A bug of design : Unmet dependencies on architecture-independent package

2015-04-17 Thread sppmg
Hi all
I think it is a bug of design . But I don't have experience for report
bug. I stop on rate the severity of this problem of reportbug program.
So, anyone can help report and show me ?

I try to follow How to report a bug in Debian using email to write
down here.

===

Subject: Unmet dependencies on architecture-independent package

Package: apt
Version: 1.0.9.7

In the Debian AMD64 ,If you install :i386 package , it will not install all 
package (architecture-independent package) , 
and try to remove this break package if you use dpkg install froced.

example:

$ apt-cache depends hime:i386
hime:i386
  Depends: libc6:i386
  Depends: libcairo2:i386
  Depends: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0:i386
  Depends: libglib2.0-0:i386
  Depends: libgtk2.0-0:i386
  Depends: libpango-1.0-0:i386
  Depends: libpangocairo-1.0-0:i386
  Depends: libx11-6:i386
  Depends: libxtst6:i386
  Depends: hime-data:i386  -- unavailable
  Depends: hime-tables:i386
  Suggests: hime-anthy:i386
  Suggests: hime-chewing:i386
  Suggests: hime-qt4-immodule:i386
 |Recommends: im-config:i386  -- unavailable
  Recommends: im-switch:i386  -- unavailable
  Recommends: hime-gtk3-immodule:i386
  Conflicts: hime

It's my OS:
Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie)
$ uname -a
Linux * 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt2-1 (2014-12-08) x86_64 
GNU/Linux

==

Thanks




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Architecture independent package

2015-04-09 Thread sppmg
Hi all
I want type Chinese in skype in Debian (testing) amd64, so I need this
package :

hime
(skype need hime-qt4-immodule:i386 , I google to get this .)

It's will depend hime-data:i386. But  hime-data is architecture
independent package, there is no :i386 .
How can i solve this ?

Thanks


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55266937.7020...@gmail.com



install kate (4.13.1 , testing) in debian stable

2014-06-26 Thread sppmg

Hi all

I want install kate 4.13.1 in debian stable, but the kde is 4.8 in 
debian stable .


I followed kate official tutorial (http://kate-editor.org/get-it/) ,and 
get source by git and apt-get source.

but I always get 4.8 version kate after compile.

Why ? And what can I do ?


Thanks much.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53abfbfa.3050...@gmail.com



My new external USB HDD can't write and show error

2014-05-30 Thread sppmg

Hi all.

I got a new external USB shell for HDD. But when I mount with write 
property, it will unmount immediately.
Only once write successful , it happened when I show this problem for 
technicist to change now one ..


there is something message :

items:
external USB shell : SilverStone TS-10B (JMicron jms567 )
HDD:Seagate Momentus Thin 320GB (ST320LT007)
filesystem: XFS
OS: debian stable/testing(up to date) / mint

dmesg:

[ 7219.357715] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 4 using ehci-pci
[ 7219.547797] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=152d, idProduct=0567
[ 7219.547814] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, 
SerialNumber=3

[ 7219.547822] usb 1-1: Product: USB to ATA/ATAPI Bridge
[ 7219.547829] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: JMicron
[ 7219.547836] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: 70135A20
[ 7219.549866] usb-storage 1-1:1.0: USB Mass Storage device detected
[ 7219.550538] scsi2 : usb-storage 1-1:1.0
[ 7220.551917] scsi 2:0:0:0: Direct-Access JMicron Generic  
0114 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6

[ 7220.553267] sd 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
[ 7220.559692] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Spinning up disk...
[ 7221.561843] ...ready
[ 7223.578769] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] 625142448 512-byte logical blocks: (320 
GB/298 GiB)

[ 7223.579887] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 7223.579899] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 47 00 10 08
[ 7223.581985] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: 
enabled, supports DPO and FUA

[ 7223.638861]  sdb: sdb1 sdb2
[ 7223.643997] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
[ 7229.734938] XFS (sdb2): Mounting Filesystem
[ 7230.123529] XFS (sdb2): Ending clean mount
[ 7260.726381] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Invalid command failure
[ 7260.726399] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb]
[ 7260.726406] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 7260.726413] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb]
[ 7260.726418] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
[ 7260.726430] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb]
[ 7260.726438] Add. Sense: Invalid field in cdb
[ 7260.726445] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] CDB:
[ 7260.726450] Write(10): 2a 08 15 9c 73 67 00 00 05 00
[ 7260.726473] end_request: critical target error, dev sdb, sector 362574695
[ 7260.726487] end_request: critical target error, dev sdb, sector 362574695
[ 7260.726534] XFS (sdb2): metadata I/O error: block 0xfa68056 
(xlog_iodone) error 121 numblks 64
[ 7260.726547] XFS (sdb2): xfs_do_force_shutdown(0x2) called from line 
1170 of file /build/linux-Zc5oK7/linux-3.14.4/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c.  Return 
address = 0xa01baa01

[ 7260.726581] XFS (sdb2): Log I/O Error Detected.  Shutting down filesystem
[ 7260.726587] XFS (sdb2): Please umount the filesystem and rectify the 
problem(s)

[ 7290.301773] XFS (sdb2): xfs_log_force: error 5 returned.


I did xfs_repair/check , but it can't help, and that HDD work well in 
other external USB shell.
what do you think ? Because NTFS didn't show error , I worry NTFS can't 
detect it .


Thank you.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5389508a.8090...@gmail.com



Re: Bug in Debian installer

2011-09-14 Thread sppmg
於 2011年09月14日 02:45, Bob Proulx 提到:
 spp mg wrote:
 I install Debian(6.0.2.1 amd64) to a old HDD.This HDD has a lvm
 partition,it's creat by Fedora installer.
 I can't delete this lvm partition in intaller,it's display about lvm
 is busy... ,even if I delete all Logical Volume and restart
 installer.

 Finally, I delete lvm partition by other PC.

 It's a bug ,right?
 It sounds like it automatically started the lvm subsystem due to the
 presence of the lvm partitions.

 Does it give you the option to Configure LVM?  I believe it should.
 If so then you can go into that menu and delete the lvm configuration
 there.

 Bob
Hi,It has Configure the Logical Volume Manager,but it only has delete
volume group

I playback this problem in my virtual machine.
First,choose Guided partitioning in partition disk step .
Now,my disk partition look like this:
--
LVM LG debian, LV root - 20.3 GB Linux device-mapper (linear)
#1 20.3 GB f ext3 /
LVM LG debian, LV swap_1 - 914.4 MB Linux device-mapper (linear)
#1 914.4 MB f swap swap
Virtual disk 1 (vda) - 21.5GB Virtio Block Device
#1 primary 254 MB B f ext2 /boot
#5 logical 21.2 GB k lvm
--
Now,I want delete lvm(vda5),but it display partition in use .So I
enter Configure the Logical Volume Manager this entry,and delete all
volume group.But it still display partition in use,even if I restart
installer.

I know a only way can use this PC to solve problem.
Enter the shell and use fdisk to delete lvm partition(vda5),and return
partition disk step.
But,this way is dirty,I think.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e708366.3030...@gmail.com



unfriendly function from aptitude(hold and upgrade)

2011-08-26 Thread sppmg

Hi all.
I found a unfriendly function from aptitude(0.6.3-4).

state:
I hold a package,and this package in the upgradable too.

now I upgrade by command ,I don't upgrade this package.
But,If I upgrade by ncurses (move point to upgradable and press + ) ,I 
will upgrade this package.



Should I send this ideal to maintainer ?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e575d82.6090...@gmail.com



[share] grub error message:symbol not found.....

2011-08-25 Thread sppmg

(I use debian testing , Bootloader is grub2.)

I upgrade debian (testing to testing) by apt yesterday.
When it done, I reboot,and get this message:

symbol not found: 'grub_dirmod64_full'

and it goes to grub rescue
---
solution:
I use other grub (from my usb) to boot HDD OS.
(enter command and type:

 linux (hd1,6)/vmlinuz-3.0.0-1-amd64 root=/dev/sda5
 initrd (hd1,6)/initrd.img-3.0.0-1-amd64
 boot


# note:
# my / is sda5 or (hd1,5)
# my boot is sda6 or (hd1,6)
)
And reinstall grub to MBR:
# grub-install  /dev/sda
and update grub
# update-grub
-
ok,it's solution.easy.

I google grub_dirmod64_full,but not found anything.
So,I share to this. :)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e56bfe0.6010...@gmail.com



Why some gnome 3.0 program can't work?

2011-08-25 Thread sppmg

(I use debian amd64 testing.and i-bus framework running.)

I upgrade debian (testing to testing) by apt yesterday.Some program come 
to 3.0.for example ,gnome-terminal,epiphany-browser.

But they has some problem.

1. gnome-terminal can't type ,it have no responses when I type.It happen 
in epiphany-browser.

2. tab can't switch by mouse wheel.

Anyone have same problem?

Is it bug ?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e56c5c9.2040...@gmail.com