Re: [bounce-debian-user=w.l.devries=student.tudelft.nl@lists.debian.org: ]

2001-03-17 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:37:21PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:15:19PM +0100, Wouter de Vries wrote:
  I really wonder what this is about ... I use fetchmail in combination
  with exim and procmail.
 
 Could you explain what it is you don't understand?
 
 [snip...]

I get these bounce mails regularly and I wonder what they are and
whether there is something I can do about it.


Wouter



Re: [bounce-debian-user=w.l.devries=student.tudelft.nl@lists.debian.org: ]

2001-03-17 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Wouter de Vries wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:37:21PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
  On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:15:19PM +0100, Wouter de Vries wrote:
   I really wonder what this is about ... I use fetchmail in combination
   with exim and procmail.
  
  Could you explain what it is you don't understand?
  
  [snip...]
 
 I get these bounce mails regularly and I wonder what they are and
 whether there is something I can do about it.

Does this happen shortly after responding to a message on this list?  If
so, some people have their mailers misconfigured in such a way that a
certain header (I forget which at the moment, Sender: ??) causes your
mailer to try to send the message to such a person, but the address is
not valid (usually only a local address).  This bounce will come
directly from your system (exim).

-- 
Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net



Re: [bounce-debian-user=w.l.devries=student.tudelft.nl@lists.debian.org: ]

2001-03-17 Thread Wouter de Vries
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 01:42:33AM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Wouter de Vries wrote:
  On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 06:37:21PM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote:
   On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:15:19PM +0100, Wouter de Vries wrote:
I really wonder what this is about ... I use fetchmail in combination
with exim and procmail.
   
   Could you explain what it is you don't understand?
   
   [snip...]
  
  I get these bounce mails regularly and I wonder what they are and
  whether there is something I can do about it.
 
 Does this happen shortly after responding to a message on this list?  If
 so, some people have their mailers misconfigured in such a way that a
 certain header (I forget which at the moment, Sender: ??) causes your
 mailer to try to send the message to such a person, but the address is
 not valid (usually only a local address).  This bounce will come
 directly from your system (exim).


Well, the strange thing is that I have nothing to do with the message or
the sender. I did not reply to the message. The only connections is that
I also am subscribed to the mailing list.
My account is hosted on a university machine running 'QUALCOMM Pop
server derived from UCB (version 2.1.4-R3)'.


Wouter



[bounce-debian-user=w.l.devries=student.tudelft.nl@lists.debian.org: ]

2001-03-16 Thread Wouter de Vries
I really wonder what this is about ... I use fetchmail in combination
with exim and procmail.

Wouter


- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:03:55 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bcc:

rom [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Mar 16 21:53:48 2001
Received: from elektron.its.tudelft.nl [130.161.33.15]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.2)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:03:54 +0100 
(CET)
Received: from ns2.tudelft.nl (ns2.tudelft.nl [130.161.180.65])
by elektron.its.tudelft.nl (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id 
VAA01353
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:53:48 +0100 (MET)
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:53:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from TUDelft-daemon by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-33 #42432)
 id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (ORCPT rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]); Fri,
 16 Mar 2001 21:53:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6])
 by mailhost1.tudelft.nl (PMDF V5.2-33 #42432)
 with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:53:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: (qmail 31792 invoked by uid 38); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:19:41 +
Received: (qmail 31734 invoked from network); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:19:39 +
Received: from smtp06.wxs.nl (195.121.6.58) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP;
 Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:19:39 +
Received: from onix.sacred-key.org ([213.10.33.89])
 by smtp06.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with ESMTP id GAB4GM01.STK;
 Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:19:34 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by onix.sacred-key.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5131792E; Fri,
 16 Mar 2001 21:23:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 21:23:14 +0100 (CET)
Resent-from: debian-user@lists.debian.org
From: Sebastiaan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Screen corruption with Amiga X - And AteoBus, Pixel64 support?
In-reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: list
X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: debian-user@lists.debian.org archive/latest/138304

Hi,

cool, Amiga! 

I do not know much about Linux on Amiga, but you might get more useful
response from the debian-m68k or debian-powerpc (if you have a
powerpc on your blizard -- can't remember, it has been too long) lists.

About the lines: it could be an error in the X server. You can try to look
which X servers are available for Amiga and see which drivers it supports
(by XF86_VGA16 -showconfig will show you the drivers that this X server
supports).

Greetz,
Sebastiaan



 On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
I've just installed Debian Linux from the 2.2r2 CD set onto my Amiga.
 
 A1200:
 Blizzard 1260 + SCSI-IV
 50Mb RAM
 1x Internal IDE Drive (1.4Gb - with Debian on it)
 2xInternal SCSI drives (4.3Gb and 520Mb on the SCSI-IV)
 1xInternal SCSI CD-R/RW Yamaha 8824S
 
 AteoBus with Pixel64 (Cirrus Logic Based graphics card supported by
 Picasso96 and CGFX 4.0)
 AteoIO-3 Card (fast serial/parallel ports)
 
 So, questions:
 1. Is there any intention to expand the CLGen driver to include the Ateo
 Pixel64 graphics card, please? I'd be willing to act as a tester for it.
 
 2. Why do I get lots of screen corruption when I run X from Debian on my
 AGA display. Sort of random vertical lines etc.
 
 Help,
 Kevin Bewley
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


- End forwarded message -



Re: [bounce-debian-user=w.l.devries=student.tudelft.nl@lists.debian.org: ]

2001-03-16 Thread Eric G. Miller
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:15:19PM +0100, Wouter de Vries wrote:
 I really wonder what this is about ... I use fetchmail in combination
 with exim and procmail.

Could you explain what it is you don't understand?

[snip...]

-- 
Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net