Re: Log monitoring GUI program

1998-09-11 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, George Bonser wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Sep 1998, Richard L Shepherd wrote:
> 
> > interface to manage/interpret/flag all the logging coming in.
> > 
> > Has anyone heard of such a package? Especially a debianised one?
> > 
> 
> There are two that I know of, XLogMaster and XLogMonitor.
> 
> Try:
> 
> http://www.gnu.org/software/xlogmaster/xlogmaster.html and
> http://members.xoom.com/chaosmaker/linux/
> 
> I think XLogMaster is what you are really after, I am not sure if there is
> a Debian package.

Thanks, in fact I just found that there is one in slink, which is OK for
me even though the rest of my system is hamm.  It's version 1.4.1 whereas
the latest release is 1.4.3, but I've opted to stick with the ease of
install over the lates version for now ;-)

R.


Log monitoring GUI program

1998-09-10 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I seem to remember reading sometime (in comp.os.linux.announce I think) 
about a package that was something like a GUI that provided log-file (e.g.
syslog written stuff) monitoring features.

I've got to the point of having several machines syslog-ing to one central
machine (as well as keeping local copies) and would like to have a nice
interface to manage/interpret/flag all the logging coming in.

Has anyone heard of such a package? Especially a debianised one?

TIA,

Richard.


LRP offline

1998-06-02 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Anyone here know why the LRP (Linux Router Project) is offline at
present?  The URl is:

http://www.psychosis.com/linux-router/

I desperately need to get to  their pages - are there any mirrors?

TIA

-- 
8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Telnet Proxy anyone?

1998-05-07 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Richard L Shepherd wrote:

> Has anyone heard of a telnet-proxy package (especially for linux and
> Debian of course)?
> 
> We have some people who have (and want to keep) their subnet blocked for
> offsite access (so they do all their WWW browsing via a WWWcache which can
> then be billed for).  I was wondering if there is something we can do like
> this for telnet.  Any ideas?

Thanks for all the help here everyone.  I have settled for the TIS
firewall Tool-kit.  It does everything I need and almost everything I want
;-)

Combined with the transparent-proxy feature of the Linux kernel I can get
it to intercept/redirect telnet connection attempts to the tn-gw proxy of
the TIS fwtk.  However I cannot get it to automatically connect to the
remote destination after successfully authenticating the local user.  The
problem is how to find out where they wanted to go, without them having to
type "c host" at the "tn-gw>" prompt. I can live with this 2 step
procedure though,

Cheers,

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Telnet Proxy anyone?

1998-04-21 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Has anyone heard of a telnet-proxy package (especially for linux and
Debian of course)?

We have some people who have (and want to keep) their subnet blocked for
offsite access (so they do all their WWW browsing via a WWWcache which can
then be billed for).  I was wondering if there is something we can do like
this for telnet.  Any ideas?

TIA

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: no popclient?

1998-04-20 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Apr 1998, Richard L Shepherd wrote:
> 
> > I see that popclient has been missing for sometime.  I have a machine with
> > popclient installed from some time ago (early days of bo).  Just recently
> > it has stopped working and I see no alternative package to get either the
> > binary (popclient) or the equivalent (lightweight) functionality.
> > 
> > The error I get when trying to pop off ANY server via my (rather old)
> > popclient binary now is:
> > 
> > popclient: querying mailserv.waikato.ac.nz at Mon Apr 20 15:23:43 1998
> > popclient: openuserfolder: open(): No such file or directory
> > 
> > Now all my local mail readers work fine so there's no reason I know of why
> > it's not happy anymore.  The only shared lib it uses is libc5 (which I
> > have).
> > 
> > Any ideas on how to fix this or what else to use?
> 
> Some time ago, when the popclient program was enhanced to support more
> protocols than just POP, the name was changed to fetchmail. fetchmail is
> in bo (stable) and also in hamm (frozen).

Thanks, that's just what I needed.  Thanks for the quick and helpful
response everyone.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


no popclient?

1998-04-20 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I see that popclient has been missing for sometime.  I have a machine with
popclient installed from some time ago (early days of bo).  Just recently
it has stopped working and I see no alternative package to get either the
binary (popclient) or the equivalent (lightweight) functionality.

The error I get when trying to pop off ANY server via my (rather old)
popclient binary now is:

popclient: querying mailserv.waikato.ac.nz at Mon Apr 20 15:23:43 1998
popclient: openuserfolder: open(): No such file or directory

Now all my local mail readers work fine so there's no reason I know of why
it's not happy anymore.  The only shared lib it uses is libc5 (which I
have).

Any ideas on how to fix this or what else to use?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Install disks for PowerPC

1998-04-20 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Sun, 19 Apr 1998, Alain Toussaint wrote:

> > where are they?  I see a directory for disks-i386 and several other
> > platforms (alpha, sparc and m68k) but no disks-powerpc.
> > 
> > So how does one get started installing Debian on a PowerPC MAC, and where
> > are the instructions?
> > 
> 
> i don't think there will be a Debian for the Mac version of the powerPC as
> long as these machine remain proprietary,there's version of linux for the
> IBM powerPC line but the only linux distribution especially for the Mac
> PPC is available at:

Thanx for the reply.  So how does one get started with the IBM PowerPC
then if there are no disks-powerpc?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Install disks for PowerPC

1998-04-20 Thread Richard L Shepherd
where are they?  I see a directory for disks-i386 and several other
platforms (alpha, sparc and m68k) but no disks-powerpc.

So how does one get started installing Debian on a PowerPC MAC, and where
are the instructions?

TIA

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Two-monitors

1998-02-17 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I have two video cards installed on my machine.  I also have 2 monitors
I'd like to have running.  However I have not yet figured out how to get
the system using the second video card.  So far the only place I see any
trace of the second one is in /proc/pci where it is listed as a PCI
device.

To possibly make life more difficult, both cards are the same brand - the
only difference being the amount of RAM installed on each (4 vs 8MB).
Does anyone have such a setup going?  I plan to use x2x once I have them
both going, but need to get over this slight hurdle first ;-)

TIA

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Two Monitors

1998-01-19 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Has anyone any experience in using two monitors on one machine.  I'm
thinking particularly of X.  I can get a second video card (which I guess
is mandatory or there'd be nowhere to plug the second one in right?).

What I'm really interested in is getting the tow side-by-side and having X
treat them as one big screen (similar to the way Macintosh's can do this).
Is this possible?  Or is my best bet to run up X :0 and X :1 and use
 to switch between them?

I'd be interested to hear...

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: tulip driver

1998-01-07 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Ian Keith Setford wrote:

> 
> Hi-
> 
> I am having no luck getting a new ethernet card up.  I just installed a
> new card with a DEC "tulip" chip and I can't get it working.  Does anyone
> have a "tulip" card working?  If so, could you share with me how you got
> it running?
> 
> I am running 2.0.30 on a ppro 200.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> -Ian

Try the latest tulip driver from:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html
I have found that it works significantly better than the one in the Debian
kernel-source packages, and in some cases it works where the old ones
simply don't! (e.g. DEC cards with the 21143 chip)

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Install debian with serial port as console?

1998-01-07 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Larry Owens wrote:

> Does anyone know if it is possible to install debian on a PC that does
> not have a video card or keyboard?  I would like to set up a linux
> system that would use a modem attatched to a serial port as the only
> console.

I have used the serial-console patch on some 1.2/1.3 systems here running
kernel 2.0.29 and 2.0.30 but have come across some problems that became
more apparent as I installed more systems:

1. when the serial-console patch is in use the line in the file
/etc/init.d/boot that is supposed to run modutils is mysteriously not
executed, whereas when not using the serial-console patch it IS
successfully executed!  Solving this got enabled me to make more things
modules rather than compiled in.

2. when doing an upgrade via dselect certain packages fiddled with
/dev/console and /dev/tty0 which was contrary to the way prescribed for
the serial-console to work.

Also, when I found that the DEC Prioris XL6x00 series have a BIOS that
supports console redirection I thought I'd try to install a system from
scratch through a terminal connected to the serial port - however the
Debian install disk just switched back to using the VGA screen after
booting from the floppy, so I couldn't use it until I'd installed and
recompiled the kernel with the serial-console patch applied.

So the Debian install disk must specifically send it's output to the VGA
screen, bypassing what the BIOS "thinks" the console ishmmm.

And finally, when using the "console redirection" BIOS setting on these
DEC machines, LILO fails to boot the machine from the hard-disk - only
floppy will work.  When attempting to boot from the HD it gets stuck at
"LI", while disabling the BIOS setting will instantly fix the problem!
How Bizare ;-)

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: BIND 8.1.1 and IP aliasing in Linux

1997-12-18 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Thu, 18 Dec 1997, dA' Phucilage Phactory wrote:

> > I have several Linux DNS servers, two of which have IP aliases on one
> > interface.  Recently I upgraded from BIND 4.9.6 to BIND 8.1.1.  One of the
> > subtle problems I have noticed is now the machines that have IP aliases
> > don't automatically update a zone when sent a notify by the primary
> > server.  Under 4.9.6 they had no problems.
> 
> 
>   I've noticed that the debian package for bind 4.9.6 isn't to great
> (no offense to whomever made it), so i downloaded bind-4.9.6-REL.tar.gz,
> and manually did it myself. I have not and will not goto 8.x until they
> resolve a lot of errors. Right now i am quite happy with 4.9.6, it works
> as it should, and isn't a hassle what so ever.
> 
>   Now to your questions, could you possibly be forgetting to
> increment your serial numbers in your databases? If so, that would
> possibly explain lack of zone transfers to your secondaries. Also, setting
> up a cronjob to pull records is a good idea. I have cron run
> named-xfer with the correct parameters every 6 hours on my secondaries to
> pull from myself.

No sorry, I know the serial numbers are not the problem.  If I do a 'ndc
reload' then it does the zone xfer alright.  As I said - the only
difference between when it was receiving and processing successfully the
notifies from primary servers and now (when it's not) is that now I've
added an IP alias to one interface and let named auto-detect the
interfaces (rather than specifying via 'listen-on' directives, which
appears to be no problem if you believe the logs).

BTW, I'm not using (and haven't been using) the debian BIND package(s) -
I've built my own, but the system is otherwise debian 1.3.whatever (bo).

But thanx for some interest...

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


BIND 8.1.1 and IP aliasing in Linux

1997-12-17 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I have several Linux DNS servers, two of which have IP aliases on one
interface.  Recently I upgraded from BIND 4.9.6 to BIND 8.1.1.  One of the
subtle problems I have noticed is now the machines that have IP aliases
don't automatically update a zone when sent a notify by the primary
server.  Under 4.9.6 they had no problems.

Points of interest:

1. One machine, which has always had aliases, stopped doing updates on
receiving notifies as soon as it was upgraded to 8.1.1.

2. Another machine was doing the notifies fine under 8.1.1 UNTIL we added
the IP alias, and now it too ignores them.

3. I haven't used any "listen-on" directives in /etc/named.conf, though
the default behaviour of using all available ones seems to be working (and
noted in the log file).

Is this a documented problem with either Linux IP aliases or BIND 8.1.1?
I'd be grateful to hear.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


HP DeskDirect 10/100TX PCI LAN Adapter

1997-12-16 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Are there Linux drivers for this card?  I'm about to get one (if there are
drivers) and would like to hear of experiences...

TIA

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Problem with booting after moving from 128 to 64M

1997-12-14 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Fri, 12 Dec 1997, Daniel J. Mashao wrote:

> I had my system working fine for about 2 months but lately I have been
> experiencing problems. I initially thought it had to do with "dirty"
> filesystems. Now I have excluded that possibility.
> 
> Now I wanted to test memory (128M) by removing 64M at a time and changing
> the lilo.conf mem statement. After I have done that the computer does not
> boot anymore. It stops after line "VFS: mount root ...". If I replace all
> 128M it boots fine, but it does not work with any combinations of 64 Megs
> 
> Any clues?

This looks very similar to what happened to me last week.  I had a system
that had 384MB RAM.  I needed to downgrade it to 128MB.  I changed the
line in /etc/lilo.conf and built a boot floppy, BUT I forgot to change the
script /usr/sbin/mkboot to reflect this change.  The system would hang
whenever it got to the "VFS: mount root ..." line during boot just as you
describe.

I had to:

1. boot off a debian rescue disk
2. manually mount the rootfs on /mnt (after switching to the shell on
Alt-F2).
3. put a blank floppy in, and
4. cat /mnt/vmlinuz > /dev/fd0
5. dismount /mnt and reboot.

This got my system back booting from a raw kernel on the floppy, but only
seeing the default maximum of 64MB RAM.  I then edited /usr/bin/mkboot to
include:
append = "mem=128M"
and reran it.  Then a reboot got me back to the 128MB RAM as intended.  A
bit of a hassle alright!

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Pentium II supported?

1997-11-27 Thread Richard L Shepherd
This may be a dumb question, but here goes:

Do Pentium II chip machines run Linux?  For instance the kernel build
procedure (e.g. make xconfig) only has options for up to Pemtium Pro
machines, which may be just a case of someone not having got-around-to
putting the options in yet, or is there a bigger reason like "it doesn't
go yet"?

I am about to order a new machine and will get a Pentium II if Debian can
run on it ;-) 

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


dhcpd config

1997-11-05 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Can anyone tell me if they've got dhcpd going on Debian?  I'm continually
getting the message:
dhcpd: No subnet declaration for eth0
in my logs when it tries to start, and it fails immediately.  But I do
have such a statement!  What's missing?

TIA

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Large buffers entry in free

1997-11-04 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Joey Hess wrote:

> > Is there a bug somewhere?
> 
> Yes. This is fixed in the procps currently in hamm, version
> 1.12.2.1. Are you using a hamm system that hasn't been updated for a
> week or so? I didn't think bo's procps had this problem too..

Oh yes it is!  I have several bo systems that I happily upgraded and all
have this problem.  Fortunately it doesn't break anything other than what
you read, but I'd like it to be fixedespecially when I'm telling
non-linux boffins around here how to see how much memory is used on my
linux servers and this garbage shows up!

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? 
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Netatalk, changing passwords

1997-10-29 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I am using debian netatalk 1.4b2, and have used it for some time happily. 
Until now I have always had Mac users who also had interactive accounts,
and so could change their passwords at the shell prompt. 

However I am now setting up a couple of servers for users who may never
log in.  I notice that when I look in the chooser at my servers (under
apple-share) the "change password" button is shaded out and unuseable.  Is
it possible to fix this somehow?  Is this what PAM is supposed to help in?
I'm really ignorant about what/how PAM is/works.

Cheers,

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Year 2000 & Debian

1997-10-22 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Not sure if this has been thrashed out before:

Is Debian (or Linux in general) year 2000 *safe*?  I'm not even sure what
that means precisely, but I'm responsible for finding out round here and
wondered if it's been discussed on this group.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8





--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Sambades on non-us site

1997-10-15 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Wed, 15 Oct 1997, Matthew Tebbens wrote:

> The Sambades package on the overseas site has permissions problems.
> Anyone notice this ? Is it on purpose ?
> 
> Matthew

Yes, my mirror has failed to pick this up for the last 2 days because of
this.  I REALLY want it for about 3 servers here.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Debian Netatalk and Ethernet cards

1997-10-12 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, LeRoy D. Cressy wrote:

> > Further to this problem I have experimented some more and have the
> > following results, all on the one machine, using different cards,
> > attempting to run netatalk on the same network:
> > 
> > Card Description:   Driver (Module):Results:
> > -   
> > Intel EtherExpressPro 100 (builtin) eepro100BAD
> > Digital 21140   tulip   BAD
> > Western Digital 8013EPC wd  Excellent
> > 
> > While all work fine for regular IP (the first 2 especially nice as they do
> > 100Mbps) only the last one is consistently good for seeing the (large)
> > appletalk network we have here...weird, annoying and frustrating...

> On ot boxes that do not support apple talk, did you do a kernel compile
> specifying in the net section to include apple talk in the kernel?  I 

Er, if you read above, all those tests were on the same machine! (So they
must have had appletalk in the running kernel.)  I ALWAYS recompile the
kernel to suit my setup.

The problem seems to be in the multicast part of the ethernet card
drivers...I'll await new versions for improvements.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


"free" command stuffed

1997-10-12 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I have just updated my servers to the latest stuff in bo (arrived on my
mirror on Saturday).  The free command now gives weird output, like this:

ns1# free
 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:386536 380196   6340  22472 202704
-/+ buffers:   1774923997940
Swap:   130748380 130368  69604

The second line figures do not add up with the first line---according to
the second line I have over 4GB of RAM (I wish!).  The other machines
report similar crap.  Also the Swap line has an extranumber at the end
that I think doesn't belong!  Have others noticed this?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Debian Netatalk and Ethernet cards

1997-10-09 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Richard L Shepherd wrote:

> Further to this problem I have experimented some more and have the
> following results, all on the one machine, using different cards,
> attempting to run netatalk on the same network:
> 
> Card Description: Driver (Module):Results:
> - 
> Intel EtherExpressPro 100 (builtin)   eepro100BAD
> Digital 21140 tulip   BAD
> Western Digital 8013EPC   wd  
> Excellent
> 
> While all work fine for regular IP (the first 2 especially nice as they do
> 100Mbps) only the last one is consistently good for seeing the (large)
> appletalk network we have here...weird, annoying and frustrating...

AND, further to this I have settled for a solution which goes like this...
keep the IP going over the eepro100 (built-in), I have a Western Digital
(old-cheapo) configured with 10.0.0.1 and netatalk running on it.  Even
though the IP number is bogus (I guess it just needs to be there to have
the interface UP) the appletalk routing seems to work fine.  Thus it can
be a High-performance WWW server out the eepro100 and the Macs can upload
there WWW pages via the WD card---not ideal but at least I didn't have to
spend any more money...

Cheers,

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Debian Netatalk and Ethernet cards

1997-10-09 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Richard L Shepherd wrote:

> I happily use netatalk on 3 debian machines using ethernet cards which all
> use the wd driver module.  Today I go to set it up on a DEC XLe6180 which
> has a builtin Intel EtherExpress 100 card in it.  The IP drivers work
> great at both 10 and 100 Mbps.  However Netatalk just isn't happy, it
> can't see the appletalk network out there (well it kind-of worked once out
> of many tries---picked an invalid net number and could aecho some other
> machines...).
> 
> I didn't think it was relevant which ethernet driver I was using, but
> eventually, after comparing with the other machines I have, it all pointed
> to the ethernet card and driver being the culprit!  Sure enough someone
> tells me that appletalk won't go on any Intel cards, is this true?  If so,
> are there any other cards people know of that I should stare clear of to?
> I'm installing this server for lots of people with Macs to share files
> with...

Further to this problem I have experimented some more and have the
following results, all on the one machine, using different cards,
attempting to run netatalk on the same network:

Card Description:   Driver (Module):Results:
-   
Intel EtherExpressPro 100 (builtin) eepro100BAD
Digital 21140   tulip   BAD
Western Digital 8013EPC wd  Excellent

While all work fine for regular IP (the first 2 especially nice as they do
100Mbps) only the last one is consistently good for seeing the (large)
appletalk network we have here...weird, annoying and frustrating...

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Debian Netatalk and Ethernet cards

1997-10-09 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I happily use netatalk on 3 debian machines using ethernet cards which all
use the wd driver module.  Today I go to set it up on a DEC XLe6180 which
has a builtin Intel EtherExpress 100 card in it.  The IP drivers work
great at both 10 and 100 Mbps.  However Netatalk just isn't happy, it
can't see the appletalk network out there (well it kind-of worked once out
of many tries---picked an invalid net number and could aecho some other
machines...).

I didn't think it was relevant which ethernet driver I was using, but
eventually, after comparing with the other machines I have, it all pointed
to the ethernet card and driver being the culprit!  Sure enough someone
tells me that appletalk won't go on any Intel cards, is this true?  If so,
are there any other cards people know of that I should stare clear of to?
I'm installing this server for lots of people with Macs to share files
with...

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Phone: 07-838-4764
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


SCSI support

1997-09-22 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Hi,

does anyone know if there is support for:
Initio PCI 9100U Ultra Fast SCSI Host Adapter Kit
within the standard debian kernel-source packages?  Or any linux support
for this card at all?

TIA...

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Best Ethernet Card

1997-09-17 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On 12 Sep 1997, Dale Martin wrote:

> The other card I see mentioned a lot, but never see much as far as
> recommendations, is the Intel EtherExpress 100.  Anyone have any
> thoughts on those?

I have the "Intel EtherExpress 100 Pro", which is different from the
regular one (requires a driver that is not currently distributed with
Debian) and it goes fantastic.  I tried it out on our Cisco Catalyst 5000
switch and got up to 90Mb transfers with a 100MB file.  Even though the
driver I have is only in alpha, we use it in production (on a major
nameserver) and it has never put a foot wrong.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Max Process size

1997-07-30 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Can anyone tell me where in the kernel sources are specified any of the
following:
max size of a process
max number of processes
I once knew, but alas that was a long time ago...!

I have kernel-source-2.0.29-7 installed

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: why kernel 2.0.29 in Debian 1.3.1?

1997-07-28 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:

> > why Debian 1.3.1 includes kernel 2.0.29 and not 2.0.30 (that is in this
> > Debian 1.3.1 but don't is preselect the first time that I install the
> > system).?
> > 
> > Is there any problem whith 2.0.30 kernel?
> 
> Apparently, there was some of the 2.1.x code that was introduced into
> 2.0.30 that caused some problems  I've no idea what it was, maybe
> others can comment; however, it caused the Debian Powers-That-Be to elect
> to go with 2.0.29 as the default.  However, 2.0.30 is still included in the
> 1.3.x distribution.
> 
> I've been using 2.0.30 on several machines without difficulty 
> Therefore, I've never investigated further as to what problems were present
> in this newer version.
> 
> 2.0.31 is supposed to be available within days.  This is supposed to
> resolve the 2.0.30 problems.

Hmmm, I have 2 problems at present:

1. Cannot boot: originally got the 1FA: prompt.  Changed some settings in
the SCSI BIOS and then it worked (2.0.30 kernel).  I recompiled the kernel
one more time and from then on it always stops at "LI".  I can't fix this
one at all, even with 2.0.29.

2. With 2.0.30 I was witnessing a memory leak.  However back with 2.0.29
it seems to be OK (or at least the leak is much slower!).

So all-in-all 2.0.29 seems to be better.  I guess the boot problem is
lilo's rather than a specific kernel versionAny helpers here?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


latex2html and lyx

1997-07-23 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I have installed both lyx (0.10.7-3) and latex2html (96.1.h-3).  I wish to
write documents in lyx and reproduce them in HTML via latex2html.

Trouble is:

when lyx makes a "nice" latex file instead of "{\bfseries bla bla}" it
produces "\bfseries bla bla\mdseries" which latex2html then munges into
"bla bla" and then at the close of the environment closes with
a "".

Hence I get line breaks where I don't want them and bold continuing to the
end of the environment!  Is there a fix for this?  Either in lyx or
latex2html?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: samba and windows NT

1997-07-23 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Tue, 22 Jul 1997, Syd Alsobrook wrote:

> I'm using debian 1.3 with samba 1.9.16.
> 
> When my main workstation was running Win95 I could connect fine now I'm
> running NT 4.0 and I can browse the to my linux box but I'm getting a login
> error that says: The account is not authorized to login from this station.

I have a colleague here who can no longer mount, via samba, his home
directory since he applied service-pack 3 to his NT 4.0 machine.  It's a
big problem here because suddenly lots of people can no longer access
their samba volumes on our main WWW (unix) servers the way they used to.
I don't yet know of a satisfactory solution.

Does anyone else?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: 100 Mbit Ethernet

1997-07-11 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Thu, 10 Jul 1997, dpk wrote:

> I don't have much experience with having two ethernet cards in a machine,

I've a little now that I've had to play with a few machines (one has 4
ethernet cards and 1 radio card!)

> My ifconfig also says 10mb because the tulip driver first probes 10mb.
> However, after boot up, once I start sending packets it says "Enabling
> 100TX port" despite the fact it says 10mb on ifconfig.  Also, my download
> capabilities have shown it.  ( On our internal network I can download up
> to 1.3 MB/sec =), my scsi hard drive griding as fast as possible the whole

Well I've got this problem solved now.  It seems that the switch port I
was testing on was stuffed.  Moving to another one I get wonderful
performance. On a 100Mb/s port I can get it working at both half and full
duplex, with ftp transfers of 3.8 MB/s (which translates to about 30Mb/s,
the other machine for the ftp is only on half duplex) on a 100 MB file
which is excellent!  The other card is still happy at 10Mb/s. And it's all
autodetect too, no options needed. 

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: 100 Mbit Ethernet

1997-07-10 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, dpk wrote:

> I actually did this today... I replaced my old bnc/twisted pair SMC card
> with a 10/100 Switchable SMC which has the 21040 DEC chipset on it (tulip
> driver). We are using a 100 Mbit hub and have noticed a great deal speed
> increase with it.  It seems as if the only thing that slows me down are my
> scsi harddrives when downloading large files!  
> 
> They still use the same drivers for the corresponding chipsets.  In my
> case I didn't have to even recompile my kernel because the DEC 21040 and
> the 21041 use the same driver.  I hope you have the same success and
> pleasure as I.  

Not quite.  I have a machine with two DEC 21140 chip ethernet cards in it.
I wish to have one at 100Mb and the other at 10Mb.  I have the first one
plugged into a port on a Cisco Catalyst 5000 switch.  The switch detects
100Mb full-duplex, however ifconfig still says 10Mb and I get huge
packet loss, presumably due to the speed mismatch.  How do you get the
cards to go at 100Mb?

> On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, Richard L Shepherd wrote:
> > 
> > This is just a quickie, and I'm sure it's an easy one too:
> > 
> > Does Linux support any/all 100 Mbit capable ethernet cards?  i.e. is it
> > possible to use 100 Mbit ethernet with Linux?
> > 

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: [Off-topic] AIC 7880 supported?

1997-07-09 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On 9 Jul 1997, Eloy A. Paris wrote:

> sorry for this off-topic question. If someone provides me with the
> mailing list I should subscribe to ask these kind of questions I will
> be very grateful...
> 
> I want to know if the AIC 7880 Ultra Wide SCSI adapter is supported
> by Linux. Also, is there any advantage in using a Pentium II instead
> of a normal Penitum or even a Pentium Pro?
> 
> I am looking at a Dell PowerEdge 2200 machine that is going to be
> a production file/Internet server. This machine has an AIC 7880 and a 
> Pentium II.

I have just got a Digital Prioris Xl 6200 which has AIC 7880 on board
(integrated) and it works fine.  I just booted up with the Debian Rescue
disk and never looked back.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Switching IP aliases

1997-07-02 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Well I have now written a script that does this quite nicely.  Only
Solaris still rebels to seeing the ARP updates.  Further investigation
shows that Solaris is breaking the rules here so I'll not bother any more
with it.  Email me if you have a need for this.  Cheers.

On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Richard L Shepherd wrote:

> I wish to have 2 nearly identical machines.  Each will have it's own IP
> number plus an IP alias.  The idea is that I wish to occasionally take 1
> down and give it's IP alias over to the other machine, so that there is no
> visible change to any clients. 
> 
> The problem is that machines on the localnet may have an entry in their
> ARP tables with the ethernet address of the old machine at the time of the
> changeover, and so be unable to reach the new holder of that IP number. 
> It is necessary for the new machine to send some packets with a source
> address of the new alias it has taken on so that local hosts will see the
> new ethernet address and update their ARP tables appropriately.
> 
> The only way I've found to do this is to alter the routing so that the new
> IP alias becomes the gateway to the localnet.  (host routes are then added
> for the primary IP address to restore that part of things) Outgoing
> packets will now have the right source address.  It sends some packets out
> and then switches the routing back to normal so that the IP alias is ready
> to be given back. This seems to work OK, but I'd really rather not stuff
> with the routing, so: 

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Switching IP aliases

1997-06-29 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Sat, 28 Jun 1997, Lindsay Allen wrote:

> Richard,
> 
> Would it fix things if you were to ping a non-existant host, thus causing
> a broadcast from your box?  Maybe ping to various subnets as required?

Good idea.  I now have two debian linux machines passing an IP alias
between them. I get the one which has just taken on the alias to ping an
unused IP number on the localnet, after setting the alias interface to be
the gateway to the localnet.  I then swap the routing back to normal.  I'm
observing what other machines on the localnet do with-respect-to their arp
tables.  These other machines are: 

AIX 4.2
Solaris 2.5
Win 95
Linux
Digital Unix (OSF)
Cisco router 

All of these happily update their arp caches as I switch the aliases
EXCEPT for Solaris!  It's brain-dead!  It continues to cache entries for
ages.  I don't know what to do about that!

> I do not have much experience here.  

I'm just learning to, with the help of some local network gurus. 

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Switching IP aliases

1997-06-28 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I wish to have 2 nearly identical machines.  Each will have it's own IP
number plus an IP alias.  The idea is that I wish to occasionally take 1
down and give it's IP alias over to the other machine, so that there is no
visible change to any clients. 

The problem is that machines on the localnet may have an entry in their
ARP tables with the ethernet address of the old machine at the time of the
changeover, and so be unable to reach the new holder of that IP number. 
It is necessary for the new machine to send some packets with a source
address of the new alias it has taken on so that local hosts will see the
new ethernet address and update their ARP tables appropriately.

The only way I've found to do this is to alter the routing so that the new
IP alias becomes the gateway to the localnet.  (host routes are then added
for the primary IP address to restore that part of things) Outgoing
packets will now have the right source address.  It sends some packets out
and then switches the routing back to normal so that the IP alias is ready
to be given back. This seems to work OK, but I'd really rather not stuff
with the routing, so: 

Is there a better way?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


100 Mbit Ethernet

1997-06-18 Thread Richard L Shepherd
This is just a quickie, and I'm sure it's an easy one too:

Does Linux support any/all 100 Mbit capable ethernet cards?  i.e. is it
possible to use 100 Mbit ethernet with Linux?

I have no such machines (though I have some that drive 100 Mbit capable
cards at 10 Mb, since that's what the nets they're on are at).  I'm just
checking to make sure there are 100 Mb drivers too...

Please reply by email...

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: gated file

1997-06-06 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I have now compiled gated (tried on another machine and it went no
problems, thought they were the same configstrange), and got it
running---good.  I have installed it on our internet exchange and it
listens to BGP nicely, including supernets---very good (no other OS's can
do that, that we have).

However: it does not seem to understand variable length subnet masks, as
given to it by the BGP server?  Instead it sets the BGP server as it's
next hop for those nets.  I would MOST like to solve this.  Is it a
problem with gated (I used "options VARIABLE_MASKS"), or is it a kernel
feature I need to explicitly turn on?

The way most of our other hosts cope with this problem is that they
receive a redirect from the BGP server so that they get the correct route
next time.  However my linux machine doesn't seem to learn these redirect
routes and continues to go the long way for these nets every single time!
This is not fatal, just rather inefficient!  This would not be an issue if
the first problem was solved but, if it can't be, this would be a second
best option ;-)

Does anyone have solutions to these?  PLease reply by email as well...TIA

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


gated

1997-06-04 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Does anyone know of a good set of sources AND patch(es) (if necessary) for
gated for linux?  I mirror the gated sources here and have just tried
building it on Debian 1.2, kernel 2.0.29 (from bo) using the patches for
gated 3.6A2 I got some time ago from ftp.redhat.com.  I guess it would be
even better if gated was packaged for Debian (hint hint) but I'm happy to
build it from sources IF it'l build!

I have previously successfully done this (redhat 3.0.3, kernel 2.0.0) but
now it seems broken (with my more up-to-date Debian).  Anyone got pointers
to better stuff than me?

TIA

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: IP-Accounting HOWTO?

1997-05-25 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Thu, 22 May 1997, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:

> On May 22, Benedikt Eric Heinen wrote
> :   I'd need to get a finer split in traffic list, I'd need to get an
> : accounted list indicating each service and each new destination
> : separately. Is there a package to do that yet?
> 
> Try net-acct.  There's a debian package out there.  Nice thing, but
> produces hge amounts of data.
> 
> It logs
> 
>   date / protocol / source_ip:port / dest_ip:port / packets / bytes / user
> 
> for every packet travelling on the connected ethernet segment (putting
> the interface in promiscous mode).   You can exclude / include specific
> networks / addresses.

But is it possible to exclude traffic based on source and/or destination
IP separately?  What we'd like to do is exclude any traffic where BOTH
source and destination are local, and record all other traffic (e.g. for
international traffic billing, where if either source or dest are
non-local we want it counted, but not otherwise).  My reading of the docs
gave me the impression that one could exclude traffic involving certain
nets but it wasn't fussy about what else the traffic involved...see what
I'm getting at?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Terminal not powerful enough for SLang

1997-05-25 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Fri, 23 May 1997, Craig Sanders wrote:

> > > $ unset termcap
> >
> > Sorry to say but that doesn't do it either. Any other ideas? NB: It
> > goes fine from a virtual console and an rxvt, just not an xterm. I'm
> > guessing that it's the colors that an xterm is not capable of that is
> > the problem.
> 
> Karl was right, except that the variable to unset is "TERMCAP", not
> "termcap". sh variables are case sensitive.

Yep that works (should have guessed that bit myself!).  I have also tried
setting TERM to xterm-color and that looks real nice too.  Thanx for all
the help everyone!

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Terminal not powerful enough for SLang

1997-05-25 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Fri, 23 May 1997, Toens Bueker wrote:

> On May 23, Richard L Shepherd wrote
> 
> > > $ unset termcap
> > 
> > Sorry to say but that doesn't do it either.  Any other ideas?
> > NB: It goes fine from a virtual console and an rxvt, just not an xterm.
> > I'm guessing that it's the colors that an xterm is not capable of that is
> > the problem.
> 
> Try "export TERMCAP="

Thanx, that did it!

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Terminal not powerful enough for SLang

1997-05-22 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Wed, 21 May 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:

> >>>>> "Richard" == Richard L Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Richard> Does anyone know how to fix the problem of trying to use
> Richard> a program (such as lynx or slrn) that uses SLang from
> Richard> reporting the error: Terminal not powerful enough for
> Richard> SLang and failing there?
> 
> $ unset termcap

Sorry to say but that doesn't do it either.  Any other ideas?
NB: It goes fine from a virtual console and an rxvt, just not an xterm.
I'm guessing that it's the colors that an xterm is not capable of that is
the problem.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Terminal not powerful enough for SLang

1997-05-22 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Does anyone know how to fix the problem of trying to use a program (such
as lynx or slrn) that uses SLang from reporting the error:
Terminal not powerful enough for SLang
and failing there?  I just did an update through dselect (using stable)
and got a new version of lynx which told me to get SLang (which I did) but
now when I start lynx I get the error message above.  I remember getting
this ages ago when trying to use slrn to read news.  I never solved it
then---just went to using pine instead!  Now I want my lynx back ;-)

Any takers...?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Other remote passwd servers?

1997-05-18 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On 18 May 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>   I make a living off Open Groups DCE (used to be OSF), and
>  billing it as an NIS replacement is akin to comparing a pocketknife
>  to a thermonuclear device. It would be arguably more accurate to say
>  DCE is nothing like NIS.

Say what you like, our varsity IS going to use it as a replacement for
NIS! (Maybe this says something about the admin here ;-))  It's not my
doing...I'm just smallfry around here...

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Other remote passwd servers?

1997-05-17 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Fri, 16 May 1997, Karl Ferguson wrote:

> Hi...
> 
> Other than NIS itself, are there any other NIS-like administrations out
> there?  From and administrators point of view, NIS works great - but users
> can simply examine the passwd file by using ypcat (sure, all be-it a
> mangled passwd field) - is there any way to stop that? (Hence my question
> for other NIS-like things).

There's DCE, Distributed Computing Environment, from OSF.  It is a very
powerful system (so I've read) for tying multi-platform networks together
under one authentication service.  Our varsity's about to dive in and use
it.  Unfortunately I don't know if there is a Linux client for it.  It is
touted as "vendor neutral", and has a fairly impressive list of supported
platforms:
AIX
AT&T GIS
Cray Unicos
.
.
.
Digital Unix
HP-UX
Irix
.
.
.
SCO
and on it goes.  It also includes NT, Macintosh and other non-unixes.  I'm
really bummed out that Linux is not in this list (but maybe the list I
have is incomplete?).  Maybe, just maybe, the SCO version could be
persuaded to operate in Linux via iBCS, but I've no idea what that
entails...

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8





--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Memory Gobbler

1997-05-07 Thread Richard L Shepherd
> At 09:20 AM 4/21/97 +1200, Richard L Shepherd wrote:
> 
> >Yes I have read that too.  However it does see the memory (when I put
> >"mem=128M" on the boot line). I'm not sure that cache isn't the problem,
> >though.  It went so well for 3 weeks, then started to go downhill.  This
> >w/e it killed itself completely!  I arrived yesterday afternoon to find
> >the screen filled with messages "out of memory for bash"  and other
> >commands too.  There was no response from any means, so I had to push the
> >reset button and start againbummer! 

Well the answer to this has come in upgrading from 2.0.27 (as in rex) to
2.0.30 (as in hamm).  I manually 'dpkg -i'ed the kernel source package
from hamm and left the rest of the system as rex.  So far no memory leaks
(2 weeks that is...).

Thanks for the interest anyway...

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Wavelan cards and PCI ethernet

1997-05-06 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Well I solved this problem very simply: get a machine whose ISA slots
actually work!  After having successfully used the WD8003 card on 4 other
machines, but not this one, I decided there must be something wrong with
this one.  So I tried another machine and it all went first pop!

On Thu, 24 Apr 1997, Richard L Shepherd wrote:

> I am trying to install a wavelan card into a linux box.  The setup is:
> Digital Celebris XL 5166
> Digital DE450 PCI Combo Ethernet Card (using tulip driver)
> Western Digital (wd8003) 8-bit (el-cheapo) Ethernet card (using wd driver)
> Built-In NCR SCSI Host (using 53c7,8xx driver)
> Adaptec 2940 Ultr-Wide PCI SCSI (using aic7xxx driver)
> (some PCI video card, who cares)
> 
> The wavelan card I want to install is:
> NCR Wavelan v1.04 (930406), IRQ 10, Port 300
> 
> I have tried having the drivers for the 2 ethernet cards, and the wavelan
> card, as modules, but the wavelan card is not recognised initially and the
> DE450 is assigned IRQ 10 (is that how PCI does it, just looks for a free
> one?) and so I cannot load the wavelan driver anymore?
> 
> I tried another tack: compiled the wavelan driver into the kernel and left
> the other 2 as modules, sure enough it now assigns the DE450 to eth1 but
> still uses IRQ 10, so I'm still stuffed.
> 
> I noticed that the driver for the wavelan probes only at 0x390, whereas I
> believe this card is at 0x300 so I altered the wavelan.c file to match
> this, but still no go!

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Wavelan cards and PCI ethernet

1997-04-24 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Hi,

I am trying to install a wavelan card into a linux box.  The setup is:
Digital Celebris XL 5166
Digital DE450 PCI Combo Ethernet Card (using tulip driver)
Western Digital (wd8003) 8-bit (el-cheapo) Ethernet card (using wd driver)
Built-In NCR SCSI Host (using 53c7,8xx driver)
Adaptec 2940 Ultr-Wide PCI SCSI (using aic7xxx driver)
(some PCI video card, who cares)

The wavelan card I want to install is:
NCR Wavelan v1.04 (930406), IRQ 10, Port 300

I have tried having the drivers for the 2 ethernet cards, and the wavelan
card, as modules, but the wavelan card is not recognised initially and the
DE450 is assigned IRQ 10 (is that how PCI does it, just looks for a free
one?) and so I cannot load the wavelan driver anymore?

I tried another tack: compiled the wavelan driver into the kernel and left
the other 2 as modules, sure enough it now assigns the DE450 to eth1 but
still uses IRQ 10, so I'm still stuffed.

I noticed that the driver for the wavelan probes only at 0x390, whereas I
believe this card is at 0x300 so I altered the wavelan.c file to match
this, but still no go!

Could anyone help me here please?  TIA,

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Memory Gobbler

1997-04-22 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Matt Lawrence wrote:

> I had similar problems with the kernel on the install disks.  If I let the
> system sit for a day or so (386 with 8M), I would get a bunch of "Couldn't
> get a free page" messages.  After rebuilding the kernel for my hardware,
> the message hasn't come back.  I've also seen this message on a 486 with
> 16M, it just took a couple of days to show up.  I beleive that there is
> some sort of a memory leak in the kernel as distributed.

I have rebuilt a kernel for my own hardware (always do, often do it a
couple of times while reorganising what gets compiled in and what's loaded
as a module).  So if there's a memory leak (which it seems there is,
though it took some time to show up), it's not solved just by avoiding the
distribution kernel.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Re: Memory Gobbler

1997-04-20 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Sat, 19 Apr 1997, Harmon Sequoya Nine wrote:

> I was looking at how to recompile the kernel to get it to recognize memory 
> above 64M,
> and it said you should have at least 512K of cache to do this...

Yes I have read that too.  However it does see the memory (when I put
"mem=128M" on the boot line). I'm not sure that cache isn't the problem,
though.  It went so well for 3 weeks, then started to go downhill.  This
w/e it killed itself completely!  I arrived yesterday afternoon to find
the screen filled with messages "out of memory for bash"  and other
commands too.  There was no response from any means, so I had to push the
reset button and start againbummer! 

Another thing that might be relevant is what I read in "man bootparam".
Linus says that some machines might reserve the top of RAM for BIOS
cacheing (or something like that) and so to allow for this, I've booted up
this time with "mem=126M".  I thought that maybe I tramped all over
some important memory beforemaybe I'm completely off track.

I am trying to get some more cache, but it's proving difficult.

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Memory Gobbler

1997-04-17 Thread Richard L Shepherd
I have 128MB RAM and 256KB cache.  My machine has been up 32 days.  For
the first 3 weeks it went really nicely, didn't get anywhere near using
any swap.  However this week it's usage has got over 100MB (now up to
120MB, after deducting buffers and cached, i.e. the second row of "free" 
output) and there's plenty of swap being used! I just can't figure out
what's eating it.  I wrote a script to total the figures produced by "ps
aux" in the VSZ and RSS columns.  At present these come to:
192452 20612
respectively.  To me this means there is only 20MB of RAM actually used by
processes, and the 192MB of virtual memory is probably not correct because
some is shared.

So: what's eating it?  If it's any help, here's the output of some
commands:
% free
 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:127756 126048   1708  17040304   3528
-/+ buffers:   122216   5540
Swap:   128484  27208 101276

% ps aux
USER   PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ   RSS  TT STAT  START   TIME COMMAND
daemon 210  0.0  0.0   832 0  ?  SW   Mar 17   0:08 rpc.portmap 
dennis 844  0.0  0.0  1452 0  pf SW   Apr 16   0:00 bash 
dennis 880  0.0  0.8  3492  1032  pf SApr 16   0:16 ical  
dmneal   17887  0.0  0.0  1072 0  q4 SW   Mar 27   0:00 csh 
nobody1586  0.0  0.0  100460  ?  SApr 15   0:00 httpd 
nobody1587  0.0  0.0  100456  ?  SApr 15   0:00 httpd 
nobody1588  0.0  0.0  100460  ?  SApr 15   0:00 httpd 
nobody   21109  0.0  0.3  3328   440  q4 S N  Apr 15   0:23 cached 
nobody   21110  0.0  0.0   816 0  q4 SWN  Apr 15   0:00 dnsserver 
nobody   2  0.0  0.0   816 0  q4 SWN  Apr 15   0:00 dnsserver 
nobody   21112  0.0  0.0   816 0  q4 SWN  Apr 15   0:00 dnsserver 
operator  2132  0.0  0.0  1484 0  q6 SW   Apr 16   0:00 bash 
operator  2245  0.1  0.7  4364   920  q6 SApr 16   4:09 wish -f /usr/bin/ex 
richards  1053  0.0  0.2  1484   300   2 S 09:07   0:00 bash 
richards  5020  0.0  0.3  1484   504   4 SMar 20   0:00 -bash  
richards  8248  0.0  0.7  2420   980   2 S 10:18   0:00 pine  
richards  9166  0.0  0.3   928   440   4 R 10:27   0:00 ps aux  
richards 31895  0.0  0.0  1488 0  pb SW16:41   0:00 bash 
root 1  0.0  0.0   81216  ?  SMar 17  41:31 init 
root 2  0.0  0.0 0 0  ?  SW   Mar 17   0:03 kflushd 
root 3  0.0  0.0 0 0  ?  SW<  Mar 17   4:42 kswapd 
root 4  0.0  0.0 0 0  ?  SW   Mar 17   0:00 nfsiod 
root 5  0.0  0.0 0 0  ?  SW   Mar 17   0:00 nfsiod 
root 6  0.0  0.0 0 0  ?  SW   Mar 17   0:00 nfsiod 
root 7  0.0  0.0 0 0  ?  SW   Mar 17   0:00 nfsiod 
root13  0.0  0.0   78848  ?  SMar 17  17:58 update  
root   196  0.0  0.2  1084   336  ?  SMar 17   1:50 /sbin/syslogd  
root   198  0.0  0.0   964 0  ?  SW   Mar 17   0:01 klogd 
root   206  0.0  0.0   80048  ?  SMar 17   0:00 /sbin/kerneld  
root   212  0.0  0.0   81224  ?  SMar 17   0:13 inetd 
root   281  0.0  0.0   936 0  ?  SW   Mar 17   0:02 au 
root   291  0.0  0.0  1068   124  ?  SMar 17   4:11 /usr/sbin/snmpd -f 
root   303  0.0  0.0   92476  ?  SMar 17   1:52 /usr/sbin/rpc.nfsd 
root   305  0.0  0.0   88872  ?  SMar 17   0:10 /usr/sbin/rpc.mount 
root   309  0.0  0.0   84488  ?  SMar 17  13:49 /usr/sbin/atalkd  
root   319  0.0  0.0   89252  ?  SMar 17   0:10 /usr/sbin/afpd  
root   322  0.0  0.0   828   112  ?  SMar 17   1:22 /usr/sbin/cron  
root   329  0.0  0.0  200480  ?  SMar 17   0:08 xdm 
root   331  0.0  0.0   804 0   1 SW   Mar 17   0:00 getty 
root   335  0.0  0.0   804 0   5 SW   Mar 17   0:00 getty 
root   336  0.0  0.0   804 0   6 SW   Mar 17   0:00 getty 
root   843  0.0  0.0  1076 0  ?  SW   Apr 16   0:00 in.telnetd 
root  1428  0.0  0.0  274080  ?  S 17:03   0:01 xterm 
root  1487  0.0  0.3  2740   420  ?  S 17:04   0:01 xterm -bg LavenderB 
root  2131  0.0  0.0  1076 0  ?  SW   Apr 16   0:00 in.telnetd 
root  2443  0.0  0.0  283620  ?  SApr 16   0:01 xterm 
root  2780  0.0  0.0  274064  ?  SApr 14   0:01 xterm 
root  3537  0.0  0.1  1232   232  ?  SMar 18   0:36 sendmail: accepting 
root  3766  0.0  0.0   848 0  ?  SW   Mar 20   0:00 papd 
root  4518  0.0  0.1  2044   208  ?  SApr 11   0:01 -massiveduck.cc.  
root  7126  0.0  0.0  1048 0  q4 SWN  Apr  9   0:01 RunCache 
root  9156  0.0  0.0  294832  ?  SApr 14   0:15 xterm 
root  9161  0.0  0.3  1456   416  ?  S 10:27   0:00 bash ./monitor.sh m 
root  9162  0.0  0.2   864   360  ?  S 10:27   0:00 /bin/ping -q -i 1 - 
root  9163  0.0  0.2   896   272  ?  S 10:27   0:00 fgrep %  
root  9164  0.0  0.2   808   268

RE: Linux in an NT domain

1997-04-16 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Carpenter, Dean (MS Mail) wrote:

> Yup - I think it's called smb-NT-verify.1.1.tar.gz.  I don't remember 
> exactly where I got it, but here's the authors name from the 
> nt-linux.readme file ...
> 
> Christopher Burke| Unique  | Web: http://www.mindware.com.au
> Mindware | Custom  | Info:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PO Box 9, Richlands  | Innovative  | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Q. 4077, Australia   | Development | Telephone:Australia 0412-696290
> 
> Check the website listed above - that has more information.

Thanx, I found it, it's at:
http://www.mindware.com.au/ftp/smb-NT-verify.1.1.tar.gz
Cheers,

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8




--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .


Linux in an NT domain

1997-04-16 Thread Richard L Shepherd
Does anyone know if Debian has packaged the package which allows a Linux
box to participate in an NT domain?  I read somewhere once that such a
package exists, but am very vague as to the details of what it did. 

NB: it's not samba, it's do with sharing the user-space/passwords etc.

Any ideas?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



Re: 'Frozen' boot disks

1997-04-14 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Sun, 13 Apr 1997, Paul Wade wrote:

> The reason I put this copy up was for testing. For the first round of
> testing, people were picking them up from sites that only had modem
> bandwidth. Yes, ftp.debian.org is the authoritative source. If you want to
> play with the new toys before the store opens, you can pick them up at my
> site.

OK, that's cool then.  I have no problems with that.  I'll just keep doing
what I am.  I'm glad to have that clarified ;-)

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



Re: 'Frozen' boot disks

1997-04-13 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Sat, 12 Apr 1997, Paul Wade wrote:
> 
> 4/6/97 I put a copy at ftp.greenbush.com, look in /pub/bodisks. The files
> are dated by time of transfer, but they are the 4/4 set.
> 
> > I have the same problem.  I had thought it may be because I mirror a
> > mirror (which in turn may not directly mirror ftp.debian.org) and so my
> > mirror was effectively a few days behind.  However I just checked on
> > ftp.debian.org and it really is empty so
> > 
> > Where are they then?

So my next question then is: is not ftp.debian.org the authoritative
source for the Debian Distribution?  i.e. I seek to maintain a mirror of
ftp.debian.org thinking that this will ensure I have an up-to-date Debian
Distribution for my linux fans.  Am I doing the right thing?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8



Re: 'Frozen' boot disks

1997-04-12 Thread Richard L Shepherd
On Sat, 12 Apr 1997, Lamar Folsom wrote:

> Is anyone else having trouble finding the disks for 1.3?  I'd appreciate any 
> pointers.  The 'bo/disks-i386/1997-04-04/' directory seems to be empty.

I have the same problem.  I had thought it may be because I mirror a
mirror (which in turn may not directly mirror ftp.debian.org) and so my
mirror was effectively a few days behind.  However I just checked on
ftp.debian.org and it really is empty so

Where are they then?

8<--->8
Richard Shepherd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
8<--->8