear
across the bottom of the splash screen appeared to
show two gnome panel icons.  This would mean that two
gnome panels attempted to start.  Doing the following
showed that a panel was running

ps aux | grep panel

It wasn't however, showing up on the screen.  Repeated
usage of the above combination showed that the panel
kept starting and dieing, as it was listed with a
different procid each time.  I was also unable to
start a panel from the terminal.  Gnome told me that a
panel was already running and asked if I would like to
start one anyway.  I said yes, and still, no panel
appeared.

I'm giving up on finding a solution to this problem. 
I'm going to wait until Sarge is released and update
Gnome when that happens.  I'm hoping it's soon.  Gnome
1.4, in my experience, has been a complete disaster. 
My thanks to Anrea for attempting to figure out this
problem with me.


Ian





__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now. 
http://messenger.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Gnome-Panel no longer starts at login, or after

2004-09-29 Thread Ian Thomas

--- Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:34:35 -0700 (PDT), Ian Thomas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > --- Andrea Vettorello
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > If you open an xterm (or gnome term) and launch
> the
> > > "panel &" command,
> > > the panel start?
> > 
> >  $ panel &
> > 
> > GLib-CRITICAL **: file gstrfuncs.c: line 1348
> > (g_strsplit): assertion `string != NULL' failed.
> > 
> > No panel starts.  I haven't found any information
> > about how to fix this problem from the following
> > sources:
> > 
> > debian mailing list archives
> > gnome mailing list archives
> > google
> > 
> > I'm a little disappointed that this would happen
> in
> > Debian Stable and surprised that no one else has
> > encountered this problem.  I'll keep looking for
> an
> > answer and post if I find one.
> > 
> 
> I suspect a stale/broken config somewhere in your
> home. Have you tried
> with a freshly created dummy account?

I tried previously by renaming my entire .gnome
directory to something else.  This didn't bring back
the panel.  However, after creating a guest account, I
got a panel on login.  I'm going to rename all of the
gnome related directories in my home folder and see if
that doesn't bring back the panel.  The solution
appears to be close now.


Ian



___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Gnome-Panel no longer starts at login, or after

2004-09-29 Thread Ian Thomas

--- Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If you open an xterm (or gnome term) and launch the
> "panel &" command,
> the panel start?

 $ panel &

GLib-CRITICAL **: file gstrfuncs.c: line 1348
(g_strsplit): assertion `string != NULL' failed.

No panel starts.  I haven't found any information
about how to fix this problem from the following
sources:

debian mailing list archives
gnome mailing list archives
google

I'm a little disappointed that this would happen in
Debian Stable and surprised that no one else has
encountered this problem.  I'll keep looking for an
answer and post if I find one.  


Ian



___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Gnome-Panel no longer starts at login, or after

2004-09-29 Thread Ian Thomas

--- Ian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> --- Andrea VeVettorelloanandreaevettorellomgmailom>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 28 SeSep004 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT), Ian
> Thomas
> >  wrote:
> > > A few days ago I logged into GNOME using GDGDMnd
> > the
> > > gnome panel failed to start up.  That left me
> with
> > > just sasawfishunning.  This is usable but I
> would
> > like
> > > the Gnome panel back for convenience sake.  I
> have
> > > tried the following:
> > > 
> > > Renaming each of the following files or
> > directories:
> > > ~/.gnome/session
> > > ~/.gnome/panel
> > > ~/.gnome
> > > 
> > > None of these made the panel come back. 
> > Attempting to
> > > start the gnome panel after logging in gives the
> > > following:
> > > 
> > >  $ panel
> > > 
> > 
> > I could be wrong, but to start the gnome panel,
> you
> > should use the
> > "gnome-panel" command (i don't have a Woody box
> with
> > Gnome installed
> > to check)
> 
> It may have changed in gnome 2, but panel is the
> command for "gnome panel" in Gnome 1.4.  I do have
> the
> following commands that include the prefix
> 'gnome-panel'.  They are: $1-add-launcher,
> $1-properties-cacapplet-panel-scscreenshot
> 
> In the file, /etc/gnome/default.session, the
> follwing entry to 'panel' is listed.
>
> 7,RestartCommand --smclient-id default7
> 
> This line is listed three times in different places
> corresponding to one for each session listed in
> /etc/gnome/default.session.  After having moved my
> session file in my home directory out of the way, I
> have tried logging in using each of the default
> settings, classic, default, and nautilus, listed in
> this file.  The gnome panel doesn't come up any of
> these times.  I, however, don't have an entry for
> panel in my own session file.  There should be one,
> and I haven't edited this file by hand. 
> 
> Thanks for the response.  Any more suggestions?

Some how my response got butchered by Yahoo.  I've
edited and it should come through okay now.


Ian



___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Gnome-Panel no longer starts at login, or after

2004-09-29 Thread Ian Thomas
--- Andrea VeVettorelloanandreaevettorellomgmailom>
wrote:

> On Tue, 28 SeSep004 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT), Ian Thomas
>  wrote:
> > A few days ago I logged into GNOME using GDGDMnd
> the
> > gnome panel failed to start up.  That left me with
> > just sasawfishunning.  This is usable but I would
> like
> > the Gnome panel back for convenience sake.  I have
> > tried the following:
> > 
> > Renaming each of the following files or
> directories:
> > ~/.gnome/session
> > ~/.gnome/panel
> > ~/.gnome
> > 
> > None of these made the panel come back. 
> Attempting to
> > start the gnome panel after logging in gives the
> > following:
> > 
> >  $ panel
> > 
> 
> I could be wrong, but to start the gnome panel, you
> should use the
> "gnome-panel" command (i don't have a Woody box with
> Gnome installed
> to check)

It may have changed in gnome 2, but panel is the
command for "gnome panel" in Gnome 1.4.  I do have the
following commands that include the prefix
'gnome-panel'.  They are: $1-add-launcher,
$1-properties-cacapplet-panel-scscreenshot

In the file, /etc/gnome/default.session, the
fofollwingall to 'panel' is listed.

7,ReRestartCommandanel --smsmlient-id default7

This line is listed three times in different places
corresponding to one for each session listed in
/etc/gnome/default.session.  After having moved my
session file in my home directory out of the way, I
have tried logging in using each of the default
settings, classic, default, and nautilus, listed in
this file.  The gnome panel doesn't come up any of
these times.  I, however, don't have an entry for
panel in my own session file.  There should be one,
and I haven't ededitedhis file by hand. 

Thanks for the response.  Any more suggestions?


Ian



__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Gnome-Panel no longer starts at login, or after

2004-09-28 Thread Ian Thomas
A few days ago I logged into GNOME using GDM and the
gnome panel failed to start up.  That left me with
just sawfish running.  This is usable but I would like
the Gnome panel back for convenience sake.  I have
tried the following:

Renaming each of the following files or directories:
~/.gnome/session
~/.gnome/panel
~/.gnome

None of these made the panel come back.  Attempting to
start the gnome panel after logging in gives the
following:

 $ panel

** WARNING **: Could not get name service!

** ERROR **: file goad.c: line 660
(real_goad_server_activate): assertion failed:
(name_service != CORBA_OBJECT_NIL)
aborting...

The 'gnome-name-service' is running according to 'ps'.
 Any suggestions?

Running Stable: Gnome 1.4


Ian



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Trouble with ifup (Resolved)

2004-08-19 Thread Ian Thomas
On Aug 19, 2004, at 6:02 PM, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
Try removing the backslashes.
My /e/n/interfaces:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.2.4
netmask 255.255.255.0
broadcast 192.168.2.255
gateway 192.168.2.1
network 192.168.254.0
Removing the backslashes worked.  After reading the manual for 
interfaces(5), I was unclear about what constituted a line.  The syntax 
of the interfaces file if very similar to the arguments of ifconfig(8), 
so I thought all the options needed to be on one line.

Thanks for the quick response.
Ian Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Trouble with ifup

2004-08-19 Thread Ian Thomas
I'm not able to get the file, /etc/network/interfaces, to be read 
successfully with by ifup(8).  The following is a copy of what is the 
contents of the interfaces file (I've left out the comments).

auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static\
address 192.168.2.3\
netmask 255.255.255.0\
gateway 192.168.2.1
When running 'ifup -a', I get the following error,
/etc/network/interfaces:12: too many parameters for iface line
ifup: couldn't read interfaces file "/etc/network/interfaces"
Line 12 is referring to the line containing 'gateway'.  I have 
attempted to format this file in numerous ways, all according to the 
specification defined in interfaces(5), without success.  Any 
suggestions?

Ian Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: boot from rescue into single user or with no modules loaded

2001-11-11 Thread Ian Thomas

--- nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian Thomas said:
> >
> >Now the system won't get past these error
> > messages.  It starts to boot, then these messages
> just
> > keep repeating over and over again.  How can I
> boot up
> > with no modules loaded from a boot disk or the
> CD-ROM?
> > I figure if I can do this, I'll update LILO and be
> in
> > good shape.
> 
> be patient and you'll succeed. ive had the same
> problems
> before. the screen scrolls like mad spitting out
> those
> errors but the system is still (barely) functional.
> 
> best thing i can reccomend is to type very
> carefully,
> don't expect to be able to read whats on the screen
> very
> easily. i remember in vi i would have to exit/reload
> vi about 20 times to be able to edit/save a file.
> because
> the screen kept filling with those errors.
> 
> ive done it a few times so i know its possible its
> just
> very annoying :)
> 
> nate
> 

It never finished booting.  I was able to log in
only once.  There Iused vi to edit the lilo.conf file.
 I used ctrl-r to refresh the screen when the
modprobes fell like rain.  I must not have done
something correctly.  The kernel does not load all the
way.  I need a way to unload all the modules before
booting or going into single user, from a rescue
cd-rom or boot disk.

Ian


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com



boot from rescue into single user or with no modules loaded

2001-11-11 Thread Ian Thomas
The subject pretty much says it all.  I needed to
install Windows98 to use a program called Xilinx. 
After doing this I went and installed System Commander
so I could dual boot into GNU/Linux and Windows 98. 
System Commander wasn't able to boot GNU/Linux.  I
uninstalled it and tried to boot into GNU/Linux using
a boot disk.  The first time I was able to with some
problems.  Here are the error messages:

modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent than
/lib/modules/2.2.19pre17/modules.dep

modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-1

Now the system won't get past these error
messages.  It starts to boot, then these messages just
keep repeating over and over again.  How can I boot up
with no modules loaded from a boot disk or the CD-ROM?
 I figure if I can do this, I'll update LILO and be in
good shape.

Ian





__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com



Re: No luck with getting xdm to work

2001-10-14 Thread Ian Thomas

--- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > My last guess, are these the apropriate
> permissions for tmp?
> > 
> > drwsrwsrwt
> > 
> >   Maybe the necessary tmp file cannot be
> created due to these permissions.
> > Any more ideas?
> > 
> 
> No, that is not the correct permission for /tmp.  It
> should be 1777 i.e.
> drwxrwxrwt.
When you replied, I got this message when trying
to retrieve your message from yahoo's POP3 server in
/var/log/mail.log.

Oct 14 08:45:38 solo sendmail[1362]: IAA01362:
ruleset=check_mail, arg1=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1], reject=451
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender domain must resolve

Not sure if this is how your mail goes out or how mine
comes in.

At any rate, I changed my /tmp permissions to 1777 and
still no luck with xdm. I enter root and the password
and the screen goes blank and returns with the login
screen. My own user ID gets the same response when
attempting to login. Any other suggestions?

Thanks for the help this far

Ian



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com



Re: Minimum RAM Requirement.

2001-03-17 Thread Ian Thomas
Check out the Linux Documentation Project, it has
instructions on how to setup a system with 4 mb.  I
have followed these instructions and gotten an IBM
laptop with slightly less than 4 mb to work fine. 
Although the installs start with non-debian dists the
author says that you can use almost any distro to add
more functionality after the initial barebones system
is up.

Ian
--- kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:59:39AM -0700,
> Simmons-Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I would like to know the minimum amount of RAM a
> computer needs in order to
> > run a basic Linux setup and then also the minimum
> for  X Window System.
> 
> Some guidelines.
> 
>   - 4 M:  bare minimum for Linux kernel, and you'll
> need to specify some
> configurations to get there.
> 
>   - 8 M:  minimum basic linux configuration.  I
> don't think modern Debians
> will install into 8 MB.
> 
>   - ~16-32 M:  you'll need something in this range
> to let the packaging
> system run.  It likes to store stuff in RAM.
> 
>   - ~32-64 M:  minimum I'd recommend for a
> single-usr workstation,
> running X, a lightweight window manager (not
> GNOME/KDE), and,
> sometimes, Netscape.  You'll be swapping a fair
> piece.
> 
>   - ~96-128 M:  comfortable single-user general
> purpose workstation.
> Tends to minimize swapping under most
> circumstances.
> 
>   - 128 M - 1G:  high end workstation, mid-level
> server.  Particularly
> useful if you're running VMWare, StarOffice,
> that bloated stuck pig
> of an office suite, or a heavily loaded services
> (apache, mysql,
> file/print).
> 
>   - 1G - 4G:  high-end server.  I believe the
> maximum addressable memory
> on Linux is currently 4GB, with a patch.  Could
> be wrong on this.
> 
> There's a lot of flexibility on all of this, and
> personal expectations
> matter.  More memory is almost always the first
> route to a faster
> system.  However, there's no reason a "workable"
> system can't 
> 
> For swap, the general rule of thumb is 1-2x
> installed RAM, though some
> people top out swap at some point, generally between
> 128 MB and 1 GB.  I
> tend to take the multiplier rule all the way up to
> max swap (4 GB, IIRC).
> You can add swapfiles at any point later, but swap
> partitions are more
> efficient (they don't fragment) and harder to add
> (you have to
> repartition).
> 
> You can always experiment with lower memory
> configurations by specifying
> the appropriat MEM= boot option, to see how your
> system would perform
> with less memory installed.  Results can be
> interesting.
> 
> Currently, memory for reasonably up-to-date systems
> is pretty cheap
> (DIMMs).  If you're buying the older SIMMs, prepare
> to pay a premium.
> 
> -- 
> Karsten M. Self
> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
>  What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?  
> There is no K5 cabal
>   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/
> http://www.kuro5hin.org
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/



Re: Setting Up Partitions:Solved,Thanks

2001-03-02 Thread Ian Thomas
I finished installing the system.  I got all the
partitions working after having to use expert mode in
fdisk.  I then jumped back into the debian curses
install and it went right on to the next step, no
problems.  That is a very robust installer.  As of
right now I am booting from floppy until I get pppd up
and running so I can download GRUB and installed. 
Apt-get looks great and seems like it will make the
transition form FreeBSD ports very easy.

Ian

I look forward to the day that I can offer helpful
advice to other users.  Thanks for the quick
responses.
--- kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> on Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:09:56AM -0800, Ian Thomas
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have a copy of Debian 2.1 Slink that I am
> trying
> > to install to a second harddrive.
> > 
> > I just recently found out on a website that
> cfdisk
> > cannot create extended partitions.  I attempted to
> do
> > this when I was installing by changing the
> partition
> > type to extended, but when it wrote the table it
> still
> > had them listed as linux native.  This is what I
> want
> > to do..
> > 
> > hdb1 (this is already my freebsd swap partition)
> > hdb2 /boot (this will be a primary partition)
> > hdb3 (extended partition containing logical
> slices)
> > hdb5 / 
> > hdb6 /var 
> > hdb7 /tmp
> > hdb8 /home
> > hdb9 /usr 
> > 
> > My swap space will go on my third drive.  I
> > thought about just doing Alt-Ctrl-F2 to get a
> prompt,
> > run fdisk and create the partition table that way,
> > then continue with the curses based install.  Is
> that
> > correct?  Also I have read that linux cannot boot
> from
> > an extended partition, is this true?  If not I can
> put
> > all of the slices in one exteneded partition.  If
> I am
> > using the wrong terminology it is because I have
> only
> > really used BSD's and am used to disklabel.
> 
> There are several HOWTOs addressing partitioning
> issues, including some
> thoughts on arranging partitions across one or more
> disks for optimal
> performance (unless you're doing high-end processing
> you'll likely not
> notice).
> 
> I've compiled my own notes at
> 
>
>
http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Linux/FAQs/partition.html
> 
> ...regarding suggested sizes.
> 
> Your thoughts on switching to a shell during the
> install process and
> creating your partitions is a good method.  I
> believe recent Debian
> installs also provide the option to run a
> partitioning utility during
> the installation process.
> 
> -- 
> Karsten M. Self
> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
>  What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?  
> There is no K5 cabal
>   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/
> http://www.kuro5hin.org
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature 



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/



Setting Up Partitions

2001-02-26 Thread Ian Thomas
I have a copy of Debian 2.1 Slink that I am trying
to install to a second harddrive.

I just recently found out on a website that cfdisk
cannot create extended partitions.  I attempted to do
this when I was installing by changing the partition
type to extended, but when it wrote the table it still
had them listed as linux native.  This is what I want
to do..

hdb1 (this is already my freebsd swap partition)
hdb2 /boot (this will be a primary partition)
hdb3 (extended partition containing logical slices)
hdb5 / 
hdb6 /var 
hdb7 /tmp
hdb8 /home
hdb9 /usr 

My swap space will go on my third drive.  I
thought about just doing Alt-Ctrl-F2 to get a prompt,
run fdisk and create the partition table that way,
then continue with the curses based install.  Is that
correct?  Also I have read that linux cannot boot from
an extended partition, is this true?  If not I can put
all of the slices in one exteneded partition.  If I am
using the wrong terminology it is because I have only
really used BSD's and am used to disklabel.

Thanks in advance
Ian

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/