Re: [OFF TOPIC]: weird cpu statistics w/ x11amp

1998-05-18 Thread Norbert Veber
On Sat, May 16, 1998 at 05:43:46AM -0400, Paul Miller wrote:
> 
> Anyone used x11amp before?  Top seems to be reporting odd cpu statistics. 
> Look at the table below.  Both programs were ran on the same system, one
> before upgrading to a pentium-200mmx chip, and the other after.
> 
> program   cyrix-166+  pentium-200mmx
> mpg12340% 10%
> x11amp80% 4%
> 
> (for x11amp, cpu percent is the sum of the two processes.)
> 
> Does this make any sense?  x11amp is configured to run in 'real time'
> mode..  would that avoid the cpu statistics?  The percent idle is around
> 97% percent with x11amp & my new pentium-200mmx chip.
> 
> Strange?

no, the pentium chip(s) have a far better fpu which is what x11amp relies on
heavily.  Personally I have a cyrix 150+ and x11amp does not work well at
all.. :)


pgp8RH1DeUsA7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[OFF TOPIC]: weird cpu statistics w/ x11amp

1998-05-16 Thread Paul Miller

Anyone used x11amp before?  Top seems to be reporting odd cpu statistics. 
Look at the table below.  Both programs were ran on the same system, one
before upgrading to a pentium-200mmx chip, and the other after.

program cyrix-166+  pentium-200mmx
mpg123  40% 10%
x11amp  80% 4%

(for x11amp, cpu percent is the sum of the two processes.)

Does this make any sense?  x11amp is configured to run in 'real time'
mode..  would that avoid the cpu statistics?  The percent idle is around
97% percent with x11amp & my new pentium-200mmx chip.

Strange?

-Paul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]