Re: Need help with ffmpeg installation - strange behaviour of my system - am I correct here?
Heureka ...
I did an aptitude ... and got the following (and the quit!!! - but do I
know whether my system is ok???):
root@primergy:~/software-env# aptitude install ffmpeg
Warning: Invalid locale (please review locale settings, this might lead
to problems later):
locale::facet::_S_create_c_locale name not valid
The following NEW packages will be installed:
ffmpeg libaom0{a} libass9{ab} libavcodec58{ab} libavdevice58{ab}
libavfilter7{ab} libavformat58{ab}
libavresample4{a} libavutil56{ab} libbluray2{ab} libcdio-cdda2{a}
libcdio-paranoia2{a} libcdio19{ab}
libfdk-aac2{a} libkvazaar4{a} libmfx1{ab} libopenh264-5{ab}
libpostproc55{a} libswresample3{a}
libswscale5{a} libvidstab1.1{a} libvpx6{ab} libx264-157{ab}
libx265-176{a} libzimg2{ab}
The following packages will be upgraded:
librubberband2{b}
1 packages upgraded, 25 newly installed, 0 to remove and 29 not upgraded.
Need to get 15.4 MB of archives. After unpacking 56.1 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libavformat58 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.28) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
Depends: libgcrypt20 (>= 1.8.0) but 1.7.6-2+deb9u4 is
installed
Depends: libopenmpt0 (>= 0.3.0) but
0.2.7386~beta20.3-3+deb9u4 is installed
libavfilter7 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
Depends: libfontconfig1 (>= 2.12.6) but 2.11.0-6.7+b1
is installed
Depends: libtesseract4 which is a virtual package and
is not provided by any available package
Depends: libva2 (>= 1.7.3) which is a virtual package
and is not provided by any available package
libopenh264-5 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
libcdio19 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
librubberband2 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
libvpx6 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
libx264-157 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
libass9 : Depends: libfontconfig1 (>= 2.12) but 2.11.0-6.7+b1 is installed
libzimg2 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
libavcodec58 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
Depends: libcodec2-0.8.1 which is a virtual package and
is not provided by any available package
Depends: libgsm1 (>= 1.0.18) but 1.0.13-4+b2 is installed
Depends: libva2 (>= 2.2.0) which is a virtual package
and is not provided by any available package
Depends: libwebpmux3 (>= 0.6.1-2) which is a virtual
package and is not provided by any available package
libavutil56 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.28) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
Depends: libva-drm2 (>= 1.1.0) which is a virtual
package and is not provided by any available package
Depends: libva-x11-2 (>= 1.0.3) which is a virtual
package and is not provided by any available package
Depends: libva2 (>= 1.8.0) which is a virtual package
and is not provided by any available package
libavdevice58 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.28) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is installed
Depends: libsdl2-2.0-0 (>= 2.0.9) but it is not going
to be installed
libmfx1 : Depends: libva-drm2 (>= 1.1.0) which is a virtual package
and is not provided by any available package
Depends: libva-x11-2 (>= 1.0.3) which is a virtual package
and is not provided by any available package
Depends: libva2 (>= 1.0.3) which is a virtual package and is
not provided by any available package
libbluray2 : Depends: libfontconfig1 (>= 2.12.6) but 2.11.0-6.7+b1 is
installed
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
Keep the following packages at their current version:
1) ffmpeg [Not Installed]
2) libass9 [Not Installed]
3) libavcodec58 [Not Installed]
4) libavdevice58 [Not Installed]
5) libavfilter7 [Not Installed]
6) libavformat58 [Not Installed]
7) libavresample4 [Not Installed]
8) libavutil56 [Not Installed]
9) libbluray2 [Not Installed]
10) libcdio-cdda2 [Not Installed]
11) libcdio-paranoia2 [Not Installed]
12) libcdio19 [Not Installed]
13) libmfx1 [Not Installed]
14) libopenh264-5 [Not Installed]
15) libpostproc55 [Not Installed]
16) librubberband2 [1.8.1-7 (now, oldstable)]
17) libswresample3 [Not Installed]
18) libswscale5 [Not Installed]
19) libvpx6 [Not Installed]
20) libx264-157 [Not Installed]
21) libzimg2 [Not Installed]
--
=====
Joerg Kampmann, Dr. Dipl.-Phys - IBK-Consult for Climate Physics - non-profit -
D-31228 Peine +49-177-276-3140
www.ibk-consult.de - www.kampmannpeine.org
www.xing.com/hp/Joerg_Kampmann
www.xing.com/net/mathe
www.researchgate
Re: Need help with ffmpeg installation - strange behaviour of my system - am I correct here?
Am 09.07.21 um 22:47 schrieb Stefan Monnier: 2. repair my situation - I cannot go to Debian 10 right now (I posted the reason somewhere here - mouse ist awfully slow and jumpy)) You might want to try `aptitude` instead of `apt`: it will try to offer ways to fix the problem (by removing&upgrading&downgrading package). The solutions it offers can sometimes take a long time to come up (because it performs a search through a large search tree), and it may have effects you won't like, so carefully review the solutions proposed. Stefan I think I now know what went wrong - AND I do not know how to revert!!!: some days ago I did unadvertantly: root@primergy:/home/joerg# apt-get install \ > build-essential \ > cmake \ > git \ > libmbedtls-dev \ > libasound2-dev \ > libavcodec-dev \ #!!! > libavdevice-dev \ > libavfilter-dev \ > libavformat-dev \ > libavutil-dev \ > libcurl4-openssl-dev \ > libfdk-aac-dev \ > libfontconfig-dev \ > libfreetype6-dev \ > libglvnd-dev \ > libjack-jackd2-dev \ > libjansson-dev \ > libluajit-5.1-dev \ > libpulse-dev \ > libqt5x11extras5-dev \ > libspeexdsp-dev \ > libswresample-dev \ > libswscale-dev \ > libudev-dev \ > libv4l-dev \ > libvlc-dev \ > libwayland-dev \ > libx11-dev \ > libx264-dev \ > libxcb-shm0-dev \ > libxcb-xinerama0-dev \ > libxcomposite-dev \ > libxinerama-dev \ > pkg-config \ > python3-dev \ > qtbase5-dev \ > qtbase5-private-dev \ > libqt5svg5-dev \ > swig \ > libxcb-randr0-dev \ > libxcb-xfixes0-dev \ > libx11-xcb-dev \ > libxcb1-dev \ > libxss-dev \ > qtwayland5 \ > libgles2-mesa \ > libgles2-mesa-dev Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut. Statusinformationen werden eingelesen Fertig Hinweis: »libfontconfig1-dev« wird an Stelle von »libfontconfig-dev« gewählt. libgles2-mesa ist schon die neueste Version (13.0.6-1+b2). libgles2-mesa wurde als manuell installiert festgelegt. pkg-config ist schon die neueste Version (0.29-4+b1). pkg-config wurde als manuell installiert festgelegt. Einige Pakete konnten nicht installiert werden. Das kann bedeuten, dass Sie eine unmögliche Situation angefordert haben oder, wenn Sie die Unstable-Distribution verwenden, dass einige erforderliche Pakete noch nicht erstellt wurden oder Incoming noch nicht verlassen haben. Die folgenden Informationen helfen Ihnen vielleicht, die Situation zu lösen: Die folgenden Pakete haben unerfüllte Abhängigkeiten: libavcodec-dev : Hängt ab von: libavcodec58 (= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden libavdevice-dev : Hängt ab von: libavdevice58 (= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libpostproc-dev (>= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libavresample-dev (>= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden libavfilter-dev : Hängt ab von: libavfilter7 (= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libpostproc-dev (>= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libavresample-dev (>= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden libavformat-dev : Hängt ab von: libavformat58 (= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden libavutil-dev : Hängt ab von: libavutil56 (= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden libglvnd-dev : Hängt ab von: libegl-dev (>= 1.3.0-1) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libgl-dev (>= 1.3.0-1) Hängt ab von: libgles-dev (>= 1.3.0-1) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libglx-dev (>= 1.3.0-1) soll aber nicht installiert werden libswresample-dev : Hängt ab von: libswresample3 (= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden libswscale-dev : Hängt ab von: libswscale5 (= 10:4.1.6-dmo1+deb10u1) soll aber nicht installiert werden libvlc-dev : Hängt ab von: libvlc5 (= 1:3.0.12-dmo0+deb10u2) soll aber nicht installiert werden libx264-dev : Hängt ab von: libx264-157 (= 4:0.157.2980+git34c06d1-dmo1+deb10u2) soll aber nicht installiert werden E: Probleme können nicht korrigiert werden, Sie haben zurückgehaltene defekte Pakete.
Re: Bash: testing a variable
I am sorry I found myself in the wrong thread ... so discard
Am 09.07.21 um 22:25 schrieb Greg Wooledge:
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 01:54:19PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
I'd like to check two things:
* Whether a given path is not already in the $PATH variable
* Whether the given path already exists
If both are true, I'd like to add the given path to the $PATH variable.
add_path_maybe() {
local p i
if [[ $1 != /* ]]; then
echo "refusing to consider a directory that doesn't begin with /" >&2
return 1
fi
if [[ ! -d $1 ]]; then
echo "directory '$1' does not exist" >&2
return 1
fi
IFS=: read -ra p <<< "$PATH"
for i in "${p[@]}"; do
if [[ $i = "$1" ]]; then
return 0
fi
done
PATH=$PATH:$1
}
--
=
Joerg Kampmann, Dr. Dipl.-Phys - IBK-Consult for Climate Physics - non-profit -
D-31228 Peine +49-177-276-3140
www.ibk-consult.de - www.kampmannpeine.org
www.xing.com/hp/Joerg_Kampmann
www.xing.com/net/mathe
www.researchgate.net/profile/Joerg_Kampmann -
https://independent.academia.edu/J%C3%B6rgKampmann
===
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or legally protected information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure use or distribution of the material in
this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen.
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtuemlich
erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und loeschen
Sie diese Mail
===
Re: Bash: testing a variable
Am 09.07.21 um 21:54 schrieb Charles Curley:
I'd like to check two things:
* Whether a given path is not already in the $PATH variable
* Whether the given path already exists
If both are true, I'd like to add the given path to the $PATH variable.
I can add the given path, and test for the existence of the given path.
I can write expressions that work to detect the given path in $PATH.
What I don't seem able to do is combine all that in a script.
Here's what I have for the script:
#!/bin/bash
# A short script for testing some code.
# pelican seems to like local installations here.
SUBSTR="${HOME}"/\.local/bin/
echo Substr is "${SUBSTR}"
# if [[ ! ${PATH} =~ .*/home/charles/.local/bin.* ]] ; then
if [[ $( echo "$PATH" | grep -E -v "${SUBSTR}" ) ]] ; then
echo Substring NOT found.;
if [ -d "${HOME}/.local/bin/" ] ; then
echo Adding to \$PATH
PATH=${HOME}/.local/bin:$PATH
fi
else
echo Substring found!;
fi
I call the script with the . operator: ". test.sh"
this is the result:
root@primergy:~/software-env# . test.sh
Substr is /root/.local/bin/
Substring NOT found.
root@primergy:~/software-env#
Why do I always end up adding the given path, even if it is already in
$PATH?
Debian is Buster, bash is 5.0.3(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu).
Re: Need help with ffmpeg installation - strange behaviour of my system - am I correct here?
Am 09.07.21 um 21:44 schrieb Greg Wooledge: On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 09:36:00PM +0200, Kampmann wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libavcodec58 : Depends: libavutil56 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is to be installed This is a really powerful indicator that you've mixed sources which are either from, or for, different Debian releases. Or mixed Debian sources and non-Debian sources. The "libc6 (>= 2.27)" dependency is identical to the libc6 dependency on the *buster* (Debian 10) version of libavcodec58. (Which is a package that does not even exist in Debian 9.) So, it looks like you've either got a buster (Debian 10) source, or you've got some third-party source that was meant to be used with Debian 10. You can't use Debian 10 sources on Debian 9. this really seems to be the clue, however: how do I get 1. information on the installed packages? 2. repair my situation - I cannot go to Debian 10 right now (I posted the reason somewhere here - mouse ist awfully slow and jumpy))
Re: Need help with ffmpeg installation - strange behaviour of my system - am I correct here?
Am 09.07.21 um 21:40 schrieb Greg Wooledge: On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 08:37:03PM +0100, Brian wrote: On Fri 09 Jul 2021 at 15:05:20 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 08:41:17PM +0200, Joerg Kampmann wrote: Hello - I tried to install ffmpeg (a normal Debian package) and got some strange messages. the ffmpeg-group adviced me to go to a Debian group. I hope I am correct here in this group. I am running Debian 9 on a Fujitsu TX 100 S1 computer ... This is not the current stable release. You may wish to *consider* upgrading, as running older releases tends to be incompatible with the desire to install recent versions of web browsers, video players, and other large and complicated packages. The OP says: Hello - I tried to install ffmpeg... This is on Debian 9. Either it installs or it doesn't. It did for me. Not being the current release seems neither here nor there. We shall see. I have a theory that they tried to add buster sources (or buster-backports, or some third-party repository meant for buster) because they wanted newer stuff than was available in stretch or stretch-backports. Frankendebian ensued. Frankendebian???
Re: Need help with ffmpeg installation - strange behaviour of my system - am I correct here?
Am 09.07.21 um 21:37 schrieb Brian: On Fri 09 Jul 2021 at 15:05:20 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 08:41:17PM +0200, Joerg Kampmann wrote: Hello - I tried to install ffmpeg (a normal Debian package) and got some strange messages. the ffmpeg-group adviced me to go to a Debian group. I hope I am correct here in this group. I am running Debian 9 on a Fujitsu TX 100 S1 computer ... This is not the current stable release. You may wish to *consider* upgrading, as running older releases tends to be incompatible with the desire to install recent versions of web browsers, video players, and other large and complicated packages. yes I know, however I am running a rather old machine (TX 100 S1 from Fujitsu) and already tried to install Debian 10 which made my mouse-pointer awfully slow and "jumpy" ... therefore I stay with Debian 9 - however I try moving with the Debian 10 - trial-disk - but at a later time in August ... The OP says: Hello - I tried to install ffmpeg... This is on Debian 9. Either it installs or it doesn't. It did for me. Not being the current release seems neither here nor there. -- = Joerg Kampmann, Dr. Dipl.-Phys - IBK-Consult for Climate Physics - non-profit - D-31228 Peine +49-177-276-3140 www.ibk-consult.de - www.kampmannpeine.org www.xing.com/hp/Joerg_Kampmann www.xing.com/net/mathe www.researchgate.net/profile/Joerg_Kampmann - https://independent.academia.edu/J%C3%B6rgKampmann === This e-mail may contain confidential and/or legally protected information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure use or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und loeschen Sie diese Mail ===
Re: Need help with ffmpeg installation - strange behaviour of my system - am I correct here?
Ok, thanks - here we go :) : (base) joerg@primergy:~$ su Passwort: root@primergy:/home/joerg# export LANG=en_US.utf8 root@primergy:/home/joerg# apt install ffmpeg Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ffmpeg : Depends: libavcodec58 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libavdevice58 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libavfilter7 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libavformat58 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libavresample4 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libavutil56 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libpostproc55 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libswresample3 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libswscale5 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. root@primergy:/home/joerg# apt install libavcodec58 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libavcodec58 : Depends: libavutil56 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libc6 (>= 2.27) but 2.24-11+deb9u4 is to be installed Depends: libcodec2-0.8.1 but it is not installable Depends: libgsm1 (>= 1.0.18) but 1.0.13-4+b2 is to be installed --- this is completely non-understandable Depends: libmfx1 but it is not going to be installed Depends: libopenh264-5 (>= 2.0.0) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libswresample3 (>= 10:4.1.6) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libva2 (>= 2.2.0) but it is not installable --- this is completely non-understandable Depends: libvpx6 (>= 1.8.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libwebpmux3 (>= 0.6.1-2) but it is not installable Depends: libx264-157 (>= 4:0.157.2980+git34c06d1) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. root@primergy:/home/joerg# Am 09.07.21 um 21:14 schrieb Anssi Saari: Joerg Kampmann writes: Hello group I wanted to install ffmpeg under Debian 9 and got some errormessages (in German): How about errormessages not in German? LANG=en_US.utf8 apt install ffmpeg? ffmpeg : Hängt ab von: libavcodec58 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden https://packages.debian.org/stretch/ffmpeg says ffmpeg in Stretch depends on libavcodec57, not 58. Could it be you've configured Debian Multimedia repository for Debian 10 for your Debian 9 system? -- ===== Joerg Kampmann, Dr. Dipl.-Phys - IBK-Consult for Climate Physics - non-profit - D-31228 Peine +49-177-276-3140 www.ibk-consult.de - www.kampmannpeine.org www.xing.com/hp/Joerg_Kampmann www.xing.com/net/mathe www.researchgate.net/profile/Joerg_Kampmann - https://independent.academia.edu/J%C3%B6rgKampmann === This e-mail may contain confidential and/or legally protected information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure use or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und loeschen Sie diese Mail ===
Re: Need help with ffmpeg installation - strange behaviour of my system - am I correct here?
Am 09.07.21 um 21:04 schrieb Brian: On Fri 09 Jul 2021 at 20:41:17 +0200, Joerg Kampmann wrote: Hello - I tried to install ffmpeg (a normal Debian package) and got some strange messages. the ffmpeg-group adviced me to go to a Debian group. I hope I am correct here in this group. You have kept these "strange" meaages secret. How could anyone work out what is going on? I am sorry - however I posted a rather long "strange" stuff here. I evidently disappeared :) - can you explain that? I am running Debian 9 on a Fujitsu TX 100 S1 computer ... ffmpeg is known to be installable on Debian 9. -- = Joerg Kampmann, Dr. Dipl.-Phys - IBK-Consult for Climate Physics - non-profit - D-31228 Peine +49-177-276-3140 www.ibk-consult.de - www.kampmannpeine.org www.xing.com/hp/Joerg_Kampmann www.xing.com/net/mathe www.researchgate.net/profile/Joerg_Kampmann - https://independent.academia.edu/J%C3%B6rgKampmann === This e-mail may contain confidential and/or legally protected information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure use or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und loeschen Sie diese Mail ===
Need help with ffmpeg installation - strange behaviour of my system - am I correct here?
Hello - I tried to install ffmpeg (a normal Debian package) and got some strange messages. the ffmpeg-group adviced me to go to a Debian group. I hope I am correct here in this group. I am running Debian 9 on a Fujitsu TX 100 S1 computer ... /base) joerg@primergy:~$ uname -a Linux primergy 4.9.0-16-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.272-1 (2021-06-21) x86_64 GNU/Linux (base) joerg@primergy:~$ / Here is the dialogue I had in the *ffmpeg*-group; Am 09.07.21 um 11:31 schrieb Kampmann/: Thanks - that is strange. Do you have any clues? /Am 09.07.21 um 11:16 schrieb Reindl Harald/: that's a problem with your distribution and not ffmpeg specific /Am 09.07.21 um 11:06 schrieb Joerg Kampmann: /Hello group I wanted to install ffmpeg under Debian 9 and got some errormessages (in German): root@primergy:~# apt install ffmpeg Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut. Statusinformationen werden eingelesen Fertig Einige Pakete konnten nicht installiert werden. Das kann bedeuten, dass Sie eine unmögliche Situation angefordert haben oder, wenn Sie die Unstable-Distribution verwenden, dass einige erforderliche Pakete noch nicht erstellt wurden oder Incoming noch nicht verlassen haben. Die folgenden Informationen helfen Ihnen vielleicht, die Situation zu lösen: Die folgenden Pakete haben unerfüllte Abhängigkeiten: ffmpeg : Hängt ab von: libavcodec58 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libavdevice58 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libavfilter7 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libavformat58 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libavresample4 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libavutil56 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libpostproc55 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libswresample3 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libswscale5 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden E: Probleme können nicht korrigiert werden, Sie haben zurückgehaltene defekte Pakete. root@primergy:~# / /and a 2nd mail on this issue: I tried to install one of the "not-installed" modules and got the following root@primergy:~/software-env# apt install libavcodec58 Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut. Statusinformationen werden eingelesen Fertig Einige Pakete konnten nicht installiert werden. Das kann bedeuten, dass Sie eine unmögliche Situation angefordert haben oder, wenn Sie die Unstable-Distribution verwenden, dass einige erforderliche Pakete noch nicht erstellt wurden oder Incoming noch nicht verlassen haben. Die folgenden Informationen helfen Ihnen vielleicht, die Situation zu lösen: Die folgenden Pakete haben unerfüllte Abhängigkeiten: libavcodec58 : Hängt ab von: libavutil56 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libc6 (>= 2.27) aber 2.24-11+deb9u4 soll installiert werden # here another version should be installed Hängt ab von: libcodec2-0.8.1 ist aber nicht installierbar Hängt ab von: libgsm1 (>= 1.0.18) aber 1.0.13-4+b2 soll installiert werden Hängt ab von: libmfx1 soll aber nicht installiert werden # this module is not installable - why? Hängt ab von: libopenh264-5 (>= 2.0.0) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libswresample3 (>= 10:4.1.6) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libva2 (>= 2.2.0) ist aber nicht installierbar# this module is not installable - why? Hängt ab von: libvpx6 (>= 1.8.1) soll aber nicht installiert werden Hängt ab von: libwebpmux3 (>= 0.6.1-2) ist aber nicht installierbar # this module is not installable - why? Hängt ab von: libx264-157 (>= 4:0.157.2980+git34c06d1) soll aber nicht installiert werden E: Probleme können nicht korrigiert werden, Sie haben zurückgehaltene defekte Pakete. // /
Re: Re: Re: Mouse awfully slow on Debian 10 on certain machines
> Hello list, I did some further research. In particular I used the live-ISO-image of > Buster (amd64) >on DVD and bootet the system. And I found the following: > Mouse still is irrational. It works fine, when no application has started after logging. > When then an application is started (in this case Firefox of the DVD) the mouse mostly does not > move. It jumps. And when there is a button something similar, the mouse behaves even worse. I > did not dig >into the "InputClass" because I did not find it So any help is urgently needed. I did some further research with live-CD's, as well with x86 as amd64: Results on both versions: mouse behaves normal after booting system and log in (when no application runs) - first thing I saw was: "*Oh no, something has gone wrong*" (I think this is no problem) so I continued and got the normal user screen. I pressed right button for settings: The mouse was a bit jumping and when I moved to the group of background pictures (via click) the mouse from picture to picture (from one background picture to the neighbouring one) is "sticky". this occurs on each "border" of the pictures. Then I started an application. I chose Firefox as application and started it. here the mouse was more or less fixed ... also keyboard typing was not possible. The mouse behaved as if stuck to the mousepad. Then I started another application: the mouse disappeared when moved from neutral background to the window of the application. I have the impression the applications hinder the mouse to move. could this be a priority problem? kind regards Jörg
Re: Re: Mouse awfully slow on Debian 10 on certain machines
Hello list, I did some further research. In particular I used the live-ISO-image of Buster (amd64) on DVD and bootet the system. And I found the following: Mouse still is irrational. It works fine, when no application has startet after logging. When then an application is started (in this case firefox of the DVD) the mouse mostly does not move. It jumps. And when there is a button something similar, the mouse behaves even worse. I did not dig into the "InputClass" because I did not find it. So any help is urgently needed. tia Jörg
AW: Re: Re: Mouse awfully slow on Debian 10 on certain machines
In the meantime I found xinput and installed it. Good tool. But things go slow due to lack of time. I will come back a bit later.===Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet.Jörg Kampmann, Dr. Dipl.-Phys.www.ibk-Consult.de - www.kampmannpeine.orgwww.researchgate.net/profile/Joerg_Kampmann === Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Jörg Kampmann Datum: 03.05.20 13:08 (GMT+01:00) An: geo...@nsup.org Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Betreff: Re: Re: Mouse awfully slow on Debian 10 on certain machines thanks a lot In order to test your suggestions I tried them under Debian 9 - 32-Bit - however these programs do not exist on my debian 9 - neither xinput and for libinput I found: bash: libinput: Kommando nicht gefunden. #--- command not found root@primergy:/home/kampmann# whereis libinput libinput: /usr/share/man/man4/libinput.4.gz Any ideas? Jörg
Re: Re: Mouse awfully slow on Debian 10 on certain machines
thanks a lot In order to test your suggestions I tried them under Debian 9 - 32-Bit - however these programs do not exist on my debian 9 - neither xinput and for *libinput* I found: bash: libinput: Kommando nicht gefunden. #*--- command not found* root@primergy:/home/kampmann# whereis libinput libinput: /usr/share/man/man4/libinput.4.gz Any ideas? Jörg
Mouse awfully slow on Debian 10 on certain machines
Hello list, I installed Debian 10 on my Fujitsu TX 100 S1 (64 and 32 Bit possible) with debian 64. After that I observed: the mouse pointer is awfully slow. Therefore I went back to Debian 9 32-bit. On a HP-Pavillon 64-bit Debian 10 works just fine. Anybody knows about this problem? What can I do? tia Jörg -- = Joerg Kampmann, Dr. Dipl.-Phys - IBK-Consult for Climate Physics - D-31228 Peine +49-177-276-3140 ===
