Re: strangest things after upgrade from 8 to 9
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 10:13:35 -0500 Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 04:01:15PM +0100, mik...@corigroup.it wrote: > > > > root@linux:~# apt-cache policy `dpkg -S /usr/bin/mpv` > > mpv: > > Installed: 0.23.0-2+deb9u2 > > Candidate: 0.23.0-2+deb9u2 > > Version table: > > *** 0.23.0-2+deb9u2 500 > > 500 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages > > 500 http://security.debian.org stretch/updates/main amd64 Packages > > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > OK. That seems normal. > > > N: Unable to locate package /usr/bin/mpv > > Oops. I forgot to have you trim the output of the 'dpkg -S' command :-) > > > > > and yes you are correct, /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57 was some spurious > > file I don't know why it was there > > and I've deleted it (and rerun ldconfig) > > and now mpv is linking to the correct file: > > > > user@linux:~$ ldd /usr/bin/mpv|grep -i "not found" > > libgnutls-deb0.so.28 => not found > > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => not found > > libvidstab.so.1.0 => not found > > libnppi.so.7.5 => not found > > > > None of these libraries exist in Debian, so you have something else > going on here. > > What is the out of these commands? > > readlink -f /usr/bin/mpv > ldd /usr/bin/mpv > > > I've also noticed that I still have 'deb8' packages installed :( > > > > root@linux:~# dpkg -l|grep -i deb8|wc > > 85 782 13487 > > > Yeah, that might be a problem. Did you read the release notes and > follow the upgrade instructions step by step? Did you happen to record > your upgrade terminal session with 'script' as recommended in the > release notes? > > Regards, > > -Roberto > > -- > Roberto C. Sánchez > I've slowly deleted the deb8 packages until the last one was only: ii libdca0:amd64 0.0.5-dmo2+deb8u1 amd64decoding library for DTS Coherent Acoustics streams which was a dependency of gnome. I've downloaded the new one from debian.org (http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/libd/libdca/libdca0_0.0.5-10_amd64.deb) and installed: root@linux:~# dpkg -l|grep -i libdca ii libdca0:amd64 0.0.5-10 amd64decoding library for DTS Coherent Acoustics streams Now the system looks better: root@linux:~# dpkg -l|grep -i deb8|wc 0 0 0 Thank you Roberto, I guess my system is still a little frankestein after 3 years of messing with Jessie :) Hope I've learned to debug and fix the following issues :) Thank you, Mike
Re: strangest things after upgrade from 8 to 9
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 16:01:15 +0100 "mik...@corigroup.it" wrote: > On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:50:13 -0500 > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 03:36:40PM +0100, mik...@corigroup.it wrote: > > > I couple of days ago I've upgraded from 8 (jessie) to 9 (stretch) > > > taking care of removing third-party repositories before upgrading, in my > > > /etc/apt/sources.list file, > > > which is now as follows: > > > > > > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free > > > deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free > > > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch-updates main contrib non-free > > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian stretch-backports main contrib > > > deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/ stretch main > > > > > > The upgrade went decently well (system is booting) but I've noticed some > > > incongruences with apt and aptitute while installing winehq-staging > > > which led me thinking some old packages were still in the system. > > > > > > So I performed (I think) a cleanup of the packages which are not included > > > in the current repositories, with the command: > > > aptitude search ?obsolete > mylist > > > and then removing the resulting packages. > > > > > > My system now 'looks' clean, but for example mpv (media player) is not > > > working: > > > > > > user@linux:~$ ldd /usr/bin/mpv|grep -i "not found" > > > libwebp.so.5 => not found > > > libx265.so.102 => not found > > > libopenjpeg.so.5 => not found > > > libgnutls-deb0.so.28 => not found > > > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => not found > > > libvidstab.so.1.0 => not found > > > libnppi.so.7.5 => not found > > > > > > and I have no idea why /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57 is liked with > > > libwebp.so.5: > > > root@linux:~# ldd /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57|grep -i found > > > libwebp.so.5 => not found > > > libx265.so.102 => not found > > > libopenjpeg.so.5 => not found > > > > > > as it looks like it's the current version as the upstream: > > > root@linux:~# dpkg -l|grep avco > > > ii libavcodec57:amd64 > > > 7:3.2.12-1~deb9u1 amd64FFmpeg library > > > with de/encoders for audio/video codecs - runtime files > > > ii libavcodec57:i386 > > > 7:3.2.12-1~deb9u1 i386 FFmpeg library > > > with de/encoders for audio/video codecs - runtime files > > > > > > > > > please help ? > > > > > You have an unofficial source listed there, so I am not sure it is > > correct to call the system 'clean'. What is the output of this command: > > > > apt-cache policy `dpkg -S /usr/bin/mpv` > > > > Also, /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57 certainly did not come from an > > official Debian package. > > > > Regards, > > > > -Roberto > > > > -- > > Roberto C. Sánchez > > > > > Hello Roberto, please have a look: > > > root@linux:~# apt-cache policy `dpkg -S /usr/bin/mpv` > mpv: > Installed: 0.23.0-2+deb9u2 > Candidate: 0.23.0-2+deb9u2 > Version table: > *** 0.23.0-2+deb9u2 500 > 500 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages > 500 http://security.debian.org stretch/updates/main amd64 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > N: Unable to locate package /usr/bin/mpv > > and yes you are correct, /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57 was some spurious > file I don't know why it was there > and I've deleted it (and rerun ldconfig) > and now mpv is linking to the correct file: > > user@linux:~$ ldd /usr/bin/mpv|grep -i "not found" > libgnutls-deb0.so.28 => not found > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => not found > libvidstab.so.1.0 => not found > libnppi.so.7.5 => not found > > user@linux:~$ ldd /usr/bin/mpv|grep -i libav > libavutil.so.55 => /usr/local/lib/libavutil.so.55 (0x7f441e37a000) > libavcodec.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libavcodec.so.57 > (0x7f441cda6000) > libavformat.so.57 => /usr/local/lib/libavformat.so.57 > (0x7f441c96f000) > libavfilter.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libavfilter.so.6 (0x7f4419d59000) >
Re: strangest things after upgrade from 8 to 9
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 09:50:13 -0500
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 03:36:40PM +0100, mik...@corigroup.it wrote:
> > I couple of days ago I've upgraded from 8 (jessie) to 9 (stretch)
> > taking care of removing third-party repositories before upgrading, in my
> > /etc/apt/sources.list file,
> > which is now as follows:
> >
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch-updates main contrib non-free
> > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian stretch-backports main contrib
> > deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/ stretch main
> >
> > The upgrade went decently well (system is booting) but I've noticed some
> > incongruences with apt and aptitute while installing winehq-staging
> > which led me thinking some old packages were still in the system.
> >
> > So I performed (I think) a cleanup of the packages which are not included
> > in the current repositories, with the command:
> > aptitude search ?obsolete > mylist
> > and then removing the resulting packages.
> >
> > My system now 'looks' clean, but for example mpv (media player) is not
> > working:
> >
> > user@linux:~$ ldd /usr/bin/mpv|grep -i "not found"
> > libwebp.so.5 => not found
> > libx265.so.102 => not found
> > libopenjpeg.so.5 => not found
> > libgnutls-deb0.so.28 => not found
> > libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => not found
> > libvidstab.so.1.0 => not found
> > libnppi.so.7.5 => not found
> >
> > and I have no idea why /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57 is liked with
> > libwebp.so.5:
> > root@linux:~# ldd /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57|grep -i found
> > libwebp.so.5 => not found
> > libx265.so.102 => not found
> > libopenjpeg.so.5 => not found
> >
> > as it looks like it's the current version as the upstream:
> > root@linux:~# dpkg -l|grep avco
> > ii libavcodec57:amd64
> > 7:3.2.12-1~deb9u1 amd64FFmpeg library
> > with de/encoders for audio/video codecs - runtime files
> > ii libavcodec57:i386
> > 7:3.2.12-1~deb9u1 i386 FFmpeg library
> > with de/encoders for audio/video codecs - runtime files
> >
> >
> > please help ?
> >
> You have an unofficial source listed there, so I am not sure it is
> correct to call the system 'clean'. What is the output of this command:
>
> apt-cache policy `dpkg -S /usr/bin/mpv`
>
> Also, /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57 certainly did not come from an
> official Debian package.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Roberto
>
> --
> Roberto C. Sánchez
>
Hello Roberto, please have a look:
root@linux:~# apt-cache policy `dpkg -S /usr/bin/mpv`
mpv:
Installed: 0.23.0-2+deb9u2
Candidate: 0.23.0-2+deb9u2
Version table:
*** 0.23.0-2+deb9u2 500
500 http://deb.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.debian.org stretch/updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
N: Unable to locate package /usr/bin/mpv
and yes you are correct, /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57 was some spurious file
I don't know why it was there
and I've deleted it (and rerun ldconfig)
and now mpv is linking to the correct file:
user@linux:~$ ldd /usr/bin/mpv|grep -i "not found"
libgnutls-deb0.so.28 => not found
libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => not found
libvidstab.so.1.0 => not found
libnppi.so.7.5 => not found
user@linux:~$ ldd /usr/bin/mpv|grep -i libav
libavutil.so.55 => /usr/local/lib/libavutil.so.55 (0x7f441e37a000)
libavcodec.so.57 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libavcodec.so.57
(0x7f441cda6000)
libavformat.so.57 => /usr/local/lib/libavformat.so.57
(0x7f441c96f000)
libavfilter.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libavfilter.so.6 (0x7f4419d59000)
libavdevice.so.57 => /usr/local/lib/libavdevice.so.57
(0x7f4416782000)
libavresample.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libavresample.so.3
(0x7f440f497000)
I've also noticed that I still have 'deb8' packages installed :(
root@linux:~# dpkg -l|grep -i deb8|wc
85 782 13487
root@linux:~# dpkg -l|grep deb8|awk '{ print $2 }'|xargs apt-get --purge remove
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer
strangest things after upgrade from 8 to 9
I couple of days ago I've upgraded from 8 (jessie) to 9 (stretch) taking care of removing third-party repositories before upgrading, in my /etc/apt/sources.list file, which is now as follows: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch-updates main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian stretch-backports main contrib deb https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/ stretch main The upgrade went decently well (system is booting) but I've noticed some incongruences with apt and aptitute while installing winehq-staging which led me thinking some old packages were still in the system. So I performed (I think) a cleanup of the packages which are not included in the current repositories, with the command: aptitude search ?obsolete > mylist and then removing the resulting packages. My system now 'looks' clean, but for example mpv (media player) is not working: user@linux:~$ ldd /usr/bin/mpv|grep -i "not found" libwebp.so.5 => not found libx265.so.102 => not found libopenjpeg.so.5 => not found libgnutls-deb0.so.28 => not found libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => not found libvidstab.so.1.0 => not found libnppi.so.7.5 => not found and I have no idea why /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57 is liked with libwebp.so.5: root@linux:~# ldd /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so.57|grep -i found libwebp.so.5 => not found libx265.so.102 => not found libopenjpeg.so.5 => not found as it looks like it's the current version as the upstream: root@linux:~# dpkg -l|grep avco ii libavcodec57:amd64 7:3.2.12-1~deb9u1 amd64FFmpeg library with de/encoders for audio/video codecs - runtime files ii libavcodec57:i386 7:3.2.12-1~deb9u1 i386 FFmpeg library with de/encoders for audio/video codecs - runtime files please help ? Thank you, Mike
Re: Can't get X server working in unstable with Ati All-In-Wonder 128 Pro
On Sun, 31 Dec 2000 12:38:31 -0500, Bart Szyszka said: > (( If you've gotten this message twice, reply to this one. I had > accidentally > sent this from my dad's account. Please send replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Thanks! )) > > I'm trying to setup my X server on a different computer and am having > trouble getting it to work. I have an Ati All-In-Wonder 128 Pro > graphics card with 32MB and have gotten the latest XFree86 stuff > from the unstable branch, but it just won't work. All the X11 messages > that I get when it doesn't work just say something to the effect that I > didn't select the right graphics card. There are several that seem to > be able to fit both on the SVGA server and Mach64. In Windows > when I view info on the card, it says some things about it being > Ati Rage 128 Pro so I tried the 'Ati Rage 128 (generic)' option and > that didn't work. I've also tried 'Ati All-In-Wonder' and 'Ati > All-In-Wonder Pro' without any success. > I got my ATI 128 Rage Pro card working with XFree-4 by following the hints at : http://www4.ncsu.edu/~distclai/rage128-howto.html#Rage128Pro It will help you set up XF86Config manually or with a script called 'setrage'.
