kernel tainted
Sep 25 23:13:30 antec kernel: [12074.506735] sr0: CDROM not ready. Make sure there is a disc in the drive. Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112791] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112795] Pid: 8085, comm: Socket Thread Tainted: P O 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 Debian 3.2.46-1 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112796] Call Trace: Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112797][] ? __report_bad_irq+0x2c/0xb5 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112803] [] ? note_interrupt+0x170/0x1f2 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112805] [] ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x15f/0x17d Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112807] [] ? handle_irq_event+0x34/0x52 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112875] [] ? _nv014710rm+0x9/0x21 [nvidia] Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112877] [] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x7c/0xaf Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112880] [] ? handle_irq+0x1d/0x21 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112882] [] ? do_IRQ+0x42/0x98 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112884] [] ? common_interrupt+0x6e/0x6e Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112886] [] ? __alloc_skb+0xed/0x133 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112888] [] ? __netdev_alloc_skb+0x15/0x2f Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112898] [] ? e1000_alloc_rx_buffers+0x8a/0x15a [e1000e] Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112902] [] ? e1000_clean_rx_irq+0x26a/0x290 [e1000e] Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112937] [] ? _nv014716rm+0xba/0x1c2 [nvidia] Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112942] [] ? e1000_clean+0x69/0x208 [e1000e] Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112944] [] ? handle_irq_event+0x40/0x52 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112946] [] ? net_rx_action+0xa1/0x1af Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112948] [] ? add_interrupt_randomness+0x38/0x155 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112951] [] ? __do_softirq+0xb9/0x177 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112953] [] ? call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112955] [] ? do_softirq+0x3c/0x7b Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112957] [] ? irq_exit+0x3c/0x99 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112959] [] ? do_IRQ+0x82/0x98 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112960] [] ? common_interrupt+0x6e/0x6e Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112961][] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x186/0x7aa Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112965] [] ? arch_local_irq_restore+0x2/0x8 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112967] [] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xe/0xf Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112970] [] ? __hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x2b2/0x2c5 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112971] [] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xe/0xf Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112973] [] ? hrtimer_start_expires+0x13/0x15 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112975] [] ? schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0xa2/0x103 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112977] [] ? update_rmtp+0x62/0x62 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112979] [] ? hrtimer_start_expires+0x13/0x15 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112982] [] ? poll_schedule_timeout+0x43/0x5e Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112984] [] ? do_sys_poll+0x2b9/0x347 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112985] [] ? poll_freewait+0x97/0x97 Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112987] [] ? __pollwait+0xce/0xce Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112989] [] ? __pollwait+0xce/0xce Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112991] [] ? __pollwait+0xce/0xce Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112993] [] ? __pollwait+0xce/0xce Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112995] [] ? __pollwait+0xce/0xce Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112997] [] ? __pollwait+0xce/0xce Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.112998] [] ? __pollwait+0xce/0xce Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113000] [] ? __pollwait+0xce/0xce Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113002] [] ? __pollwait+0xce/0xce Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113005] [] ? sys_poll+0x43/0xab Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113006] [] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113007] handlers: Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113013] [] ahci_interrupt Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113015] [] irq_handler Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113018] [] oxygen_interrupt Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113044] [] nv_kern_isr Sep 25 23:45:04 antec kernel: [13967.113045] Disabling IRQ #16 Sep 25 23:52:13 antec kernel: [14395.374535] firewire_ohci: Removed fw-ohci device. Sep 25 23:54:54 antec kernel: [14556.808628] fuse exit I already have irqpoll in grub.cfg which driver might be causing this problem? Thanks. Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130926040804.GA3723@antec
Re: swapper tainted
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:49:32AM +0400, recovery...@gmail.com wrote: > Judging from xchi_hcd, it's a USB 3.0 hub. Try unloading this module > on suspend, and loading it at resume. > > Or, try this: > > http://www.pcl-developers.org/xhci-hcd-I-hate-you-USB-3-0-and-Primesense-Asus-Xtion-td5707949.html blacklisted xchi_hcd. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130920215548.GA25670@antec
Re: swapper tainted
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 08:58:55AM +0200, emmanuel segura wrote: > lspci -vv 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family DRAM Controller (rev 09) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P8P67 Deluxe Motherboard Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200/2nd Generation Core Processor Family PCI Express Root Port (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B- PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn- Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 04) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P8P67 Deluxe Motherboard Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82579V Gigabit Network Connection (rev 05) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P8P67 Deluxe Motherboard Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- Kernel driver in use: e1000e 00:1a.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 (rev 05) (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P8P67 Deluxe Motherboard Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev b5) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B- PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn- Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 5 (rev b5) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B- PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn- Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.6 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 7 (rev b5) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B- PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn- Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1c.7 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI Express Root Port 8 (rev b5) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- TAbort- Reset- FastB2B- PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn- Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family USB Enhanced Host Controller #1 (rev 05) (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P8P67 Deluxe Motherboard Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation P67 Express Chipset Family LPC Controller (rev 05) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P8P67 Deluxe Motherboard Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- SERR- 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family SATA AHCI Controller (rev 05) (prog-if 01 [AHCI 1.0]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer
Re: swapper tainted
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:51:35AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > Just before the error is the complaint > > irq event 55: bogus return value ff94 > > What device have you got on IRQ 55? (Try "grep 55: /proc/interrupts" to grep 55: /proc/interrupts 55: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge xhci_hcd > find out) Looking at the other context of that error, I's say that > whatever device that is, is not recovering well from suspend (some > devices don't handle it well - workarounds involve unloading the driver > before suspend or resetting it on resume etc. Of course, what the device > is will dictate how much of a hassle that is)/ any idea what device it is? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130920050454.GA22933@antec
Re: swapper tainted
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:10:26PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote: > If you are using the proprietary Nvidia driver, that's it. I do I am using 304.88 from wheezy repository.. How could I fix it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130918011346.GA11380@antec
Re: swapper tainted
On 17 September 2013 18:58, emmanuel segura wrote: > Read this link http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=3582750 > Read it. It must be, How to tell which driver caused the taint?
swapper tainted
This happens in hibernation. 6143 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.484624] ACPI: Waking up from system sleep state S4 6144 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536857] PM: noirq restore of devices complete after 51.993 msecs 6145 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536892] irq event 55: bogus return value ff94 6146 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536897] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Tainted: P O 3.4.49-amd64-20130619232207 #3 6147 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536901] Call Trace: 6148 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536903] [] ? __report_bad_irq+0x21/0xc1 6149 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536915] [] ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x162/0x1ac 6150 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536920] [] ? handle_irq_event+0x35/0x53 6151 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536925] [] ? handle_edge_irq+0xa2/0xcc 6152 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536932] [] ? handle_irq+0x18/0x20 6153 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536937] [] ? do_IRQ+0x41/0x97 6154 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536944] [] ? common_interrupt+0x6a/0x6a 6155 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536946] [] ? intel_idle+0xd9/0x107 6156 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536956] [] ? intel_idle+0xb7/0x107 6157 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536962] [] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xce/0x1b9 6158 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536968] [] ? cpu_idle+0x9c/0xe6 6159 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536973] [] ? start_kernel+0x3d5/0x3e0 6160 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536978] [] ? repair_env_string+0x57/0x57 6161 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536985] [] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0x101/0x10c 6162 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.536987] handlers: 6163 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.537010] [] xhci_msi_irq 6164 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.537012] PM: early restore of devices complete after 0.085 msecs 6165 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.770178] ehci_hcd :00:1a.0: setting latency timer to 64 6166 Sep 16 00:34:30 antec kernel: [28317.770216] usb usb5: root hub lost power or was reset uname -a Linux antec 3.4.49-amd64-20130619232207 #3 SMP Wed Jun 19 23:24:04 EDT 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux What might be the problem? I run debian wheezy but use my own compiled kernel.. Thanks. Jim.
Re: debian squeeze amd64 recent frequent crashes
my set of old RAM fixed the issue. Shame on you Gskill. Thanks List! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACAe89w1MHZpcxpO05P=q7K5YJn+fTW-hF8Oo4=19fd-etb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: debian squeeze amd64 recent frequent crashes
On 6 February 2013 13:13, Kelly Clowers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Jim Green > wrote: >> my debian squeeze amd64 has served me well for past 2/3 years. I >> struggled a few days with recent frequent crashes and hope to get some >> help from the list. I already downgraded from bpo kernel 3.6 to stock >> 2.32 kernel but didn't help.. I tried running memtest86 but it freezes >> as shown in the below log. Could someone share some procedures how to >> fix this?.. > > Yeah, if Memtest86 is crashing/freezing, you need to start replacing hardware. > > Start with the RAM. If you are using multiple sticks, you could try > taking them out and testing them one by one. If you have some other > known good RAM you could test with it to verify that it is the RAM and > not the motherboard/CPU/power. RAM is most likely though. I managed to use memtester to get some diagnosis. it gave me tons of failures. my RAM is a set of 4x8G GSkill http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231490 it is too bad they failed in half a year. should not save a few bucks on this brand.. % sudo memtester 3 memtester version 4.1.3 (64-bit) Copyright (C) 2010 Charles Cazabon. Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 (only). pagesize is 4096 pagesizemask is 0xf000 want 3MB (3145728 bytes) got 3MB (3145728 bytes), trying mlock ...locked. Loop 1: Stuck Address : testing 0FAILURE: possible bad address line at offset 0x20af2783. Skipping to next test... Random Value: ok FAILURE: 0xf0b6c16d8e202230 != 0xe0b6c16d8e202230 at offset 0x06345f83. FAILURE: 0x86477452228cbcbe != 0xa6477452228cbcbe at offset 0x20b01985. FAILURE: 0xc8afe26b8d01d1ed != 0xd8afe26b8d01d1ed at offset 0x20b01f05. FAILURE: 0x1037683fc596127a != 0x37683fc596127a at offset 0x20b01f83. FAILURE: 0x286f95f380509108 != 0x86f95f380509108 at offset 0x20e018c1. FAILURE: 0x18375b375400d4de != 0x8375b375400d4de at offset 0x20e01f83. FAILURE: 0xa02fd5b38400cc07 != 0x802fd5b38400cc07 at offset 0x20e45945. FAILURE: 0xe161e82704046d82 != 0xc161e82704046d82 at offset 0x20e45a31. FAILURE: 0x34264dc30854d783 != 0x24264dc30854d783 at offset 0x20e6a783. FAILURE: 0x102730680291a71f != 0x2730680291a71f at offset 0x20f36783. FAILURE: 0x5e625c1c50061114 != 0x4e625c1c50061114 at offset 0x20fb6783. FAILURE: 0xe07237a92e12ac4a != 0xc07237a92e12ac4a at offset 0x21045a31. FAILURE: 0x80efd6af2022127c != 0x90efd6af2022127c at offset 0x216d5705. FAILURE: 0x30277f3ba212af26 != 0x20277f3ba212af26 at offset 0x21a89783. FAILURE: 0x1327efdb3b203a42 != 0x327efdb3b203a42 at offset 0x21aae783. FAILURE: 0x306e5bb80208a3b0 != 0x206e5bb80208a3b0 at offset 0x21acd5c7. FAILURE: 0x4227414b9b88e3c0 != 0x5227414b9b88e3c0 at offset 0x21acd685. FAILURE: 0x13a17c9d8000eaa0 != 0x3a17c9d8000eaa0 at offset 0x21acd783. FAILURE: 0x343f25fd1042aded != 0x243f25fd1042aded at offset 0x22979f83. FAILURE: 0x90b61a9d5201c995 != 0x80b61a9d5201c995 at offset 0x22a01f83. FAILURE: 0x1026515eaa6bd6ab != 0x26515eaa6bd6ab at offset 0x22a45f83. FAILURE: 0x1196bde284a8c42d != 0x196bde284a8c42d at offset 0x232c5f83. Compare XOR : FAILURE: 0xf0d991c497c0ce6a != 0xe0d991c497c0ce6a at offset 0x06345f83. FAILURE: 0x866a44a92c2d68f8 != 0xa66a44a92c2d68f8 at offset 0x20b01985. FAILURE: 0xc8d2b2c296a27e27 != 0xd8d2b2c296a27e27 at offset 0x20b01f05. FAILURE: 0x105a3896cf36beb4 != 0x5a3896cf36beb4 at offset 0x20b01f83. FAILURE: 0xc052b84f79e175a6 != 0xd052b84f79e175a6 at offset 0x20c18f83. FAILURE: 0x2892664a89f13d42 != 0x892664a89f13d42 at offset 0x20e018c1. FAILURE: 0x185a2b8e5da18118 != 0x85a2b8e5da18118 at offset 0x20e01f83. FAILURE: 0xa052a60a8da17841 != 0x8052a60a8da17841 at offset 0x20e45945. FAILURE: 0xe184b87e0da519bc != 0xc184b87e0da519bc at offset 0x20e45a31. FAILURE: 0x34491e1a11f583bd != 0x24491e1a11f583bd at offset 0x20e6a783. FAILURE: 0x80c9d15b1bd1a3a7 != 0x90c9d15b1bd1a3a7 at offset 0x20ecd783. FAILURE: 0x104a00bf0c325359 != 0x4a00bf0c325359 at offset 0x20f36783. FAILURE: 0xe095080037b35884 != 0xc095080037b35884 at offset 0x21045a31. FAILURE: 0x148abfad94a8d0b0 != 0x48abfad94a8d0b0 at offset 0x21045f05. FAILURE: 0xa85274699dc7dca3 != 0x885274699dc7dca3 at offset 0x216b6005. FAILURE: 0x1946090b8bc22ff3 != 0x946090b8bc22ff3 at offset 0x216b6631. FAILURE: 0xf0e6435395c1aa58 != 0xd0e6435395c1aa58 at offset 0x216d5185. FAILURE: 0xc486289fea34ed41 != 0xe486289fea34ed41 at offset 0x216d5245. FAILURE: 0x8112a70629c2beb6 != 0x9112a70629c2beb6 at offset 0x216d5705. FAILURE: 0xd31207bb0ab8e25f != 0xc31207bb0ab8e25f at offset 0x216d57d1. FAILURE: 0x304a4f92abb35b60 != 0x204a4f92abb35b60 at offset 0x21a89783. FAILURE: 0x30912c0f0ba94fea != 0x20912c0f0ba94fea at offset 0x21acd5c7. FAILURE: 0x424a11a2a5298ffa != 0x524a11a2a5298ffa at offset 0x21acd685. FAILURE: 0x13c44cf489a196da != 0x3c44cf489a196da at offset 0x21acd783. FAILURE: 0x5a49b56c71a43880 != 0x4a49b56c71a43880 at off
Re: where to get patched older kernel for example 2.6.39
On 6 December 2011 19:33, Arno Schuring wrote: > Jim Green (student.northwest...@gmail.com on 2011-12-06 05:17 +): >> On 6 December 2011 05:07, Bob Proulx wrote: >> > Do you have any examples of something in the Linux 3.x kernel that >> > isn't in the 2.6.38 kernel that is likely to cause trouble? >> >> Actually I don't :) I haven't got the chance to look through the long >> changelogs.. >> >> my other concern using the 3.** kernel is my .config for the kernel, >> probbaly it doesn't work for 3.** kernel because of new kernel >> parameters or parameter changes.. > I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. I'm sure there are some changes > (I can recall a submenu being moved around sometime in recent history, > which made all parameters appear as NEW), but most of them will be > additional drivers which you can safely ignore. > > Just to be sure: you do know about make oldconfig, right? I heard about it but never used before, I only used menuconfig. does that mean my .config would always work for newer kernels? I think I'll dig on make oldconfig. Thanks! Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacae89yeprddbfaiykgftyhrre88xgvib3t9upubyczutfr...@mail.gmail.com
Re: where to get patched older kernel for example 2.6.39
On 6 December 2011 05:07, Bob Proulx wrote: > Do you have any examples of something in the Linux 3.x kernel that > isn't in the 2.6.38 kernel that is likely to cause trouble? Actually I don't :) I haven't got the chance to look through the long changelogs.. my other concern using the 3.** kernel is my .config for the kernel, probbaly it doesn't work for 3.** kernel because of new kernel parameters or parameter changes.. Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACAe89z8AkyiSZd7hdq8jfeS6F=wgJV_K2M_vzNzx=5ft9h...@mail.gmail.com
Re: where to get patched older kernel for example 2.6.39
On 5 December 2011 23:43, Bob Proulx wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: >> If you want to run the older series of kernel but with security >> patches applied then perhaps the best source would be a distro kernel >> such as the Debian Squeeze Linux kernel 2.6.39. It contains all of > > Oops, 2.6.39 isn't the squeeze kernel. That is from backports. The > squeeze kernel is 2.6.32. squeeze stock kernel is a little bit too old for me because I run some pretty new hardware like i7-2600k, etc. but using something like 3.** which introduces features I don't need sounds like not a good idea for my setup. Thank you for the pointer, I'll check the debian source. Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACAe89ytR2yQwoeP9tq20D=l2xmkqs_nok7jhvn3fbovpjn...@mail.gmail.com
where to get patched older kernel for example 2.6.39
Hello community: I use debian squeeze running 2.6.38.8-4. usually I download kernel source tree from kernel.org and strip stuff I don't need and compile my own kernel. but there is a problem, I think the older kernel such as 2.6.38 are not being patched on kernel.org. lets say there was a bug fix on 3.0.0 on some old feature, this patch is likely not patched to 2.6.38. Could anyone advise where I can find such older but patched source trees I can compile my self? I don't want go bleeding edge 3.** kernels I just want a relatively old but patched kernel. Thank you. Jim. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACAe89z=RGB-fGbzm-G2C0ck8Wt2y9+3K2G=NaEjP=emewj...@mail.gmail.com
Re: single cable dual nic?
On 25 April 2011 13:19, Jim Green wrote: > On 25 April 2011 09:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jim Green wrote: >>> I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I >>> am thinking of bonding them to one nic, but I only have one cable so >>> will only use one port. Will this do much help to the >>> throughput/speed? If I have two cables connecting to both ports I >>> think it will definitely help, but here I only be using one cable/one >>> port and two nics bonded to one virtual nic. >> >> Your board has Realtek 8111Es for NICs. I won't sugar-coat it: that >> stuff cannot be called good gigabit ethernet NICs in any way. Its only >> saving grace is that it is dirty cheap. >> >> Try to get jumbo frames working on your network, it should help you get >> better throughput _if it works right_. You just have to set the MTU to >> the *same jumbo frame size* on *every host on your network* to enable >> that. But make sure your switch can handle jumbo frames first, and that >> such support is enabled. >> >> Example jumbo MTU sizes: 9000, 7200, 4000. Which one you can reliably >> use depends on the least capable device in your network and their bugs. >> >> I would expect bonding to actually make things worse with r8169-based >> NICs, but maybe it would distribute the interrupts better and give you >> better performance at the cost of wasting even more CPU resources. This >> is only cost-effective if you happen to have a gigabit managed switch >> capable of link bonding (LACP) already, or when directly connecting two >> computers. >> >> Bonding with just one cable simply doesn't help performance. Either the >> devices notice the missing link and disable the offending ports (and you'll >> be slightly worse off than you'd be without any bonding in the first place), >> or you will have the packet loss from hell. >> > > Looking at this, I think I am better off disabling the realtec nic and > use intel® 82579 Gigabit LAN controller on the board instead. Btw, will be using e1000e module for this nic. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=vH7uGb=UNdejMb¡z93qqvf...@mail.gmail.com
Re: best practice to use newer cpan modules on squeeze
On 20 April 2011 03:30, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > On 04/20/2011 05:55 AM, Jim Green wrote: >> >> Hello! >> in squeeze most perl modules are not up-to-date. for example >> libmoose-perl. >> >> In this case I include the sid repo and attempt to upgrade to sid >> version of libmoose but a hell of dependency begins. I am afraid if >> insist on upgrading this module, lots of perl core module/perl would be >> upgraded in sid. >> >> what should be the best practice here right now? I use cpan command to >> install some modules that are not available in debian. but how about >> those not up-to-date ones? >> >> Thanks! >> Jim >> >> >> > > I would rebuild source packages from sid in squeeze . I settled down on this(building deb packages for squeeze from CPAN).. not the easiest but I would say pretty clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktikmduvqd+bnpn_mymyp82c+ov5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: single cable dual nic?
On 25 April 2011 09:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Jim Green wrote: >> I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I >> am thinking of bonding them to one nic, but I only have one cable so >> will only use one port. Will this do much help to the >> throughput/speed? If I have two cables connecting to both ports I >> think it will definitely help, but here I only be using one cable/one >> port and two nics bonded to one virtual nic. > > Your board has Realtek 8111Es for NICs. I won't sugar-coat it: that > stuff cannot be called good gigabit ethernet NICs in any way. Its only > saving grace is that it is dirty cheap. > > Try to get jumbo frames working on your network, it should help you get > better throughput _if it works right_. You just have to set the MTU to > the *same jumbo frame size* on *every host on your network* to enable > that. But make sure your switch can handle jumbo frames first, and that > such support is enabled. > > Example jumbo MTU sizes: 9000, 7200, 4000. Which one you can reliably > use depends on the least capable device in your network and their bugs. > > I would expect bonding to actually make things worse with r8169-based > NICs, but maybe it would distribute the interrupts better and give you > better performance at the cost of wasting even more CPU resources. This > is only cost-effective if you happen to have a gigabit managed switch > capable of link bonding (LACP) already, or when directly connecting two > computers. > > Bonding with just one cable simply doesn't help performance. Either the > devices notice the missing link and disable the offending ports (and you'll > be slightly worse off than you'd be without any bonding in the first place), > or you will have the packet loss from hell. > Looking at this, I think I am better off disabling the realtec nic and use intel® 82579 Gigabit LAN controller on the board instead. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktimcjqpytax6axo6hhoj7svkqr_...@mail.gmail.com
single cable dual nic?
Hi: I have a asus p8p67 deluxe board and it has two nics and two ports, I am thinking of bonding them to one nic, but I only have one cable so will only use one port. Will this do much help to the throughput/speed? If I have two cables connecting to both ports I think it will definitely help, but here I only be using one cable/one port and two nics bonded to one virtual nic. Thanks! Jim. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTik=w9vxkznur13nrnmvkypzsbt...@mail.gmail.com
sysctl vs kernel .config
Hello debianers: today i successfully compiled 2.38.4 kernel using make-kmkg and fixed the hibernate can't resume issue for kernel 2.38-2, got a couple questions here: first is run time and the latter is compile time, but what is the difference here, is one of the other's subset? do their parameters overlap? which is the preferred file to change? changing .config requires a recompile. Thanks! Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTim8=4=asa9tvc0ba9wtrqdy50r...@mail.gmail.com
best practice to use newer cpan modules on squeeze
Hello! in squeeze most perl modules are not up-to-date. for example libmoose-perl. In this case I include the sid repo and attempt to upgrade to sid version of libmoose but a hell of dependency begins. I am afraid if insist on upgrading this module, lots of perl core module/perl would be upgraded in sid. what should be the best practice here right now? I use cpan command to install some modules that are not available in debian. but how about those not up-to-date ones? Thanks! Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktinzl7wcfyotu8wlekhznj1mej5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: raid10 and lvm problem on new lenny install
On 20 March 2011 04:09, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > On 20 March 2011 02:24, Jim Green wrote: >> http://www.gagme.com/greg/linux/raid-lvm.php > > That looks like an LVM1 article. > > Here's a readable one about LVM2: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-lvm2/ > > "With LVM2, there's no limit on the maximum numbers of extents per PV/LV." Thanks! > > Jonathan > -- > Jonathan Matthews > London, UK > http://www.jpluscplusm.com/contact.html > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=K0fDpyWeEjzGT=8iflk__ro9fko_vwa_nz...@mail.gmail.com > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTim4yP=x8ndgcacb_yff2nhqdtdguplrwuj+0...@mail.gmail.com
Re: raid10 and lvm problem on new lenny install
Thank you for the excellent explanation! http://www.gagme.com/greg/linux/raid-lvm.php from this link I read "The maximum number of physical extents is approximately 65k so take your maximum volume size and divide it by 65k then round it to the next nice round number. " looks like I already have Total PE 953799 this is bigger than 65k, does anyone know the current maximum number PE in debian lenny? Jim On 19 March 2011 22:15, Gregory Seidman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:02:24PM -0400, Jim Green wrote: >> this is what I have from fdisk -l, I have lvm on /dev/md1, md1 is a >> raid10 array with 4x2T drives. >> Disk /dev/md1: 4000.5 GB, 4000525058048 bytes >> 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 976690688 cylinders >> Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 524288 bytes / 2097152 bytes >> Disk identifier: 0x > > Note that 4000525058048 != 4 x 2^40 (4398046511104) > >> this is what I have from pvdisplay >> --- Physical volume --- >> PV Name /dev/md1 >> VG Name 2600k >> PV Size 3.64 TiB / not usable 0 >> Allocatable yes >> PE Size 4.00 MiB >> Total PE 953799 >> Free PE 831052 >> Allocated PE 122747 >> PV UUID WUpkTR-xyCK-HGOc-Hk7Q-OfBp-Mqsz-GubCy7 > > 2^40 = 1099511627776 > > 4000525058048 / 1099511627776 = 3.6384563446044921875 ~= 3.64 > >> I don't know why I only have a 3.64T pv size, it should be 4T I think, >> in the installation of lenny i use ext3 for all the partitions, >> also I set the unused space for each partition as 1%. >> >> Thank you if you have an explanation or if you have ways to reclaim >> the 0.36 T from my arrays. > > The difference is between what vendors use to describe their drives (TB, > meaning trillions of bytes) and what sane computer systems use (TiB, > meaning 2^40 bytes). > >> Jim > --Greg > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110320021554.ga29...@anthropohedron.net > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinQ=5oZdBVrc0X48ojS8KmsFTEgGgCcxsUQ69=t...@mail.gmail.com
raid10 and lvm problem on new lenny install
this is what I have from fdisk -l, I have lvm on /dev/md1, md1 is a raid10 array with 4x2T drives. Disk /dev/md1: 4000.5 GB, 4000525058048 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 976690688 cylinders Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 524288 bytes / 2097152 bytes Disk identifier: 0x this is what I have from pvdisplay --- Physical volume --- PV Name /dev/md1 VG Name 2600k PV Size 3.64 TiB / not usable 0 Allocatable yes PE Size 4.00 MiB Total PE 953799 Free PE 831052 Allocated PE 122747 PV UUID WUpkTR-xyCK-HGOc-Hk7Q-OfBp-Mqsz-GubCy7 I don't know why I only have a 3.64T pv size, it should be 4T I think, in the installation of lenny i use ext3 for all the partitions, also I set the unused space for each partition as 1%. Thank you if you have an explanation or if you have ways to reclaim the 0.36 T from my arrays. Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimwmxzmvrgdow1bt0nvvxiiupfqpohp+hmsy...@mail.gmail.com
Re: question about storage
> IIRC, the OP said he's currently "storing some huge historical data to > mysql database" on a combination of his internal laptop drive and two > 320GB external USB drives. Let's see, that's > > 320 + 320 + 250?? = 890 GB _IF_ they're full, which they probably > aren't, and he's probably holding duplicated copies on the 320 GB drives > for redundancy. So 2 TB mirrored, 1 TB net, would fit his needs, easily. sorry for the confusion. the size of data I _plan_ to use is on the 4T level so 8T is needed.. and that's why I really need a desktop right now. Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=eXWT0GyaDCtqJ=zxerxr0yi3yjwn5u5+tg...@mail.gmail.com
Re: question about storage
> Just stay away from the WD Green drives, or any 512/4096 hybrid drives, > for your sake. :) Thanks! also lets say I am building a quad/hex core desktop box for computing. I'd like listen to ur advice about cpu and motherboard, I am not partial to intel but I do prefer a quiet and debian friendly box that can hold 4x2T data can simulate things relatively fast. Jim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=swjtfetmpwxzbsmrvfz4wexfnarm0vca07...@mail.gmail.com
Re: question about storage
> > Why 4*2TB drives? Unless this is a MythTV server that's total overkill, > and more than you need to spend. And then you have the 512/4096 sector > size mismatch issue if you go with WD's 2TB green drives which murders > performance. I highly discourage use of the WD green drives. 2T drive is not that more expensive than 1T drive also, I use mysql database to store relatively high frequency price data and other data. Initially I plan to buy the WD green drives:( I guess the performance hit is for all >2T drives? > >> 2, buy some independent storage like NAS, buy another desktop with >> small harddrive to access the NAS, debian installed on NAS and desktop >> of course. >> >> what do you think would be a better solution for me? I like the NAS >> idea that storage is independent so I can keep the NAS even if I >> upgrade my desktops, but the con is I need to buy separate NAS.. > > For $370 USD + shipping you can build your own basic yet expandable > NFS/CIFS server with fault tolerance, that will likely out perform a > cheap off the shelf NAS box. The figure above also includes the price > of a quality inexpensive 5 port GbE switch and all requires cables and > wiring. Unless you really _need_ a huge amount of space right now and > multi spindle performance, I'd go with two mirrored 1TB drives to keep > costs down. The figure above includes 2x1TB HDS drives. > > Here's a parts list description with the Newegg links below. > > Quality InWin ATX Black pedestal Server chassis > w/ 5 tool free 3.5" HDD bays and excellent airflow > 450 watt PSU with 120mm fan and 4 SATA power connectors > Gigabyte socket AM3 mobo with 4 SATA II connectors > 2.8 GHz 45 watt single core AMD CPU > 2 GB dual channel memory kit > 2 x HDS Deskstar 1 TB SATA II 7.2k rpm HDDs > DVD ROM drive > 2 SATA cables (always have a spare in case one is bad) > 5 port desktop gigabit switch > 2 14 ft. Cat 5e patch cables > > Grand total just less than $370 USD for quality kit. > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811108237 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817822002 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128454 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103888 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134637 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822145304 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827118031 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812200116 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833156250 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812196386 This is nice and affordable but it doesn't provide much computing power for me do backtest the price data... I am considering building a desktop with i7-2600k core(need to wait till the motherboard for it is fixed). Thanks! Jim. > > -- > Stan > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d60526d.7030...@hardwarefreak.com > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinuqpk2neshkb2hxhu0q-smdktalc7m258tw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: question about storage
Hello:
I think I'll probably do this,
4x2T drive in desktop and use a external closure for backup(because I
am using mirroring, disk failure should be ok though). and I'll be
using soft raid to avoid hardware raid card.
Thank you both!
Jim.
On 19 February 2011 01:39, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/19/2011 12:23 AM, David Christensen wrote:
>>
>> On 02/18/2011 08:36 PM, Jim Green wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a laptop with 120G harddrive, 2x320G external harddrive, I
>>> don't have a desktop.
>>> Now I am doing something serious storing some huge historical data to
>>> mysql database and want to have some better storage solution ...
>>> I have two options
>>> 1, buy a desktop with 4x2T harddrives and use lvm on raid1, I need
>>> the
>>> redundancy of data.
>>> 2, buy some independent storage like NAS, buy another desktop with
>>> small harddrive to access the NAS, debian installed on NAS and
>>> desktop
>>> of course.
>>> what do you think would be a better solution for me?
>>
>> On 02/18/2011 08:50 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> > Option 3: Multi-drive external USB enclosure. Gives you the capacity
>> > of a NAS at 1/3 the cost.
>>
>> I prefer the responsiveness of data drives inside the machine using
>> the data, especially with hardware-based RAID.
>>
>
> Sure. But that means you must buy a desktop (probably with a large tower
> case).
>
>>
>> Think about how you're going to back up 4 TB (?) of data. You might
>> want to put two drives in your desktop with hardware RAID0 and two
>> into a backup server with LVM JBOD (so you can add more drives later
>> without having to wipe the existing backups). You might also want to
>> have some external device that you can dump the backup to
>> periodically and store off-site.
>>
>
> Or a 2nd external enclosure ("first" if you buy a tower PC) for your
> backups. You can then buy slower "green" drives for it.
>
> If he's wedded to his laptop, I'd buy 2 of the 4-drive USB enclosures and
> populate one with 7200RPM "normal" drives and the other with 5900RPM "green"
> drives.
>
> Wed each pair with md and/or lvm.
>
> If OP ever decides he needs the speed of a desktop-tower, then he can
> directly move the 7200RPM drives into the tower.
>
>>
>> bonnie++ is very useful for benchmarking multiple drive
>> configuration options:
>>
>> http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/bonnie++
>>
>
>
> --
> "The normal condition of mankind is tyranny and misery."
> Milton Friedman
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject
> of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d5f65b0.4020...@cox.net
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin2ghj-9cmvabvxvtcrpany8gxjj9v81xjq8...@mail.gmail.com
question about storage
Hello! I have a laptop with 120G harddrive, 2x320G external harddrive, I don't have a desktop. Now I am doing something serious storing some huge historical data to mysql database and want to have some better storage solution(I hate the two external harddrives I bought 4 years ago, need to power them on individually and connect with laptop each time I need to use data in them). I have two options 1, buy a desktop with 4x2T harddrives and use lvm on raid1, I need the redundancy of data. 2, buy some independent storage like NAS, buy another desktop with small harddrive to access the NAS, debian installed on NAS and desktop of course. what do you think would be a better solution for me? I like the NAS idea that storage is independent so I can keep the NAS even if I upgrade my desktops, but the con is I need to buy separate NAS.. Thank you! Jim. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=te1rmbvvg-ymwpnywo3uvmzemfx3_1lfur...@mail.gmail.com
Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze
On 12 February 2011 15:08, Stephen Powell wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:50:04 -0500 (EST), Camaleón wrote: >> >> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:32:56 -0500, Jim Green wrote: >>> >>> I am using a different lightweight windows manager icewm... I guess >>> some modules changed name in upgrade and I don't know which to >>> blacklist.. thanks! >> >> Let me test it. >> >> I have blacklisted the module the same way you did and after restarting >> the system (I'm running testing) the module does not load. >> >> You can check it with "lsmod | grep pcspkr" > > Keep in mind that blacklisting a module only prevents the hot-plug > system (i.e. udev) from loading it. It can still be loaded manually > by the user or automatically by the kernel (if it is a dependency > of some other module). For example, if the module name is listed > in /etc/modules, then it will be loaded, whether it is blacklisted > or not. # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time. # # This file contains the names of kernel modules that should be loaded # at boot time, one per line. Lines beginning with "#" are ignored. loop sbp2 thinkpad-acpi fan_control=1 firewire-sbp2 iwl3945 I don't have it in my /etc/modules.. > > -- > .''`. Stephen Powell > : :' : > `. `'` > `- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/1062761743.771838.1297541307404.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=sr_ecknkttaze7bzxfytidrpajv8az9f88...@mail.gmail.com
Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze
On 12 February 2011 14:03, Camaleón wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:55:23 -0500, Jim Green wrote: > >> On 12 February 2011 13:50, Camaleón wrote: > >>>> I am using a different lightweight windows manager icewm... I guess >>>> some modules changed name in upgrade and I don't know which to >>>> blacklist.. thanks! >>> >>> Let me test it. >>> >>> I have blacklisted the module the same way you did and after restarting >>> the system (I'm running testing) the module does not load. >>> >>> You can check it with "lsmod | grep pcspkr" >> >> it shows no ouput so I think pcspkr is not loaded. > > Then the problem comes from a different source... Do you have "snd_pcsp" > module loaded? :-? this is all I got.. snd_hda_codec_analog45530 1 snd_hda_intel 16811 2 snd_hda_codec 46002 2 snd_hda_codec_analog,snd_hda_intel snd_hwdep 4054 1 snd_hda_codec snd_pcm_oss28671 0 snd_mixer_oss 10461 1 snd_pcm_oss snd_pcm47226 4 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_pcm_oss snd_seq_midi3576 0 snd_rawmidi12513 1 snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event 3684 1 snd_seq_midi snd_seq35463 2 snd_seq_midi,snd_seq_midi_event snd_timer 12258 3 snd_pcm,snd_seq snd_seq_device 3673 3 snd_seq_midi,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq snd34375 13 snd_hda_codec_analog,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device soundcore 3450 1 snd snd_page_alloc 5045 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm > > Greetings, > > -- > Camaleón > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.02.12.19.03...@gmail.com > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinVPZFHLho9NWUb=2ht532ggcnjn7ar4lhjz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze
On 12 February 2011 13:49, Tixy wrote: > On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 12:32 -0500, Jim Green wrote: >> Hello: >> I upgraded from lenny to squeeze, overall it was ok, but I still >> couldn't silence the system beep.. > > I had a beep problem in Squeeze recently and finally fixed it using ALSA > mixer and muting the 'Beep' slider. (Had to select it a visible first in > preferences.) Yes... this works... Thanks! I thought this could be a common problem too... hope the other upgraders could see this post too. > > > -- > Tixy () The ASCII Ribbon Campaign (www.asciiribbon.org) > /\ Against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297536553.3648.13.ca...@computer2.home > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinwz3D2oibnqj7ScaHzdZXkC4B5Jr5_Btb¿z...@mail.gmail.com
Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze
On 12 February 2011 13:50, Camaleón wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:32:56 -0500, Jim Green wrote: > >> On 12 February 2011 13:22, Camaleón wrote: > >>> In GNOME, you can try by disabling it via gconf editor: >>> >>> /apps/metacity/general/audible_bell [ ] >>> >>> (remove the check if present) >> >> I am using a different lightweight windows manager icewm... I guess >> some modules changed name in upgrade and I don't know which to >> blacklist.. thanks! > > Let me test it. > > I have blacklisted the module the same way you did and after restarting > the system (I'm running testing) the module does not load. > > You can check it with "lsmod | grep pcspkr" it shows no ouput so I think pcspkr is not loaded. > > Greetings, > > -- > Camaleón > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.02.12.18.50...@gmail.com > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik7q3661--cmihsc_kiuunt3tmqjymnzkd4d...@mail.gmail.com
Re: system beep after upgrade to squeeze
On 12 February 2011 13:22, Camaleón wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 12:32:47 -0500, Jim Green wrote: > >> I upgraded from lenny to squeeze, overall it was ok, but I still >> couldn't silence the system beep.. > > (...) > > In GNOME, you can try by disabling it via gconf editor: > > /apps/metacity/general/audible_bell [ ] > > (remove the check if present) I am using a different lightweight windows manager icewm... I guess some modules changed name in upgrade and I don't know which to blacklist.. thanks! > > Greetings, > > -- > Camaleón > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.02.12.18.22...@gmail.com > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=alezkwcvhynisjzwcbkfsh8mfxnkft83yx...@mail.gmail.com
system beep after upgrade to squeeze
Hello: I upgraded from lenny to squeeze, overall it was ok, but I still couldn't silence the system beep.. I already have blacklist pcspkr in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf this used to work in lenny, but stopped working in squeeze, thanks for any help! Jim. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikgm5cjKYjYeTSmPHGHBkR23n-4YBDNUJw=9...@mail.gmail.com
