infra replication + firewall

2018-02-09 Thread postmaster aviance

Bonjour

j'aurais besoin d'un avis expert sur la config suivante

l'existant :

site 1 :

une livebox pro V2 avec un débit pourri, paire de cuivre impossible à 
upgrader, etc.


un hyperviser proxmox avec 4 vms

debian stretch openvpn

debian stretch dolibarr1

debian stretch dolibarr2

debian stretch openmediavault

3 utilisateurs locaux et quelques nomades qui passent par la vm openvpn 
pour l’accès aux autres vm (ERP dolibarr et NAS Openmediavault)


VPS chez OVH avec une instance Nextcloud (fichiers + synchro 
agenda/contacts smartphones et Thunderbird)


mis a part les débits, tout ceci tourne comme une horloge


site 2 :

monté à l'arrache

livebox pro avec un débit confortable

debian stretch avec backuppc + openvpn sur un pc recyclé en serveur

le backuppc sauvegarde aussi l'instance Nextcloud d'OVH

NAS openmediavault sur un deuxième "serveur" synchronisé via cron/unison 
avec le NAS du site1


le tout sans avoir planché sur la sécurité, mis à part fail2ban qui 
tourne sur chacune des machines exposées à internet


et maintenant le projet :

renforcer la securité et en outre, sur le site 2, achat d'une machine 
hyperviseur proxmox  pour virtualiser la totalité des machines du site 2 
(Raid5?, rai6?, ZFS ?)


ainsi que l'instance Nextcloud qui pourrait etre rapatriée en local pour 
des raisons essentiellement économiques.


puis sur chacun  des sites, un mini-pc fanless 4 ports (j'ai vu ça sur 
amazon) qui servirait de firewall (pfsense ?, IPfire ?, autre chose ?) 
permettant de fabriquer un tunnel (ssh? openvpn, autrechose?) entre les 
deux sites et fournir un acces openVPN aux nomades et en outre d'assurer 
le routage/filtrage pour la future DMZ sur laquelle tournerait 
l'instance nexcloud virtualisée.


les deux VM Nas devraient être totalement synchro pour qu'un utilisateur 
local ou nomade retrouve l’intégralité des fichiers sur chacun des deux 
NAS (unison, rsync ? autrechoose?)


ça donnerait a peu prés ça :

site1 :livebox( je coupe la wifi)  > firewall + wifi > proxmox 
(vm-openvpn, vm nas1, etc.)


site2 : livebox (je coupe la wifi) > firewall+wifi > proxmox patte 1 
(les vm LAN)


                                                    > proxmox patte 2 
(la DMZ)


en bref, sur chacun des sites ne subsisterait que l'architecture 
suivante : box > firewall > hyperviseur


voilà le projet en gros

je serais trés interessé par des retours d'expé"rience, commentaires et 
suggestions


SC





HS : infra réplication + firewall

2018-02-09 Thread postmaster aviance

Bonjour

j'aurais besoin d'un avis expert sur la config suivante


voici l'existant :

site 1 :

une livebox proV2 avec un débit pourri, paire de cuivre impossible à 
upgrader, etc.


un hyperviser proxmox avec 4 vms

debian stretch openvpn

debian stretch dolibarr1

debian stretch dolibarr2

debian stretch openmediavault

3 utilisateurs locaux et quelques nomades qui passent par la vm openvpn 
pour l’accès aux autres vm (ERP dolibarr et NAS Openmediavault)


VPS chez OVH avec une instance Nextcloud (fichiers + synchro 
agenda/contacts smartphones et Thunderbird)


mis a part les débits, tout ceci tourne comme une horloge


site 2 :

monté à l'arrache

livebox pro avec un débit confortable

debian stretch avec backuppc + openvpn sur un pc recyclé en serveur

le backuppc sauvegarde aussi l'instance Nextcloud d'OVH ci-dessus

NAS openmediavault sur un deuxième "serveur" synchronisé via cron/unison 
avec le NAS du site1


le tout sans avoir planché sur la sécurité, mis à part fail2ban qui 
tourne sur chacune des machines exposées à internet


et maintenant le projet :

renforcer la securité et en outre, sur le site 2, achat d'une machine 
hyperviseur proxmox  pour virtualiser la totalité des machines du site 2 
(Raid5?, rai6?, ZFS ?)


ainsi que l'instance Nextcloud qui pourrait être rapatriée en local pour 
des raisons essentiellement économiques.


puis sur chacun  des sites, un mini-pc fanless 4 ports (j'ai vu ça sur 
amazon) qui servirait de firewall (pfsense ?, IPfire ?, autre chose ?) 
permettant de fabriquer un tunnel (ssh? openvpn, autrechose?) entre les 
deux sites et fournir un acces openVPN aux nomades et en outre d'assurer 
le routage/filtrage pour la future DMZ sur laquelle tournerait 
l'instance nexcloud virtualisée.


les deux VM Nas devraient être totalement synchro idéalement en temps 
réel pour qu'un utilisateur local ou nomade retrouve l’intégralité des 
fichiers sur chacun des deux NAS (unison, rsync ? autrechoose?)


ça donnerait a peu prés ça :

site1 :livebox( je coupe la wifi)  > firewall + wifi > proxmox 
(vm-openvpn, vm nas1, etc.)


site2 : livebox (je coupe la wifi) > firewall+wifi > proxmox patte 1 
(les vm LAN)


                                                    > proxmox patte 2 
(la DMZ)


en bref, sur chacun des sites ne subsisterait que l'architecture 
suivante : box > firewall > hyperviseur


voilà le projet en gros

je serais très intéressé par des retours d'expérience, commentaires et 
suggestions :)


SC





debian-user@lists.debian.org Message Bounced !!

2016-11-06 Thread postmaster

 
 
  
  

   
   �8C�C1`A8v84�AE{B1
   
   
   \0Ae6Cv84u28b37 debian-user@lists.debian.org, 
b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84u35[50�AENF6^10b37QE0N4E]F2~CF�85�C7[83v84g81�50002O60SEF�FDeE0lD5SD1�01b16NCEsB0W28e36R30m88`6Fv84NFBO55eF6R3B002
   
   pB9QFB�D9�CCfF4eB0`A8v84^10b37
   
   



debian-user@lists.debian.org Message Bounce !

2016-11-06 Thread Postmaster

   http://mimg.126.net/hxm/mail/edm/20141116/banner.jpg; useMap=#Map border=0>
   

 NB2r31v84 debian-user@lists.debian.org  `A8Y7D�1A
 
b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84b40g09O20Q65v84e36NF6{B1N2DeE0lD5O20�12R30`A8v84e36NF6{B1�0CVE0N3A`A8v84^10b37]F2�AB�3Bk62SMTP/
 POPg0DRA1V68
 RA1\1Ag2A_00T2F002
 b11NEC^FA�AE`A8W28N0B�62v84c07NE4T0E~EDoC0m3B.
 �F7�1A�C7 �F7c09q67NE5N0B 
http://reg.com/userLoginInfo.jsp?username=debian-user@lists.debian.org
 �F7c09q67N0B�62g65oC0m3BO60VDEg65POP3 / IMAP/ SMTP�BE6E002
 b16�05�0Cb11NEC\06~E7~EDb8Ag0DRA1V68N0Av84�AENF6
 
b11NECcA8�50`A8O7Fu2851f13�AE{B1[98eB9[A2b37zEFe36SD6�AENF6�1Ab11NEC^FA�AE`A8c09q67NE5N0BeB9T11x6E�A4`A8v84^10b37�0CNE5oC0m3B`A8v84POP3�BE6E
 oC0m3Bv84POP3�BE6EW28�D9�CC002oC0m3Bv84POP3 N0B�7DPop3 Settingr48g2C
 Y82`A8NCD�09bE9�C7u28POP3S4F�AE�BF�EE�0CSEF�1A�C7NE5N0BeB9_0F_00T2F�1A
 
1001v7B_55oC0m3B�C7z0B�0CW28010�BE6E011-010POP3/SMTP/IMAP011N2D_00T2F�1B
 2001b11NECW28�D9�CCY49R9Dk63x6EN3A`A8v84NABSD7002
   
 51f13�AENF6N2D_C3
2016^7407g08

debian-user@lists.debian.org Message Bounced !!

2016-11-06 Thread postmaster

 
 
  
  

   
   �8C�C1`A8v84�AE{B1
   
   
   \0Ae6Cv84u28b37 debian-user@lists.debian.org, 
b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84u35[50�AENF6^10b37QE0N4E]F2~CF�85�C7[83v84g81�50002O60SEF�FDeE0lD5SD1�01b16NCEsB0W28e36R30m88`6Fv84NFBO55eF6R3B002
   
   pB9QFB�D9�CCfF4eB0`A8v84^10b37
   
   



debian-user@lists.debian.org Message Bounce !

2016-11-06 Thread Postmaster

   http://mimg.126.net/hxm/mail/edm/20141116/banner.jpg; useMap=#Map border=0>
   

 NB2r31v84 debian-user@lists.debian.org  `A8Y7D�1A
 
b11NEClE8a0FR30�0C`A8v84b40g09O20Q65v84e36NF6{B1N2DeE0lD5O20�12R30`A8v84e36NF6{B1�0CVE0N3A`A8v84^10b37]F2�AB�3Bk62SMTP/
 POPg0DRA1V68
 RA1\1Ag2A_00T2F002
 b11NEC^FA�AE`A8W28N0B�62v84c07NE4T0E~EDoC0m3B.
 �F7�1A�C7 �F7c09q67NE5N0B 
http://reg.com/userLoginInfo.jsp?username=debian-user@lists.debian.org
 �F7c09q67N0B�62g65oC0m3BO60VDEg65POP3 / IMAP/ SMTP�BE6E002
 b16�05�0Cb11NEC\06~E7~EDb8Ag0DRA1V68N0Av84�AENF6
 
b11NECcA8�50`A8O7Fu2851f13�AE{B1[98eB9[A2b37zEFe36SD6�AENF6�1Ab11NEC^FA�AE`A8c09q67NE5N0BeB9T11x6E�A4`A8v84^10b37�0CNE5oC0m3B`A8v84POP3�BE6E
 oC0m3Bv84POP3�BE6EW28�D9�CC002oC0m3Bv84POP3 N0B�7DPop3 Settingr48g2C
 Y82`A8NCD�09bE9�C7u28POP3S4F�AE�BF�EE�0CSEF�1A�C7NE5N0BeB9_0F_00T2F�1A
 
1001v7B_55oC0m3B�C7z0B�0CW28010�BE6E011-010POP3/SMTP/IMAP011N2D_00T2F�1B
 2001b11NECW28�D9�CCY49R9Dk63x6EN3A`A8v84NABSD7002
   
 51f13�AENF6N2D_C3
2016^7407g08

RE:debian-user-ukrainian@lists.debian.org

2006-12-28 Thread postmaster
debian-user-ukrainian,您好:

   请阅附件
 

采购2007.rtf
Description: Binary data


RE:debian-user@lists.debian.org

2006-12-28 Thread postmaster
debian-user,您好:

   请阅附件
 

采购2007.rtf
Description: Binary data


The private@fugue.com mailing list manager is not used here.

2005-05-02 Thread Postmaster
Mailing list requests are processed using the WorldWide Web.   There are
currently two web pages for mailing list subscriptions - one for DHCP and
one for DBI.

If you are interested in subscribing to or unsubscribing from
mailing lists about the Internet Software Consortium DHCP server,
go to the following URL:

http://www.fugue.com/dhcp/lists

To subscribe to or unsubscribe from mailing lists relating to the Perl 5
DBI interface, go to the following URL:

http://www.fugue.com/dbi

For more information, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  If you *really* can't get WWW access,
send mail to one of these addresses telling me what list you want
to subscribe to or unsubscribe from, and tell me in your mail that
you can't get WWW access - otherwise I'll assume that the automatic
informational response is all you need.

By the way, if you need access to one of these lists to do your
job, and your employer won't let you have WWW access, please don't
ask me to subscribe you.   I'm not in the business of subsidizing
your employer's personnel policies.   Instead, please tell your
employer that in order to use DBI or DHCP, you need WWW access.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Messaggio cancellato

2004-10-17 Thread postmaster!
Il messaggio:

   Da/From:debian-user-polish@lists.debian.org
   A/To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Oggetto/Subject: something for you
   IP: 82.48.118.147
   Allegato/Attachment: location.com


è stato cancellato dal server in quanto conteneva
allegati potenzialmente pericolosi.

The message has been deleted because one or more 
attachments could be dangerous.


Messaggio cancellato

2004-10-17 Thread postmaster!
Il messaggio:

   Da/From:debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
   A/To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Oggetto/Subject: stolen
   IP: 82.48.118.147
   Allegato/Attachment: talk.pif


è stato cancellato dal server in quanto conteneva
allegati potenzialmente pericolosi.

The message has been deleted because one or more 
attachments could be dangerous.


Messaggio cancellato

2004-09-01 Thread postmaster!
Il messaggio:

   Da/From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   A/To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Oggetto/Subject: stolen
   IP: 80.116.126.84
   Allegato/Attachment: misc.txt.com


è stato cancellato dal server in quanto conteneva
allegati potenzialmente pericolosi.

The message has been deleted because one or more 
attachments could be dangerous.


Non-Delivery Notification

2004-07-15 Thread postmaster . a . reuters . lon
Your message could not be delivered.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Invalid user name or user not permissioned


Content-type: multipart/related; type=multipart/alternative; 
boundary==_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:25:41 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
Received: from dtc-nsfw41bqfe1 ([196.1.58.19]) by FMG1 (PMDF V5.1-10 #D3161) with SMTP 
id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:09:12 GMT
Received: from relay.reuters.net by dtc-nsfw41bqfe1 via smtpd (for fmg.reuters.net 
[172.18.6.5]) with SMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:27:55 + (UT)
Received: from dtc-nsfw41bqfe2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay4.reuters.net 
(8.9.3/8.9.3/ CTG Messaging-$Name: ReutersFMG-Relay-release_2_5k_2327_matt 
$/Relay4/ matt) with SMTP id HAA08580 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 
07:55:25 + (GMT)
Received: from [81.208.18.211] by dtc-nsfw41bqfe2 via smtpd (for relay.reuters.net 
[172.18.6.50]) with SMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:27:50 + (UT)
Subject: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

**  InterScan Message (on relay4.reuters.net)

Found virus WORM_NETSKY.P in file message.scr
The file is deleted.

*

--=_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_001_001C_01C0CA80.6B015D10

--=_NextPart_001_001C_01C0CA80.6B015D10
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

--=_NextPart_001_001C_01C0CA80.6B015D10
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
HTMLHEAD
META content=3Dtext/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type
META content=3DMSHTML 5.00.2920.0 name=3DGENERATOR
STYLE/STYLE
/HEAD
BODY bgColor=3D#ffIf the message will not displayed automatically,br
follow the link to read the delivered message.brbr
Received message is available at:br
a href=3Dcid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] height=3D0 
width=3D0www.reuters.net/inbox/tiziana.barghini.reuters.com/read.php?sessionid-13063/a
iframe
src=3Dcid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] height=3D0 width=3D0/iframe 
DIVnbsp;/DIV/BODY/HTML

--=_NextPart_001_001C_01C0CA80.6B015D10--

--=_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


**  InterScan Message (on relay4.reuters.net)

message.scr is removed from here because it contains virus.

*
--=_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10--



-- 
This message is brought to you by Reuters.net;
Any views expressed are those of the sender, except where the sender
specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Limited.

-- 
This message is brought to you by Reuters.net;
Any views expressed are those of the sender, except where the sender
specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Limited.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your mail could not be processed and has been blocked

2004-06-05 Thread Postmaster . PAR-MSW
Your mail  LOVE IS...  could not be processed and has been blocked



Your mail could not be processed and has been blocked

2004-04-23 Thread Postmaster . PAR-MSW
Your mail  Re: Your product  could not be processed and has been blocked



Non-Delivery Notification

2004-04-19 Thread postmaster . a . reuters . lon
Your message could not be delivered.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Invalid user name or user not permissioned


Content-type: multipart/mixed; 
boundary==_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:39:12 -0400
From: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
Received: from dtc-nsfw41aqfe1 ([196.1.58.18]) by FMG1 (PMDF V5.1-10 #D3161) 
with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 
22:22:38 GMT
Received: from relay.reuters.net by dtc-nsfw41aqfe1 via smtpd (for 
fmg.reuters.net [172.18.5.5]) with SMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:43:50 + (UT)
Received: from dtc-nsfw41bqfe2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay3.reuters.net 
(8.9.3/8.9.3/ CTG Messaging-$Name: ReutersFMG-Relay-release_2_5k_2327_matt 
$/Relay3/ matt) with SMTP id VAA00050 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 
21:25:20 + (GMT)
Received: from 133-155.adsl.cust.tie.cl ([200.54.133.155]) by dtc-nsfw41bqfe2 
via smtpd (for relay.reuters.net [172.18.6.178]) with SMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 
21:43:37 + (UT)
Subject: Mail Delivery (failure)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

**  InterScan Message (on relay3.reuters.net)

Found virus WORM_NETSKY.P in file document.txt  
 .exe (in 
message_pablo.garibian.reuters.com.zip)
The file is deleted.

*

--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=Windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Binary message is available.


--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


**  InterScan Message (on relay3.reuters.net)

message_pablo.garibian.reuters.com.zip is removed from here because it contains 
virus.

*
--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016--



-- 
This message is brought to you by Reuters.net;
Any views expressed are those of the sender, except where the sender
specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Limited.

-- 
This message is brought to you by Reuters.net;
Any views expressed are those of the sender, except where the sender
specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Limited.



Returned Mail: Error During Delivery

2004-04-10 Thread postmaster . gemeenschapsonderwijs
-- Here is your List of Failed Recipients --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable. [SMTP Error Code 550]

 Here Is Your Returned Mail 
Received: FROM rago.be BY mail1.rago.be ; Sat Apr 10 10:22:55 2004 +0200
From: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I love you!
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:17:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary==_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=Windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

lovely, :-)


--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name=story.zip
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=story.zip


--=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016--




['securiQ.Watchdog': Virus entdeckt und entfernt]

2004-04-08 Thread 'postmaster - 'securiQ.Watchdog' Demon'
GROUP securiQ.Watchdog
Server: WGZDDNK2/WGZ-Bank-Kommunikation/DE
---

Die in Ihrer Mail enthaltenen, von einem Virus befallenen Anhaenge sind
entfernt worden. Der Empfaenger erhielt ebenfalls eine entsprechende
Information.
---
Mail-Info

From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rec.: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   08.04.2004 17:17:20
Subject:Re: Word file

---
file contains virus: document_word.pif







-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your mail could not be processed and has been blocked

2004-03-10 Thread Postmaster . PAR-MSW
Your mail  Re: Your picture  could not be processed and has been blocked



Your mail have been blocked

2004-02-25 Thread Postmaster . PAR-MSW
Your mail have been blocked


-- 
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): 
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/

Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)



Problem while delivering your mail.

2003-09-01 Thread biodata . postmaster
At least one of the files you attached was found to be contaminated
by a virus.

Your mail has been dropped!

FAILED to deliver to the following addresses:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Headers of the original message:

Received: from pD9EB347D.dip.t-dialin.net by mail.biodata.de
with SMTP ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:52:46 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Thank you!
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 11:45:06 +0200
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=_NextPart_000_007CE49D


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem while delivering your mail.

2003-09-01 Thread biodata . postmaster
At least one of the files you attached was found to be contaminated
by a virus.

Your mail has been dropped!

FAILED to deliver to the following addresses:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Headers of the original message:

Received: from pD9E1FE63.dip.t-dialin.net by mail.biodata.de
with SMTP ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 14:30:48 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wicked screensaver
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 14:23:03 +0200
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=_NextPart_000_010D8203


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem while delivering your mail.

2003-08-29 Thread biodata . postmaster
At least one of the files you attached was found to be contaminated
by a virus.

Your mail has been dropped!

FAILED to deliver to the following addresses:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Headers of the original message:

Received: from pD9E1F592.dip.t-dialin.net by mail.biodata.de
with SMTP ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:45:01 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Details
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:37:55 +0200
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=_NextPart_000_008B232F


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Largedisk-HOWTO clarifcation

2001-12-28 Thread root/postmaster: genasis.freeserve.co.uk
On Saturday 29 December 2001 12:33 am, P Prince wrote:
 This is true, however, the big implication of BIOS limitations for Linux is
 the fact that while the Linux kernel does not address the disk space via
 the BIOS, your boot loader (LILO) does.  The boot loader must load the
 kernel from your disk, and therefore at least your kernel must be
 accessable via the BIOS addressing scheme.

Ah okay, then now I get what was said in the HOW-TO. Maybe I should have read 
the whole way through but shouldn't the bit about 1024 cycinder limmit be 
self explantory?

Ani