Re: X with dvorak

2001-07-07 Thread joeytsai
> I have the dvorak keymap loaded for myy everyday use in consoles, but 
> after upgrading to X-4 it insists on using a qwerty layout.  How do I
> set up X to use the dvorak keyboard layout?
> 
Put this in your .xinitrc:

setxkbmap dvorak

// joey tsai



junkbuster not running?

2001-06-28 Thread joeytsai
Hi all,

I installed debian on another machine, but for some reason, junkbuster isn't
running.  I mean, it runs, and it shows up in a ps, but the proxy isn't
working... plus trying telnet won't connect to the port... any suggestions?


// joey tsai



Re: newbie fighting with Helix Gnome

2001-04-18 Thread joeytsai
> Since I've been running "sid" and Ximian's Gnome packages, until I did
> an "apt-get dist-upgrade" yesterday, I saw no problems. Then, I ran into
> a similar problem as the original poster -- there was a debian package
> newer than the ximian one and it caused a brief headache.
> 
> Why exactly shouldn't you mix the two ??
> 
> Won't ximian normally have newer packages than debian, and therefore
> avoid a conflict ??

You can check previous posts about this subject. 

Ximian does not support the unstable branch of Debian.  Furthermore, their
versioniong seems to be inconsistent (or at least troublesome) with the
"standard" Debian package versioning.

Finally, the unstable packages are usually more up-to-date.

// joey tsai



Re: newbie fighting with Helix Gnome

2001-04-17 Thread joeytsai
:: Ross Boylan ::
> Is this a bug with anything, or just an inevitable result of trying to put
> unlike things (ximian and debian) together?

If you are running unstable (sid), you should not be running Ximian's Gnome.
Purge their packages (they have ximian or helix in their version) and use
Debian's.

// joey tsai



Re: jvm and mozilla 0.8

2001-03-28 Thread joeytsai
:: DvB ::
> This is actually a known issue with 0.8 (should be in the release notes, 
> I think...). To fix it, make a symlink in $MOZDIR/plugins which points 
> to the actual library file (I for get where it is... something like 
> java1.2/plugin/i386/ns600).

[corban][03:02pm][/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins] # ls -l
total 776
-rw-r-xr-x1 root root 2363 Jan 25 22:30 ShockwaveFlash.class*
drwxr-xr-x6 root root 4096 Mar 28 07:24 java2/
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root   765852 Jan 25 22:30 libflashplayer.so*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   69 Feb  9 00:53 libjavaplugin_oji.so ->
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/java2/plugin/i386/ns600/libjavaplugin_oji.so*
-rw-r--r--1 root root13720 Mar 21 23:55 libnullplugin.so

Still no luck. :-(

// joey tsai



Re: jvm and mozilla 0.8

2001-03-28 Thread joeytsai
:: William Leese ::
> Moz installs the plugins in the wrong dir.. remove the plugins subdirectory 
> in your moz dir. and link it to the directory where the plugins are 
> installed. Or cp/mv the plugins to that directory

Could you be more specific?  Moz installs to which wrong subdirectory?  And
which is the correct plugin directory?  It looks like my plugins are in
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins.  I think it is the correct directory, because the
Flash plugin is also there, and that works.

// joey tsai



Re: jvm and mozilla 0.8

2001-03-28 Thread joeytsai

:: Chung, Ha-Nyung ::
> Installing mozilla0.8-dev may solve the problem.  Even though it is not just
> mozilla0.8-dev package that really solve it, some package on which
> mozilla0.8-dev depends on seems to be able to. 

I just installed mozilla-dev and reinstalled the plugin, but still no luck. :-/

// joey tsai



Re: jvm and mozilla 0.8

2001-03-28 Thread joeytsai
:: christophe barbe ::
> I believe you need to enable java in edit/preferences/advances.

Yeah, I had it enabled.  If it isn't enabled, then you won't even get the prompt
for the plugin to download.  Any other hints?

// joey tsai



jvm and mozilla 0.8

2001-03-27 Thread joeytsai
Hi, has anyone gotten the jvm plugin working with Mozilla 0.8?  I've been able
to download it, install it (I got the "Installation successful" screen), but
when I restart the browser and try "about:plugins" - the plugin doesn't show up.

// joey tsai




nautilus staying around?

2001-03-20 Thread joeytsai
Whenever I use Nautilus, then close its window, its process still sticks around
and I have to kill it manually.  I'm assuming this is a "feature."  Can anyone
shed light on this?

I'm using unstable.

// joey tsai



Re: Can't get php working, please help

2001-02-14 Thread joeytsai
I'm running into the same problem with php3.

I have uncommented the line

LoadModule php3_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp3.so

As well as the the two "AddType" lines, and still apache doesn't load php3 when
I try viewing my .php3 files.

Has anyone run into this problem also?

// joey tsai

> aha! more information is better than less information.
> 
> according to /usr/share/doc/apache/manual/mod/directives.html
> (check it out -- you should have one, too) the "AddType" 
> directive is handled by the MIME module -- i.e. you need
> to make sure you uncomment
> 
>   LoadModule mime_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_mime.so
> 
> (if you're using apache 1.3 that is.)



Re: php troubles

2001-02-08 Thread joeytsai
Well, "httpd" doesn't seem to be a valid command, but "apache -l" does give:

Compiled-in modules:
  http_core.c
  mod_so.c
  mod_macro.c
suexec: enabled; valid wrapper /usr/lib/apache/suexec

// joey tsai

:: Rick Rezinas ::
> does running
> httpd -l 
> 
> show the following modules installed?
> http_core.c
> mod_so.c



Re: php troubles

2001-02-08 Thread joeytsai
Yeah, I do. :/

// joey tsai


:: Rick Rezinas ::
> hello,
> 
> do you have a line like 
> 
> AddType application/x-httpd-php3 .php
> AddType application/x-httpd-php3 .php3
> 
> uncommented in there too?



php troubles

2001-02-08 Thread joeytsai
Hi,

I can't seem to get apache to load the php module and to process my .php3 pages.
I have the

LoadModule php3_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp3.so

line uncommented in /etc/apache/httpd.conf, and I've restarted the server.  Does
anyone know what could be wrong?  THanks,

// joey tsai



compiling lame - glib error

2001-01-29 Thread joeytsai
Hi, I just downloaded the newest version of lame (3.87) and I'm having problems
compiling.  The error message I'm getting is:

gcc  -DNDEBUG -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -ffast-math
-finline-functions -Wall -pedantic -DBRHIST -DHAVEGTK  -DUSE_LAYER_2
-DUSE_LAYER_1 -DHAVEMPGLIB -DLAMESNDFILE  -fPIC  -c main.c -o main.o
In file included from /usr/include/gdk/gdktypes.h:33,
 from /usr/include/gdk/gdk.h:31,
 from /usr/include/gtk/gtk.h:31,
 from main.c:18:
/usr/include/glib.h:66: glibconfig.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [main.o] Error 1

I have libglib1.2-dev installed, as well as libgtk1.2-dev. 

It appears that glibconfig.h exists in /usr/lib/glib/include/glibconfig.h.

Can anyone help?


Thanks,

// joey tsai



Re: Best Light Web browser??

2000-12-06 Thread joeytsai

> Any other choices aside Mozilla, Opera, Netscape, for something low 
> footprint? 
I'm really impressed with the new nightly CVS builds of Galeon lately.

http://galeon.sourceforge.net

For fast text-based browsers, I use links.

apt-get install links

// joey tsai