Re: [bounce-debian-user=w.l.devries=student.tudelft.nl@lists.debian.org: ]

2001-03-17 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:37:21PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:15:19PM +0100, Wouter de Vries wrote:
  I really wonder what this is about ... I use fetchmail in combination
  with exim and procmail.
 
 Could you explain what it is you don't understand?
 
 [snip...]

I get these bounce mails regularly and I wonder what they are and
whether there is something I can do about it.


Wouter



Re: [bounce-debian-user=w.l.devries=student.tudelft.nl@lists.debian.org: ]

2001-03-17 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 01:42:33AM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Wouter de Vries wrote:
  On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:37:21PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
   On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:15:19PM +0100, Wouter de Vries wrote:
I really wonder what this is about ... I use fetchmail in combination
with exim and procmail.
   
   Could you explain what it is you don't understand?
   
   [snip...]
  
  I get these bounce mails regularly and I wonder what they are and
  whether there is something I can do about it.
 
 Does this happen shortly after responding to a message on this list?  If
 so, some people have their mailers misconfigured in such a way that a
 certain header (I forget which at the moment, Sender: ??) causes your
 mailer to try to send the message to such a person, but the address is
 not valid (usually only a local address).  This bounce will come
 directly from your system (exim).


Well, the strange thing is that I have nothing to do with the message or
the sender. I did not reply to the message. The only connections is that
I also am subscribed to the mailing list.
My account is hosted on a university machine running 'QUALCOMM Pop
server derived from UCB (version 2.1.4-R3)'.


Wouter



Re: apt problems and why?

2001-03-17 Thread Wouter de Vries
Maybe esound-common is still an old version. You could try a apt-get
update before trying again, because esound-common could have been
updated.


Wouter

On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 09:12:50AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
 I had something similar happen when I did woody-sid dist-upgrade.
 
 Anyway, make sure that the 2 other 'esound' packages are selected for
 installation also.  This solved (one of) my problem(s) - hope it works
 for you  :)
 
 R.
 
 On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 03:55:39AM +0200, Daniel Mashao wrote:
  I get the following error message 
  
  
  home:/home/daniel# apt-get -f install
  Reading Package Lists... Done
  Building Dependency Tree... Done
  Correcting dependencies... failed.
  Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
libesd0: Depends: esound-common but it is not installed
  E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused
  by held packages.
  E: Unable to correct dependencies
  
  I cannot solve this problem and also I cannot install any package. Any
  help? This has to be looked at as one of Debian's biggest weakness. We
  boast about Debian easy upgradability but it does sometimes show Msoft
  weaknesses. 
  
  I have tried to install  esound-common but it cannot because of something
  else, untlimately the system is un-upgradable. 
   Thanks,
  /--/
  Daniel J. Mashao
  Electrical Engineering[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  University of Cape Town   
  http://www.eleceng.uct.ac.za/~daniel 
  Rondebosch, 7700, S. Africa   (w) 021-6502816  (c) 082-928-3692
  /--/
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



[bounce-debian-user=w.l.devries=student.tudelft.nl@lists.debian.org: ]

2001-03-16 Thread Wouter de Vries
I really wonder what this is about ... I use fetchmail in combination
with exim and procmail.

Wouter


- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:03:55 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:

rom [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Mar 16 21:53:48 2001
Received: from elektron.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.33.15]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.2)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:03:54 +0100 
(CET)
Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65])
by elektron.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id 
VAA01353
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:53:48 +0100 (MET)
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:53:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from TUDelft-daemon by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-33 #42432)
 id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (ORCPT rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]); Fri,
 16 Mar 2001 21:53:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6])
 by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-33 #42432)
 with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:53:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: (qmail 31792 invoked by uid 38); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:19:41 +
Received: (qmail 31734 invoked from network); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:19:39 +
Received: from smtp06.wxs.nl (195.121.6.58) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP;
 Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:19:39 +
Received: from onix.sacred-key.org ([213.10.33.89])
 by smtp06.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with ESMTP id GAB4GM01.STK;
 Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:19:34 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by onix.sacred-key.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5131792E; Fri,
 16 Mar 2001 21:23:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:23:14 +0100 (CET)
Resent-from: debian-user@lists.debian.org
From: Sebastiaan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Screen corruption with Amiga X - And AteoBus, Pixel64 support?
In-reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: list
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: debian-user@lists.debian.org archive/latest/138304

Hi,

cool, Amiga! 

I do not know much about Linux on Amiga, but you might get more useful
response from the debian-m68k or debian-powerpc (if you have a
powerpc on your blizard -- can't remember, it has been too long) lists.

About the lines: it could be an error in the X server. You can try to look
which X servers are available for Amiga and see which drivers it supports
(by XF86_VGA16 -showconfig will show you the drivers that this X server
supports).

Greetz,
Sebastiaan



 On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
I've just installed Debian Linux from the 2.2r2 CD set onto my Amiga.
 
 A1200:
 Blizzard 1260 + SCSI-IV
 50Mb RAM
 1x Internal IDE Drive (1.4Gb - with Debian on it)
 2xInternal SCSI drives (4.3Gb and 520Mb on the SCSI-IV)
 1xInternal SCSI CD-R/RW Yamaha 8824S
 
 AteoBus with Pixel64 (Cirrus Logic Based graphics card supported by
 Picasso96 and CGFX 4.0)
 AteoIO-3 Card (fast serial/parallel ports)
 
 So, questions:
 1. Is there any intention to expand the CLGen driver to include the Ateo
 Pixel64 graphics card, please? I'd be willing to act as a tester for it.
 
 2. Why do I get lots of screen corruption when I run X from Debian on my
 AGA display. Sort of random vertical lines etc.
 
 Help,
 Kevin Bewley
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


- End forwarded message -



Re: wraping lines in mutt

2001-03-15 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:48:25PM -0500, D-Man wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:35:42AM -0800, Steven E. Harris wrote:
 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 | 
 |  In my case, it is vi.  I have a .exrc file in my home directory that
 |  has the following contents:
 |  
 |  set wl=76
 | 
 | I tried creating such a file, and (n)vi does note that the wraplen
 | variable is set to 76, but I can still type way past that 76 column
 | point. I thought that maybe vi would chop the lines up upon exit, but
 
 I don't know about nvi, but in vim the formatoptions must also be
 set properly to wrap the lines.  (Also, in vim the variable
 textwidth must be set, not wraplen)
 
 Someone else said to set it to t, mine is set to tcq.
 
 Also, gqip  or  gqap  will rewrap the current paragraph.  gqG  will
 reqwrap from here to the end of the buffer,  gq}  will rewrap from
 here to the end of the current paragraph.

l337 ! :)



Re: highlight folders with new mails in mutt

2001-03-05 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 11:15:44AM +0100, Philipp Schulte wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:20:37PM -0500, mike polniak wrote: 
 
  Then i would have to check the paths to the mailboxes next.
 
 They are correct and typing c brings me to them. Any other idea?
 Phil
Have you added the mailboxes to the muttrc file?
Mutt only watches mailboxes specified.

Wouter

oops .. I sent it to debian-devel first  sorry



Re: From Sid -- Woody

2001-03-05 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 10:10:41PM -0300, Rafael Maximino Dib Gon?alves wrote:
 Hey fellas,
 there's the following:
 some time ago, before de pkg pools, I was using the unstable distro fine
 (it was woody). But then the pkg pools came, n even knowing I'd have to
 live on the edge, have all my pkgs broken, circular dependency problems
 n all stuff, I decided to keep using the unstable. But now there r some
 problems appearing, I'm having some changes at home and so I simply
 can't stay with something unstable anymore... the woody distro would be
 fine. But how can I come back to woody? My last dist-upgrade was about
 only 2 days...
 Am I fucked up or is it still a light in the end of the tunnel?
 thx folks, bye
 
 btw. should I simply grab all my old packages, on the
 /var/cacha/apt/archives (which is currently big) and reinstall by hand
 (of course, also changing my sources.list to woody...)?

I recommend not upgrading your system to sid anymore (duh ..) and put testing
in your sources.list. If everything is working for you there is no need to
downgrade is there? Woody is frozen so I don't think your sid packages will be
replaced by newer packages though ... But eventually you'll be running testing
when all packages have gotten upgraded.

Wouter



Re: Logitech MouseManPlus, gpm, and X

2000-12-02 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 06:22:17PM +, Rick wrote:
 
 yes, I did, and it wasn't super-easy, but I'm not at home to look at
 configs at the moment to give advice.  I'm thinking that I used the PS/2
 protocol, and spent a fair amount of time reading vague directions and
 tweaking settings and restarting gpm.

well, please do tell me your secret :)



Re: ISDN says no channel for ippp0 on dialing... why?

2000-12-01 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 03:55:32AM +0100, J?rgen A. Erhard wrote:
 I've tried to install ISDN for a friend.  Now I got the Hisax module running
 (after I found the secret incantation needed for the ISA Siemens I-Surf 1.0
 (some PEEKs and POKEs (yes ;-) in isapnp.conf)).
 
 But when I try dialing, it says
 
isdn_net_force_dial: No channel for ippp0

 I've looked for that message in the kernel sources, but the only thing I get
 is that the ISDN subsystem seems to think that all the channels are used
 up... but there's nothing using the ISDN line!
 
 So... what do I miss?  If any config files are needed, ask me... though
 everything seems to be in order.
 
 Really, I'm stumped...

Maybe a stupid question ... but is the cable plugged in and is the cable good?
You might consider testing it with another isdn device..

Wouter



Re: Logitech MouseManPlus, gpm, and X

2000-12-01 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:15:08PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote:
 Quoth Carel Fellinger, 
  I've a Logitech MouseMan Wheel and use Protocol IMPS/2 instead.
  Works for me.
 
 That seemed to do it. Thanks.

And did anybody get the wheel working with imwheel? ( I did not .. )

Wouter