Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:06:15PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Have you looked at pngcrush? > > apt-cache show pngcrush No, but I'll definitely look into it for next time. Thanx! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:36:30PM -0600, Alan Shutko wrote: > That looks like it's 8 bits per color, or 24 bpp. What does identify > -verbose say about it? It looks like you're correct. Thanx, I'll remember this if the issue comes up again. ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 20:35, csj wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:52:09 -0600, > Greg Norris wrote: > > > > I thought this might provide some much-needed amusement... My > > wife has put together a picture of SCO's crack legal team, > > which pretty much explains their entire strategy. Feel free to > > share! ;-) > > > >http://home.kc.rr.com/snidely/cornscolio.gif > > Speaking of IP hassles, maybe you should have exported that into > the free png format. http://www.gregfolkert.net/pics/satire/tn/scolegalteam.png.html There ya be... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
Greg Norris wrote: On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:34:59PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote: Just out of curiousity, did you originally save it as a 24-bit or 8-bit PNG? IIRC, GIFs are always 8-bit and 8-bit PNGs are comparable in size. I can understand how a 24-bit PNG would be bigger, but I can't see how an 8-bit would be that much different in size. The original image claims to be 8-bit... it's approximately 3 times the size of the gif version. $ file cornscolio.* cornscolio.gif: GIF image data, version 89a, 788 x 1000 cornscolio.png: PNG image data, 788 x 1000, 8-bit/color RGBA, non-interlaced $ ls -l cornscolio.* -rw-r--r--1 adricadric 263471 Nov 4 17:49 cornscolio.gif -rw-r--r--1 adricadric 743422 Nov 4 17:32 cornscolio.png Have you looked at pngcrush? apt-cache show pngcrush -Roberto pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
Greg Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The original image claims to be 8-bit... it's approximately 3 times the > size of the gif version. That looks like it's 8 bits per color, or 24 bpp. What does identify -verbose say about it? -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - I am the rocks. DOS Gang version...DOS.N.HOOD -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:34:59PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Just out of curiousity, did you originally save it as a 24-bit or > 8-bit PNG? IIRC, GIFs are always 8-bit and 8-bit PNGs are comparable > in size. I can understand how a 24-bit PNG would be bigger, but I can't > see how an 8-bit would be that much different in size. The original image claims to be 8-bit... it's approximately 3 times the size of the gif version. $ file cornscolio.* cornscolio.gif: GIF image data, version 89a, 788 x 1000 cornscolio.png: PNG image data, 788 x 1000, 8-bit/color RGBA, non-interlaced $ ls -l cornscolio.* -rw-r--r--1 adricadric 263471 Nov 4 17:49 cornscolio.gif -rw-r--r--1 adricadric 743422 Nov 4 17:32 cornscolio.png -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
Greg Norris wrote: On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0800, csj wrote: Speaking of IP hassles, maybe you should have exported that into the free png format. The original version was png, actually... I converted it to gif because more browsers handle that format, and it has a significantly smaller file size in this instance. The site it's hosted on has a minimal bandwidth allocation, so size was not an insignificant concern. In addition, the gif patent has expired in the USA (and is very close to doing so elsewhere), and simply isn't an issue which troubles me all that much. If anyone requests the png version, I'd be happy to email it. People are welcome to share either version (email, posting on the web, whatever). Just out of curiousity, did you originally save it as a 24-bit or 8-bit PNG? IIRC, GIFs are always 8-bit and 8-bit PNGs are comparable in size. I can understand how a 24-bit PNG would be bigger, but I can't see how an 8-bit would be that much different in size. -Roberto pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0800, csj wrote: > Speaking of IP hassles, maybe you should have exported that into > the free png format. The original version was png, actually... I converted it to gif because more browsers handle that format, and it has a significantly smaller file size in this instance. The site it's hosted on has a minimal bandwidth allocation, so size was not an insignificant concern. In addition, the gif patent has expired in the USA (and is very close to doing so elsewhere), and simply isn't an issue which troubles me all that much. If anyone requests the png version, I'd be happy to email it. People are welcome to share either version (email, posting on the web, whatever). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:52:09 -0600, Greg Norris wrote: > > I thought this might provide some much-needed amusement... My > wife has put together a picture of SCO's crack legal team, > which pretty much explains their entire strategy. Feel free to > share! ;-) > >http://home.kc.rr.com/snidely/cornscolio.gif Speaking of IP hassles, maybe you should have exported that into the free png format. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 04:52:09PM -0600, Greg Norris wrote: > I thought this might provide some much-needed amusement... My wife has > put together a picture of SCO's crack legal team, which pretty much > explains their entire strategy. Feel free to share! ;-) Heh, heh, heh. He said 'crack'. Heh heh heh. -- Dave Thayer | WARNING: Persons denying the existence of Denver, Colorado USA | robots may be robots themselves. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT] SCO's crack legal team
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 11:52, Greg Norris wrote: > I thought this might provide some much-needed amusement... My wife has > put together a picture of SCO's crack legal team, which pretty much > explains their entire strategy. Feel free to share! ;-) > >http://home.kc.rr.com/snidely/cornscolio.gif LOL. Nice. -- .''`. Paul William : :' :Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[OT] SCO's crack legal team
I thought this might provide some much-needed amusement... My wife has put together a picture of SCO's crack legal team, which pretty much explains their entire strategy. Feel free to share! ;-) http://home.kc.rr.com/snidely/cornscolio.gif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
